An Audit of Colposcopy Practice on Mild Dyskaryosis or Borderline Changes on Cervical Smear and the Effectiveness of “See & Treat” vs. Biopsy and Recall.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cervical Screening and HPV testing
Advertisements

AUDIT OF COMPLIANCE WITH NHSCSP GUIDELINES REQUIRING MDT REVIEW OF ALL CERVICAL CANCER PATIENTS Dr. M Bhattacharjee Dr. A Mutton Dr. S Nagarajan.
Detection of human telomerase gene (TERC) amplification in cervical neoplasia: A retrospective study of 79 patients Pap smear slides Renarta Crookes Sheffield.
Cervical Cancer DR KHALID H. WALI SAIT (FRCSC) ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF GYNECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Introduction Women experience distress and heightened anxiety in relation to further diagnostic evaluation of pre-cancerous cell changes of the cervix,
COLPOSCOPY RANDOM CERVICAL BIOPSIES ENDOCERVICAL CURETTAGE S.C.P.M.G.-Fontana.
ACCP Evidence base: Implications for policy and practice R. Sankaranarayanan MD Head, Screening Group World Health Organization (WHO) International Agency.
HPV and cervical screening Test of cure
Screening for Cervical Cancer
COLPOSCOPY Cervical Screening QARC Training School October 2012.
AN AUDIT OF PAP SMEAR, COLPOSCOPY AND HISTOLOGY RESULTS FROM IN TUNGARU CENTRAL HOSPITAL (KIRIBATI)
Cervical screening Tim Wright Sept 07. Introduction What who when What who when Benefits (evidence) Benefits (evidence) Cost Cost Does it fit wilson’s.
Ealing Hospital NHS Trust Outcomes of Pregnancy of Unknown Location L INDA F ARAHANI, A IKATERINI I ATROPOULOU, C HARITY K HOO, T AN T OH L ICK Department.
PATTERN OF GYNAECOLOGICAL MALIGNANCIES IN DELTA STATE UNIVERSITY TEACHING HOSPITAL,OGHARA:A 2 YEAR REVIEW. MOFON C EBEIGBE P.E ABEDI H.O DELSUTH.
Screening for Cervical Cancer Max Brinsmead MB BS PhD May 2015.
A Quantitative Multi-Gene RT-PCR Assay for Prediction of Recurrence in Stage II Colon Cancer (CC): Selection of the Genes in 4 Large Studies and Results.
EBC course 10 April 2003 Critical Appraisal of the Clinical Literature: The Big Picture Cynthia R. Long, PhD Associate Professor Palmer Center for Chiropractic.
Colposcopy & Research.  Arch Gynecol Obstet May 26. [Epub ahead of print] Arch Gynecol Obstet.  Risk factors for treatment failure following cold.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Outcome of Large Loop Excision of Transformation Zone (LLETZ ) in women over forty at two London Hospitals.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Uterine sarcomas in RIPAS Hospital, Brunei; a 10 year retrospective study. Dr Alice Kurien, Dr Saw Ohnmar,
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Maternal Obesity & Obstetric outcomes John R, Johnson JK, Pavey J Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,
An audit of CMV disease in renal transplant recipients transplanted at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham Gemma Banham, Shazia Shabir, Richard Borrows.
1 Lecture 10: Meta-analysis of intervention studies Introduction to meta-analysis Selection of studies Abstraction of information Quality scores Methods.
Sheffield Gynaecological Cancer CentreSheffield Teaching Hospitals PRIMARY HPV SCREENING A view from colposcopy John Tidy Consultant Gynaecological Oncologist.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Negative LLETZ following severe dyskaryosis: a curious phenomenon Üçyiğit A, Jones M H, Dutta A, El.
1 Lecture 10: Meta-analysis of intervention studies Introduction to meta-analysis Selection of studies Abstraction of information Quality scores Methods.
HPV testing as a Primary screening tool in England Dr Karin Denton.
Appendix 2 Comparison of screening from age 20 and age 25 Table of harms and benefits.
Prostatectomy operations in England South West Public Health Observatory Trends in the use of radical prostatectomy in England Sean McPhail.
Cervical Cancer: Experiences from a Cohort of HIV-infected Women Pascoe M, Magure T, Mudhokwani P et al Abstract: MOAB0202.
Prison Abnormalities Dr J H F Smith Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield East Pennine Cytology Training Centre NEYH Cervical Screening Symposium 2013.
UOG Journal Club: July 2016 Ability of a preterm surveillance clinic to triage risk of preterm birth: a prospective cohort study J Min, HA Watson, NL Hezelgrave,
UOG Journal Club: February 2017
Understanding Test Results
Trreatment of Preinvasive Lesions
Colposcopic Biopsy Results of HPV 16 and 18 patients in Bartın
Quality issues in monitoring diagnostic and treatment performance Dr
NHS Cervical Screening Programme Introducing HPV Triage
UOG Journal Club: July 2016 Ability of a preterm surveillance clinic to triage risk of preterm birth: a prospective cohort study J Min, HA Watson, NL Hezelgrave,
Operative Approach and
Cytology Codes & management Colposcopy- Management of cervical lesions
Analysis of Incompletely Excised BCCs (4.68%)
Efficacy of random cervical biopsy and routine endocervical curettage in subjects with normal colposcopy.
Facilitator: pawin puapornpong
Dr. Nu Nu Htwe Specialist Assistant Surgeon
UOG Journal Club: January 2018
M.Boal; J. Batt; P. Wilkerson; D.R. Titcomb
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
PROACT-4 Trial design: Patients enroute to the hospital with acute chest pain were randomized to point of care troponin testing (n = 305) vs. usual care.
Background There is ongoing debate to identify the most effective drug-eluting stent between the two currently most used devices (ie, sirolimus- [SES]
Trial profile John A Dormandy et al. Lancet 2005;366:
EVALUTE THE EFFICACY OF ADJUVANT REGIMEN 3FEC- 3T IN STAGE II BREAST CANCER Hai Phong, 2017 LÊ THU HÀ, Ph.D. Nguyễn Khánh Hà, Dr.
Performance Measures Related to Colposcopy for Canadian Cervical Cancer Screening Programs: Identifying Areas for Improvement  Kathleen M. Decker, PhD,
Current and emerging management options for Clostridium difficile infection: what is the role of fidaxomicin?  O.A. Cornely  Clinical Microbiology and.
CHAMPION Trial design: Patients with recent hospitalization for heart failure were implanted with a pulmonary artery pressure monitor and randomized so.
Your Name Adolescent Risk Taking (Psych 4900) Weber State University
SMART-STRATEGY Trial design: Patients with a bifurcation coronary lesion were randomized to a conservative strategy (n = 128) vs. an aggressive strategy.
Trial profile Luc F Van Gaal, Lancet 2005;365:1389.
Knowledge gaps in key risk factor numbers
Affected and unaffected prefectures in northeast Japan
Summary of search results: (A) Research applications receiving a final favourable opinion between 1 January and 30 June 2016, falling into the first four.
Demographics of study participants and reasons for declining participation. CIN2+, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia  grade 2+; GCSE, General Certificate.
A. Al-Janabi1, Z. K. Jabbar-Lopez2, C.E.M. Griffiths1, Z.Z.N. Yiu1
Number of patients treated at clinics that followed up fewer than 10 patients (2013–2016) or 20 patients (2012) and proportion of patients followed up.
Medical Scientific Experts
Fig 4 Population level predicted proportions of cutaneous melanocytic biopsy interpretations that would be verified by the consensus reference panel or.
Number of hospital presentations for self-harm in Derby from 2003 to 2012 (inclusive) based on Multicentre Study data, Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)
Kaplan–Meier plot of proportion of persons convicted (excluding traffic offenses) for the first time in the background population (thin line) and in men.
Presentation transcript:

An Audit of Colposcopy Practice on Mild Dyskaryosis or Borderline Changes on Cervical Smear and the Effectiveness of “See & Treat” vs. Biopsy and Recall (TOMBOLA Group Protocol) in a DGH Setting Dr M A Shiraz; Ms Tracey Speed; Mr Khalil Razvi Southend University Hospital P048 Introduction Results Current gynaecological practice for cervical smears with borderline change/ mild dyskaryosis is “See and Treat” at Colposcopy1. The TOMBOLA trial2 demonstrated that this policy was of no advantage compared to a policy of biopsy and recall. This means that a significant proportion of our patients are being over treated, leading to patient morbidity by way of pain and bleeding3. Given these implications we set about validating the TOMBOLA group findings on our own colposcopy population. Thus, here we present our results based on two years (2011/2012) of data. Methods Our colposcopy service maintains a database of all our colposcopy patients including their original cervical smear result together with the colposcopy findings (± treatment) and further follow up as per our local protocols. Using this database we identified all patients that had initial smear results of Borderline Change vs. Mild Dyskaryosis for the years 2011 & 2012. We then analysed what proportion of these patients subsequently underwent See & Treat vs. Biopsy & Recall. We further looked at what the final histology of each case was and analysed the proportion of patients that had high risk features i.e. CIN II/ III. Fig 2. Of the 459 Mild Dyskaryosis 415 patients had Biopsy & Recall. Of these only 31% had high risk histology Fig 3. Of the 635 Borderline Change patients 550 patients had Biopsy & Recall, of these only 28% had high risk histology Fig 1. Profile of Patients Conclusions Given the above results we support the TOMBOLA group findings of promoting Biopsy & Recall over the current policy of See & Treat. We feel that this is appropriate given the high yield of less aggressive cases that we see at Colposcopy. References 1) Cárdenas-Turanzas, Marylou, et al. The lancet oncology 6.1 (2005): 43-50. 2) TOMBOLA group BMJ: British Medical Journal 339 (2009) 3) TOMBOLA, The. "After‐effects reported by women following colposcopy, cervical biopsies and LLETZ: results from the TOMBOLA trial." BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 116.11 (2009): 1506-1514.