ARC Rejoinder Session Professor Doug McEachern Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research and Innovation) 4 July 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research Administrators Seminar NCGP update Dr Laura Dan Chief Program Officer 25 November 2013.
Advertisements

DECRA 2015 Workshop Jean Martin Room, Beryl Rawson 5 February 2014 CASS Research Office.
CRICOS #00212K 1 University of Canberra ARC Tips and Tricks Professor Andrew Cheetham PVC – Research & Information Management University of Canberra Professor.
Office for Research Rejoinder Workshop Responding to Assessor Feedback Nicky Church: Manager, Research Grants Rebecca Marshallsay: Research Grants Officer.
THE FINAL MAJOR PROJECT. ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 1. Understand the requirements of an art and design project 1.1 Analyse the requirements and parameters of.
Chapter – 4 Tax Disputes Chapter outcomes: 1.Filing of Objection 2.Procedures for consideration of the objection and decision 3.Postponement of payment.
11 LB160 – Book 3 Producing Influential Documents 1 Copyright Material © Arab Open University, Lebanon Branch LB160_Book 3_Spring 2010_A joint effort between.
Queen’s Teaching Awards QUB Teaching Awards Aims of the Briefing Session To raise awareness of the Queen’s Teaching Awards Scheme To encourage colleagues.
Is survival selfish? Argument by lane wallace
SIMBA & SIMBA ADVOCATES2 PETITION NO. 170 OF 2016 ARBS Vs. THE AG & OTHERS. A PRESENTATION TO ARBS ON 14 th JULY, 2016.
Common Assessment 2.
Good teaching for diverse learners
Preparing for your visa application
2012 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
Digital Citizenship focus on Digital Etiquette
Proposed Significant Disproportionality New Data Collection Presenters: Robert Trombley, Richelle Davis.
2017 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
The Argumentative Essay
NHMRC – Project Grants 2011 Application Process
Financial Accountability in CAP
CRITICAL ANALYSIS Purpose of a critical review The critical review is a writing task that asks you to summarise and evaluate a text. The critical review.
Lecture 01: A Brief Summary
Warm Up Respond to the following prompts in your notebook in full sentences. If you were to submit an opinion column to Arizona Republic or The Wolf.
Norton’s Field Guide to Writing
Psychology & Sociology
Marking the Text.
Employee Engagement Survey Education Session #3
Summary of Evidence/Reason for Referral
Supporting Student Learning Through Effective Curricular Administration Welcome to the presentation “Supporting Student Learning Through Effective Curricular.
The Argumentative Essay:
PRC Information Session
Unit 3 Analyzing Informational Text
INNOVATION WITH INDUSTRY – Session 2
Roles and Responsibilities of an External Examiner
Essay 4: Response Essay Responding to Reading.
LAW112 Assessment 3 Haley McEwen.
CT is a self-directed process by which we take deliberate steps to think at the highest level of quality. CT is skillful, responsible thinking that is.
THE FINAL MAJOR PROJECT
Key Dates for GEARS Spring 2018 All Faculty Selected Faculty
What is an ARGUMENT? An argument is a reasoned, logical way of demonstrating that the writer’s position, belief, or conclusion is valid. Arguments seek.
Argument English III Fall 2014.
Week 2 Class 2.
Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
2011 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
Dealing with Conflict and Maintaining Faculty Morale
Language and Communication
UCR Space Request Process Flowchart
Key Stage 2 Assessment.
Language and Communication
Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING Day 4
TEACHNG AWARDS 2019 BRIEFING SESSION
TEACHNG AWARDS 2018 BRIEFING SESSION
Timed Writing Workshop
2013 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
Professor Bob Miles Facilitator
Implementation Approach Distribution Workgroup – June 2014
Summary of Evidence/Reason for Referral
What questions should we ask?
Critical Thinking Problem Solving.
Assessment Framework CPD
Rulemaking in iowa.
Key Dates for GEARS Fall 2017 All Faculty Selected Faculty
Is survival selfish? Argument by lane wallace
9th Literature EOC Review
ZERO PENDENCY COURTS PROJECT BY THE DELHI HIGH COURT
Looking at what a text says and how it says it. Norton 38-58
Language and Communication
READING AND RESPONDING
Customer Problem Statement Template
Presentation transcript:

ARC Rejoinder Session Professor Doug McEachern Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research and Innovation) 4 July 2008

ARC Rejoinder Session Discovery projects Started 1 July due ARC 14 July Internal deadline 10 July NHMRC Between 14 June and 4 July (?) 7 working days to respond

ARC Rejoinder Session Why Are There Rejoinders? An interpretation of administrative law A right to respond to ‘the evidence’ to be considered by those who will make judgments

ARC Rejoinder Session Who is the rejoinder written for? It is not a reply to the assessor It is not read by the assessor It is only relevant to the committee assessing the application Hence – no point in being angry, hurt, offended, scornful or any of those emotions in dealing with criticism in the assessment

ARC Rejoinder Session Points about rejoinder text Be cautious about criticising the choice/competence of the assessors Assessors chosen by the committee considering the application A reason for the choice which may not be obvious to you

ARC Rejoinder Session More Points … Keep a sense of perspective – the most important evidence the committee has at its disposal is the application Be temperate in your response and language (think what would persuade you in reading the rebuttal of criticism you have made of another academic’s work)

ARC Rejoinder Session More Points … Do not make claims about what you intend to do which are not supported by what you say in the application If an assessor identifies a fault in the application, acknowledge that and provide a correction or alternative way forward

ARC Rejoinder Session More Points … Rejoinders can make a difference If no assessments, do not make a rejoinder Remember, sometimes the assessor is right!

ARC Rejoinder Session Key Messages Track record – outcomes and impact of previous research Importance of method Importance of the problem Innovation in the solution proposed Be positive and argue the case for funding

ARC Rejoinder Session Basic Details Rejoinders are submitted online Rejoinders are submitted through the Research Office Discovery Projects – internal deadline Thursday 10 July Due dates for Linkage Projects rejoinders - via RA [Research-Announcements]