IEEE SA IEEE LTSC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pete Johnston, Eduserv Foundation 16 April 2007 Update on work of Joint DCMI/IEEE LTSC Task.
Advertisements

IEEE Resource Aggregation Model for Learning, Education and Training.
IEEE SA IEEE LTSC. Standards for Learning Technology Reference Model for Resource Aggregation for Learning, Education and Training Service Interface for.
IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee Report to Plugfest 9 Prepared by Robby Robson Chair, LTSC February 23, 2005 LTSC This work.
AIP Archival Information Package – Defines how digital objects and its associated metadata are packaged using XML based files. METS (binding file) MODS.
ISO TC 184/SC4 1/12 Opening Plenary: QC Report Thomas L. Warren Technical Writing Program Ok.State U.
The Standards Development Process IEEE Gary Hoffman April 13, 2015.
E-Learning standards and meta-data: Case study ดร. น้ำทิพย์ วิภาวิน Sripatum University Library.
Robby Robson Chair, IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee Chair, NSDL Technology Committee June 2005 Understanding and Using Standards This work.
ISO/IEC CD and WD : Core Model and Model Mapping ISO/IEC JTC1/SC32/WG September 2005, Toronto SC32/WG2 Japan (Kanrikogaku Ltd) Masaharu.
IEEE Learning Technology Standards AICC MEETING – FEB 2004.
Learning Objects Metadata IEEE P Learning Technology Standards Committee London, UK March 16, 2000 Chair: Wayne Hodgins.
Progress report for ISO/IEC DTR Metadata Mapping Procedure(MMP) October, 2012 Tae-Sul Seo and Sung-Joon Lim 1.
SCORM Course Meta-data 3 major components: Content Aggregation Meta-data –context specific data describing the packaged course SCO Meta-data –context independent.
Common Terminology Services 2 CTS 2 Submission Team Status Update HL7 Vocabulary Working Group May 17, 2011.
WSDL – Web Service Definition Language  WSDL is used to describe, locate and define Web services.  A web service is described by: message format simple.
Overview of the IEEE Process. Overview of Process l Project Approval l Develop Draft Standards l Ballot Draft l IEEE-SA Standards Board Approval l Publish.
IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee Sponsor report to the CS SAB March 28, 2008.
Dual Logo Procedures Alex Zamfirescu IEC USNC TA TC93 Convener IEC TC93 WG2 November 2004.
Doc.: IEEE /197R3 Submission July 2003 Terry Cole, AMDSlide WG Technical Editor’s Report Opening Session, July 2003 Plenary Meeting Terry.
Draft-melia-mipshop-mobility-services-ps-01.txt. From IETF #66 Discuss MIH PS (as expressed by the WG chair) Need a single PS at WG level (several drafts.
802.16m Closing Report September 16, 2010 St. Petersburg, Russia Session # IEEE m-10/0030r1.
Doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission July 2007 Terry Cole, AMDSlide Common Editorial Comment Resolution Process Date: Authors:
March 8 -9, SAB Vice Chair's Report IEEE LTSC SPONSOR REPORT March 9, 2005.
Minutes Document March 2006 Terry Cole, AMDSlide Editor’s Best Practices Terry Cole, AMD WG Technical Editor & Simon Barber, Devicescape.
Doc.: IEEE /0077r1 Submission May 2013 Hyunduk Kang, ETRISlide 1 TG1 Closing Report for May 2013 Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Europortfolio Europass CV ePortfolio interop IMS ePortfolio Interoperability (ZIP IMS eP CP Import/Export) Model based on Europass CV Application Profile.
SAB Sponsor Progress Report
Proposed P802.16s Amendment Extension Request to RevCom
Publishing Services at the IEEE-SA
FAST TRACKING IN THE IEEE
IEC TC93 Liaison Report to DASC Alex Zamfirescu IEC USNC TA TC93 Convener IEC TC93 WG2 September 2004.
Sponsor Ballot Process
Editor’s Guideline Version 1.0
WG Technical Editor’s Report
WG Technical Editor’s Report
Proposed P802.16s Amendment Extension Request to RevCom
IEEE 802 Process for Interactions with ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6
NA4 Test Team Status Test meeting, 07/09/04
Submission Title: [Task Group 4 Low Rate WPANS Closing Report]
P802.11s report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
Submission Title: [Task Group 4 Low Rate WPANS Closing Report]
Submission Title: [Task Group 4 Low Rate WPANS Closing Report]
The Standards Development Process
John D’Ambrosia Recording Secretary, IEEE 802 LMSC
Training for developers of X-Road interfaces
IEEE WG Closing Report – March 2006
WG Technical Editor’s Opening Report (March)
IEC Maintenance Committee Report
WG Technical Editor’s Report
March 2009 Closing Report for TGmb
Carolina Mendoza-Puccini, MD
WG Technical Editor’s Report
Adaption PAR Process IEEE OpMan Section Process for adoption of non-IEEE Standards Sponsor identification A Sponsor, as defined by subclause.
TG3 Review Procedure Proposal
November 2010 doc.: IEEE /0872r4 November 2010
Closing IEEE 802 EC Friday 15th March 2019
(System Development Life Cycle)
Closing IEEE 802 EC Friday 15th March 2019
Closing IEEE 802 EC Friday 15th March 2019
IEEE OmniRAN TG Status Report to IEEE 802 WGs
Proposal of a Geographic Metadata Profile for WISE
DASC Meeting February 21, 2008 Victor Berman, Chair
WG Technical Editor’s Report
TGn Editor Report Sept 2008 Date: Authors:
DMTF Alliance Partner Technical Symposium
802.11F Meeting Report March 2002 Month 1998 doc.: IEEE /xxx
IEEE WG: P Status Review
Title: TG LE (P802.16h) Agenda - Session #51
Recording Secretary, IEEE 802 LMSC
Presentation transcript:

IEEE SA IEEE LTSC

LTSC Working Groups WG 10 Computer Managed Instruction WG 12 Learning Object Metadata WG 13 Reference Model for Resource Aggregation for Learning, Education and Training WG 20 Competencies

Working Group 13 We currently have 6 open PARs 1484.13.1 to 1484.13.6 1484.13.1 Standard for Learning Technology - Conceptual Model for Resource Aggregation for Learning, Education, and Training The remaining open PARS are a set of recommended practices for various Aggregation Format Mappings based on the Core Ontology developed in 1484.13.1. These are listed below. All 5 best practices are at the same stage.

Status 1484.13.6 Comprises a "human readable" standards document, and four accompanying ontology files. The draft standard has completed WG review. The editor is now integrating the WG comments and visualisations produced from the final ontology files into the document to produce the balloting draft. It is anticipated that this should be ready for Mandatory Editorial Coordination (MEC) in approximately 4 weeks. The balloting versions of the ontology files have been sent to the IEEE for hosting ready for ballot. Copyright clearances required for this standard are complete.

Status 1484.13.2 to 1484.13.6 Technical work has been completed and a first draft of the ontology file is available (this is required as supporting but not ballotable material for 1484.13.1) The WG is conducting quality review on the ontologies, creating required references and identifiers during this process. This work is completed on 4 of the 5 mapping best practices. Each mapping best practice will comprise a "human readable" best practice document, and two accompanying ontology files.

Status The format for the "human readable" form of the mapping best practice has been tested in an annex to 1484.13.1 Once the balloting draft of 1384.13.1 is completed the editor will begin drafting the "human readable" best practice documents and the WG chair will request appropriate copyright clearances. The order of drafting will be determined by the WG and may not be sequential.

Working Group 12 LOM Corrigenda LOM XML Binding Corrigenda

Working Group 11 1484.11.1 Revision Reaffirmation ballot on the XML binding of the current data model

1484.11.1 Revision We have decided that the data model needs to be restructured and have been researching a simple data model definition mechanism. We have decided that the data model needs to be restructured and have been researching a simple data model definition mechanism.

1484.11.1 Revision We are pursuing three related problems and have done work on all three Agreeing on a data model definition mechanism Agreeing on implementation use cases to validate data model requirements Mapping the current CMI data elements into the new model

1484.11.1 Revision We would like to adopt a data model definition mechanism that has some grounding and traction and are currently pursuing a variation of the System Entity Structure approach

1484.11.1 Revision We would like our solution to be broadly applicable to other runtime data used in learning applications. We would like to validate this with IEEE LTSC competency definition standard and the draft RAMLET core ontology. We are collaborating with the LETSI organization on implementation requirements and on a learning activity definition mechanism.

Working Group 20 Service Interface for the Exchange of Competency Models Service Interface for the Exchange of Reusable Competency Definitions

Service Interface for the Exchange of Competency Models Project 1484.20.2 This standard describes a service interface for exchanging models of competencies, including the structure and elements used to describe a competency. It is limited to sharing the information needed for a system to identify the competency models it uses and how it instantiates them. This standard does not prescribe a way to exchange the descriptions of specific competencies or the competence of an entity such as an individual, team, or organization.

Service Interface for the Exchange of Reusable Competency Definitions Project 1484.20.3 This standard describes a service interface for exchanging definitions of competencies using IEEE 1484.20.1-2007, Standard for Reusable Competency Definitions. This standard is limited to exchanging the definitions of competencies and does not prescribe a way to exchange competency models or the competence of an entity such as an individual, team, or organization.