LHC Baseline = BCMS 25ns S. Hancock.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISS meeting, (1) R. Garoby (for the SPL study group) SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities at CERN:
Advertisements

Expected performance in the injectors at 25 ns without and with LINAC4 Giovanni Rumolo, Hannes Bartosik and Adrian Oeftiger Acknowledgements: G. Arduini,
Beam Gymnastics and LLRF in the PS S. Hancock The remarkable versatility of the PS machine comes at the price of the complexity of its rf beam controls,
Note: most of the slides shown here are picked from CERN accelerator workshops. Please refer to those workshop for further understanding of the accelerator.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Thomas Roser Muon collaboration meeting February 8-10, 2002 AGS beam intensity upgrades What has been achieved Sextupole power supply upgrades Bunch manipulation.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Requirements 1.Present performance: 1E13p from.
H. Damerau, S. Hancock, LHC Beam Studies Review 28/08/2012 PS: the Longitudinal Plane 1 H. Damerau, S. Hancock LIU Beam Studies Review Meeting 28 August.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
Moriond 2003M. Benedikt, S. Hancock Injection and Accumulation in a High Energy Ion Storage Ring Michael Benedikt, Steven Hancock AB Division, CERN.
First measurements of longitudinal impedance and single-bunch effects in LHC E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF Thanks: P. Baudrenghien, A. Butterworth, T. Bohl,
History and motivation for a high harmonic RF system in LHC E. Shaposhnikova With input from T. Argyropoulos, J.E. Muller and all participants.
07-JUL-2003LEADE / JW1 Satellite bunches in the LHC Satellite “definition” Satellite luminosity Satellite detection & tolerances J. Wenninger AB/OP.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
HL-LHC/LIU Joint workshop Goal: Progressing towards an agreed set of 450 GeV beam parameters for High Luminosity operation in LHC after LS2 & LS3. Slides.
Luminosity expectations for the first years of CLIC operation CTC MJ.
0 1 Alternative Options in the Injectors – Preliminary Summary H. Damerau LIU-TM#8 18 October 2013 Many thanks for discussions and input to T. Argyropoulos,
Production of bunch doublets for scrubbing of the LHC J. Esteban Muller (simulations), E. Shaposhnikova 3 December 2013 LBOC Thanks to H. Bartosik, T.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
E.M, PS-OP shut-down lectures, 20/02/ u Requirements of the LHC on its injectors u What are the nominal & already achieved beams at PS exit? u How.
Some ideas for/from the SPS LIU-SPS team. Scrubbing (only) for ecloud in SPS? aC coating remains baseline..... –but scrubbing has many potential advantages.
Content  The LHC beams produced  LINAC2 & PSB  The PS  The SPS  Super Cycles and N0n-LHC physics  Conclusions IEFC Workshop, 8 March 2012 Rende.
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
SPS proton beam for AWAKE E. Shaposhnikova 13 th AWAKE PEB Meeting With contributions from T. Argyropoulos, T. Bohl, H. Bartosik, S. Cettour.
Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage? 1 H. Damerau LIU-PS Working Group Meeting 4 March 2014.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
Filling Schemes for the 2010 Heavy Ion Run Updated (3 rd iteration) version of BCWG presentation initially on 28 September, updated after discussions with.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
CONTENT: Beam characteristics and MP concerns BI configuration Operational settings Collimators Planning Shift breakdown Thanks to: P.Baudrenghien, G.Bellodi,
LER Workshop, Oct 11, 2006Intensity Increase in the LER – T. Sen1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac  Motivation  Slip stacking in the.
Beam loss and radiation in the SPS for higher intensities and injection energy G. Arduini 20 th November 2007 Acknowledgments: E. Shaposhnikova and all.
Longitudinal Painting S. Hancock p.p. G. Feldbauer.
Longitudinal aspects on injection and acceleration for HP-PS Antoine LACHAIZE On behalf of the HP-PS design team.
ELENA RF Manipulations S. Hancock. Apart from debunching before and rebunching after cooling, the principal role of the rf is to decelerate the beam and.
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
Longitudinal Limitations of Beams for the LHC in the CERN PS 0.
Update on RF parameters A.Lachaize11 th HPPS design meeting04/09/13.
HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.
RF manipulations in SIS 18 and SIS 100 O. Chorniy.
LIU-PS Beam Dynamics Working Group Introduction and objectives
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
Plans for ions in the injector complex D
Space charge studies at the SPS
Longitudinal beam parameters and stability
Tomography at Injection in the PSB
Acknowledgments: LIU-PT members and deputies, H. Bartosik
PSB rf manipulations PSB cavities
New AD Production Beam in the PSB
Multiturn extraction for PS2
M. Mehler1), H. Klingbeil1), B. Zipfel2)
Progress towards Pulsed Multi-MW CERN Proton Drivers
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Introduction to LHC beam production in PSB and PS
Beam dynamics requirements after LS2
DEMONSTRATION OF TRIPLE BUNCH SPLITTING IN THE CERN PS
Generation of Higher Brightness Beams for LHC
Collective effects in the SPS and LHC (longitudinal plane)
PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV
JLEIC 200 GeV Ion Injector Chain and Bunch Formation
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Some Thoughts on the JLEIC Ion Injector
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Choice of harmonic number with the consideration of ion beam formation
Presentation transcript:

LHC Baseline = BCMS 25ns S. Hancock

Background For given LHC optics and energy, luminosity scales roughly as the product of the beam brightness in collision and the total current in each beam. However, this does not mean that the empirical fact of constant beam brightness at the exit of the PS Booster implies that luminosity can only be increased by raising the intensity.

Batch Compression versus Splitting The pivotal harmonic of h=21 prior to acceleration in the PS is achieved by additive steps (batch compression) and not just by multiplicative ones (splitting). Double-batch injection into h=9 makes maximum use of Booster rings. The trick of bunch merging reduces the effective splitting factor by two, so that the BCMS 25ns beam has the same splitting factor as the nominal 50ns one. Issues of limited longitudinal acceptance (rather than of high transverse brightness) mean that this merging step must be made at higher energy – hence the introduction of an intermediate plateau at 2.5GeV (kinetic). Pure h=21  100ns h=7→ 7+14+21 → 21, 18b “Nominal” 𝑆 𝐶𝑃𝑆 (25𝑛𝑠) = 12 h=9→ 10 → 20 → 21, 16b “BCS” 𝑆 𝐶𝑃𝑆 (25𝑛𝑠) = 8 h=9→10→11→12→13→14→7→21, 12b “BCMS” 𝑆 𝐶𝑃𝑆 (25𝑛𝑠) = 6 1.4GeV 2.5GeV

Cavity Tuning Groups The 10MHz coarse tuning has been reconfigured during LS1 specifically to increase the number of cavities available on a given harmonic during rf gymnastics. The previous 6-2-2 grouping has been modified to 4-3-3, which permits three triplets of cavities to operate where before three pairs were used. CT1: C56, C66, C76, C81 CT2: C36, C46, C51 CT3: C86, C91, C96 CT4: C11, Test Cavity CT1: C51, C56, C66, C76, C81, C91 CT2: C36, C46 CT3: C86, C96 CT4: C11, Test Cavity

Cavity Voltage Groups Pre-LS1 “H84” matrix pattern The downside of the new tuning groups is that the voltage groups of the 10MHz matrix must follow suit, which in turn means rebuilding all timing trees that are multi-harmonic and reprogramming their associated functions for all users for which those trees are active. Consequently, the only pre-LS1 users that are safe to reload in the machine are single-harmonic ones. C11 C36 C46 C51 C56 C66 C76 C81 C86 C91 C96 Pre-LS1 “H84” matrix pattern Post-LS1 “H84” matrix pattern

Cavity Group Programmes During batch compression from h=9 to h=14, two groups are active at any one time on harmonics h and h+1, with the third group tuning to h+2. During merging, two groups are active on h=14 and h=7, with the third group tuning to h=21. Although the h=14 component is reduced to zero, the corresponding group remains tuned at this harmonic for the final step. During triple splitting, all three groups are active on h=7, 14 and 21. The voltage programmes shown are correct for the measured waterfall plot, but after LS1 each cavity group will deliver up to 60kV providing more acceptance throughout the process. This is important at the critical stage when the merged “super bunches” are triple split into h=21 buckets. New TREEH21BCMS will pilot all this.

Special Case: BCMS Intermediate The merging step means not only that the minimum number of Booster bunches injected into a BCMS cycle is two, but also that the phases of all triple splitting components must be inverted for such an intermediate beam. Otherwise each populated bucket gets merged with an empty one.

Nota Bene 25ns is less demanding for the PS than 50ns, not least because all 25ns schemes in Run 2 will be limited to a maximum intensity per bunch of some 1.3×1011 by the rf power available in the SPS. The radial and phase loops of the low-level beam control remain closed throughout, but they do not need to be switched to follow every single harmonic number change as the cavity return is simulated by an MHS. The harmonic sequence for the loops is h=9, 11, 13, 7, 21. The roles of the controlled blow-ups are essentially unchanged: the first is before any acceleration, the second is after triple splitting and the third is after transition. However, the parameters of BU2 get adapted for 2.5GeV (the synchrotron frequency is reduced by a factor of 2 with respect to that at 1.4GeV). Apart from minor modifications to the 10MHz part due to the change in cavity matrix pattern, a revised TREEH84 pilots almost identical functions for the 10MHz voltage descent and subsequent 20 and 40MHz splitting and 40+80MHz bunch rotation. It has been proposed to establish a common extraction timing at C2850 (or C1650 for a 2bp cycle) for all LHC-type proton beams and to incorporate a 2.5GeV intermediate plateau irrespective of whether the beam delivered is single- or multi-bunch (including nominal). This would make all extraction settings identical and mean only two magnetic cycles need to be maintained – which is a principle previously established for protons but is only still the case for lead ions. The deadtime at 2.5GeV for non-BCMS beams would lead to negligible beam degradation and would make little extra demand on the main power supply.

Booster Specs. The upper intensity limit of 1.3×1011 ppb at LHC injection corresponds to 0.9×1012 p/Ring at transfer from the Booster. Although this is significantly less than already achieved, the risetime of the kickers in the transfer line limits the length of the bunches to 150ns when they are recombined for injection into h=9 PS buckets, which is less than the well-established 180ns of the nominal scheme. Consequently, to mitigate the penalty of shorter bunches, it is proposed to transfer them with the maximum possible momentum spread as this increases their physical size and hence reduces their space charge footprint in the downstream PS. Using 8+8kV of C02+C04 voltage in bunch shortening mode will produce 150ns bunches with an emittance of 1.5eVs – i.e., much more than the 0.9eVs for 8kV of pure h=1 (and more even than the 1.3eVs empirical limit of the old nominal scheme). But this is new and must be tested. 0.9eVs: h=1 @ 8kV → h=9 @ 25kV 1.5eVs: h=1+2 @ 8+8kV → h=9 @ 65kV

Reserve Slide Measurements (end 2012) Nominal 50ns BCMS 50ns 1.4GeV NPSB [1012/Ring] 1.2 0.6 1.6 0.8 450GeV1) Nb [1011] 1.7 1.63) 1.1 βγε<H+V> [µm] 2.6 1.3 Brightness [1011/µm] 1.0 1.5 0.42 0.85 Rel. Brightness (Potential) 1.54) (2.0) 2.0 (2.0) Equivalent L/M [arb. units] 1.4 0.27 0.55 1) Measurements were made early on the LHC injection plateau. It was not always possible to make wirescans at SPS extraction, but agreement between the two machines at transfer is known to be good. 2) Operational experience with nominal 25ns beams was scant. These results are derived from fills 3425 and 3429; the latter saw 804 bunches at 4TeV. 3) 1.9×1011 ppb could have been delivered but this was considered inexpedient. 4) The minimum emittance from the Booster is set at ~1.0µm by Linac2. For the BCMS 50ns beam to reach its full potential, it would first have to be shaved down to well below this value.