Results and Discussion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enhancing the Nutritive Value of Grass Seed Straw for Beef Cattle Carl Hunt Department of Animal and Veterinary Science University of Idaho Kristen Johnson.
Advertisements

* Strategically Feeding Protein and Energy During Winter and Managing Cow Condition Don C. Adams
By C Kohn, Department of Agricultural Sciences Waterford, WI
Take it to the Bank: Keys for Financial Success Keys for Financial Success Barry H. Dunn, Ph.D. Animal and Range Sciences Dept. South Dakota State University.
Residual Feed Intake and the Cow Herd A. M. Meyer 1 *, R. L. Kallenbach 2, M. S. Kerley 1 University of Missouri, Columbia 1 Division of Animal Sciences.
Management and Supplementation Strategies to Improve Reproduction of Beef Cattle on Fescue John B. Hall Extension Beef Specialist Virginia Tech.
Optimum range beef production is achieved only by matching the animal’s genetic potential to the nutritional environment.
MS Proposal Evaluation of beef calf production system, for Tizimin, Yucatan Mexico Kotaro Baba.
Evaluation of beef cow-calf nutrition in Yucatan, Mexico: MS thesis progress report Animal Science Kotaro Baba January 2006.
FEEDING TO ENHANCE LIVESTOCK PRODUCTIVITY
Beef cow reproductive management
Energy balance changes in cows and matching calving seasons with forage availability TIES Seminar Kotaro Baba.
Basics to Small Farm Beef Cow Nutrition Adam Hady Agriculture Agent Richland County UWEX Basics to Beef Cow Nutrition.
1 Supplementation of Low Quality Forages Norman Suverly WSU Okanogan County Extension Educator.
Animal Nutrition K.Launchbaugh USDA-ARS BLM Photo K.Launchbaugh.
CRITICAL POINTS IN THE FEEDING OF HIGH YIELDING DAIRY COWS Gergácz, Z., †Báder, E., Szűcs, E. University of West Hungary, Faculty of Agricultural and Food.
Reproductive Management of Dairy Cows with Particular Reference to Organic Systems Michael G Diskin & Frank Kelly Animal Production Research Centre,
Extension Animal Scientist
USING A TEST HAY FOR FEEDING LIVESTOCK Shelby J. Filley Regional Livestock & Forage Specialist Proper nutrition at a lower cost.
Role of nutrition and metabolism on fertility in dairy cows
Rate and Duration of Seed Component Accumulation in Water Stressed Soybeans José L. Rotundo & Mark Westgate Iowa State University, 1301 Agronomy Hall,
STAT231: EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN “EFFECTS OF STOCKING DENSITY AND SOURCE OF FORAGE FIBER ON SHORT-TERM RESPONSES IN RUMINAL FERMENTATION, BEHAVIOR, AND LACTATIONAL.
Abstract: This study was conducted to determine the effects of reducing rumen degradable protein (RDP) with constant rumen undegradable protein in mid-lactation.
Improving Beef Cattle Reproductive Rates Through Management Part 1 Dr. Tom R. Troxel Professor and Associate Department Head – Animal Science.
Forage Quality I: Nutritional Quality Lawton Stewart SE Hay Convention March 29, 2011.
Rural Economy Research Centre AESI Student Day 05/11/2009 Examining the relationship between production costs and managerial ability P. Smyth 1, 2, L.
Use of Exogenous Fibrolytic Enzymes and Bluegrass Seed Straw in Wintering Beef Cow Feeding Regimes J.I. Szasz†, C.W. Hunt†, K.A. Johnson‡, J.J. Michal‡,
INFLUENCE OF SYNCHRONIZED OVULATION AND PRE- SYNCHRONIZATION ON PREGNANCY RATES USED TIMED AI IN LACTATING DAIRY COWS G. Gabor and F. Toth.
Effects of Endophyte-Infected Fescue on Animal Performance Master Grazer Educational Program.
SUCKLING CONTROL IN PRIMIPAROUS BEEF COWS UNDER RANGE CONDITIONS G. Quintans, C. Jiménez de Aréchaga and A.I. Vázquez National Institute of Agricultural.
How to Feed Cows on Pasture Well, It Depends! Traditional operator trying to save on feed cost –Probably less than 10# pasture for short periods –Assuming.
Segregating herds based on animal class and nutritional need Lawton Stewart Grazing School September 22, 2011.
The Reproductive Cycle
Beef Extension Specialist
Summer Supplementation: Plant, Animal and Environmental Response ─ A Nebraska Perspective Terry Klopfenstein, Will Griffin, Kelsey Rolfe Animal Science,
Pasture-Based Nutritional Considerations for Beef Cattle Lawton Stewart Grazing School May 6, 2010.
ASPP-300 Forage Planning Software J. A. Jennings and M. S. Gadberry University of Arkansas.
Supplementing Feed to Grazing Cattle Dallas Mount Platte County Extension Educator.
Phosphorus Management for Sustainable Dairy Production International Conference: Steps to Sustainable Livestock John Bailey Sustainable Agri-Food Sciences.
Dairy Cattle Production (95314)
3. Milk production and composition
Productivity Per Animal vs. Per Acre
A. R. Alizadeh1 , M. Pakfar1, K. Karkoodi1, and H. Sadri2
Fig. 1 Experimental design
Alternative supplementation strategies for replacement beef heifers grazing dry California foothills annual range during summer. R. B. Monteiro1,2, G.
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences
F. Y. Obese, G. B. Martin, M. A. Blackberry, J. K. Damptey and C. M
Body Condition Scoring Beef Cows
Legendre H.1, Goby J.P.², Le Stum J.2 Martin G.3, Gidenne T.1
SHORT- AND LONG-TERM IMPACTS OF HEAT STRESS
Interactions between the phosphorus content of animal manures
Animal Production Research Institute,
XXVI WORLD BUIATRICS CONGRESS Santiago Chile – November 2010
Dairy vs. Beef Management
Joyce,. J. R. ¹, Jeffries, B. H. ², Stewart, Jr. R. L. ³, Segers, J. R
How to Feed the Cow Herd When There Is No Feed
Rangeland Animal Demand
Body Condition Scoring of Beef Cattle, Sheep and Goats
parameters and immune cells of their calves
Literature Review ANSC 312 Grant Edwards.
Body Condition Scoring Beef Cattle
Grazing Methods and Their Role in Pasture Management
Calculating Forage Requirements and Yield
Body Condition Scoring Beef Cows. Body condition score is an indicator of stored energy reserves Fat tissue Protein tissue (muscle and organs)
Body Condition Score in Dairy Cattle
Developing Heifers Earl H. Ward.
Herbivore Intake REM Integrated Rangeland Management
Evaluation of economics of cool-season annuals or reduced labor supplementation systems for wintering cow-calf pairs Ken Kelley, Max Runge, Jessica Kelton,
Body Condition Score and Breeding Back
Managing Stockpiled Tall Fescue to Extend the Grazing Season
Presentation transcript:

Results and Discussion Effect of Herbage Allowance on Forage Mass, Insulin and IGF-1 Concentrations during the Gestation and Lactation of Primiparous Beef Cows Grazing Campos Martín Claramunt1 and Pablo Soca2 517 Centro universitario de la Regional Este 1 and Facultad de Agronomía 2, Universidad de la República, Uruguay. martinclaramunt@gmail.com Increase the herbage allowance (HA) from 2.5 to 4 increased the reproductive response, calf weight at weaning and biological efficiency of primiparous beef cows grazing Campos grasslands. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of 2 HA on forage mass, insulin and IGF-1 concentrations during gestation-lactation of primiparous beef cows as signals of forage intake, energy balance and metabolic memory. A sample of 32 (n = 16 per treatment) spring calving primiparous Hereford beef cows selected from 80 cows belonging to HA experiment was selected. Two (High vs Low) HA treatments (forage Dry Matter/kg liveweight) fluctuated throughout the seasons: autumn (middle gestation) 5 and 3, winter (late gestation) 3 and 3, spring (early lactation) and summer (late lactation) 4 and 2 kg DM/kg liveweight for high and low HA, respectively. Forage mass was greater in High than Low HA (P = 0.04) and was not affected by HA x days post partum (DPP). Insulin was not affected by HA and this suggests low differences in forage energy intake. Insulin concentrations decreased at 20 DPP (early spring) and increased at the end of summer (180 DPP) associated with greater forage mass and forage energy intake. IGF-1 was greater (P<0.05) in High than Low HA at -90 DPP but no other differences were identified. IGF-1 nadir occurred later in High than Low HA; then, both increased to 50 DPP and remained constant until 185 DPP. Herbage allowance improved IGF-1 levels during autumn despite the reduced differences in forage mass and probably in energy intake. Nutritional plane during autumn could be a lasting metabolic signal associated with greater reproductive response and biological efficiency of primiparous beef cows grazing Campos grasslands Introduction Material and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusion References Click Headings to View More Information

Introduction Beef cows primarily graze Campos grassland at high stocking rates Low productive and reproductive response (Weaning rate 64% and Calf BW at weaning 140 kg) . Even lower records in primiparous cows Increase the Herbage allowance (HA) from 2.5 to 4 kg of forage dry matter / kg bodyweight in multiparous and primiparous beef cows grazing Campos grasslands increased (Do Carmo et al. 2016): reproductive response calf weight at weaning biological efficiency An increase in HA could increase insulin and IGF-1 indicating an improvement in energy intake and energy balance, respectively. Insulin and IGF-1 are associated with a shorter anoestrus postpartum and pregnancy rates, and could explain the effect of HA on reproductive response and efficiency (Hess et al. 2005) Campos We hipothesize that an increase in HA increases the concentration of insulin and IGF-1 of primiparous beef cows

Material and Methods 32 (8 per treatment*block) spring calving cows were selected from 80 cows belonging to a completely randomized block design experiment of two blocks (spatial replica) and two HA from -150 (autumn) to 185 (summer) days postpartum (DPP) (Claramunt et al. 2017 Click here to view more information). Treatments (ratio between forage mass and stocking rate; Aiken 2016) fluctuated throughout seasons: autumn 5 and 3, winter 3 and 3, spring and summer 4 and 2 kg forage DM/kg liveweight for high and low HA, respectively (Fig. 1). Put-and-take was employed to adjust HA and forage mass was measured seasonally via the comparative yield method. Blood samples were collected –90 (autumn end), -50, -20 (winter), 20, 50 (spring), 85 and 185 DPP (summer) (Fig.1). Insulin and IGF-1 were determined by IRMA and RIA with comercial kits Forage mass, Insulin and IGF-I were analyzed using mixed models. Means were compared using Tukey. Fig. 1. Treatments, management and blood samples design

Results and Discussion HA P = 0.04 DPP P <.0001 HAxDPP P = 0.35 HA P = 0.31 DPP <.0001 HAxDPP P = 0.21 HA P = 0.01 DPP <.0001 HAxDPP P = 0.0007 Figures. Forage mass, Insulin and IGF-1 concentrations for High and Low Herbage allowance. Values are l.s.m. ± s.e. Forage mass was greater in High than Low HA. Summer forage mass was greater than autumn, winter and spring. Insulin was not affected by HA and this suggests low differences in forage energy intake. Insulin concentrations decreased at 20 DPP (early spring) and increased at the end of summer (180 DPP) associated with greater forage mass and forage energy intake (Da Trindade et al. 2016). IGF-1 was greater (P<0.05) in High than Low HA at -90 DPP but no other differences were identified. IGF-1 nadir occurred later in High than Low HA; then, both increased to 50 DPP and remained constant until 185 DPP. The high energy requirement during final gestation/winter (-90 to 0 DPP) and lactation (spring-summer) probably explained that High HA improved IGF-1 only during autumn. This improvement in IGF-1 occurred despite the reduced differences in forage mass and insulin between HA.

Conclusion Herbage allowance improved IGF-1 levels during autumn despite the reduced differences in forage mass and probably in energy intake. Autumn is a key season to improve the nutritional plane of the cow in this ecosystem. Prepartum IGF-1 levels could be a lasting metabolic signal associated with greater reproductive response and biological efficiency of primiparous beef cows grazing Campos grasslands

References Aiken GE (2016) Invited review: grazing management options in meeting objectives of grazing experiments. The Professional Animal Scientist 32, 1–9. doi:10.15232/pas.2015-01406 Claramunt, M., Fernández-Foren, A., & Soca, P. Effect of herbage allowance on productive and reproductive responses of primiparous beef cows grazing on Campos grassland. Animal Production Science. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16601. Da Trindade, J. K., Neves, F. P., Pinto, C. E., Bremm, C., Mezzalira, J. C., Nadin, L. B., ... & Carvalho, P. C. (2016). Daily forage intake by cattle on natural grassland: response to forage allowance and sward structure. Rangeland ecology & management, 69(1), 59-67. Do Carmo, M. Claramunt, M. Carriquiry, Soca P (2016) Animal energetics in extensive grazing systems: rationality and results of research models to improve energy efficiency of beef cow-calf grazing Campos systems. Journal of Animal Science 94(S6):84–92 Hess, B. W., Lake, S. L., Scholljegerdes, E. J., Weston, T. R., Nayigihugu, V., Molle, J. D. C., & Moss, G. E. (2005). Nutritional controls of beef cow reproduction. Journal of Animal Science, 83(13_suppl), E90-E106.