Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1):011401-011401-13. doi:10.1115/1.4034156 Figure Legend: Techno-economic analysis model architecture

Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1):011401-011401-13. doi:10.1115/1.4034156 Figure Legend: Thermodynamic cycle configuration of a recuperated cogeneration gas turbine engine: station numbering

Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1):011401-011401-13. doi:10.1115/1.4034156 Figure Legend: Effect of polystyrene insulation thickness on digester tank heat demand

Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1):011401-011401-13. doi:10.1115/1.4034156 Figure Legend: Effect of cycle OPR and COT on recuperated engine performance parameters: (a) electrical efficiency ratio, (b) heat rate ratio, and (c) recuperator GS inlet and AS exit temperatures for nrec=88%

Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1):011401-011401-13. doi:10.1115/1.4034156 Figure Legend: Effect of recuperator effectiveness nrec and cycle COT on electrical efficiency

Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1):011401-011401-13. doi:10.1115/1.4034156 Figure Legend: Effect of technology level on cogenerated gas turbine cycle performance parameters: (a) electrical efficiency ratio, (b) heat rate ratio, and (c) exergetic efficiency ratio

Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1):011401-011401-13. doi:10.1115/1.4034156 Figure Legend: Effect of COT and OPR on the exergetic efficiency of cogenerated gas turbine engine cycles

Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1):011401-011401-13. doi:10.1115/1.4034156 Figure Legend: Economic sustainability assessment: (a) annual revenue and expenses, (b) annual EBITDA, OIBDA and EBT, and (c) cash account

Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1):011401-011401-13. doi:10.1115/1.4034156 Figure Legend: Effect of gas turbine technology level on projected cash account

Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1):011401-011401-13. doi:10.1115/1.4034156 Figure Legend: Effect of gas turbine technology level on the IRR