Leadership Coordinating Council School Support Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

WEST HEMPSTEAD UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT Three Year Strategic Plan
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Missouri Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (MO SW-PBS) Implementation Mary Richter MO SW-PBS State Coordinator.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.
 87 th General Assembly Regular Session  November 8, 2011.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
EARLY LEARNING COUNCIL AND SICC COLLABORATION: Addendum to September 30, 2012 Report on EI/ECSE Unique Complexities and Recommendations to Improve Service.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Office of Service Quality
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
SEPTEMBER 10, 2012 A REPORT TO THE ARKANSAS JOINT EDUCATION COMMITTEE.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
ASCCC Cultural Competency and Advocacy Plan Update Cleavon Smith, Berkeley City College Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
Huntsville City Schools AdvancEd Survey District Accreditation Cathy C. McNeal, Ed.D. January 8, 2013.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Contextualization in English and Reading: A Few Examples
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
AdvancED Accreditation External Review October 23-26, 2016
Dr. Jo Alice Blondin, President, Clark State Community College
Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett
The Equity Business Case Why Workforce Equity is Good for Business
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Strategic Planning Goals
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
District Leadership Team Sustainability Susan Barrett Director, Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network Sheppard Pratt Health.
SUNY Applied Learning Campus Plan Parts V-VII
District Accreditation
Center For Faculty Excellence: Leadership and Faculty Development
87th General Assembly Regular Session 2009
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Zelphine Smith-Dixon, State Director of Special Education
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Introduction to the Capability Framework
Toward an inclusive campus community:
SCALED LEADERSHIP MEETING
Leadership for Standards-Based Education
A Tool To Support Implementation of the Oregon K-12 Diploma
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
OLAC Beliefs/Assumptions
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Jewish Educational Services Assessment: Results & Implementation
Successes and Opportunities
Introduction Introduction
Strategic Plan: Tri-Cities High School
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
February 21-22, 2018.
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE Board of Education May 2018
Reading Paper discussion – Week 4
Presentation transcript:

Leadership Coordinating Council School Support Program Act 222 Update 2017 Leadership Coordinating Council School Support Program

Lcc purpose – act 222 6-1-403. Purpose. The purpose of the School Leadership Coordinating Council is to: Serve as a central body to coordinate the leadership development system efforts across the state including: Encouraging school districts to work with the Department of Education, the Department of Higher Education, the Department of Workforce Education, the Arkansas Leadership Academy, and other leadership groups; Recommending a state leadership development system to coordinate all aspects of leadership development based on educational leadership standards adopted by the Department of Education; and Devise a system of gathering data which includes input from practitioners, educational and community leaders, university leadership and faculty, and other interested parties; Assist the Department of Education, the Department of Higher Education, the Department of Workforce Education, the Arkansas Leadership Academy, school districts, and other leadership groups in enhancing school leadership and school support efforts; and Aid in the development of model evaluation tools for use in the evaluation of school administrators.

Leadership Coordinating council David Cook, Chair

Meetings of the Leadership Coordinating Council held on January 26, 2017 April 24, 2017 (Sub-committee meeting) September 21, 2017

2017-2018 Leadership Coordinating Council Members Donny Lee, Chair of the Arkansas Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Council of Deans Johnny Key, Commissioner of Education David Cook (Chair), Director of the Arkansas Leadership Academy Maria Markham, Director of the Department of Higher Education Charisse Childers, Director of the Department of Career Education Richard Abernathy, Executive Director of the Arkansas Association of Educational Administrators Tracey-Ann Nelson, Executive Director of the Arkansas Education Association Tony Prothro, Executive Director of the Arkansas School Boards Association Mary Gunter, Executive Director of the Arkansas Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Dale Query, Executive Director of the Arkansas Rural Education Association Shelly Albritton, Arkansas Professors of Educational Administration Roy Hester, Arkansas Center for Executive Leadership Jeff Williams, representative from the Educational Service Cooperatives Scott Smith, Arkansas Public School Resource Center Michele Linch, Arkansas State Teachers Association Jane English, Chair of the Senate Committee on Education Bruce Cozart, Chair of the House Committee on Education

Act 344 (91st General Assembly, 2017) -An Act to amend the membership of the School Leadership Coordinating Council (4 members added) A representative from the Arkansas Public School Resource Center A representative from the Arkansas State Teachers Association The Chair of the Senate Committee on Education The Chair of the House Committee on Education

Objectives of the Leadership Coordinating Council reset through June 2019 PSEL Help in creation of rubric for LEADS Ad Hoc Create strategies for bringing leadership programs to the Delta IMPACT Legislation which allows flexibility in use of NSLA funds for recruitment and retention of leaders Expand services of ALA in order to serve a broader base of leaders

Arkansas Leadership Academy School Support/Organizational Development Program

School Support Program Provides weekly on-site coaching and facilitation. Creates sustainable systems for the purpose of improving student achievement. Builds leadership capacity within schools and districts. Provides expertise and support to all stakeholders- educators, students, and community. In 2001, The Arkansas Leadership Academy was selected by the Southern Regional Educational Board to design a program for low-performing schools. A state-wide team created the Intensive School Support for Low-Performing Schools which is what eventually became the School Support Program in 2005 with ACT 129 during the Arkansas 85th General Assembly. Then ACT 222 of 2009 provided the continued authorization of the School Support Program. The Arkansas Leadership Academy has record of helping low-performing schools get back on track and improving student achievement. “The Arkansas Leadership Academy had the best record for getting schools back on track.” Review of School Improvement Consultation Expenditures and Results Presented by the Bureau of Legislative Research to the Joint Education Committee (Feb. 7, 2012)

Organizational Development Expanded the work of School Support Program to the School District Level to support wide-scale improvement efforts Organizational Development was first implemented during the 2015-16 school year in 6 school districts across the state 4 districts were added in 2016-2017 school year 3 new districts and one community college were added in 2017-2018 Provides leadership development at the district and individual school level Hypothesis: sustainable change happens faster when all levels focus on aligning organizational energy toward identified needs areas that are based on student and adult learning data

Research Models Theory of Change link outcomes and activities to explain HOW and WHY the desired change is expected to come about Logic Model graphically illustrate program components, and creating one helps stakeholders clearly identify outcomes, inputs and activities

Performance coach The Performance coach supports the transfer of learning from the “On-Site” learning experiences (THEORY) to the school/district setting (PRACTICE) The Performance coach provides ongoing support and accountability for the implementation of the “next steps” for the leadership team.

The Performance Coach and the Principal develop a Personal Learning Plan based on the skills in the PSSR. The Performance Coach supports the Leadership Team in establishing a set of shared core beliefs for a school. The Performance Coach and Principal conduct classroom walkthroughs and analyze the data to plan professional development opportunities for the staff. The Performance Coach supports the leadership team in establishing collaborative groups to analyze student learning data and make decisions regarding allocation of resources to increase the teaching and learning process in the school/district. The Performance Coach supports a school staff in the integration of new technology to meet the learning needs of both students and adults.

Learning Experiences Master Principal Program Assistant Principal Institute Teacher Leadership Institute Leadership Team Institute Facilitation of Adult Learning Institute Student Voice Institute Executive Collaborative Institute The Academy offers programs and institutes designed to reach districts and schools at all levels with the goal of building sustainable systems. The Arkansas Leadership Academy is dedicated to supporting district and school leaders who are committed to building their capacity through team-building and shared decision making in order to be responsive to change and to take their incentives to scale.

Leadership Development System Needs Assessment There are three stages in the assessment process: 1. Preparation: Gain a clear understanding of the performance expectations included in each rubric to conduct an accurate assessment. If particular expectations are not clear, seek clarification. 2. Assessment: Check the boxes next to those expectations in each rubric that best describes your school/district performance. 3. Reflection and Rating: reflect on the expectations you have checked and rate your school/district performance on each rubric using the five point rating scale: 1-Beginning 2-Emerging 3-Applying 4-Integrating 5-Innovating

Strategic Plan The Performance Coach and the Leadership team engage in a process to establish priority areas from the Needs Assessment and develop a strategic plan that will guide the work of the PC and Leadership Team throughout the current school year. Strategic Plan focus areas are determined collaboratively and are based on the data provided by the leadership team during the needs assessment. The Strategic Plan is updated continuously and evidence toward those goals are collected and is used to monitor the work in the district.

Progress monitoring LEADS Optional Staff Survey Principal Self-Efficacy Survey Teacher Self-Efficacy Survey Teacher Collective Efficacy Survey Organizational Health Inventory (E,M,S) Stages of Concern Questionnaire Leadership Development System Self Assessment *All surveys are delivered electronically in the fall of a school/district’s first contract year and in the spring of each year to measure longitudinal changes in efficacy, performance, school culture, and concern profiles *Reports are delivered to principals and data is used to plan services and learning experiences of school

Baseline – Year 1: OHI-S, OHI-M, OHI-E, TSES, TCES, & PSES Progress Monitoring Baseline – Year 1: OHI-S, OHI-M, OHI-E, TSES, TCES, & PSES

Implementation Dip

www.arkansasleadershipacademy.org Like us on Facebook @ARleadacademy