Results and Discussion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 What is? Structural Equation Modeling (A Very Brief Introduction) Patrick Sturgis University of Surrey.
Advertisements

Structural Equation Modeling Using Mplus Chongming Yang Research Support Center FHSS College.
CHAPTER 21 Inferential Statistical Analysis. Understanding probability The idea of probability is central to inferential statistics. It means the chance.
Chapter 12 Simple Linear Regression
Multivariate Data Analysis Chapter 11 - Structural Equation Modeling.
Structural Equation Modeling
1 1 Slide © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning™ Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Correlation and Regression Analysis
Simple Linear Regression Analysis
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS & Updated by SPIROS VELIANITIS.
Introduction to Linear Regression and Correlation Analysis
Regression Analysis Regression analysis is a statistical technique that is very useful for exploring the relationships between two or more variables (one.
1 Example 1.0: Indirect Effects and the Test of Mediation.
INT 506/706: Total Quality Management Introduction to Design of Experiments.
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide Multiple Regression n Multiple Regression Model n Least Squares Method n Multiple Coefficient of Determination n Model Assumptions n Testing.
1 1 Slide © 2004 Thomson/South-Western Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 7: fitting a model, fit indices, comparingmodels, statistical power.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Chapter 15 Multiple Regression n Multiple Regression Model n Least Squares Method n Multiple.
1 1 Slide © 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
Chapter 16 The Chi-Square Statistic
Multiple Regression and Model Building Chapter 15 Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Regression Chapter 16. Regression >Builds on Correlation >The difference is a question of prediction versus relation Regression predicts, correlation.
Measurement Models: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Chapter 13 Multiple Regression
WP coordinator meeting June 17/ WP3 progress report.
1 1 Slide © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning™ Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Chapter 10 The t Test for Two Independent Samples
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
How to Fool Yourself with SEM James G. Anderson, Ph.D Purdue University.
Chapter 12 Simple Linear Regression n Simple Linear Regression Model n Least Squares Method n Coefficient of Determination n Model Assumptions n Testing.
Presentation on AMOS Analysis of MOment Structures By James Bowers, Jr., MA Ben Jarrett, BS from the Applied Research Lab.
Chapter 17 STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)  Relatively new statistical technique used to test theoretical or causal.
INTRODUCTION TO MULTIPLE REGRESSION MULTIPLE REGRESSION MODEL 11.2 MULTIPLE COEFFICIENT OF DETERMINATION 11.3 MODEL ASSUMPTIONS 11.4 TEST OF SIGNIFICANCE.
Chapter 8 Introducing Inferential Statistics.
01-Business intelligence
Chapter 13 Simple Linear Regression
Chapter 14 Introduction to Multiple Regression
The University of Manchester
Structural Equation Modeling using MPlus
Project 5 Data Mining & Structural Equation Modeling
Chapter 15 Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Path Analysis in SEM.
Multiple Regression Analysis and Model Building
Essentials of Modern Business Statistics (7e)
Chapter 13 Created by Bethany Stubbe and Stephan Kogitz.
Distribution of soil P fractions in oil palm plantation of
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling
Chapter 10 Verification and Validation of Simulation Models
Statistics in Applied Science and Technology
Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Essential Statistics (a.k.a: The statistical bare minimum I should take along from STAT 101)
IE-432 Design Of Industrial Experiments
Assessing Student Learning
The Nature of Probability and Statistics
The University of Manchester
9 Tests of Hypotheses for a Single Sample CHAPTER OUTLINE
Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida
Prepared by Lee Revere and John Large
Chapter 11: The ANalysis Of Variance (ANOVA)
Introduction Procedure
Multiple Regression Models
Multiple Regression Chapter 14.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
SOC 681 – Causal Models with Directly Observed Variables
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) With Latent Variables
Chapter 9 Dummy Variables Undergraduated Econometrics Page 1
Structural Equation Modeling
St. Edward’s University
Presentation transcript:

Results and Discussion RE-SPECIFICATION OF MODELS OF THE PHOSPHORUS CYCLE IN TROPICAL SOILS USING STRUCTURAL EQUATION Marcus Vinicius da Silva Sales1*; Antonio Carlos Gama-Rodrigues, 1 Emanuela Forestieri Gama-Rodrigues1; Seldon Aleixo1. 1Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro – UENF *Correspond Author: Email: msales@uenf.br, Av. Alberto Lamego 2000, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brasil; 28013-602 Introduction Phosphorus ( P ) is essential for plant metabolism and nutrient limitations on its availability , both at the beginning of the vegetative cycle and the production cycle can result in huge losses in agricultural productivity . In strongly weathered tropical soils in particular, the ability of fixation of P in the soil is high, which can lead to low productivity . Thus , understanding of the P cycle in soil becomes important to establish management strategies aimed at increasing the availability of this nutrient to plants in low-input production systems . The aim of this study was to use the technique of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with latent variables using the SPSS AMOS 22 IBM software to re-specify hypothetical models of the P cycle, based on the method of Hedley sequential extraction of P, to check interactions among the pools of P and to identify which pools act as a P source or sink in unfertilized soils in different land uses. Figure 1: The hypothesized structural model for the soil P cycle. .   Materials and Methods Soil P data were collected from Gama-Rodrigues et al. (2014) and corresponded to studies that used the sequential fractionation technique developed by Hedley et al. (1982) and modified by Tiessen and Moir (1993). The database consisted of 81 observations covering a wide variation of unfertilized soil types under different land use systems in the tropical region (native forest, secondary forest, agroforest, savannah and pasture). The P fractions used were resin inorganic P (Pi­), bicarbonate P (Pi and organic phosphate (Po)), hydroxide P (Pi and Po), sonic P (Po), HCl Pi, HCl Phot and residual P. The variables were separated by specific groups through factor analysis, thus allowing the identification of pools , representing the models presented , Figures 1 and 2 .            The models were constructed using the AMOS 22 statistical software that works with structural equation modeling , and allows addition of a graphical visualization , to understand the processes of inter - relationships between the measured and latent variables . Measurable variables are variables that can be directly measured variables and latent variables are formed by concepts. Figure 2. Hypothetical model of the relations of P fractions (measured variables) to pool available (latent variable) from the SEM to the cycle of soil P in different agroforestry systems in southern Bahia, Brazil. The numbers correspond to the estimated standardized parameter (P<0.05). Variable error (ɛ2-ε5 and ζ1) are normalized values​​. (X2 = 6.9, df = 6, P <0.33). Figure 2: Respecified structural equation model for the soil P cycle. All measured variables (in boxes) are represented as effect indicators associated with latent variables (in circles). The numbers correspond to the standardized parameters estimated (P < 0.001). ** Significant at P < 0.01. ° Significant at P < 0.1. Error variables (ԑ 1 – ԑ6, δ8, ζ1) are standardized values. Model χ2 = 7.02, df = 7, p = 0.427.   Results and Discussion Conclusion In general, the respecified models were adequate and able to represent a generalization of P cycling in soils that have similar characteristics as the sampled data. The model, not only is there a direct relationship between the Organic, Occluded and primary Mineral pools and the Available P pool, but the indirect relationships via the Organic pool were theoretically and statistically adequate. The respecified model corroborated the hypothesis of the dependence of the Available P pool to the Organic pool in unfertilized tropical soils. The respecified model shows good results that confirm the assumptions of the initial model, Figure 1. Organic and primary Mineral pools are sources of P by direct relations to the pool of Available P , while the Occluded pool, shows up as the sink of P direct relation to the pool of Available P . The primary Minerals pool showed high positive overall effect (β = 0.774), the Occluded pool also had a positive overall effect, though not significant (β = 0.028). The Available P pool was explained by 70% of the variations. The respecified model presented is adjusted with χ2 = 7.019, df = 7, p = 0.427, GFI = .976, CFI = 1.000 e RMSEA = 0.006, Figure 2. The results of this study showed that no theory of the P cycle can or should be represented by a single model of structural equations. Depending on the respecification conducted, if performed correctly and without changing the general idea of the hypothetical model, very approximate results may be obtained, which will only then require sound judgment to choose the best model. References GAMA-RODRIGES, A.C., SALES, M.V.S., SILVA, P.S.D., COMERFORD, N.B., CROPPER, W.P., GAMA-RODRIGUES, E.F.. An exploratory analysis of phosphorus transformations in tropical soils using structural equation modeling. Biogeochemistry, 118; 453-469, 2014. HEDLEY, M.J., STEWART, W.B., CHAUHAN, B.S.. Changes in inorganic and organic soil phosphorus fractions induced by cultivation practices and by laboratory incubations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:970–976, 1982. TIESSEN, H., MOIR, J.O.. Characterization of available P by sequential extraction. In: Carter MR (ed) Soil sampling and methods of soil analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 75–86, 1993. Apoio financeiro: