Effective Control of the Landing Obligation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Armand Racine Consultant Chemicals Branch
Advertisements

Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
WTO, Trade and Environment Division
Managing the Health and Safety of Contractors
Introduction to basic principles of Regulation (EC) 45/2001 Sophie Louveaux María Verónica Pérez Asinari.
1 Global Real Estate Valuation Policy Update: the European Perspective The principle: the EU Treaty does not provide the European institutions with direct.
CFP Reform Implementation of the Landings Obligation: Context and Process.
Health and Consumers Health and Consumers 1 Commission’s expectations to MS’ structures of enforcement Enforcement of European Animal Welfare related legislation.
Law and the Environment 2015 University College Cork
ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY IN GREECE THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK & THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL GUARANTEES/ INSURANCE PRODUCTS TO COVER OPERATORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER.
BALTIC RAC 28 Feb 2007 STOCKHOLM. Objectives and mission Organise operational coordination of fisheries control and inspection activities by MS. Assist.
1 Inspection of LCPs: System for Inspection. ECENA Training Workshop Bristol, March 2008.
U D T Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive, Warsaw June 2004 INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC SYSTEM OF ENSURING.
Occupational Health and Safety
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Staffing and Training.
1 Inter-linkages: BCH, Parties, Capacity Building, Compliance and RA Concept Sustainability Biosafety Programme - Secretariat of the Convention on Biological.
Overview report of a series of FVO fact- finding missions and audits carried out in 2012 and 2013 in order to evaluate the systems put in place to give.
Croatian Report on new Environmental Protection Law Josipa Blažević-Perušić, B.Sc. Arch. State Secretary Anita Pokrovac-Patekar, B.Sc. Pharm. Senior Environmental.
Roles and Responsibilities
1 ACCREDITATION – BG situation April 2014, Prague STATE AGENCY STATE AGENCY FOR METROLOGICAL AND TECHNICAL SURVEILLANCE TECHNICAL SURVEILLANCE 1.
Corporate Governance Yoshi Kawai Secretary General, IAIS IAIS-ASSAL Regional Seminar Buenos Aires, Argentina, November 2011 PUBLIC.
1 MARKET SURVEILLANCE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION A coordinate approach for metrology Lucia Palmegiani Policy Officer, DG ENTR I.5 WELMEC, WG 5, Malta, 23 October.
1 The statistical approach for monitoring maritime safety used and developed by EMSA Béatrice Comby Project Officer - Production and development of maritime.
Massella Ducci Teri Italian approach to long-term digital preservation Policies for Digital Preservation ERPANET Training Seminar.
Recommendation 2001/331/EC: Review and relation to sectoral inspection requirements Miroslav Angelov European Commission DG Environment, Unit A 1 Enforcement,
A European campaign on Risk Assessment Common errors in Risk Assessment.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency School of Drafting Regulations – November 2014 Government and Regulatory Body Functions and Responsibilities IAEA.
Permitting and Inspection. 1. When is decentralization effective? Delegate most permit writing and inspection functions to lowest possible level to effectively.
Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 providing for Minimum Criteria for Environmental Inspections in the Member.
Reduction of Mercury in Products Action Plans. 2 Action Plan  describes the activities to be carried out and the related implementation strategies for.
1 The Future Role of the Food and Veterinary Office M.C. Gaynor, Director, FVO EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate.
The New Legislative Framework
Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Establishment of A Regulatory Framework Gustavo Caruso, Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section.
An overview of OECD Strategies for Improving Regulatory Performance Regulatory Reform and Building Governance Capacities – New Delhi 3 December 2009 Mr.
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
Gdansk International Air & Space Law Conference November 2013 Authority and Organisation Requirements “effective management systems for authorities and.
VICH Training Strategy Steven D. Vaughn, DVM Director, Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
National and regional good practices in seafood traceability in Asia to combat IUU fishing March 2016 Kochi, India.
THE OFFICE FOR REGISTRATION OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS, MEDICAL DEVICES AND BIOCIDAL PRODUCTS Responsibility in the handling of medical devices.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
1. Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency General presentation on the Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 Providing an overview of the main.
Data Collection Framework/Data Collection Multiannual Programme Kenneth Patterson Deputy Head of Unit, Common Fisheries Policy and Aquaculture, Directorate-General.
To Satisfaction of the Administration Seminar on the Implementation of measures to ensure that safety standards are “to the Satisfaction of the Administration.
National Food Control Systems
ISO/IEC
66 items – 70% of circulated products
Mike Mitchell Fair Seas Limited
ENFORCEMENT OF CFP IMPLEMENTATION
Establishing the Infrastructure for Radiation Safety Preparatory Actions and Initial Regulatory Activities.
Revision of the EU Fisheries Control System
Technical Assistance and Capacity Building Activities in SADC
COASTAL STATE RESPONSIBILITY (IMO) – HYDROGRAPHY
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
EMFF Funding opportunities for the environment
Institutional Framework, Resources and Management
Pressure Equipment Workshop September 2007 – Day 2
The Commission Communication on implementation (COM (2012) 95) in relation to Water Industry Directives (Urban Waste Water Treatment, Drinking Water,
Operationalizing Export Certification and Regionalization Programmes
DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES
Working Group on Data, Information and Knowledge Exchange
INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC
Noor Vergeer, Wojtek Kalocinski Border management and Schengen
EU Food Safety Requirements: - Hygiene of Foodstuffs -
Fishery General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean
Regulating ship waste from a European perspective
National Legislation in the Pressure Sector and the PED
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
© Fresh Thoughts Consulting
Presentation transcript:

Effective Control of the Landing Obligation Landing Obligation Seminar 15 November 2017

Control and enforcement of the landing obligation Sea and land based aspects to control and enforcement: On land – control of landing/post landing and reporting activities; At sea – control of catches, discards and reporting activities → main challenge. Significant incentives exist for non-compliance at sea: "Choke" issue; High-grading/low-grading; Catches of low value <MCRS; Difficulties for competent authorities to prove non-compliance → low deterrence. ↓ Inadequate control and enforcement at sea will result in widespread non-compliance at sea.

Indications of non-compliance To date, limited effective controls have been applied to fishing vessels at sea: Little significant increase in the quantities of <MCRS landed and quantities reported discarded; CCTV trials indicate differences in catch composition between CCTV equipped and non-equipped vessels; EFCA coordinated last haul programmes and catch composition studies indicate discrepancies between verified reference data and unverified catch registration documents; An escalation of problems are anticipated with full implementation in 2019.

Means to control the landing obligation at sea Available options: Routine control and inspection; Aerial surveillance; Comparison of reference data to non-reference data; Control observers; Continuous REM coverage of all catch handling and catch storage facilities. This is acknowledged as the most effective option and would entail: CCTV coverage & data storage; Supplementary REM tools e.g. sensors; Automatic recognition software.

Problems encountered by competent authorities re CCTV installation No EU legislation mandating the use of CCTV; No regional agreement on the harmonised application of CCTV; Reluctance for any unilateral introduction of CCTV by Member States – "level playing field"; Current legal provisions: Member States shall adopt appropriate measures, allocate adequate financial, human and technical resources and set up all administrative and technical structures necessary for ensuring control, inspection and enforcement of activities carried out within the scope of the common fisheries policy. They shall make available to their competent authorities and officials all adequate means to enable them to carry out their tasks (Art 5(3) CR); Member States shall adopt appropriate measures for ensuring control, inspection and enforcement of activities carried out within the scope of the CFP, including the establishment of effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties (Art 36(3) CFP); For the purpose of monitoring compliance with the landing obligation, Member States shall ensure detailed and accurate documentation of all fishing trips and adequate capacity and means, such as observers, closed-circuit television (CCTV) and others. In doing so, Member States shall respect the principle of efficiency and proportionality (Art 15(13) CFP). Control and enforcement of the CFP shall in particular be based on and shall include the following: (a) a global, integrated and common approach (Art 36(2) CFP).

Possible solution Revision of the Control Regulation to include REM measures to effectively control the landing obligation at sea Mandate the use of continuously recording CCTV systems on vessels with the capacity to discard high volumes of fish in a short period of time such as RSW tank, freezer and automatic grader equipped vessels; For remaining vessels, coverage levels should be determined per fleet segment in accordance with regional risk assessments under the guidance of the EFCA; Within each fleet segment individual vessels to be equipped with CCTV to be decided on a dynamic risk management basis (comparison of reference data from CCTV equipped vessels with non-equipped vessels).

Some potential challenges Installation and maintenance costs; Data access and exchange by flag and coastal state competent authorities; Additional resources needed to review large volume of CCTV data; Privacy laws.

Questions?

Working group questions What measures should be adopted by Member States to ensure effective control and enforcement of the landing obligation at sea and should the use of CCTV be made mandatory in the revised Control Regulation? What technical and legal challenges need to be addressed for the use of CCTV? What measures would promote buy-in from industry? How can the landing obligation be controlled now, before the revision of the Control Regulation? How can we ensure that catch data is reliable under the landing obligation?