QUALITY ACTION PROJECT STRUCTURE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State University – Higher School of Economics
Advertisements

Short overview of the SCORE project
The Education Reform Initiative of South Eastern Europe-an instrument for regional cooperation Towards a European Qualification Framework for Lifelong.
ClimDev-Africa Program & African Climate Policy Center (ACPC)
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
Role of RAS in the Agricultural Innovation System Rasheed Sulaiman V
Identification of critical success factors for implementing NLLS, through collaboration and exchange of expertise IDENTIFY LLP-2008-RO-KA1-KA1NLLS.
S3 Project aim The main goal, thus expected result, of the S3 project would be to strengthen tools used for Structural Fund policies (SF), through the.
EVALUATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGY PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
PRESENTATION The Structured Dialogue. What? A participative process for young people and decision-makers to discuss and elaborate recommendations jointly.
Name Speaker This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding from the European.
The Programme is funded by Erasmus+ under
Needs Assessment: Young People’s Drug and Alcohol Services in Edinburgh City EADP Children, Young People and Families Network Event 7 th March 2012 Joanne.
Innovation in the Rural Development Networks Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development Matthias Langemeyer & Iman Boot.
Security, Democracy & Cities Security, Democracy & Cities Democracy,
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
1 WERT: WP 5 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010 Aim To pilot and evaluate the content and context of the course material with target groups To help women.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENS SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP CONSUMER
Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA), Germany This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which.
Health Promotion as a Quality issue
DG Education et Culture Socrates - Comenius 1 Europe and education School education.
María Amor Barros del Río Gender as content in research in Horizon 2020 GENDER AS CONTENT IN RESEARCH IN HORIZON 2020 CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP FOR RESEARCHERS.
This presentation is the intellectual property of the authors. Contact for permission to reprint and/or distribute This poster arises from.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
Christine Winkelmann This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding from the.
This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding from the European Union within.
Matthias Wentzlaff-Eggebert, BZgA This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
Project Manager – MCESD Project Partner - MEUSAC “ Closer to Europe ” Operational Programme 2 Cohesion Policy Empowering People for More Jobs.
"The role of Rural Networks as effective tools to promote rural development" TAIEX/Local Administration Facility Seminar on Rural Development Brussels,
European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education Project updates Marcella Turner-Cmuchal.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND CLUE final conference, 24 September 2014, Turin EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Johanna.
Teacher’s Professional Development in EU Policy
Aiming High – Strategies for meaningful youth participation from Link Up Jacquelyne Alesi.
Arancha Oviedo EQAVET Secretariat
Project KA2-CBHE School-to-Work Transition for Higher education students with disabilities in Serbia, Bosnia & Herzegovina and Montenegro (Trans2Work)
Support Sustainable Research through a
WP1 - Consortium coordination and management
ICT PSP 2011, 5th call, Pilot Type B, Objective: 2.4 eLearning
GREECE-ALBANIA IPA CROSS BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME
Evaluating ESD in RCEs: The Start-up Tools
A&M Workplan Objectives
UNECE Work Session on Gender Statistics, Belgrade,
Presentation about BILAT USA 4.0
EuropeAid Co-operation Office
Alessandra Luchetti Deputy Head of Unit
Background to The Conference
HPH Strategy Seminar Beijing, China 7 september 2013 Andrea Limbourg
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
Introduction to the training
SRH & HIV Linkages Agenda
Blueprint Outlines practical, consumer-focused, state and local strategies for improving eating and physical activity that will lead to healthier lives.
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Mandates for Unit A6 "Statistical cooperation" (Doc MGSC/2013/16)
Family and Community Services
Key Stakeholders are aware of the Coalitions activities
Juan Gonzalez eGovernment & CIP operations
Strategy
Strengthening the Role of EQAVET National Reference Points
Proposal for a workshop on monitoring EURO-INBO 2013
Field monitoring Project (number and title)
NDPHS Work Plan for 2012 NDPHS 8th Partnership Annual Conference
The Active Citizens Fund in Bulgaria Programme Priorities and Measures for Support Short version of the presentation delivered at the Official Launch.
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
Getting Knowledge into Action for Healthcare Quality
- Kick-off meeting - ERANET Cofund BlueBio WP4 (Leader: AEI)
Presentation transcript:

QUALITY ACTION PROJECT STRUCTURE Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (QHP) EU Joint Action Project 2013-16 Name Speaker This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding from the European Union within the framework of the Health Programme.

The Joint Action “Improving Quality in HIV Prevention” (QHP) TITLE Funding: 2008-2013 Public Health Programme of the European Commission (Work Plan 2012) Project Management: Executive Agency for Health and Consumers (EAHC) Duration: 01/03/2013 – 29/02/2016 EU co-funding: 1.5 Mio Euro (42%) Partner contribution: 2.0 Mio Euro (58%) This is the official administrative title of the project and relevant for all contractual documentation and communication. For dissemination we use the short title “Quality Action” with the subtitle “Improving HIV prevention in Europe”. This way all key words are covered. The EU co-funding contribution is not distributed equally among the partners. Individual ratios of EU funding/Partner contribution depend on the financial capacity, daily rates and ability to contribute staff working days.

Partners Associated Partners: 25 Collaborating Partners: 17 TITLE Associated Partners: 25 Collaborating Partners: 17 Countries: 18 + 7 = 25 Government Organisations: 12 Non-Government Organisations: 13 East: 7 West: 11 Associated Partners are co-signatories of the Agreement and have a budget as part of the Joint Action. They receive EU co-funding and are responsible to contribute to deliverbles and reporting. Collaborating partners have expressed their support for the project and contribute their own resources. They participate in work packages, the advisory group and the practical application of tools. Joint Actions are the joint projects of governments. Ministries of health of all participating countries made the decision to participate. Ministries then ‘designated’ organisation(s) in their country to become the actual partners. Ministries could designate government or non-government organisations. Quality Action has a balance of government and non-government organisations as partners. This reflects the fact that HIV prevention works best in a partnership approach. The context for HIV prevention differs between western, central and eastern European countries (and to some extent between north and south). These differences include epidemiology and priority populations, political, social and cultural contexts as well as different histories of responding to the epidemic. The Joint Action has partners in all these different areas. It aims to consider these differences to make the project equally useful for all partners. Associated Partners are co-signatories of the Agreement and have a budget as part of the Joint Action. They receive EU co-funding and are responsible to contribute to deliverbles and reporting. The Joint Action has partners in all these different areas. It aims to consider these differences to make the project equally useful for all partners.

Coordinator TITLE The Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA) is an authority in the portfolio of the German Federal Ministry of Health and responsible for: Principles and guidelines for health promotion and health education Interagency coordination National disease prevention and health promotion campaigns Training programs and materials International cooperation (WHO, EU) BZgA develops principles and guidelines on the contents and methods of health promotion and health education. BZgA coordinates health promotion activities among a range of stakeholders (Federal states (Länder), associations, health funds) It runs nation-wide campaigns and programs It also has a separate focus area for research and quality improvement Topic areas include: HIV/AIDS and STI prevention Prevention of abuse/consumption of legal and illegal substances: tobacco, alcohol and illicit drugs Prevention of nutrition-related diseases Sexuality education and family planning Organ, tissue and blood/plasma donation Planning, implementation and evaluation of prevention campaigns Development and implementation of training programmes and instruments International cooperation (WHO, EU)

Quality Action: Objectives TITLE Train 60 trainers/facilitators to support the use of QA/QI tools Support 80 applications of QA/QI tools Document resulting quality principles and criteria Incorporate QA/QI into HIV prevention policy Each country selects trainer/facilitators who will support the application of the tools in their country. Some may collaborate across several countries in a region. Trainers/facilitators will have existing skills and then attend the capacity building activities of Quality Action. Each country selects the HIV prevention programs and projects that will participate in the application of QA/QI tools as part of Quality Action. Quality Action aims to have an overall mix of projects and programs reflecting HIV prevention priorities according to epidemiological evidence. The project will collect and analyse individual results of applying the tools. We will translate emerging trends into common quality principles and criteria that can be transferred across different contexts. These can then be used to increase quality levels of new HIV prevention activities right from the planning stage. To support a focus on quality improvement, it will be helpful if all stakeholders agree to spend time and resources to make it possible. This requires awareness and support also at the policy level. Quality Action will work with policy makers to incorporate quality into policy statements and strategic and action plans.

Quality Action: Products TITLE 5 practical QA/QI tools Training modules, including an e-learning package Starting environment and evaluation report Collection of case studies Charter for quality in HIV prevention Policy kit Stakeholder platform Core documents and translations Describing the project’s starting environment includes the extent of current and previous quality activities in HIV prevention in Europe. Training modules support building the capacity of trainers/facilitators who will then use them to train others locally. Case studies document the stories of practical application. They are also used to investigate barriers and enablers of quality improvement in the HIV prevention field. Charter: Agreed quality principles and criteria for HIV prevention. Includes the rationales and recommendations for future practical application in the field. The Policy kit will contain a policy review, a glossary of terms and definitions, recommended policy statements/strategic actions and supporting advocacy methods. The stakeholder plarform is the interactive component of the project website. Core documents and their translations are collated towards the end of the project period to form a package to support future efforts in this area.

Quality Action: Work Packages TITLE 4. Tools 5. Capacity Building 6. Practical Application 7. Quality Principles and Criteria 8. Policy Development 1. Coordination 2. Dissemination 3. Evaluation All Joint Actions include three basic, overarching work packages to cover basic project management functions The content-specific work packages correspond to the Joint Action’s objectives

WP6: Practical Application WP5: Capacity Building WP4: Tools Each of the project’s five content-specific Work Packages targets one of the key elements of the Quality Improvement diagram: Work Package 4 (Tools) provides practical methods and processes for self-reflection and participation. Work Package 5 (Capacity Building) empowers the people who do the prevention work to engage with quality and apply it to their projects/programs. Work Package 6 (Practical Application) recruits projects and programs in Europe to participate in the practical application of tools. Work Package 7 (Principles and Criteria) analyses the results of quality improvement activities and documents them for future reference and dissemination. Work Package 8 (Policy Development) advocates for quality as a common goal and incorporates it at the structural level. WP7: Principles and Criteria WP8: Policy Development

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Coordinator Steering Group 25 Associated Partners Advisory Group 25 Associated Partners in 18 Countries Work Package Leaders: Implementation Advice Consensus Conflict resolution 16 Collaborating Partners in 7 countries BZgA: Coordination Administration Budget Timeline Deliverables Milestones Representation Reporting The coordinator convenes and facilitates the Steering Group and the Advisory Group. The Steering Group coordinates the work of all the difference work packages and aims to make decisions by consensus. The Advosory Group provides advice and contributes to dissemination. It is made up of representatives from collaborating partners, the IQhiv core group, international organisations and peak bodies and invited experts. The coordinator takes requests for advice from the Steering Group to the Advisory Group, reports back and links work package leaders with relevant experts who can offer specific advice. The coordinator communicates with the EU regarding the funding agreement and administrative matters. Work package leaders organise the work of the work package with all partners who contribute to the work package. WP7 Scientific Reference Panel

Project overview: Year 1 TITLE Tools: ready for application Training packages Recruiting programs and projects to apply tools Work package work plans Stakeholder platform Evaluation: Starting Environment Data collection instruments Policy review The project can be divided into three main phases, each about 12 months in duration. The first year is taken up with preparation, organisation and getting materials ready.

Project overview: Year 2 TITLE Training Part 1 National/regional training events Practical application of tools Training Part 2 Data collection Policy networking Training and practical application take place in the second year.

Project overview: Year 3 TITLE Data analysis Developing quality principles and criteria Policy discussion Case studies from practical application Final revisions to tools and training packages Concluding project conference Dissemination Reports The third year focuses on the results and outcomes of the practical application as well as reporting and dissemination.

Thank you for your attention! TITLE For information: matthias.wentzlaff-eggebert@bzga.de To apply tools: carolin.vierneisel@dah.aidshilfe.de Matthias Wentzlaff-Eggebert is the contact person at BZgA, the coordinating partner of Quality Action. Carolin Vierneisel coordinates Work Package 6: Practical Application. She can assist you if you want to join the main activities of Quality Action and apply a QA/QI tool to your work as part of the project. 9 Reasons to get involved in Quality Action: Become aware of what you are already doing well Learn about when, how and why you are already successful (and sometimes fail) Get new ideas on how to improve what you are doing Increase participation and benefit from stakeholder input Provide yourself with space and time to reflect on your work and build on your team and internal communication Enhance your co-workers/employees’ work satisfaction Build different types of evidence that supports your HIV prevention interventions Simplify and enhance the planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of your projects and programs Network with other European organisations in make HIV prevention more effective.