As a general rule, the repulsion decreases as follows:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright McGraw-Hill Chapter 9 Chemical Bonding II: Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories.
Advertisements

Section 8.4 Molecular Shapes
VSPER Molecular shapes Valence Shell Electron Repulsion Theory.
Molecular Geometry Lewis structures show the number and type of bonds between atoms in a molecule. –All atoms are drawn in the same plane (the paper).
Molecular shapes Balls and sticks. Learning objectives  Apply VSEPR to predict electronic geometry and shapes of simple molecules  Distinguish between.
Molecular Shape The Geometry of molecules. Molecular Geometry nuclei The shape of a molecule is determined by where the nuclei are located. nuclei electron.
Molecular shapes Balls and sticks. Learning objectives  Apply VSEPR to predict electronic geometry and shapes of simple molecules.
Chapter 9 Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories.
Molecular Shapes Chapter 6 Section 3. Molecular Structure It mean the 3-D arrangement of atoms in a molecule Lewis dot structures show how atoms are bonded.
Molecular Geometry (Shapes of Molecules)
Carvone Bucky ball Molecular Geometry Chapter 8 Part 2.
Molecular shapes A simple matter of balls and sticks.
4.27 – 4.28 The Shapes of Molecules R. Doon – Slough Grammar School.
Covalent Bonding Shapes VALENCE SHEELL ELECTRON PAIR REPULSION
Molecular Structure Molecular geometry is the general shape of a molecule or the arrangement of atoms in three dimensional space. Physical and chemical.
Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion Theory (4.3 of textbook)
The Shapes of Molecules Or in Big Scientific Words “MOLECULAR GEOMETRY”
Molecular Geometry and VSEPR Theory
▪ Thus, the geometry of a molecule is determined
SHAPES OF MOLECULES AND IONS
Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion Theory
Sahara Williams.
Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories.
Molecular Geometry VSEPR.
CHEMISTRY Matter and Change
VSEPR and Molecular Geometry
Deviations from Expected Shape
TOPIC: Molecular Geometry (Shapes of Molecules) Essential Question: How do you determine the different shapes of molecules?
VSEPR Pronounced vesper…a vespa for her A vest purrs???
Molecular Geometries and Bonding Theories
Ch. 6 – Molecular Structure
Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion Theory
Molecular Geometry bond length, angle determined experimentally
SHAPES OF MOLECULES.
Lewis Structures & VSEPR
Valence Shell Electron Pair
Ch. 6.5 Bonding Theories Molecular Geometry.
Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion Theory (VSEPR)
Bellwork Monday Draw the following Lewis dot structures. CCl4 NH4+
Valence shell electron pair repulsion (VSEPR) model:
MOLECULAR GEOMETRY Bonding Unit.
II. Molecular Geometry (p. 183 – 187)
CHEMISTRY 161 Chapter 10 Chemical Bonding II
Chapter 6 – 3 Molecular Geometry (p. 214 – 218)
Important Information:
Molecular Structure Molecular Geometry.
Molecular Shapes: True shapes of molecules
Molecular Geometry bond length, angle determined experimentally
Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion
Molecular shapes Balls and sticks. Learning objectives  Apply VSEPR to predict electronic geometry and shapes of simple molecules  Distinguish between.
Molecular Geometry 11/8 Opener:
Molecular Geometry.
Molecular shapes.
Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion Theory
VSEPR & Geometry Lewis structures show the number and type of bonds between atoms in a molecule or polyatomic ion. Lewis structures are not intended to.
5.1 Molecular Shape Obj 1 Chemistry.
Molecular Structure II. Molecular Geometry.
Molecular Geometry.
Molecular Geometry bond length, angle determined experimentally
Molecular Geometry bond length, angle determined experimentally
II. Molecular Geometry (p. 183 – 187)
Molecular Shapes It mean the 3-D arrangement of atoms in a molecule
Molecular Geometry.
Molecular Shapes Mrs. Chan.
Molecular Geometry.
6.5 VSEPR Theory and Molecular Shapes
II. Molecular Geometry (p. 183 – 187)
II. Molecular Geometry (p. 183 – 187)
Valence Shell Electron-pair Repulsion model
VSEPR Theory.
Presentation transcript:

As a general rule, the repulsion decreases as follows: lone pair – lone pair > lone pair – bond pair > bond pair – bond pair repulsion repulsion repulsion Electrons in a bond pair are held by the attractive forces of the two nuclei in the two atoms. These electrons have less spatial distribution than lone pair electrons, which are associated with only one particular atom.

Consequently, the lone pair electrons occupy more space and experience a greater repulsion from the neighboring lone pairs and bond pairs.

Consequently, the lone pair electrons occupy more space and experience a greater repulsion from the neighboring lone pairs and bond pairs. Examples: 1. Sulfur dioxide, SO2

Consequently, the lone pair electrons occupy more space and experience a greater repulsion from the neighboring lone pairs and bond pairs. Examples: 1. Sulfur dioxide, SO2 The Lewis structure is

Consequently, the lone pair electrons occupy more space and experience a greater repulsion from the neighboring lone pairs and bond pairs. Examples: 1. Sulfur dioxide, SO2 The Lewis structure is That is ignoring the lone pairs on the surrounding atoms.

Note that it is essential to retain the lone pair on the central atom.

Note that it is essential to retain the lone pair on the central atom Note that it is essential to retain the lone pair on the central atom. This particular example has resonance.

Note that it is essential to retain the lone pair on the central atom Note that it is essential to retain the lone pair on the central atom. This particular example has resonance. The second structure is

Note that it is essential to retain the lone pair on the central atom Note that it is essential to retain the lone pair on the central atom. This particular example has resonance. The second structure is That is ignoring the lone pairs on the surrounding atoms.

Note that it is essential to retain the lone pair on the central atom Note that it is essential to retain the lone pair on the central atom. This particular example has resonance. The second structure is That is ignoring the lone pairs on the surrounding atoms. If we take the average of the two resonance structures, then we have where represents 1.5 bonds.

There are three charge clouds off the central S atom.

There are three charge clouds off the central S atom There are three charge clouds off the central S atom. To get these as far apart as possible, requires the structure of SO2 to be bent (or nonlinear).

There are three charge clouds off the central S atom There are three charge clouds off the central S atom. To get these as far apart as possible, requires the structure of SO2 to be bent (or nonlinear).

There are three charge clouds off the central S atom There are three charge clouds off the central S atom. To get these as far apart as possible, requires the structure of SO2 to be bent (or nonlinear). If SO2 were linear repulsion between bond pairs would be minimized, but the angle between the lone pair and each of the two S O bond pairs would be 90o.

There are three charge clouds off the central S atom There are three charge clouds off the central S atom. To get these as far apart as possible, requires the structure of SO2 to be bent (or nonlinear). If SO2 were linear repulsion between bond pairs would be minimized, but the angle between the lone pair and each of the two S O bond pairs would be 90o. Since lone pair-bond pair repulsion is greater than bond pair-bond pair repulsion, SO2 must be bent.

There are three charge clouds off the central S atom There are three charge clouds off the central S atom. To get these as far apart as possible, requires the structure of SO2 to be bent (or nonlinear). If SO2 were linear repulsion between bond pairs would be minimized, but the angle between the lone pair and each of the two S O bond pairs would be 90o. Since lone pair-bond pair repulsion is greater than bond pair-bond pair repulsion, SO2 must be bent. Note that we have no means to predict the exact OSO angle.

2. ammonia, NH3

2. ammonia, NH3 The Lewis structure is

2. ammonia, NH3 The Lewis structure is The underlying symmetry is tetrahedral.

Four charge clouds (three bond pairs and one lone pair) point to the vertices of a tetrahedron.

Four charge clouds (three bond pairs and one lone pair) point to the vertices of a tetrahedron. No bonds in place yet.

Four charge clouds (three bond pairs and one lone pair) point to the vertices of a tetrahedron.

Four charge clouds (three bond pairs and one lone pair) point to the vertices of a tetrahedron. However, the shape of a molecule is determined by the positions of the nuclei.

Four charge clouds (three bond pairs and one lone pair) point to the vertices of a tetrahedron. However, the shape of a molecule is determined by the positions of the nuclei. So the shape of NH3 is trigonal pyramidal.

Four charge clouds (three bond pairs and one lone pair) point to the vertices of a tetrahedron. However, the shape of a molecule is determined by the positions of the nuclei. So the shape of NH3 is trigonal pyramidal. Because the lone pair repels the bond pairs more strongly than the bond pair-bond pair repulsions, the three N H bonds in ammonia are pushed closer together, with the result that the bond angle HNH is smaller than the tetrahedral angle.

3. water, H2O

3. water, H2O The Lewis structure is

3. water, H2O The Lewis structure is that is

Four charge clouds (two bond pairs and two lone pairs) point to the vertices of a tetrahedron (underlying symmetry is tetrahedral).

Four charge clouds (two bond pairs and two lone pairs) point to the vertices of a tetrahedron (underlying symmetry is tetrahedral). But the shape is determined by the position of the nuclei, so the molecule is bent.

Four charge clouds (two bond pairs and two lone pairs) point to the vertices of a tetrahedron (underlying symmetry is tetrahedral). But the shape is determined by the position of the nuclei, so the molecule is bent.

We would expect a further decrease in the bond angle HOH (due to lone pair-lone pair repulsion and lone pair-bond pair repulsion) from the regular tetrahedral angle of 109o 28’. The bond angle in water is 105o (from experiment – not from VSEPR theory).

4. xenon tetrafluoride, XeF4

4. xenon tetrafluoride, XeF4 The valence electron count for xenon is taken to be 8 electrons.

4. xenon tetrafluoride, XeF4 The valence electron count for xenon is taken to be 8 electrons. So the Lewis structure is

4. xenon tetrafluoride, XeF4 The valence electron count for xenon is taken to be 8 electrons. So the Lewis structure is or, in more simplified form (for the purpose of getting the shape)

4. xenon tetrafluoride, XeF4 The valence electron count for xenon is taken to be 8 electrons. So the Lewis structure is or, in more simplified form (for the purpose of getting the shape) Note it is essential to retain the lone pairs on Xe.

possibility one

possibility two

possibility two Which of the two structures is to be preferred?

possibility two Which of the two structures is to be preferred? The key interaction to consider is the lone pair-lone pair repulsion.

possibility two Which of the two structures is to be preferred? The key interaction to consider is the lone pair-lone pair repulsion. You usually want to make the angle between the lone pairs as large as possible, so possibility two is energetically preferred.

So XeF4 is square planar.

5. bromine pentafluoride, BrF5

5. bromine pentafluoride, BrF5 The Lewis structure is

5. bromine pentafluoride, BrF5 The Lewis structure is or in more compact form (for the purpose of getting the shape)

There are a total of six charge clouds off the central atom (five bond pairs and one lone pair).

There are a total of six charge clouds off the central atom (five bond pairs and one lone pair).

Arrange these to point to the vertices of a regular octahedron. There are a total of six charge clouds off the central atom (five bond pairs and one lone pair). Arrange these to point to the vertices of a regular octahedron.

There are a total of six charge clouds off the central atom (five bond pairs and one lone pair). Arrange these to point to the vertices of a regular octahedron. So the shape of the BrF5 molecule is square pyramidal.

Note in the examples with lone pairs on the central atom, these lone pairs play an important role in predicting the correct shape of the molecule.

Summary of rules for applying VSEPR Theory to predict the geometry of simple molecules

Summary of rules for applying VSEPR Theory to predict the geometry of simple molecules 1. Write the Lewis structure of the molecule: (i) Draw in chemical bonds from the central atom. (ii) Draw in any lone pairs on the central atom.

Summary of rules for applying VSEPR Theory to predict the geometry of simple molecules 1. Write the Lewis structure of the molecule: (i) Draw in chemical bonds from the central atom. (ii) Draw in any lone pairs on the central atom. 2. To predict basic shape, note that lone pairs repel one another and bond pairs more strongly than bond pairs repel one another.

3. As a good approximation, treat double and triple bonds as if they were single electron pairs between neighboring atoms. Finally, remember that there is no way to predict bond angles accurately in cases involving lone pairs on the central atom.

Exercises Predict the shape of the following: 1. CO2 2. BCl3 3. SiH4 4. AsCl5 5. PF6-

Exercises Predict the shape of the following: 6. CO32- 7. NO2- 8. ClO3- 9. BrF3 10. ICl4-

Exercises 1. linear 2. trigonal planar 3. tetrahedral 4. trigonal bipyramidal 5. octahedral