The Advanced LIGO Angular Control System (ASC) (Hanford edition)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Advertisements

19. October 2004 A. Freise Automatic Alignment using the Anderson Technique A. Freise European Gravitational Observatory Roma
8/13/2004 Stefan Ballmer, MIT / LIGO Hanford 1 Length and angular control loops in LIGO Stefan Ballmer Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Hanford.
Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
LIGO-G W Proposed LHO Commissioning Activities in May 02 Fred Raab 29 Apr 02.
Marcus Benna, University of Cambridge Wavefront Sensing in Dual-Recycled Interferometers LIGO What is Wavefront Sensing? How does it work? –Detection of.
LIGO-G W Where Did the LSC Signals Come From? Fred Raab 27 June 02.
LIGO- G05XXXX-00-R 40m meeting, May Experimental update from the 40m team 40m TAC meeting May 13, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech and the 40m collaboration.
Higher order laser modes in gravitational wave detectors
Marcus Benna, University of Cambridge Wavefront Sensing in Dual-Recycled Interferometers LIGO What is Wavefront Sensing? How does it work? –Detection of.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
Virgo Control Noise Reduction
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
1 1.ISC scope and activities 2.Initial Virgo status 3.Design requirements 4.Reference solution and design status 5.Plans toward completion 6.Technical.
Amaldi conference, June Lock acquisition scheme for the Advanced LIGO optical configuration Amaldi conference June24, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech.
1 Wan Wu, Volker Quetschke, Ira Thorpe, Rodrigo Delgadillo, Guido Mueller, David Reitze, and David Tanner Noise associated with the EOM in Advanced LIGO.
Matt Evans, LSC March 2003 (G E)1 Lock Acquisition in LIGO  Who am I? »Matt Evans »Caltech graduate  What is Lock Acquisition? »The process.
G Z AJW for Marcus Benna, Cambridge Wavefront Sensing for Advanced LIGO Model of wavefront sensing in a dual- recycled interferometer Consequences.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.
1 1.Definition 2.Deliverables 3.Status of preliminary design 4.Risks 5.Tasks to be done 6.Decisions to be taken 7.Required simulations 8.Planning ISC workshop:
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
08/24/2004 Stefan Ballmer, MIT / LIGO Hanford G I 1 Hanford 4km Recent improvements and currently limiting noise sources Stefan Ballmer Massachusetts.
Advanced LIGO Simulation, 6/1/06 Elba G E 1 ✦ LIGO I experience ✦ FP cavity : LIGO I vs AdvLIGO ✦ Simulation tools ✦ Time domain model Advanced.
LIGO-G D 1 Status of Detector Commissioning LSC Meeting, March 2001 Nergis Mavalvala California Institute of Technology.
8/13/2004 Stefan Ballmer, MIT / LIGO Hanford G I 1 Thermal Compensation System Servo and required heating for H1 Stefan Ballmer Massachusetts.
Aligning Advanced Detectors L. Barsotti, M. Evans, P. Fritschel LIGO/MIT Understanding Detector Performance and Ground-Based Detector Designs LIGO-G
1 Locking in Virgo Matteo Barsuglia ILIAS, Cascina, July 7 th 2004.
Optical Spring Experiments With The Glasgow 10m Prototype Interferometer Matt Edgar.
LIGO- G Z LSC meeting at Baton Rouge, March Caltech 40m Lab Update LSC Meeting Baton Rouge Mar 21, 2007 Robert Ward, Caltech and the 40m.
LIGO-G Z March 2007, LSC meeting, Osamu Miyakawa 1 Osamu Miyakawa Hiroaki Yamamoto March 21, 2006 LSC meeting Modeling of AdLIGO arm lock acquisition.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
40m Optical Systems & Sensing DRD, G R 1 40m Optical Systems and Sensing Design Requirements Document & Conceptual Design Michael Smith 10/18/01.
Testing Advanced LIGO length sensing and control scheme at the Caltech 40m interferometer. at the Caltech 40m interferometer. Yoichi Aso*, Rana Adhikari,
Current Status of Main Interferometer Design Yoichi Aso 2011/2/4, LCGT f2f Meeting.
Main Interferometer Subsystem
LCGT LSC Design and other practical interferometer details Yoichi Aso 2010/12/7.
Time domain simulation for a FP cavity with AdLIGO parameters on E2E
Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors
Daniel Sigg, Commissioning Meeting, 11/11/16
Demonstration of lock acquisition and optical response on
Main Interferometer Meeting
Time domain simulation for a FP cavity with AdLIGO parameters on E2E
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
First Lessons from the Advanced LIGO Integration Testing
GEO600 Control aspects where do the error signal come from?
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory, Caltech 26 Aug 2017
Yoichi Aso on behalf of the LCGT ISC Group
Output Mode Cleaners: Introduction for non-experts
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities
Homodyne or heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO?
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report
Lock Acquisition Real and Simulated
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1
Homodyne detection: understanding the laser noise amplitude transfer function Jérôme Degallaix Ilias meeting – June 2007.
Automatic Alignment Control scheme for Advanced Virgo
Presentation transcript:

The Advanced LIGO Angular Control System (ASC) (Hanford edition) Hanford Observatory, Washington State July 13, 2015 Stefan Ballmer LIGO-G1500923

ASC basics PR2 PR3 SR2 11 mirrors 2 input beam params (pos, angle) SR3 13 Total (x2 for pit and yaw) SR3

ASC basics loop count Main Interferometer TOTAL: 10DoF controlled Arm alignment: 4DoF [E/I]TM[X/Y] Input beam – IFO: 2DoF IM4 & PR2 (3) PRC alignment: 1DoF PRM MICH alignment: 1DoF BS SRC alignment: 1DoF SRM SRC pointing: 1DoF SR2 (3) (3DoF uncontrolled: IMC pointing, PR3, SR3) TOTAL: 10DoF controlled

ASC basics aux loops Additional loops OMC alignment 2DoF OM3, OMC WFS centering: 4DoF RM1&2, OM1&2 IMC: 3DoF IM1-3, PZT (1DoF uncontrolled: IMC output pointing) (no IMC WFS centering) ALS arm: 3DoF/arm [E/I]TM, TMS (green beam input position on ETM uncontrolled) ALS input beam: 4DoF/arm PZTs TOTAL: additional 21DoF (not this talk)

Rel vs Abs Reference 13 loops: Rel Abs X-arm: 2 Y-arm & BS: 2 1 PRC: 1 2 SRC: 1 2 Input: 2 Total: 6 7 Note: We can choose which DoF we want to servo to rel. references, but total (6) is fixed. The actual control scheme is more complicated

The sensors 2 types of sensors: QPD (quadrant photo diode) Gives information about beam position on QPD Signal: e.g. yaw=(left-right)/sum unit: beam waist on PD WFS (wave front sensor) Gives relative information two laser fields at different frequencies (e.g. carrier and side band)

WaveFrontSensor101 - The sensor head is an RF QPD Each quadrant gets demodulated with cos and sin (I & Q)  8 signals/WFS  Combined into 4 signals/WFS (I/Q, PIT/YAW) Carrier wave front SB wave front ~ x - I Q I_PIT Q_PIT

Example MEDM screen

WaveFrontSensor102 WFS sensitive to wave front tilt at sensor But 2 such WFS can be placed per beam (different Gouy phase near vs far field) Two modulation sidebands: 9MHz: mostly sees PRC 45MHz: sees PRC and SRC Installed WFS: 4 heads AS: A/B (Gouy phase), RF45 & RF36 REFL: A/B (Gouy phase), RF9 & RF45

ASC sensors

The PD’s

Hard and Soft modes At high circulating power the radiation pressure couples the modes of the 4 arms Hard modes have a higher frequency… Soft modes have a lower frequency… …than individual suspensions (see picture) Ideally control arms as comm/diff, hard/soft: CHARD, DHARD, CSOFT, DSOFT

Hard and Soft modes In practice: High g-factor cavity means we are mostly sensitive to HARD modes. All test masses thus effectively mostly actuate the HARD mode. We control HARD modes with ETMs only, but at high bandwidth. We control SOFT modes with ITMs only, but at low bandwidth.

The loops The following slides refer to the H1 system, as of July 12 2015 L1 is mostly similar, but some differences exist Loops shapes: On most mirrors the ASC actuation is split across several stages Final integrator is in the top SUS stage

The WFS loops: DHARD Guarantee good dark port contrast (carrier) Sensed by AS_A_45_Q WFS i.e. carrier misalignment against SB45 reference Actuates on DETM 2-3Hz bandwidth (i.e. suppresses the suspension modes)

The WFS loops: MICH Guarantee good dark port contrast Sensed by AS_B_36_Q WFS i.e. SB9 misalignment against SB45 reference Actuates on BS 2-3Hz bandwidth (i.e. suppresses the suspension modes)

The WFS loops: INP1 & PRC2 Guarantee input beam - IFO overlap (2DoF) Sensed by a combination of 4 REFL WFS REFL_[A/B]_RF[9/45]_I IMP1 actuates on IM4 (last input mirror) PRC2 actuates on PR2 (will likely switch to PR3) Low bandwidth (so far)

The WFS loops: CHARD Guarantee PRC – arms (common) overlap Sensed by a combination of RELF_A_RF9_I and RELF_B_RF9_I Actuates on CETM Low bandwidth (so far)

The WFS loops: SRC1 Guarantee SRC – arms overlap Most difficult DoF to sense: For pitch: AS_B_RF36_I WFS For yaw: AS_A_RF36_I WFS (actually currently only lower two quadrants) Actuates on SRM Low bandwidth (so far)

The QPD loops: PRC1 Pointing of (backward propagating) beam in PRC POP_A_DC Actuates on PRM Low bandwidth

The QPD loops: SRC2 Output pointing of the SRC AS_C_DC Actuates on SR2 (mostly) and SRM (feed-forward) Low bandwidth

The QPD loops: DSOFT & CSOFT Remaining (soft) arm cavity alignment Sensed by transmission QPDs: TR[X/Y]_[A/B] Note: the A and B diodes in transmission are in different Gouy phases The particular combination of signals was picked to make the error signal insensitive to TMS motion. Actuates on ITMs, currently: Pitch in DITM/CITM Yaw in ITMX/ITMY (will likely change to DITM/CITM) Low bandwidth

PIT output matrix

YAW output matrix

PIT input matrix

YAW input matrix

References ISC design document Modeling of Alignment Sensing and Control for Advanced LIGO T0900511 L1&H1 ASC configuration for ER7 G1500741