Planning for Airport Noise The Roar of Discontent

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By Noise Performance Metrics A View on the Situation at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol in 2003 M.E.S. Vogels National Aerospace Laboratory NLR Amsterdam, the.
Advertisements

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA).
Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group Sensitive Facilities Committee AIRPORT NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM Louisville and Jefferson County MITIGATION ISSUES.
Federal Aviation Administration Environmental Prescreening Training Module 3 Noise Review.
Solar Guidance for Airports: Information for Sponsors on Developing Airport Compatible Solar Projects Association of California Airports September 16,
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Airport Noise Basics Noise Analysis Overview 2010 Hershey Conference Chris Osburn, Env. Protection.
Juneau Flightseeing Noise Informational Work Session November 6, 2000.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Federal Grants and Airport Capital Improvement Programs Western-Pacific Region Association of California.
Federal Aviation Administration FY2007 Noise Program Presented to: AAAE/Airport Noise Mitigation Symposium November 2, 2006 Boston, MA.
AAAE National Aviation Environmental Management Conference Steven M. Taber Chevalier, Allen & Lichman, LLP Aviation Noise Tampa, Florida February 9-10,
Introduction to Noise Control
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
OSU Airport – Overview of Master Plan and Draft Environmental Assessment Purpose of an Airport Environmental Assessment (EA) Identify environmental impacts.
Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group NOISE ABATEMENT STRATEGIES Alternatives and Results New Zion Baptist Church Neighborhood Orientation and Discussion.
Presentation to: 2006 Transportation Research Board Noise & Vibration Conference Williamsburg, VA Supplemental Tools for Environmental Noise Analysis Roger.
Wyle Aviation Services, Arlington, VA www.wylelabs.com Sustaining Your Airport - FAA Can’t Do It For You Wyle Aviation Services Joe Czech October.
Neighbor’s Committee Meeting Paul L. Shank P.E., C.M Chief Engineer July 14, 2015.
Cognitive Impact on Children from Airplane Noise 2008.
NextGen for Noise Mitigation Paul Dunholter, P.E. BridgeNet International October 10, 2007.
Noise Policy Options for Farnborough Airport – Presentation on work carried out by Hepworth Acoustics for Rushmoor Council Peter Hepworth Thursday 31 st.
08 June 2006 Portland 2006: aircraft certification session Yves Morier The EASA Advance -NPA for UAV systems Certification Presentation by: Y Morier EASA.
Review of the Noise Compatibility Program Presentation to the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors October 29, 2002 Reid-Hillview Airport FAR Part 150.
Federal Aviation Administration NextGen Environmental Management System (EMS)
NextGen Next Generation Air Transportation System
Farnborough Airspace Change Proposal Briefing to FACC 26 th November 2014 TAG Farnborough Airport.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Noise 101: Federal Noise Laws and Regulations Town of Payson M.L. Chittick, Scottsdale FSDO January.
Buffalo Niagara International Airport Noise Mitigation Program Political Contours versus Reality Presented by : Mark Clark Sr. Aviation Planner of BNIA.
© CT Management Group Pty Ltd 2015 Municipal Association of Victoria Rate Cap Forum 25 th November 2015 Ian Mann CT Management Group
A Technology Partnership for the New Millennium Anne Harlan, Director William J. Hughes Technical Center 68th NASAO Annual Convention September 20, 1999.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration CHANGING NOISE CONTOURS AN FAA PERSPECTIVE NOISE MITIGATION SYMPOSIUM JOHN SILVA OCTOBER 2, 2006.
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
Airport Land Use Relationship CE 633. errata Surrounding land use is difficult to control. Consider airspace issues with respect to local gov’ts and planning.
2005 Europe/US International Aviation Safety Conference, Cologne 7-9 June The Europe-US International Aviation Safety Conference 2005 ‘ Aviation Safety.
Town of Morrisville, NC November 2012 AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY AND RESIDENTIAL LAND USES.
Mary Ellen Eagan President Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Inc. Using ‘Supplemental Metrics’ to Address the Effects of Noise on People TRB ADC40 Committee.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Introduction to Noise Control Environmental Science Ithan B. Zimmer, Ph.D., P.E.
Teterboro Airport Part 150 Noise/Land Use Compatibility Study
Jon Hadler and Dr. David Ison
SPRINGBANK AIRPORT COMMUNITY NOISE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE May 30, 2017
Draft Environmental Assessment Report for Bradley International Airport October 2016
AVIATION SYSTEM BLOCK UPGRADES (ASBU)
Airports Division Great Lakes Region Overview of Airfield Capacity
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) August 6, 2008
Performance Based Transition
Presented by United Arab Emirates
Draft ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
ACA Conference - September 2017
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
NextGen and Its Impact on Performance
Airport Planning.
Municipal Association of Victoria Rate Cap Forum 25th November 2015
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Qualitative Scenarios
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
Municipal Association of Victoria Rate Cap Forum 25th November 2015
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
University of California—Irvine
DCA, A Pilot’s Perspective
National Airspace and Noise Policy
Airport Traffic Counting The Problems & Solutions
Airport Land Use Relationship
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
San Francisco Fire Department
Balanced Approach to Noise Mitigation
Moving Forward with Positive Change
Balanced Approach to Noise Mitigation
Airspace Change Proposal
ROMATSA – SAFETY, EFFICIENCY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE IN ATM
Presentation transcript:

Planning for Airport Noise The Roar of Discontent Luke Jensen 16.781 Airport Systems November 12, 2013

Outline Aircraft Noise Metrics Planning and Reporting Requirements Case Study 1: Logan Runway 14/32 Case Study 2: Greener Skies over Seattle

Noise Metrics Def: Noise is any unwanted sound Perceived loudness is ultimate concern “A-weighted” dB Equivalent Noise Level DNL, CNEL Other metrics Max Level Time-Above Graphic: Harris, Miller, Miller, & Hansen

Converting “Noise” to “Annoyance” Complicated problem Highly subjective Compounding factors Pitch Loudness Sharpness Tonality Duration Time of day Regression appropriate?

Mandatory Reporting Requirements National Environment Policy Act (NEPA, 1969) FAA Airport Environment Program Order 1050.1E Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Assessment Mandatory for all expansion projects

Optional Reporting FAA Airport Environment Program Part 150: Noise Compatibility Planning Required for federal NCP funding Optional, but lucrative Part 161: Noise-related Access Restrictions

Case Study #1: Logan Airport Runway 14/32 Opened in 2006 34-year development timeline (mostly politics) Clear-cut symbolism of new pavement Graphic: HNTB Graphic: Michael Philip Manheim/NARA Graphic: Boston Sunday Globe

Historical Context All Images: Michael Philip Manheim/NARA

Justification for Airside Improvement Plan

Noise Analysis Process: Detailed forecast Integrated Noise Model study to obtain contours Visualization + Census Synthesis

Case Study #2: Greener Skies over Seattle New “Required Navigation Performance” Approaches Tailored flight paths Reduce emissions, flight time Concentrated flight paths New frontier of NextGen Public relations challenge: is this good or bad for communities? Graphic: FAA

New Analysis Methods: CatEx?

Conclusions Movement toward multi-stakeholder collaborative decision making shows strong promise Political factors most important factor of environmental review timeline Noise metrics currently taken as “given”, should likely be revisited given modern noise research NextGen implementation timeline constrained by environmental review process Further investigation of Categorical Exception to FAA Order 1050.1E needed

Thank You! Questions?