Recycle Rush Scoring Analysis

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Beach Cities Robotics – Team 294 Andrew Keisic Dec 2008

Advertisements

Purpose of this Presentation Drivetrain Selection o Types of drivetrains o Types of wheels o Drivetrain mechanics o Best drivetrain for your team o Maintenance.

Programming Requirements Last updated Jan 30, 2015, 8:00PM.

Driver & Human Player Views: Lines of Sight Siri Maley FIRST Team 1640, 28 January 2011.

Engineering H193 - Team Project Gateway Engineering Education Coalition P. 1 Spring Quarter 2006 Individual Competition Week 8 Day 2.

Surviving the Desert. Spring 2011MGMT E-4000, M. S. White, Ph.D., J.D. Team Decision-Making.

May Madness – VEX RED ALLIANCE STATION RED HUMAN ZONE BLUE ALLIANCE STATION VEX Board BLUE LZ (2x2) BLUE LZ RED LZ BLUE HUMAN ZONE.

FIRST Training Resource Alliances, Eliminations and Scouting Evan Morrison Mentor, Teams 190 and 971.

Control System New control system: roboRIO – Allows for programming over the USB device port.

SELECT A LESSON 1. A WORLD AND CHARACTERS 2. PATHS AND ENEMIES 4. USING PAGES TO CHANGE THE RULES 5. GAME ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 6-7. CREATING YOUR OWN GAME.

Match Scouting Tutorial 2015 By Team 1403’s Strategy Team.

1 New standard in North Sea drilling operations..

1 Improving Your Alliance Performance Team Scouting and Working Together September 6 th, 2014 FTC Season Kickoff Thomas Gill.

Bell Work: 5/14/15 O What advantages would robots with human-like appearances and capabilities have, and what tasks might they be particularly suited to.

GAME PLAYING 1. There were two reasons that games appeared to be a good domain in which to explore machine intelligence: 1.They provide a structured task.

Strategic Design FROM THE GAME TO CONCEPT DANNY BLAU ANDYMARK, INC 1.

FRC GAME ANALYSIS AND DESIGN STRATEGY Caleb Sykes Mentor, FRC 4536.

 Find out all possible methods of scoring points  Determine the most efficient method(s) of scoring points  Amount of macaroni is inversely proportional.

 Knowing your controls › Learn your controls before a competition › Communicate with your programmers any changes they can make to ensure the controls.

Developing a Strategy Strategy Building for the FIRST Robotics Competition.

Designing Robots How to make a stable robot! Much of the information in this power point is from Winning Design! By James J. Trobaugh.

Team 5282 Durand, MI - Railroaders. Field Layout Field Dimensions: 26 ft 7in * 54ft 1in Courtyard: 16 ft 2 in Alignment line measured 11 ft from castle.

Deriving Consistency from LEGOs What we have learned in 6 years of FLL by Austin and Travis Schuh © 2005 Austin and Travis Schuh, all rights reserved.

By Chad.  Need to be passionate about robotics  Chase Perfection Catch excellence  Canburglars.

Robotics Projects First Attempt at Creating Teams Take a Closer Look at the Game.

Do Now  Explain one potential problem with landfills.

Djohan Wahyudi Supervised by: Prof. Dr. Pericles A. Mitkas Vivia Nikolaidou 1.

Systems Engineering Beach Cities Robotics – Team 294 Andrew Keisic Dec 2008.

Project Overview  Introduction  Clawbot Build  Design Modification  Design Development  Programming  Sensors  Advanced Sensors  Open design challenges.

Break-Away Strategy Game A turn based strategy game used to simulate Break-Away Brought to you by Team 33.

FRC Strategy Jesse Knight FRC 1885.

FRC Scouting and Competitive Assessment

Final Presentation Monday, April 18, 2016

Project Overview Introduction Clawbot Build Design Modification

Deriving Consistency from LEGOs

Crossfire Game Overview

2017 Robot Priorities & Decision process

Parsing IV Bottom-up Parsing

21’s (2+ Persons) You can pick any points on the floor to shoot from as long as all teams are shooting from the same spots Use both baskets and both sides.

Winning a regional Reaching Einstein Strategy

Introduction Defining the Problem as a State Space Search.

Higher: Factors Impacting on Performance- Physical - Tactics

CONCEPTS Drive Trains , Object Manipulators, and Lifting Mechanisms

INTERMEDIATE PROGRAMMING LESSON

INTERMEDIATE PROGRAMMING LESSON

Unit 4: Imperfect Competition

By Josie Schmitt and Maddy Burke

Individual Competition

Goal setting in sports performance

Dr. Chung-Hao Chen (ECE)

Parsing IV Bottom-up Parsing

Design Sample: Build a Swing

Strategy Guide Strategy guide what is it trying to say Coaches role

Lecture 3: Environs and Algorithms

Planning and Scheduling

For First Place Most Times Up at the Table

Easter Holiday Maths Challenge

Recycling Rush prepared by Adambots FIRST Team 245

How to Choose an Executive Benefit Program

National 5: Factors Impacting on Performance- Physical - Tactics

First Attempt at Creating Teams Take a Closer Look at the Game

R13 Launch Robots must not be taller than 12 inches on a launch OR re-launch Active technicians cannot be holding/handling anything on the field.

Distributed Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Robot Decentralized Collective Construction Gyu-Young Hwang

Co-opertition FIRST The game was played by two alliances of two teams competing against each other to score points by placing balls in their.

Introduction When faced with the task of designing and building a VEX robot, students (and teachers) will often immediately want to pick up their tools.

Online Pogo Game Customer Service

Pogo Game Customer Care Helpline Number

Call Pogo Contact Phone Number and Enjoy Pogo Game

Introduction When faced with the task of designing and building a VEX robot, students (and teachers) will often immediately want to pick up their tools.

Presentation transcript:

Recycle Rush Scoring Analysis FIRST Team 20 – The Rocketeers

Assumptions The times used for this analysis were found by human simulations of robot tasks for this game; they are likely on the lower side of accurate We have assumed that there is only one highly competitive robot contributing to the score, with the other two on the alliance doing nothing We have not analyzed auto due the high degree of reliance on alliance partners This analysis may change depending on how the GCD chooses to handle “The Noodle Agreement” This analysis is intended to highlight scoring maximum differences using different strategies, not serve as a prediction for average match scores

Task Times (seconds) Get tote from step (3) Score container (4) * Assumes totes are within easy reach and the stack is built from the bottom Get tote from step (3) Pick up tote (2) Get container (3) HP put litter in container (8) Push litter to landfill (5) Stack 2 (3)* Stack 3 (6)* Stack 4 (9)* Stack 5 (12)* Stack 6 (15)* Line up to pick up (3) Score container (4) Drive to far platform with, without totes (4,8) Line up and place tote (4) Line up and place stack (6) Place tote on step (3) HP stack 2 (7) Robot score litter (15) Reorient tote (8) Reorient container (8) HP put tote on field (2)

Point Breakdown All credit to Team 237: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=132100

Tasks for building and scoring a stack from the landfill * Assumes totes are within easy reach and the stack is built from the bottom Get tote from step (3) Pick up tote (2) Get container (3) HP put litter in container (8) Push litter to landfill (5) Stack 2 (3)* Stack 3 (6)* Stack 4 (9)* Stack 5 (12)* Stack 6 (15)* Line up to pick up (3) Score container (4) Drive to far platform with, without totes (4,8) Line up and place tote (4) Line up and place stack (6) Place tote on step (3) HP stack 2 (7) Robot score litter (15) Reorient tote (8) Reorient container (8) HP put tote on field (2)

From Landfill Action Time (s) Points # in Match Pts/Match Extra Time (s) Stack 2 27 4 5 20 +container 34 2 3 36 33 +litter 42 18 54 9 Stack 3 35 6 30 50 24 48 Stack 4 43 8 58 60 19 Stack 5 51 10 66 72 Stack 6 59 12 17 74 1 61

Tasks for building and scoring a stack from the feeder station * Assumes totes are within easy reach and the stack is built from the bottom Get tote from step (3) Pick up tote (2) Get container (3) HP put litter in container (8) Push litter to landfill (5) Stack 2 (3)* Stack 3 (6)* Stack 4 (9)* Stack 5 (12)* Stack 6 (15)* Line up to pick up (3) Score container (4) Drive to far platform with, without totes (4,8) Line up and place tote (4) Line up and place stack (6) Place tote on step (3) HP stack 2 (7) Robot score litter (15) Reorient tote (8) Reorient container (8) HP put tote on field (2)

From Feeder Station Action Time (s) Points # in Match Pts/Match Extra Time (s) Stack 2 21 4 6 24 9 +container 28 12 48 23 +litter 36 18 3 54 27 Stack 3 26 5 30 33 72 41 Stack 4 31 8 32 11 38 46 2 60 43 Stack 5 10 90 51 Stack 6 39 56 42 84

Things to note Loading from the feeder station is much faster, and as such yields more points Extra time can be used to build smaller stacks or go for co- op (depending on the amount extra) Containers are required for the highest scores It appears to be possible for one robot to use up all three uncontested containers by itself Litter is nice to have, but not critical for scoring high