Dipole circuit & diode functioning

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHC Machine Protection
Advertisements

Electrical Installation
Protection study options for HQ01e-3 Tiina Salmi QXF meeting, 27 Nov 2012.
TEV DUMP SWITCH FAILURES OF 2/10/09 Dan Wolff/EE Support.
CSCM Project Powering cycle and results of the PSpice simulations Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to H. Thiesen, A. Verweij TE-MPE-TM
LHC Status ReportLHC Status Report Lyn Evans 96 th LHCC meeting, CERN 19 th November 2008.
LMC 30 LPC A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 30 Sept 2009, LMC meeting 1.9 K, 0 T, 7.5 kA run Heat pulse.
A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 3 Feb 2009, LHC Performance Workshop – Chamonix 2009 Arjan Verweij TE-MPE - joint stability - what was wrong with the ‘old’ bus-bar.
1 Second LHC Splice Review Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement possible QC tool for consolidated splices H. Thiesen 28 November 2011 K. Brodzinski,
The diode lead resistance ‘issue’ A. Verweij, TE-MPE, CSCM workshop 7/10/2011 Contents:  Diode geometry  Measurements performed in the past  Measurements.
CERN Rüdiger Schmidt FCC week 2015 Long Magnet Stringpage 1 Incident September 19 th Architecture of powering and protection systems for high field.
Becoming familiar with QPS systems in the LHC (incl. EE) Presentation 02 Sept PART 1 of 3. Part 1: General layouts and principles Presentation of.
HFM High Field Model, EuCARD WP7 review, 20/1/2011, Philippe Fazilleau, 1/16 EuCARD-WP7-HFM Dipole Conceptual Review Nb 3 Sn dipole protection Philippe.
LHC diodes: Status report (for information)
Frequency Transfer Function Measurements during LS1 Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to Arjan Verweij, Zinur Charifoulline, Andrea Musso MPE-TM
R.Schmidt, HC 28/5/ Access to underground areas during powering Risk: accidental massive helium release (as on 19 September) when superconducting.
CSCM type test: Diode Leads and Diodes Gerard Willering & Vincent Roger TE-MSC With thanks to Bernhard Auchmann, Zinour Charifoulline, Scott Rowan, Arjan.
1 CC & MP - CC10 - CERN Crab LHC J. Wenninger CERN Beams Department for the LHC Machine Protection Panel.
Upper limits for QPS thresholds for selected 600 A circuits B. Auchmann, D. Rasmussen, A. Verweij with kind help from J. Feuvrier, E. Garde, C. Gilloux,
13 kA Energy Extraction LHC machine Gert Jan Coelingh – Knud Dahlerup-Petersen – TE/MPE/EE.
Essential lessons from commissioning of the 28 EE systems of LHC sector A corrector circuits.
BCWG - 16/11/20102 Content WHY do we need a HW Commissioning campaign? WHAT are we going to do? HOW are we going to do it? ElQA QPS Powering Tests Planning.
FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 1/19 FRESCA II Dipole review March 28 th, CERN Magnet protection Protection studies.
Faster ramp rates in main LHC magnets Attilio Milanese 7 Oct Thanks to M. Bajko, L. Bottura, P. Fessia, M. Modena, E. Todesco, D. Tommasini, A. Verweij,
TE-MPE -EI 23/6/2011,Antonopoulou Evangelia RQS circuit Simulation results of Quench Antonopoulou Evangelia June 2011 Thanks to E. Ravaioli.
Advanced simulations of events in the RB circuit Short circuit to ground Quench of a dipole provoked by the quench heaters Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to.
Machine Protection Review, R. Denz, 11-APR Introduction to Magnet Powering and Protection R. Denz, AT-MEL-PM.
Main dipole circuit simulations Behavior and performance analysis PSpice models Simulation results Comparison with QPS data Ongoing activities Emmanuele.
LHC circuit modeling Goal: Create a library of electrical models and results for each circuit Useful and usable for the next 20 years…… Web site cern.ch/LHC-CM.
TE-MPE –EI, TE - MPE - TM 8/12/2011, Antonopoulou Evelina RQS circuit Simulation results Antonopoulou Evelina December 2011 Thanks to E. Ravaioli.
Tiina Salmi and Antti Stenvall, Tampere University of technology, Finland FCCW2016 Roma, April 13 th, 2016 Quench protection of the 16T dipoles for the.
Comparison of magnet designs from a circuit protection point of view Arjan Verweij, CERN, TE-MPE with input from M. Prioli, R. Schmidt, and A. Siemko A.
Machine Protection Review, Markus Zerlauth, 12 th April Magnet powering system and beam dump requests Markus Zerlauth, AB-CO-IN.
The most likely cause of death for a superconducting magnet Input data for thermal modeling of Nb 3 Sn Superconducting Magnets by Andrew Davies Find the.
Quench behavior of the main dipole magnets in the LHC By Gerard Willering, TE-MSC On behalf of the MP3-CCC team Acknowledgements TE-MSC, MP3, BE-OP, TE-MPE,
CSCM Test description and Risk assessment  Goal  The typical and ultimate current cycle  Test sequence for type test and regular test  Risk assessment.
AHMEDABAD INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
D1 and D2 powering and protection
MQY-30 Test Result Report
Quench Simulation at GSI
Powering LHC magnets version 30/3/2007.
STEAM Applications Part I The circuit point of view
Quench estimations of the CBM magnet
Status of RB circuit modeling PSpice models Simulation results: nQPS & oQPS Comparison with QPS data Ongoing activities Emmanuele Ravaioli TE-MPE-TM
Superconducting Circuits, a generic view
12 October 2009 RRB Plenary R.-D. Heuer
Potential failure scenarios that can lead to very fast orbit changes and machine protection requirements for HL-LHC operation Daniel Wollmann with input.
Quench protection of the MAGIX high-order correctors
LHC Dipole Diode Insulation Consolidation Review (I) INTRODUCTION
Circuit-protection aspects of different preliminary magnet-design options
Powering the LHC Magnets
FMEA of a CLIQ-based protection of D1
Concepts for magnet circuit powering and protection M
Update on circuit protection simulations of the HL-LHC Inner Triplet circuit Matthias Mentink, Circuit specifics + STEAM simulations: Samer Yammine, LEDET.
Dipole diode lead resistance measurement
Comparison of magnet designs from a circuit-protection point-of-view
Circuits description and requirements - Closed Session-
Status of studies on FCC magnet circuit architecture and protection
3 issues identified in review
Machine Protection Xu Hongliang.
Chapter 7 – Response of First Order RL and RC Circuits
Novel Protection Schemes for HVDC System
COOLING OF POWER DEVICES
Andrzej Siemko (CERN) and Marco Zanetti (MIT)
Hilumi WP3 meeting, 1 October 2014
Circuit Components.
Quench calculations of the CBM magnet
Simulations of failure cases 1st STEAM Workshop June 2019
Other arguments to train two sectors to 7 TeV
Presentation transcript:

Dipole circuit & diode functioning Risk analysis of single and double short-to-ground Arjan Verweij, TE-MPE-PE RB circuit and diode functioning Voltage in the circuit Single short Double short

RB circuit L=15.2 H I (6.5 TeV)=11 kA I (7 TeV)=11.85 kA Even point Odd point L=15.2 H I (6.5 TeV)=11 kA I (7 TeV)=11.85 kA Earth current measurement system (H. Thiesen, 2008)

RB circuit & diode functioning Even point Odd point Normal operation (ramp-up/down, plateau): the diodes are not conducting. Quench: - the power converter is switched off, - the quench heaters of the quenching magnet(s) are fired, → voltage over the quenching magnet(s) rapidly increases, → bypass diodes of the quenching magnets open when VQ>6 V, → current in the quenching magnet quickly transfers into its bypass diode, typically with a characteristic time of a few 100 ms. - the EE switches are opened (with 0.34 & 0.6 s delay in odd & even points.

RB circuit & diode functioning The diode voltage reduces quickly (<1 s) from about 6 V to about 1 V due to the warming-up of the silicon wafer. The current in the circuit then decays with a time constant of about 100 s (t=L/REE). The diodes of the quenching magnets, including the busbars towards these diodes, have to support this current. The energy dissipated in the diode, Q=∫VIdt, is mainly absorbed by the heat sink, and finally transferred to the helium.

Some numbers Helium volume in diode box About 5.2 liter Helium enthalpy from 1.9 to 4.3 K 6 kJ Latent heat helium 13 kJ Helium enthalpy from 4.3 K to 100 K 20 kJ Volume heat sink 2x1.6 liter Cross-section diode lead 285 mm2 I [kA] Qstored [MJ] MIIT’s [MA2s] Qdiode [kJ] Tdiode-lead [K] Theat-sink [K] 6 274 1800 600 42 138 11 920 6050 1100 97 191 13 1284 8450 1300 158 211 Assumptions: adiabatic conditions, Vforward=1 V, t=100 s, RRRCu=100, no additional contact resistances

Voltage in the circuit (at 10 kA) After Fast Power Abort (FPA), the voltage distribution in the circuit changes significantly.

Voltage in the circuit after a quench (at 10 kA) The voltage distribution in the circuit does not depend much on the number and location of the quenched magnets.

Single short in the RB circuit A single short with sufficiently low impedance causes the 1 A fuse to blow, hence moving the 0 V of the circuit to the location of the short. The associated strong voltage transients very likely triggers the Quench Detection Systems of one or more magnets. Example for a short at z=2000 m

Probability for a single short LHC statistics: 2 shorts occurred for about 250 quench events, corresponding to about 1000 magnet quenches (with I>1.5 kA) Line A Quench @11 kA Short P1=0.002 Line B 2 secondary quenches @ 9 kA Short P2=2*0.002=0.004 2 secondary quenches @ 3 kA Short P3=2*0.002=0.004 Probability of one short for a high-current quench event is SPi=0.01 A single short should not give collateral damage, but might require warm-up and repair if the fault cannot be removed by the “Earth Fault Burner”.

Possible scenario for a double short-to-ground 1 4 2 10 11 3 89 3 6 5 7 10 11 1. Magnet quench 2. Converter switch-off 3. EE1 and EE2 switched in, giving high V 4. Short 1 6. Trips/quenches in other magnets due to voltage transients 5. Fuse blows 7. Short 2 8. RB circuit divided in 2 sub-circuits 9. Inductance imbalance generates current through the shorts 10. Energy dissipated in the short causes melting of the debris 11. Arcs are generated, probably remaining during most of the discharge

Simulation of a double short-to-ground The RB circuits are modelled in detail using PSpice-STEAM (6500 components per circuit!!) The simulations showed very good agreement with measured transient phenomena: Power converter switch-off, EE switch opening, Appearance of a short-to-ground, Fuse blowing in the earth measurement system. Short 1 Short 2 Unknown parameters in the simulation are: Resistances of the shorts (we assume about 1 W) The heat needed to melt the debris (we assume 3 kJ) Voltage needed to generate an arc (we assume 15 V) Voltage during the arcing process (we assume 15 V)

Simulation of a double short-to-ground I=11 kA (Qstored=920 MJ) Simulations by M. Prioli Edebris 1,2 = 3 kJ Eshort 1,2 = 22 MJ E EE2 = 80 MJ E EE1 = 800 MJ The energy dissipated in the arcs depends mainly on the position of the two arcs, the voltage of the arc, and the current(s) at which the shorts occur.

Remarks The build-up of the current in the shorts is slow, typically 100-1000 A/s. So most likely the debris melts, contrary to the Earth Fault Burner, where the debris might blow away. The heat needed to melt the debris has no impact on the occurrence of arcs and on the energy dissipated in the arcs. For info: =1 mm, length=40 mm 2 𝐾 1500 𝐾 𝐶𝑝𝑉𝑑𝑇 =200 J =10 mm, thickness=2 mm 2 𝐾 1500 𝐾 𝐶𝑝𝑉𝑑𝑇 =1000 J

Probability for a double short Line A 8 quenches @ 11 kA Short 2 P1=8*0.0022 Line B Short 1 8 quenches @ 11 kA Short 2 P2=8*0.0022 2 secondary quenches @ 9 kA Short 2 P3=2*0.0022 2 secondary quenches @ 3 kA Quench @11 kA Short 2 P4=2*0.0022 4 quenches @ 9 kA Short 2 P5=2*4*0.0022 2 secondary quenches @ 9 kA Short 1 4 quenches @ 9 kA Short 2 P6=2*4*0.0022 2 quenches @3 kA 2 secondary quenches @ 3 kA Short 2 P7=2*2*0.0022 Short 1 2 quenches @ 3 kA Short 2 P8=2*2*0.0022

Probability and consequences of a double short Lines I [kA] Qst [MJ] Earcs [MJ] P1 8*(0.002)2=0.0032% A-A 11 908 Small P2 A-B 0 to 46 MJ P3 2*(0.002)2=0.0008% 9 608 0 to 30 MJ P4 3 68 P5 2*4*(0.002)2=0.0032% B-A P6 B-B P7 2*2*(0.002)2=0.0016% P8 0 to 3.4 MJ So about 0.01% (P2+P3+P5+P8) probability of dissipating an amount of energy in the arcs which is >100x the energy needed to melt a hole in the diode tube.

Final remarks Assuming a training campaign with 500 quench events gives: on average 500*0.01=5 shorts-to-ground in the diode tube. → delay of several days (per short) or possibly warm-up a 5% probability of a double short without puncture of the diode tube. → delay of several days or possibly warm-up a 5% probability of a double short with puncture of the diode tube. → severe damage and warm-up (all analysis based on very low statistics) Ongoing or foreseen studies: Further development of the PSpice-STEAM model Study if/how we can reduce the voltage transients in the circuit (change the 100 W bypass resistors, add capacitors) Study if it is beneficial to increase the rating of the earth fuse Study on an improved earth measurement & monitoring system