CLIC BDS tuning and luminosity signal

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
Advertisements

Solenoid effects and compensation B. Dalena, D. Swoboda, R. Tomás.
1 Latest CLIC FFS Tuning Results Americas Workshop on Linear Colliders Thanks to: Rogelio Tomas Garcia, Yngve Inntjore Levinsen, Andrea Latina, Oscar Roberto.
January 15, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity December/January vs September/October -Machine studies and instrumentation -Simulation.
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
Update on ILC ML Lattice Design Alexander Valishev, for the FNAL LET group FNAL AP Dept. Meeting March 7, 2007.
Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.
CLIC main detector solenoid and anti-solenoid impact B. Dalena, A. Bartalesi, R. Appleby, H. Gerwig, D. Swoboda, M. Modena, D. Schulte, R. Tomás.
ILC Start-End Simulations Glen White, SLAC May 13, 2014 AWLC14, Fermilab.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
New Progress of the Nonlinear Collimation System for A. Faus-Golfe J. Resta López D. Schulte F. Zimmermann.
European Organization for Nuclear Research International Linear Collider INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON FUTURE LINEAR COLLIDERS ЛЦВС14 Vinča Institute of Nuclear.
Dynamic Aperture Study for the Ion Ring Lattice Options Min-Huey Wang, Yuri Nosochkov MEIC Collaboration Meeting Fall 2015 Jefferson Lab, Newport News,
Top threshold Monte Carlo generator Stewart Boogert John Adams Institute Royal Holloway, University of London Filimon Gournaris (Ph.D student and majority.
Status of the Rebaselining D. Schulte for the Rebaselining Team D. Schulte, CLIC Rebaselining, October 2013.
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
Karsten Büßer Instrumentation of the Forward Region of the TESLA Detector International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics Aachen, July 19th.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Analysis of Multipole and Position Tolerances for the ATF2 Final Focus Line James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1.
1 Alternative ILC Bunch Compressor 7 th Nov KNU (Kyungpook National Univ.) Eun-San Kim.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
Fast or slow positron spin flipping Sabine Riemann (DESY) November 17, 2008 ILC08, University of Illinois - Chicago.
1 DR -> IP Beam Transport Simulations with Intra-Train Feedback Glen White, SLAC Jan 19 th 2006.
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
Low Emittance Generation and Preservation K. Yokoya, D. Schulte.
Ken Moffeit SLAC LCWA09 1 Polarization Considerations for CLIC Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October.
Event Generation of Tim Barklow SLAC October 21, 2010.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann LET Beam Dynamics Workshop, Lumi scans with wakefields in Merlin Lumi scans with wakefields in Merlin Isabell-A.
On the possibility of stop mass determination in photon-photon and e + e - collisions at ILC A.Bartl (Univ. of Vienna) W.Majerotto HEPHY (Vienna) K.Moenig.
Beam-Beam interaction SIMulation: GUINEA-PIG C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay CARE 05, Geneva, November 2005.
IWLC10, 18 th -22 nd October10, CERN/CICG 1 Global Design Effort Updates to ILC RDR Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin & James Jones ASTeC, STFC.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
Luminosity Issues for LC BDS Glen White, SLAC LCWS2013, Tokyo November 12, 2013.
Luminosity at  collider Marco Zanetti (MIT) 1. Intro,  colliders basics Luminosity at  colliders Sapphire simulation Alternative approaches Luminosity.
1 Updated comparison of feedback implementation for e + e - and e - e - modes of operation with realistic errors in the BDS M. Alabau Pons, P. Bambade,
Beam-Beam interaction SIMulation: GUINEA-PIG
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
ILC BDS Alignment, Tuning and Feedback Studies
In collaboration with P. N. Burrows, A. Latina and D. Schulte
Tolerances & Tuning of the ATF2 Final Focus Line
Benchmarking MAD, SAD and PLACET Characterization and performance of the CLIC Beam Delivery System with MAD, SAD and PLACET T. Asaka† and J. Resta López‡
Beam Dynamics in Curved ILC Main Linac (following earth curvature)
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
Wake field limitations in a low gradient main linac of CLIC
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
New algorithms for tuning the CLIC beam delivery system
Update on Single-beam Tuning of the CLIC 3 TeV Traditional Lattice
Effects of DFS on Single-beam Tuning
Adaptive Alignment & Ground Motion
γ γ-> hadron Background Events at CLIC
Other beam-induced background at the IP
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Accelerator Physics Technical System Group Review
CEPC partial double ring scheme and crab-waist parameters
CEPC main ring magnets’ error effect on DA and MDI issues
M. Tigner, R. Helms, M. Palmer, D. Rubin, D. Sagan Cornell University
Study of e+ e- background due to beamstrahlung for different ILC parameter sets Stephan Gronenborn.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML
CLIC Interaction Region when beams meet detectors
Start-to-End Simulations for the TESLA LC
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
The Effects of Beam Dynamics on CLIC Physics Potential
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Presentation transcript:

CLIC BDS tuning and luminosity signal Barbara Dalena in collaboration with: E. Marin, A. Latina, J. Barranco D. Schulte and R. Tomás

B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI Outline CLIC BDS tuning Update since ILCW’10 Consideration on luminosity signals 29/03/2011 B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI

pre-alignment H&V [m] Summary of IWLC’ 10 pre-alignment H&V [m] Success rate % lattice comments 10 80 L* = 3.5 m nominal 84 Higher energy bandwidth 87 Lumi optimization + horizontal knobs Design and sextupole knobs improve the FFS performances Since the workshop… New improved knobs New tuning strategies 29/03/2011 B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI

B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI Tuning strategy (1/2) inputs horizontal and vertical random mis-alignment:  =10 m bending magnets perfectly aligned 100 seeds identical electron and positron machine Tuning steps Luminosity optimization (Simplex-Nelder algorithm) Horizontal and Vertical sextupole knobs In both steps we need some fast luminosity measurements Luminosity optimization needs O( 10000 ) measurements Knobs tuning L points  M knobs  N iter O( 100 ) measurements 29/03/2011 B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI

Luminosity results (1/2) luminosity optimization only: 55% of the seeds reach 100% of nominal luminosity. after 2 iterations of H and V knobs: 90% of the seed reach 90% of nominal luminosity luminosity optimization needs ~16000 luminosity measurements Knobs tuning 20 points  8 knobs  2 iter ~ 320 luminosity measurements 29/03/2011 B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI

B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI Tuning strategy (2/2) inputs horizontal and vertical random mis-alignment:  =10 m bending magnets perfectly aligned 100 seeds identical electron and positron machine tuning steps 1. (BDS) 1-to-1 correction x and y plane : 50 iteration (= 50 bunch) 2. (BDS) DFS y plane and target DFS x plane: 40 iteration (= 40 bunch) 3. (BDS) Multipole shunting: 20-30 bunch 1. + 2. + 3. ~ 60 ns 4. (FFS) sextupole knobs scan : O(100-1000) luminosity measurement 5. (FFS) luminosity optimization O(1000) 29/03/2011 B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI

Luminosity results (2/2) 1-to-1, DFS and multipole shunting recover ~ 1% of lumi (bad systematic convergence of the algorithm in the horizontal plane) most of the luminosity is recovered by the sextupole knobs (10 H &V knobs ) 20 points  10 knobs  4 iter ~ 800 luminosity measurement luminosity optimization ~4000 (iteration) luminosity measurement 95% of the machine reach 90% of nominal CLIC luminosity Total number of luminosity measurements reduced from ~17000 to ~5000 29/03/2011 B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI

Luminosity signal

Luminosity measurement signal radiative bhabha : high counting rate O(104 /bx) but not really visible in the spent beam spectrum low angle bhabha 7-70 minutes for 1% luminosity measurement according to the  cut O(20 -2 Hz) Daniel Schulte CLIC08 Workshop long term luminosity stability due to dynamic imperfections in Main Linac + BDS ~ 10-30 minutes we need to tune in O( min ) 29/03/2011 B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI

Possible signals (H knobs) Beamstrahlung photons  total luminosity only for horizontal beam size changes 29/03/2011 B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI

Possible signals (V knobs) Incoherent pairs & hadronic events  luminosity 29/03/2011 B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI

Combination of beamstrahlung signal The correlation of beamstrahlung photons from the two beams are more  luminosity than their number. Not similar relative rate changes with different beam conditions 29/03/2011 B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI

Hadronic events signals No Pt cut applied Nhadron per bx are ~3 Hadronization from Pythia (D. Schulte) pions multiplicity is a good signal candidate 29/03/2011 B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI

B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI  cuts Defined to reduce incoherent pairs background Lorentz boost in the lab frame + helix track in a uniform magnetic field (5 Tesla) Two regions can be identified pairs <  < det  > det 29/03/2011 B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI

Multiplicity distributions Pt cut 0.050 GeV/c Pt cut 0.160 GeV/c 3 train : Mult rms ~ 7%  ~ 1% with 100 train 29/03/2011 B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI

B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI Conclusion Static tuning of CLIC BDS-FFS succeded with two techniques Minimum number of luminosity measurements needed so far ~ 5000  we need a fast luminosity measurement Possible luminosity signals are hadronic events pions multiplicity with 1% rms with 100 train  2 s for one luminosity measurement (~3 hour to tune the system) Outlook Improve the tuning algorithm to reduce the number of luminosity measurements Look at multiplicity/energy fluctuation for different beam condition and correlations with beamstrahlung 29/03/2011 B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI

Back-up

Tuning strategy (1/2) inputs Tuning steps horizontal and vertical random mis-alignment:  =10 m bending magnets perfectly aligned 100 seeds identical electron and positron machine Tuning steps luminosity optimization (Simplex-Nelder algorithm) While (luminosity gain > iteration -1) apply knob of best lumi and iterate horizontal dispersion x H y vertical dispersion <y, x’> <y’,> V <y, y’> <x, y> 29/03/2011 B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI

Luminosity Measurement Signal Daniel Schulte - CLIC08 Workshop Integrare con prima 29/03/2011 B.Dalena, 7th CLIC-ILC BDS+MDI