Purposes of the Effort Utah Code # 63C Maximizing job creation Ensuring a high quality of life for residents in and surrounding the project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Economic Development Strategy Salt Lake City Corporation October 2008.
Advertisements

Jackson Community Comprehensive Plan – Big Picture Planning for Natural Resources Keeping it Green: Conserving Your Future Through Land Use Planning Presented.
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Community Development Department ZONING ORDINANCE AND DESIGN UPDATE (ZODU) Sustainable Land Use, Culturally Influenced.
From – A Report of the Connecticut Regional Institute for the 21 st Century by Michael Gallis & Associates, 1999 (known as the “Gallis Report”) Knowledge.
New York State Economic Development. “The best place in the world to live, work, raise a family and grow a business”
DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable March 30, 2012.
+ Proposed Lockwood Targeted Economic Development District 2015 Yellowstone County.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
High Growth Counties: Opportunities for Pinal County Pinal County Comprehensive Plan Curt Dunham AICP Partners for Strategic Action, Inc. Comprehensive.
Delaware Community Investment Fund Committee of 100 Economic Roundtable June 26, 2015.
1. 2 VIA Long Range Plan  Vision for High-Capacity Transit across VIA service area by 2035  From extensive public and stakeholder input  Prioritization.
1 Welcome! West Valley-Taylorsville Transit Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement Public Open House/Hearing July 19, 2006.
Seattle Station Area Planning Milestones & Events Transit-Oriented Development Program Information & Schedule Station Area Atlas Station Area Recommendations.
REGIONAL FORUM FOR BEVERLY, DANVERS AND SALEM DECEMBER 8, 2010 North Shore Regional Strategic Planning Project.
Southern Nevada Strong Consortium Committee Meeting April 18, 2013.
Mid-Shore CEDS Committee Meeting January 6, 2010.
© Jerusalem Policy Forum Towards Economic Development in East Jerusalem Now A Strategic Approach by the Jerusalem Policy Forum.
Collaboration Collaboration Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Housing choices and opportunities Housing choices and.
8th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable Arlington, VA March 30, 2012 PlanMaryland Maryland Department of Planning.
Perspectives from members of the Real Estate and Building Industry.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
LOCAL BUFFER SUPPORT PROGRAM 1 May 2014 MAV. Liveability, growth and waste As Melbourne continues to grow, we need secure the right mix of resource recovery.
UW Cooperative Extension Land Use Education Programs Comprehensive Planning Overview March 15th Osceola WI Polk County UWEX-Cooperative Extension.
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
Village of Ossining Vision Presentation Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. May 11 th, 2005.
Regional Visioning Land Use and Transportation for Four Million New Residents A Presentation to the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council February.
Headwaters Communities in Action Building A Better Quality of Life Together.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
How Would a Transportation – Land Use Grant Program Work in the Washington Region? Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Technical Committee.
Land Use and Economic Development in Rural Areas Supplemental Module.
Vision North Texas East & Southeast Fort Worth Economic Development Summit September 17, 2010.
On the Right Track Meeting Greater Boston’s Transit and Land Use Challenges May 17, 2006.
Why things (supposedly) don’t happen in Hampton Roads Few coordinating bodies. Few coordinating bodies. Dillon Rule. Dillon Rule. 16 Independent cities.
Why Plan? Unprecedented pressure for growth and change To identify development and preservation areas over next 20 years To recommend types of land uses.
Community Redevelopment for Eastside Report on Advisory Committee Input and Request for Board Direction June 26, 2012.
Global Solution for Local Problems: Atlanta Aerotropolis 2014 AMPO Conference October 23, 2014 Nancey Green Leigh, PhD, FAICP Professor and Associate Dean.
Neighborhood Planning Process Lacoochee/Trilby Neighborhoods.
Western Sydney update The Future of the Western Sydney Economy Keynote Address: The Honourable Anthony Albanese, the Minister for Transport and Infrastructure.
City Council – Project Update September 14, 2015.
Council Grove Zoning & Planning Committee Final Plan Presentation March 9, 2016.
ULI Symposium: Central City Commercial Development 1988.
Economic Drivers : Government, construction, and related finance sectors hardest hit by global recession Persistently high unemployment and weak recovery.
Informational meeting with Conner Center Businesses November 26, 2007.
ANN ARBOR REGION SUCCESS STRATEGY Board of County Commissioners Working Session Nov 6, 2008  Present vision and strategy  Discuss BOC’s continued leadership.
Local buffer support Program
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
ARCH – 4601 Feasibility Study Presentation
Salt Lake County 2050 Population: 1.5M People? Utah County 2050 Population: 1.3M People? In 2050, there could be 1.5 million people in Salt Lake County.
Transforming Communities in the 21st Century
Salt Lake County 2050 Population: 1.5M People? Utah County 2050 Population: 1.3M People? In 2050, there could be 1.5 million people in Salt Lake County.
Salt Lake County 2050 Population: 1.5M People? Utah County 2050 Population: 1.3M People? In 2050, there could be 1.5 million people in Salt Lake County.
Salt Lake County 2050 Population: 1.5M People? Utah County 2050 Population: 1.3M People? In 2050, there could be 1.5 million people in Salt Lake County.
An Inland Port in Salt Lake County
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
The Rise of Utah County.
Envision Chaffee County Summary
Introduction This presentation will provide an overview of the transit situation in Middle Tennessee and what organizations like the Transit Alliance of.
Innovation Corridors Innovation Café
Introduction This presentation will provide an overview of the transit situation in Middle Tennessee and what organizations like the Transit Alliance of.
Goal #3: Create Great New Places Strategy A: Update Strategic and Policy Documents to Accommodate New Growth through Compact and Contiguous Development.
Local buffer support Program
Transforming Communities in the 21st Century
Good afternoon. Thank you for attending the 2013 Arizona Transit Association conference. I hope that you found the sessions valuable and have enjoyed your.
Transforming Communities in the 21st Century
Transforming Communities in the 21st Century
Genesys Health System Campus & Community Revitalization
FRLP Proposed Boundary Line Adjustment: Confluence Virginia
New Hanover Comprehensive Plan
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Bannock County Comprehensive Plan
Presentation transcript:

Purposes of the Effort Utah Code # 63C-17-104 Maximizing job creation Ensuring a high quality of life for residents in and surrounding the project area Strategic residential and commercial growth Preservation of natural lands and expansion of recreational opportunities Provision of a variety of community and housing types that match workforce needs Planning for future transportation infrastructure and other investments to enhance mobility and protect the environment

Three Key Components of Success Infrastructure Land use Infrastructure foundation Finance plan Green infrastructure & environment Placemaking Culture Look and feel Convenience Lifestyle choices Recreation Education Industry Ecosystem Building the cluster Workforce Tuning the economic engine Capital Achieving the area’s potential is a three-legged stool. Infrastructure and land use are critical to make the area work. Placemaking is essential to bring employees. This needs to be a place where people want to live and work. And we need to make sure the industry cluster succeeds to bring business.

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Fall 2016-Spring 2017 Stakeholder organization Public engagement Research: markets, demographics, best practices Conceptual vision/goals Phase 2 Spring-Fall/Winter 2017 Scenario development and modeling Public and stakeholder input on scenarios Phase 3 Winter 2017-2018 Funding strategy Vision development Implementation underway Final Report As you can see on this graphic, we’ve proposed a first phase that includes studying existing conditions, trends, and best practices, and working with the stakeholders and public to understand the conceptual vision and goals for the area. This phase could run roughly through the spring of 2017, with an interim report in 2016. In the second phase, we work with the stakeholders and public to put more detail to the vision by creating and analyzing scenarios across a variety of topics. The stakeholders and public help create the scenarios, and their reaction to the scenarios leads to a more detailed vision, as well as implementation tools. This phase could run roughly through the fall of 2017. The third phase involves preparing an implementation plan, including financing tools and recommendations. If desired, it may be possible to complete the final vision and implementation plan at the end of 2017. DELIVERABLES: Conceptual vision/goals Analysis of best practices, markets, etc. DELIVERABLES: Well-analyzed scenarios and findings Initial financing concepts DELIVERABLES: Vision and implementation plan Implementation underway

Salt Lake County 2050 Population: 1.5M People? Utah County 2050 Population: 1.3M People? In 2050, there could be 1.5 million people in Salt Lake County and 1.3 million in Utah County. This could be the worst bottleneck in the West or the best location to work, live, and grow a business. Source: RCLCO

Project Area “The area surrounding the border between Salt Lake County and Utah County, commonly referred to as the Point of the Mountain.”

Nowhere else has this much land dead center in the middle of a major metro region growing this rapidly in between high-quality universities and surrounded by a growing workforce We worked with San Diego, and they couldn’t find a place to grow new industry centers We identified this area several years ago as critical to the future and as key to implementation of the statewide Your Utah, Your Future vision—the 20,000 acre number came from us Excellent access (2 freeways, commuter rail, future light rail) Economic growth engine: the top place to grow a new business Educated young, growing workforce Rapidly growing Great amenities If we get it right, this can become the economic engine that powers Utah for the next century, a place we can be proud of But if we get it wrong, this area can grind to a halt—literally

Nowhere else has this much land dead center in the middle of a major metro region growing this rapidly in between high-quality universities and surrounded by a growing workforce We worked with San Diego, and they couldn’t find a place to grow new industry centers We identified this area several years ago as critical to the future and as key to implementation of the statewide Your Utah, Your Future vision—the 20,000 acre number came from us Excellent access (2 freeways, commuter rail, future light rail) Economic growth engine: the top place to grow a new business Educated young, growing workforce Rapidly growing Great amenities If we get it right, this can become the economic engine that powers Utah for the next century, a place we can be proud of But if we get it wrong, this area can grind to a halt—literally

Nowhere else has this much land dead center in the middle of a major metro region growing this rapidly in between high-quality universities and surrounded by a growing workforce We worked with San Diego, and they couldn’t find a place to grow new industry centers We identified this area several years ago as critical to the future and as key to implementation of the statewide Your Utah, Your Future vision—the 20,000 acre number came from us Excellent access (2 freeways, commuter rail, future light rail) Economic growth engine: the top place to grow a new business Educated young, growing workforce Rapidly growing Great amenities If we get it right, this can become the economic engine that powers Utah for the next century, a place we can be proud of But if we get it wrong, this area can grind to a halt—literally

Geographic constraints Jordan River Terrain slope Environmentally sensitive areas (wetlands, etc.) Hazard-prone areas Federal Lands NEW MAP GRAPHIC In 2050, there could be 1.5 million people in Salt Lake County and 1.3 million in Utah County. This could be the worst bottleneck in the West or the best location to work, live, and grow a business.

Many Jurisdictions Bluffdale South Jordan Riverton Herriman Draper Lehi Saratoga Springs Sandy Salt Lake County Utah County State This is a complex area with many local government jurisdictions. I can’t overemphasize the role of the cities. They control land use and development within their boundaries, and a “one size fits all” vision won’t work. Each city will choose its own future, although infrastructure must connect and the cities must work together. A vision cannot be successful unless these jurisdictions believe in the vision.

A Myriad of Landowners Rosecrest Communities Draper City [4,423 acres] Daybreak [4,354] LDS Church [3,833] Micron [1,724] Geneva Rock [1,026] Lehi City [778] Holbrook Farms/Ivory [776] Shirley Butterfield [643] DAI Investments [632] Staker Parson [630] Laguna Investments Company [629] Prison Site [592] Rosecrest Communities Traverse/Truimph/Forge Wasatch Properties Western States Ventures Perry & Associates DR Horton IM Flash The Gardner Company Camp Williams NSA Ebay Young Living DJ Investment Group Thanksgiving Point Boyer Company There are also many large landowners, including quite a few who own parcels larger than the prison site. These landowners will play a key role in deciding what happens, and their full participation is critical. Many have owned the land for decades waiting for this day to come. They are also Utahns who want to see this area succeed. These are some of the long-term Utah developer families: the Gardners, the Plumbs, the Ivories, the Perrys, the Clydes.

Big Ideas High-tech university, Stanford-like, national scale/lab, National Research System 38 Greenspace 34 Innovative Transportation--electric vehicles/charging stations, self-driving vehicles, etc. 26 Mixed-use developments 18 Public transportation 17 Recreation hubs for paragliding, skiing, mountain biking, Jordan River 14 Live/work/play hubs 13 Tax revenue source for open space 12 Preserve East-West corridors 11 Non-traditional zoning, moving away from euclidean zoning Regional placemaking and success, quality of life, jobs 10 Entertainment & Amenities 9 Double-track and electrify FrontRunner 8 Tax Policy, state/local tax system 7 Compatible borders between counties/jurisdictions 5 Active transportation/connectivity Regional transportation - Change UTA Rules Second Downtown 4 Gondola/tram connection to resorts 3 Transit-oriented development 2 Recognize the 'Utah model' Revitalize Utah Lake Collaborative education environment Globally-competitive environment 1 Education for future workforce, workforce development center Shuttles Move Camp Williams New political entity Land aggregation

Biggest Challenges Transportation -- congestion 46 Funding (transportation) 29 Land use coordination between markets, developers, cities, public 21 Air quality 19 Protecting the feel of the area, preserving open space Water supply & distribution 15 Local jurisdiction coordination Housing affordability 13 Recreational opportunities 10 Ensure private sector success 8 Not overshooting the market 6 East-west transportation 5 Public buy-in, credibility 4 Overregulation of land use policy 3 Conflicting interests 2 Identity & placemaking 1 Low connectivity NIMBYism Short Timeline Difficulty bringing infrastructure to region Attracting workers/younger generations to move to the region

Discussion

1. Choose one word to describe this vision. 2 1. Choose one word to describe this vision. 2. What challenges do you foresee in your industry with this vision? 3. What are the obstacles needed to be overcome? Challenges

1. What long term goals does your group have. 2 1. What long term goals does your group have? 2. How would this development benefit your group? 3. What do you need from others? Opportunities

1. What does successful engagement throughout this process look like for you? 2. What is the best way for you/your group to provide input? Engagement

We Need Your Input! Pointofthemountainfuture.org