Template Matching Can Accurately Track Tumor Evaluation of Dose Calculation of RayStation Planning System in Heterogeneous Media Huijun Xu, Byongyong Yi,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
14th GEANT4 User and Collaboration Workshop - Catania, Oct. 15/ B.Caccia, G.Frustagli, M.Mattia, S.Valentini Istituto Superiore di Sanita' e INFN,
Advertisements

Backscatter for EPID dosimetry
Pencil-Beam Redefinition Algorithm Robert Boyd, Ph.D.
RapidArc plan verification using ArcCHECK™
In the past few years the usage of conformal and IMRT treatments has been increasing rapidly. These treatments employ the use of tighter margins around.
Energy deposition and neutron background studies for a low energy proton therapy facility Roxana Rata*, Roger Barlow* * International Institute for Accelerator.
Slice Thickness Interpolation: The effect of interpolated slice thickness on the 2D vs 3D gamma results are shown in Table 3 for the QA data set only.
Pascal Storchi Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center
Algorithms used in heterogeneous dose calculations show systematic error as measured with the Radiological Physics Center’s anthropomorphic thorax phantom.
Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland 8th ECMP, Athens, Dosimetry audits in radiotherapy.
Lotte Verbunt Investigation of leaf positioning accuracy of two types of Siemens MLCs making use of an EPID.
G4NAMU GEANT4 North America Medical Users Organization (G4NAMU) GEANT4 in external beam therapy Harald Paganetti.
Tissue inhomogeneities in Monte Carlo treatment planning for proton therapy L. Beaulieu 1, M. Bazalova 2,3, C. Furstoss 4, F. Verhaegen 2,5 (1) Centre.
Introduction Modern radiation therapies such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volume modulated arc therapy (VMAT) demand from dose calculation.
Dose Distribution and Scatter Analysis
Results The measured-to-predicted dose ratio criteria used by the RPC to credential institutions is , however for this work, a criteria of
TWO FIELD BREAST PLAN VS. OPTIMIZED CONFORMAL BREAST PLAN: COMPARISON OF PLAN PARAMETERS Authors: Borko Basarić, Ozren Čudić, Milan Teodorović, Borislava.
Evaluation of New Pre-Treatment In-Air Patient Specific QA Software for TomoTherapy Treatments Lydia L. Handsfield¹, Quan Chen¹, Kai Ding¹, Wendel Renner²,
Научно-практический центр протонной лучевой терапии и радиохирургии (Москва-Дубна) A SYSTEM FOR MEASUREMENT OF A THERAPEUTIC PROTON BEAM DOSE DISTRIBUTION.
Patient Plan Results: Table 3 shows the ratio of the Pinnacle TPS calculation to the DPM recalculation for the mean dose from selected regions of interest.
Test of the proposed method Introduction CCD Controller CCD Illuminator gel Filter 585nm Assembling the phantom before its irradiation. The phantom, ready.
Kelly Younge, Ph.DKelly Younge, Ph.D Don Roberts, Benedick Fraass, Daniel McShan, and Martha Matuszak University of Michigan, Department of Radiation Oncology,University.
MONTE CARLO BASED ADAPTIVE EPID DOSE KERNEL ACCOUNTING FOR DIFFERENT FIELD SIZE RESPONSES OF IMAGERS S. Wang, J. Gardner, J. Gordon W. Li, L. Clews, P.
F. Foppiano, B. Mascialino, M. G. Pia, M. Piergentili Geant4 Simulation of an Accelerator Head for Intensity Modulated RadioTherapy Monte Carlo 2005 Topical.
IMRT QA Plan Site 5%/3mm3%/3mm2%/2mm 0% noise1% noise2% noise0% noise1% noise2% noise0% noise1% noise2% noise HN
Application of a 2-D ionization chamber array for dose verification of dynamic IMRT with a micro-MLC Fujio ARAKI, PhD 1, S. TAJIRI 2, H. TOMINAGA 2, K.
Medical Accelerator F. Foppiano, M.G. Pia, M. Piergentili
Use of the IC Profiler detector array for comprehensive machine QA ESTRO QA & Dosimetry Satellite Symposium Steve Morgan, Medical Physics Dept,
The Radiological Physics Center’s Anthropomorphic Quality Assurance Phantom Program Carrie F. Amador, Nadia Hernandez, Andrea Molineu, Paola Alvarez, and.
1 A Comprehensive Study on the Heterogeneity Dose Calculation Accuracy in IMRT using an Anthropomorphic Thorax Phantom S Davidson 1, R Popple 2, G Ibbott.
Araki F. Ikegami T. and Ishidoya T.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم. Simulation of Photon Beam Interaction with the ZUBAL Head Phantom Presented by: Mostafa Hossni El-Soubki Plan-UNC-Image plotter.
IRCC & Mauriziano Hospital & INFN & S Croce e Carle Hospital
Introduction The Radiological Physics Center (RPC) anthropomorphic quality assurance (QA) phantom program is one tool the RPC uses to remotely audit institutions.
F. Foppiano, M.G. Pia, M. Piergentili
E. Mezzenga, E. Cagni, A. Botti, M. Orlandi, M. Iori Medical Physics Unit, ASMN-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Italy
P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade, L.Peralta, J. Varela GEANT4 Medical Applications at LIP GEANT4 Workshop, September – 4 October LIP – Lisbon.
TLD POSTAL DOSE QUALITY AUDIT FOR 6MV AND 15MV PHOTON BEAMS IN RADIOTHERAPY CLINICAL PRACTICE Sonja Petkovska 1, Margarita Ginovska 2, Hristina Spasevska.
RD Instruments Home of the ADCP Measuring Water in Motion and Motion in Water AVOIDING BIASED DATA DURING REAL TIME HADCP DATA COLLECTION.
Commissioning of a commercial treatment planning system for IMAT and Dose Painting treatment delivery. G. Pittomvils 1,,L. Paelinck 1, F. Crop 2, W. De.
The Effects of Small Field Dosimetry on the Biological Models Used In Evaluating IMRT Dose Distributions Gene Cardarelli,PhD, MPH.
Rapid Arc Treatment Verification: post evaluation on Delta-4 and proposal of a new verification protocol G. Pittomvils 1,,L. Paelinck 1, T. Boterberg 1,
MCS overview in radiation therapy
Adapting A Clinical Medical Accelerator For Primary Standard Dosimetry
J Cho, G Ibbott, M Kerr, R Amos, and O Mawlawi
J Cho, G Ibbott, M Gillin, C Gonzalez-Lepera, U Titt and O Mawlawi
Monte Carlo modeling of the Siemens Optifocus multileaf collimator
Evaluation Of RTOG Guidelines For Monte Carlo Based Lung SBRT Planning
Evaluation of the AAA Treatment Planning Algorithm for SBRT Lung Treatment: Comparison with Monte Carlo and Homogeneous Pencil Beam Dose Calculations 
Absolute Dose Measurement
Influence of the grid size on the dosimetric characteristics of IMRT beams and on overall treatment plans G. Pittomvils1, L. Olteanu1, B. Vanderstraeten1,
A system of dosimetric calculations
Study of dental prostheses influence in radiation therapy
Development and characterization of the Detectorized Phantom for research in the field of spatial fractionated radiation therapy. D. Ramazanov, V. Pugatch,
A. Nisbet 1,2, A. Dimitriadis 1,2,3, A.L. Palmer 1,4, C.H. Clark 2,3
Arghya Chattaraj, T. Palani Selvam, D. Datta
Implementation of Object Spot Avoidance in Proton Pencil Beam Treatment on Whole Breast with Implant Metal Injector Peng Wang, PhD, DABR, Karla Leach,
Dosimetry of Alternative Techniques for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Hanh Pham, B.S, CMD, Thanh Nguyen, BS, Christina Henson, MD, Salahuddin.
L. A. den Otter. , R. M. Anakotta. , M. Dieters. , C. T. Muijs. , S
Ch 10. A System of Dosimetric Calculations
CBCT Equivalent Source Generation Using HVL and Beam Profile Measurements. Johnny Little PSM - Medical Physics Graduate Student University of Arizona.
Relationship between dosimetric leaf gap and dose calculation errors for high definition multi-leaf collimators in radiotherapy  Jinkoo Kim, James S.
Phantom Verification of AAA and Acuros Dose Calculations for Lung Cancer: Do Tumor Size and Regression Matter?  Satomi Shiraishi, PhD, Luis E. Fong de.
The effects of clinical and statistical heterogeneity on the predictive values of results from meta-analyses  W.G. Melsen, M.C.J. Bootsma, M.M. Rovers,
Action Levels on Dose and Anatomic Variation for Adaptive Radiation Therapy Using Daily Offline Plan Evaluation: Preliminary Results  Baoshe Zhang, PhD,
P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade, L.Peralta, J. Varela
Hot and cold spots are common problems associated with planning:
Dosimetric Measurements
GHG meeting at ESTRO36 May, 2017
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Presentation transcript:

Template Matching Can Accurately Track Tumor Evaluation of Dose Calculation of RayStation Planning System in Heterogeneous Media Huijun Xu, Byongyong Yi, Heeteak Chung, Karl Prado, Shifeng Chen Purpose To investigate the clinical reliability of heterogeneity-based dose algorithm using RayStation treatment planning system v.4.0. Methods RayStation collapsed cone dose calculations were compared with a) ion chamber and film measurement and b) Monte Carlo dose calculation Heterogeneous media included a multi-layer phantom (Figure 1) and 8 lung cancer patients To measure the phantom dose corresponding 6MV beam with MLC-defined field size 5x5, 10x10, 15x15 or 20x20 cm2, farmer chamber positioned at center of central solid water layer, and the films placed at interfaces of solid water and Styrofoam. Measurement was performed by using (Figure 1) For Monte-Carlo-based dose comparison, the absolute gamma analyses (3mm/3%) were performed for PDD in the phantom and for patient volumes receiving dose above 10% of maximum dose. Figure 1. Schematic figure of the heterogeneous multi-layer phantom and positions of ion chamber and film Results Between RayStation and ion chamber measurement: <1% point dose differences for all of the field sizes (Table 1) Between RayStation and film measurement: 5x5cm2 field had < 4mm maximum difference in penumbra <0.3mm for the field width at all phantom interfaces (Figure 2) Between RayStation and Monte Carlo: > 95% gamma passing rate for PDD along beam axis in the phantom (Table 1) and > 95% 3D gamma passing rate for all the patients Table 1. Comparison between RayStation and chamber measurement or Monte Carlo in terms of phantom dose for different MLC-defined fields Field size (cm2) RayStation vs. chamber dose difference (%) RayStation vs. Monte Carlo PDD gamma (%) 5x5 -0.88 95.4 10x10 -0.05 98.6 15x15 -0.69 99.6 20x20 -0.98 99.3 Figure 2. Dose profiles measured by film (blue dots) versus RayStation calculation (red solid line). Depth is at interface between central solid phantom and lower Styrofoam. Field size is 5x5cm2 at center of central solid water slab.. Table 2. Average, minimum and maximum 3D gamma passing rate (3mm/3%) between RayStation and Monte Carlo for 8 lung patient cases. A 10% dose threshold was used here. Conclusion RayStation provides clinically acceptable heterogeneity-based algorithm Average (%) Minimum Maximum 98.0 95.1 99.8