2014-2015 PoHi TLE information.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alliance College-Ready Public Schools
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
Osceola School District’s Classroom Instructor Evaluation The Ins and Outs of Our Classroom Instructor Evaluation
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Special Education and Teacher Evaluations Janelle Smith Dr. Peter Verona O Director of Special Services O Byron CUSD #226 O O Byron.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Parkview Elementary Audit findings and responses Dates of Visit: November 4, 5, 6, 2014.
Alaska Educator Evaluation Overview Yukon Koyukuk School District.
Teacher Evaluation Update
Peninsula School District
Everyone has been trained on the development of the SIP First draft of the SIP should be entered on the state website,
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
Pause for Discussion Multiple pauses are included for discussion opportunities.
TCRP TEACHER ADVISORY PANEL MEETING December 2011 Derrick Chau, VP Instruction Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.
Clinical Teaching/Student Teaching
ADEPT Framework
Whiteboard Zoom Out Surveying Year One of the Oklahoma Value-Added Model.
Alicia Currin-Moore Executive Director, TLE Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Verona Public Schools DEAC Meeting Agenda: PARCC vs Marzano Configuration Discussion Marzano Moving Forward: Administrator/Supervisor/Teacher.
Educator Effectiveness Update September Training Outcomes Review the WPSD Evaluation System – Overall Focus – New & Modified Components – System.
Toolkit #3: Effectively Teaching and Leading Implementation of the Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including the Common Core.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
1 INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITATOR ORIENTATION August 15, 2011.
MANAGING TEACHER EVALUATIONS EFFICIENTLY TO MAKE INFORMED DECISIONS
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information.  The primary evaluator will assign the final rating  The primary evaluator will take the lead on any Performance.
MRVED Common Professional Development Proposal Montevideo Public Schools Flexible Learning Year Application:
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
TLE The Basics…. Who is here today? Corner 1- New to OKCPS Corner 2- New to Teaching Corner 3- New to Oklahoma Corner 4- New to the U. S.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
One Team. One Vision. Unlimited Success Gerald Oehler Old Court Middle School
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
New Teacher Induction.
Evaluation 4.0 Or at least a 3.75.
Sample evidences for Teacher Evaluation Robyn White
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Compass Information System (CIS)
Teacher Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation Process
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved?
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Evaluation Updates.
Alabama Teacher Mentoring Program
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Leon LEADS Leon Evaluation And Development System
DEAC MEETING AGENDA: AchieveNJ Updates Formal Observations
Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
TEACHNJ Act Tenure Law & Value Added Teacher Evaluation
Evaluation Information
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
Information July 15, 2015.
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

2014-2015 PoHi TLE information

Tle tIMELINE

Full Implementation of TLE – 2015-2016

Qualitative Data

Observations (50% of pie) Domains 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Marzano learning maps are to be used for observation this year. August 18, 2014 - May 1, 2015 Observations may begin now and must be completed to count toward the Final Evaluation by May 1.

Observation & post-conference timeline Category 1 Teachers – worked in district less than three years 1 Conference Prior to each date - November 15, February 10, and May 1 (3 conferences) Category 2 Teachers – worked in district more than three years 2 Conferences Prior to May 1

Domain Weights Domain 1: 68.33% - 41 Elements

Category I Category II At least 55% at Level 4 Superior (5) Highly Effective (4) Effective (3) Needs Improvement (2) Ineffective (1) At least 55% at Level 4 At least 55% at Level 3 or higher Less than 75% at Level 1 or lower 75% or more at Level 1 or lower and more than 0% at Level 3 or Higher 75% or more at Level 1 or lower and 0% at Level 3 or higher Category II Superior (5) Highly Effective (4) Effective (3) Needs Improvement (2) Ineffective (1) At least 65% at Level 4 At least 65% at Level 3 or Higher Less than 65% at Level 1 or lower 65% or more at Level 1 or lower and more than 0% at Level 3 or Higher 65% or more at Level 1 or lower and 0% at Level 3 or higher

New Piece of the instructional improvement process to be added SY14-15 One formal observation must include a pre and post/reflective conference. The post/reflective conference will serve as one required post conference. Observation of lesson will be at least 20 consecutive minutes. Documents to support this process will be provided Pre-planning form A (completed and discussed with evaluating principal before observation) Lesson plan (teacher may choose the PoHi lesson plan or the Learning Sciences “intentional thinking map”completed and turned in to evaluating principal with pre-planning form) Post/Reflective Conference form A (completed with evaluating principal in the post/reflective-conference, after observation of planned lesson)

Pre-Planning Conference Purpose: To discuss the lesson to be observed. Tips: Planning conference should be scheduled Should bring completed pre-planning form and lesson plan Both the observer and teacher should have a clear understanding of the planned lesson to be observed Will fulfill data points for Domain 2 Schedule observation of lesson

Post/Reflection Conference Purpose: To discuss observed lesson, related documents and student work/data from the lesson to plan for future practice. Tips: This conference will fulfill data points in Domain 3 Reflection Conference should be completed as soon after the observation as possible, in the teacher and administrator’s schedules Teacher/Observer will discuss the next steps as a result of the planning/reflective process Responses and questions can be prepared ahead of time, based on the emailed observation and feedback provided.

Forms Domain 1 learning map changes are geared to promoting college and career readiness Learning map for Domains 2, 3, 4 Preview pre-conference form, 2 options for lesson plan, and post/reflective conference form.

Quantitative Data

Other Academic Measures (15% of Pie) Other Academic Measures are to be completed by the end of the first quarter, which is October 15, 2014. The OAM part A must be completed and turned in to evaluating principal, with a copy of the pre-test and results of pre-test. See your evaluating principal or D. Hawkins for additional information regarding OAMs.

Support for OAMS You will find various examples of OAMs on the OSDE website. Go to osde.gov, Click on Educators, Scroll down to Teacher Evaluation, Click on Teacher and Leader Effectiveness (TLE), Click on OAM Sample Worksheet Resources. The examples include OAMs such as alternative education, nurses, librarians, SPED (17 examples), Counselors, Art/Music Expression, Elementary Music, Instrumental/Vocal Music, and Yearbook.

Roster Verification 2014–2015 Information MUST be as accurate as possible because student academic growth information is scheduled to be compiled for the 2015-2016 teacher evaluation.

Support for TLE We will keep you updated with the latest information and will provide technical support for all components of TLE.

Summary Domains 2, 3, 4 will be added to Domain 1 for observations this year For one observation you will have a pre-conference and post/reflective conference with your evaluating principal, with forms and a lesson plan completed, to achieve data points of Domains 2 and 3, as well as state law Domain 4 includes parent contact and professionalism. The documentation of parent contact each nine weeks and PLC participation will achieve data points in this domain. OAMs and pre-tests for OAMS completed and due to evaluating principals in the first nine weeks of school Keep track of students in/out of your class for accurate Roster Verification