WSDOT Passenger Rail Service Outcome Agreements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome to Site Management Amy Thompson. Agenda I.Foundation Introductions Setting the Session Agenda II.Site Management Principles III.Site Management.
Advertisements

Intercity Bus Program: Alternative Strategy for Rural Transport
Challenges to Tubular Rail Innovation. Profitability. Acceptance by Public and Regulators. Multiple Jurisdictions. 1.
John Barton, P.E. Assistant Executive Director for Engineering Operations Texas Department of Transportation Mid-States Highway-Rail Safety Conference.
Transportation Border Working Group
Carter Danne, PE, PTOE Parametrix, Inc. Assessment of Point Defiance Bypass for High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail.
1.  NCHRP Report 657 is the general guidebook for implementing passenger service on shared corridors  This guidebook “drills down” on the issue of service.
Overview CMAA May 29, What is Metro Regional Rail >Manage more than 165 miles of R/W in L.A. County >Develop capital improvement projects and.
Overview ACEC July 16, What is Metro Regional Rail >Manage more than 165 miles of R/W in L.A. County >Develop capital improvement projects and.
New Intercity Bus Funding Approach Stephen Abernathy, AICP Intercity Bus Program Manager Public Transportation Division.
Oregon Passenger Rail EIS Project Leadership Council Hal Gard, Rail Administrator, ODOT John Sibold, Cascade Rail Corridor Director, WSDOT Salem, OR June.
Dan O’Neal, Chairman Washington State Transportation Commission.
SHRP2 R16- Innovations for Delivering DOT/RR Projects Expeditiously COI Meeting April 11, 2012 SCORT – P ORTLAND, M AINE Presented by F RANK A. F REY F.
Passenger Rail Discussion Group April 17, 2012 Seattle, Washington Cross Border Passenger Rail: A Canadian Perspective.
1 Passenger Rail Solutions – Balanced Approach 2009 Ark-La-Tex Rail Summit May 9, 2009 – Marshall, TX Joe Adams, Vice President – Public Affairs.
CSX’s I-95 Corridor for the Virginians for High Speed Rail March 13, 2007.
1 SCORT 2010 September 21, 2010 David Valenstein Federal Railroad Administration State Rail Planning.
BC / WA J OINT T RANSPORTATION M ANAGEMENT F RAMEWORK Paula J. Hammond, P.E. Washington State Department of Transportation Secretary & Executive Council.
High Speed Rail on the Horizon State Public Transportation Partnerships Conference Westin Hotel, Seattle, WA August 3 - 5, 2010 Paula Hammond Secretary.
Port of Oakland. Northern California’s ‘Capitol Corridor’ on Union Pacific Railroad The busiest intercity passenger route in the country outside the NEC.
2010 SCORT/TRB Rail Capacity Workshop September 22, 2010 Jacksonville, Florida George C. Xu, Ph.D. Executive Manager, Planning and Research State Rail.
VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS SYSTEM PLAN 2040
BNSF Railway AASHTO Rail Conference Oklahoma City, Oklahoma September 21, 2009 Rick Depler BNSF Assistant Director Passenger Train Operations.
Railroad 101 Equipment April 9, Next Generation Corridor Equipment Committee  Established by Section 305 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement.
California State Rail Plan Overview Presentation Tribal Informational Meeting – March 1,
Barbara Ivanov Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Freight Systems Division Director Washington State Freight Mobility Plan Truck Freight.
Cross Border Rail Passenger Service Transportation Border Working Group Buffalo, New York – April 8, 2014.
Passenger Rail Agreements That Work Pan Am/NNEPRA Standing Committee on Rail Transportation September 13,
Stakeholder Agreements & Successful Business Relationships What Works for Maine SCORT September 20, 2010.
April 29,  Investment in new and improved services, with a strong focus on customer experience  Investment focused on improving efficiency  Shorter.
Intercity Rail Background/ Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Update Met Council TAC Meeting November 5, 2008.
North Carolina Rail Division Staff of about 50 Mission to: Improve & expand passenger rail service Improve safety at crossings Provide industrial access.
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
The Crescent Corridor Intermodal Freight Project Improving Lives and Livelihoods IN & AROUND DC Washington, DC December 16,
The Future of Freight and High Speed Rail in Today’s Economy SASHTO Annual Conference – Biloxi, MS Shayne Gill Program Manager Aviation, Passenger Rail.
Page 1 Fall, 2010 Regional Cross Sector Meeting Elements of an Effective Protocol.
August 2008 A Presentation To R.L. Banks & Associates, Inc. SCORT 2008 State Success Stories Intercity Passenger Rail Ken Withers, P.E.
Developing State-Amtrak Agreements Stephen Gardner Vice President, Policy and Development March 8, 2010.
Partnership Analysis & Enhancement Tool Kit Cindy S. Soloe Research Triangle Institute (RTI) April Y. Vance Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Michigan Accelerated Rail Service Passenger & Freight Director Kirk T. Steudle, P.E. Michigan Department of Transportation Faster, Better, Cheaper, Safer,
Project Management Process Transition & Closure Project Management Process Project Description Team Mission/ Assignment Major Milestones Boundaries Team.
Oregon Passenger Rail Leadership Council Meeting June 6, 2012.
6 November 2013 Created for IEA Conference Presented by: M. Cristina Ferrari NAVFAC SW Environmental Program Manager Naval Facilities Engineering Command.
Nate Asplund Director – Public Private Partnerships September 20, 2009 SCORT 2009 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
SCORT PRESENTATION CURRENT PASSENGER RAIL INITIATIVES MARCH 15, 2011 MARK IMHOFF, DIVISION DIRECTOR Colorado Department of Transportation Division of Transit.
Federal Funding Strategies Update Internal Working Document Update on Federal Funding California High-Speed Rail Authority In Partnership with: Kadesh.
I-5 North Coast Corridor. I-5 North Coast Corridor FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Are we “only” expanding the freeway? Why widen the freeway? Are we just.
Addressing Freight in the Planning and Programming Process presented by Jim Brogan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. July 11, 2001 FHWA Freight Planning Workshop.
Intercity Passenger Rail: Legislative Policy Recommendations Astrid Glynn Chair ASC Intercity Passenger Rail Legislative Team AASHTO Standing Committee.
Beyond Oil Transforming Transportation: A National Demonstration Project Breakout Session: A New Paradigm - Future of Transportation, Funding, and Climate.
Rail Planning Efforts and Lessons Learned Nicole Katsikides Acting Director, Office of Freight & Multimodalism Maryland Department of Transportation Presentation.
Phase-1: Prepare for the Change Why stepping back and preparing for the change is so important to successful adoption: Uniform and effective change adoption.
First Things First Grantee Overview.
Establishing good working relations
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
NCHRp Report 773 Capacity Modeling Guidebook FOR SHARED-USE PASSENGER AND FREIGHT RAIL OPERATIONS A project to develop guidebook for DOT’s, Public Agencies.
ODOT Railroad Access & Safety
IFSP Aligned with the Early Intervention Data System
Michigan Update Michigan Association of Rail Passengers
Evaluating ESD in RCEs: The Start-up Tools
2017 SCORT Conference Washington, DC
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FINAL QUARTERLY COLLABORATIVE WORKSHOP
Grade Crossing Safety Jason l. sanchez manager public projects
OVERVIEW: POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL (ptc)
2016 SCORT Annual Meeting Federal Grant Opportunities
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data
ROLE OF LAWYER IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LARGE MINING PROJECTS
Tia Citizens’ review panel November 5, 2018
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Presentation transcript:

WSDOT Passenger Rail Service Outcome Agreements SCORT Annual Meeting JASON BIGGS P.E., Operations Program Manager – Rail, Freight, and Ports Division February 2017

Amtrak Cascades corridor 467-mile corridor 300 miles in Washington 134 miles in Oregon 33 miles in British Columbia 18 stations from Vancouver, BC to Eugene, Oregon Current daily roundtrips Four between Seattle and Portland Two between Seattle and Vancouver, BC Two between Portland and Eugene, Oregon Starting in 2017 – Service Outcomes Two additional roundtrips between Seattle and Portland Improve reliability to 88% Shorter travel times between Seattle and Portland A service of the states of Washington and Oregon

Service Outcome Agreements Why are they needed? Definition and protection of public benefit Planned investments on Host Railroad owned corridors FRA Requirement for funding eligibility What do they provide? Sets forth how the corridor will be operated Defines Roles and Responsibility (State, Amtrak, Host RRs) Defines Reliability standard Corrective measures (if applicable)

Example requirements from WSDOT Service Outcome Agreements Obligation of WSDOT to construct improvements Obligation of WSDOT to maintain improvements (separate agreement) Amtrak permitted to operate new service Defines Operating Schedules Access and frequency for new service levels by host railroad Identifies On-Time Performance levels by host railroad Memorializes Maximum minutes of delay by host railroad Defines Term Length - 20 yr commitment

WSDOT Service Outcome – Reporting & Analysis Reporting and analysis is required to FRA on the service outcomes that includes contractual obligations of: At least an average of 88% on-time reliability Delay Ceiling thresholds to be met Report frequency includes weekly, monthly, quarterly, and yearly

Cascades Performance Database - Reporting Tool WSDOT, in coordination with BNSF and Amtrak, developed a comprehensive data source for Cascades train performance The database compares host railroad and Amtrak delay codes and minutes Imports data directly from external partners (Amtrak and BNSF) about all delays, reconciles differences, and reports data Allows WSDOT to document, analyze, verify and report compliance

Cascades Performance Database project timeline

Challenges met – lessons learned Timing - Early partner engagement is essential Start early to develop the parameters of the agreement Establish clear expectations and commitments among partners Recognize the long-tem commitments (20 Years) Resources – Resources are available and committed throughout life of SOA Discuss potential obstacles, such as access to proprietary data, data collection, and timing for release of data Understand the stakeholder’s business model and relationship to other agreements Acknowledge there will be differences on approach and create a process to address them fairly

Questions? For more information, please contact: Jason Biggs, P.E. Rail, Freight, and Ports Division Operations Program Manager BiggsJR@wsdot.wa.gov 360-705-6902