Diversity: from Stereotype to Discrimination

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Having an Open Mind: The Impact of Openness to Experience on Interracial Attitudes and Impression Formation Francis J. Flynn Journal of Personality and.
Advertisements

Prejudice.
Organizational Behavior 15th Ed
Introduction to IELTS Exam
Prejudice. 2 What is the difference between: Race? Ethnicity? Minority Group?
Qualitative Argues that meaning is situated in a particular perspective or context. Different people have different perspectives and contexts. There are.
Sociological Research Methods. The Research Process Sociologists answer questions about society through empirical research (observation and experiments)
Reliability of one cognitive process
Statistical Bias in Research Studies & Polls AQR.
Perception The process of becoming aware of objects and events from the senses. Something effects your senses You interpret and explain the sensation to.
Week 2: Interviews. Definition and Types  What is an interview? Conversation with a purpose  Types of interviews 1. Unstructured 2. Structured 3. Focus.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education Organizational Behavior 15th Global Edition Diversity in Organizations 2-1 Robbins and Judge Chapter 2.
Module 64 Kimmy, Katie, Krystal pd2. Target: Describe how and why the genders differ in mental ability scores Question What two of the five senses do.
Scope of Systems Requirements: Definition o f Requirements Not to define the full system Not to define the full system Describe or define the essential.
The Influence of Locational Context on Perceptions of Black Women
Interpersonal Skills Practicum in LPSCS.
Stereotypes- are they outdating attitudes in modern society?
Chapter Six What Makes a Teacher Effective?
“Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll understand.”
“Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll understand.”
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning
Interactive Topic Test
AS level Psychology The Core Studies The developmental approach
Handout 3: Identify development needs
Requirements Elicitation – 1
Attitudes, and Job Satisfaction
Edy van Renselaar 30 January 2018
CHAPTER 2: PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH METHODS AND STATISTICS
A Class Divided… …Follow up Discussion.
SPARKS January 18, 2013 Please make sure you get a popsicle stick from Ms. McQuade. If you have a red popsicle stick, please sit in the front two rows.
Module 02 Research Strategies.
Chapter Three Research Design.
Organizational Behavior 15th Ed
Diversity.
Attitudes, and Job Satisfaction
The social approach Attitudes.
Social Psychology Sharon Evans.
How did we come to know … Different sources of knowledge: Experience
Research Methods Week 4 Research Design.
Correlational Studies
The social approach Prejudice Social Approach.
Define workplace diversity and explain why managing it is so important
How important is personal space?
Theoretical Perspectives
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
by Carl O. Word, Mark P. Zanna, and Joel Cooper
Handout 3: Identify development needs
Infusing Diversity Into University of York, United Kingdom
Defining and explaining psychological abnormality
Introduction to gender stereotypes
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
Investigating associations between two variables
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
Practical Issues- BUT FOR WHICH METHOD?
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
Interview Preparation Workshop
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
The social approach Attitudes.
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
Scientific Method Basic procedures
DISCRIMINATION.
Reminder for next week CUELT Conference.
Statistical Bias in Research Studies & Polls
Assessment Chapter 3.
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
People watched Love Island because deep down they love happy endings
Presentation transcript:

Diversity: from Stereotype to Discrimination Self-fullfilling Prophecies

Stereotypes come true A study by Word, Zanna & Cooper 1974 This study examined how stereotypes about dark- skinned people can become true. It was documented in a range of earlier studies that “white” Americans held a negative perception “black” Americans. Within the context of a job interview it was investigated whether this negative perception would cause white interviewers to behave differently towards black candidates than they did towards white candidates. These different behaviours would then explain why black candidates would perform objectively less well in such interview situations.

The approach The questions asked by the investigation were tested by two studies: In Study 1 white test persons were informed that they should interview four candidates for a job. 45 minutes were available for all the interviews. For the evaluation one interview with a white and one with a black candidate were used. The candidates were not informed of the hypothesis being investigated. The length of the interview, speech errors and non-verbal behaviour were recorded as measurable components. In Study 2 only white candidates were interviewed (by white interviewers). The interview behaviour towards the candidates was varied. Some of the participants were interviewed like black candidates, whilst others were interviewed like the white candidates in Study 1. The most important dependent variable was the performance of the candidates, which was assessed by independent evaluators.

Result Study 1 revealed that the white interviewers treated the black and white candidates differently. The interviewer sat closer to the white interviewee and allowed more time for the conversation, and in addition made fewer speech errors. (white) (black) Candidates Fig. 7.1: Study 1: average non-verbal behaviour towards black and white candidates

Result Study 2: The candidates who were interviewed like the black ones in Study 1 (the interviewer sat further away, allowed less time and made more speech errors) displayed less adequate behaviour than the candidates who were interviewed like the white ones in Study 1. (black) (white) Treated like __________ candidate in Study 1 Fig. 7.2: Study 2: average performance of the candidates, who were interviewed like a black or like a white candidate

Summary The results of both studies conformed to the hypothesis!! Self-fulfilling prophecies can cause black people to perform worse that white people. The differing performances, that were comprehensively documented, can be seen as a result of the interviewers behaving differently towards the black and towards the white candidates. Alone the expectations that people have about certain characteristics of an object of perception, can lead to the person behaving in such a way that the object of perception actually exhibits the assumed characteristics. Stereotypes become consolidated through self-fulfilling prophecies and “seemingly” confirmed.

Exercise Observe your own behaviour during a conversation with: a person of the opposite sex with a homosexual person, if possible a person who has a physical disability a person from a different ethnic background to yours Do you behave differently? Are you more agitated, quieter, more excited, calmer? Do you speak differently (louder, slower, more broken)? How close do you get to the particular person? Do you listen to the person seriously? To whom are you more friendly, courteous? To whom are you more matter-of-fact, reserved? Compare each conversation to one with a person of your own gender or other group you belong to!