Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In re Richard A. ALCORN and Steven Feola Supreme Court of Arizona, 202 Ariz. 62, 41 P.3d 600.
Advertisements

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In re Richard A. ALCORN and Steven Feola Supreme Court of Arizona, 202 Ariz. 62, 41 P.3d 600.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In re FROST Supreme Court of New Jersey, 171 N.J. 308, 793 A.2d 699 (2002) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against SCHAFER Supreme Court of Washington, 149 Wash.2d 148,
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In the Matter of Stanley R. JUHNKE Kansas Supreme Court, 273 Kan. 162, 41 P.3d 855 (2002)
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. U.S. v. JIMENEZ RECIO 537 U.S. 270 (2003) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. U.S. v. Willard JOHNSON U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, 327 F.3d 554 (2003) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. BUTLER 19 Ohio St.2d 55, 249 N.E.2d 818 (1969) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. TWEEDY, Supreme Court of Oklahoma 2000.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. DECK v. MISSOURI 125 S.Ct (2005) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. GEORGIA HS ASSN v. WADDELL 248 Ga. 542, 285 S.E.2d 7 (1981) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. POHLE v. CHEATHAM Court of Appeals of Indiana, 724 N.E.2d 655 (2000) Case Brief.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION ATTACKING THE PLEADINGS.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. PEOPLE v. DLUGASH 41 N.Y.2d 725, 363 N.E.2d 1155 (N.Y. 1977) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. COHEN v. BAYSIDE S&L 62 Misc.2d 738, 309 N.Y.S.2d 980 (1970) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. LUCY v. ZEHMER 196 Va. 493, 84 S.E.2d 516 (1954) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. PONDER v. GRAHAM 4 Fla. 23 (1851) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. BLANTON v. CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 489 U.S. 538 (1989) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. COLBY v. CARNEY HOSPITAL 356 Mass. 527, 254 N.E.2d 407 (1969) Case Brief.
Reliance Contracts – Prof. Merges Sept. 8, Ricketts v. Scothorn.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. PAPACHRISTOU v. JACKSONVILLE 405 U.S. 156 (1972) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. GRIFFIN v. CALIFORNIA 380 U.S. 609 (1965) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. BROWN v. SOUTHLAND 620 F.Supp (E.D.Mo. 1985) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. MOSELEY v. ZIEG 180 Neb. 810; 146 N.W.2d 72 (1966) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. TRONCALLI v. JONES 237 Ga.App. 10, 514 S.E.2d 478 (1999) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. PENNSYLVANIA v. BRUDER 488 U.S. 9 (1988) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. McDERMOTT v. HARRIS Florida Circuit Court, Leon County, No (Fla. 2d Cir. Ct. Nov.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. Pamela L. PETERS Supreme Court of Wisconsin, 263 Wis.2d 475, 665 N.W.2d 171 (2003)
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. COCKRELL v. HILLERICH & BRADSBY CO. 611 S.E.2d 505 (S.C. 2005) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. CARRUTHERS v. STATE Supreme Court of Georgia, 528 S.E.2d 217 (2000) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE FARM v. CAMPBELL 538 U.S. 408 (2003) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. LYNCH v. LYNCH 164 Ariz. 127 (1990) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. LOWE v. QUINN 27 N.Y.2d 397, 267 N.E.2d (N.Y. 1971) Case Brief.
Contract Law: A Beginning CHAPTER SIX. 6 | 2 Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. What a Contract Is A contract is a legally enforceable.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. WYMAN v. NEWHOUSE 93 F.2d 313 (2d Cir. 1937) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. STAFFORD 223 Kan. 62, 573 P.2d 970 (Kan. 1977) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. GUFFEY 262 S.W.2d 152 (Mo.Ct.App. 1953) Case Brief.
Chapter 19 Healthy Romantic Relationships. © Copyright 2005 Delmar Learning, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc.2 Chapter Objectives 1.Explain Sternberg’s.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. UNITED STATES v. JEWELL 532 F.2d 697 (2d Cir. 1976) Case Brief.
Brown: Legal Terminology, 5 th ed. © 2008 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved. Legal Terminology Fifth Edition by Gordon.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE v. LEE 353 N.W.2d 213 (Minn.Ct.App. 1984) Case Brief.
 Sandhyarani Das Gupta was a minor girl who was staying with her mother in the Refugee Colony at Ghola.  Manibala Majumdar induced this girl with the.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. BUSBY v. STATE 894 So.2d 88 (Fla. 2004) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. HOFFMAN v. RED OWL STORES, INC. 26 Wis.2d 683, 133 N.W.2d 267 (1965) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. WILLIAMS Supreme Court of Iowa 695 N.W.2d 23 (2005) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. ISHMAEL v. MILLINGTON 241 Cal.App.2d 520, 50 Cal.Rptr.592 (1966) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STUMP v. SPARKMAN 435 U.S. 349 (1978) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. FINE v. DELALANDE, INC. 545 F.Supp. 275 (S.D.N.Y. 1982) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. RIEMERS v. GRAND FORKS HERALD 688 N.W.2d 167 (N.D. 2004) Case Brief.
Standard of Review & “Facts” on Appeal
SALTZMAN v. AHERN 306 So.2d 537 (Fla.App. 1975)
STATE v. WINDER 348 N.Y.S.2d 270 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1973)
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
MARTIN v. MARCIANO 871 A.2d 911 (R.I. 2005)
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
Chapter 11 Consideration and Promissory Estoppel
Chapter 11 Consideration and Promissory Estoppel
CAMPBELL SOUP CO. v. WENTZ 172 F.2d 80 (3d Cir. 1948)
Chapter 6 Issue Identification
BROWN v. BROWN 300 So. 2d 719 (Fla. DCA 1974)
STATE v. KINGMAN 463 P.2d 638 (Wash. 1970)
NORRIS v. TOWN OF WHEATLAND 613 N.Y.S.2d 817 (S.Ct. Monroe Cty. 1994)
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
ARENA LAND & INV. CO., INC. v. PETTY 69 F.3d 547 (10th Cir. 1995)
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
Courts and Court Systems
Chapter 14 External Memorandum
PEOPLE v. ALEXANDER 53 Ill.App.2d 299, 202 N.E.2d 841 (1964)
Chapter 14 External Memorandum
Chapter 4 Case Law and Case Briefing
Presentation transcript:

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ROSE v. ELIAS Supreme Court, Appellate Division 576 N.Y.S.2d 257 (1991) Case Brief Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ROSE v. ELIAS PURPOSE: A contract lacking consideration. Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ROSE v. ELIAS CAUSE OF ACTION: Breach of contract. Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ROSE v. ELIAS FACTS: Elias, a married man, promised in writing to purchase apartment for Rose in return for love and affection provided him during prior three years. Court held this was insufficient for consideration for a contract. Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ROSE v. ELIAS ISSUE: Whether trial court was correct in granting motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ROSE v. ELIAS HOLDING: Yes. No consideration and arguments of estoppel and unjust enrichment without merit. Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ROSE v. ELIAS REASONING: Consideration insufficient, neither the past provision of love and affection, nor claimed forbearance of job opportunities (not regarded as consideration at the time of the promise). Court also influenced by the sexual services that were important in the relationship. Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.