Collaborative Decision Making “Collaborative Tools and Technology”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 4 Building A New Trust Model.
Advertisements

Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 2 Developing A Collaborative Framework.
October 31, Metron Aviation, Inc. Dan Rosman Assessing System Impacts: Miles-in-Trail and Ground Delays.
ATFM Priorities Evaluation Study Alison Hudgell QinetiQ
FAA / Eurocontrol TFM/CDM Technical Interchange Meeting
01/14/01 S2K+1 Field Training Spring /14/01 FAR 121 Air Safety PAD Operational Responsibility shared by: –P ilots –A TC –D ispatchers Enhancing.
Vastly Distributed System ATCSCC CDM net TFM hub TRACONs TRACON(s) Towers ARTCC ARTCC(s) Towers Airports Industry AOC(s) GA International.
- European CDM - To benefit from the animation settings contained within this presentation we suggest you view using the slide show option. To start the.
The Evolution of NWS Aviation Weather Services in Chicago Mike Bardou National Weather Service Chicago The views expressed in this presentation are those.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-35/PIA3 Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network-Wide.
Traffic Management and FUA integration
Federal Aviation Administration 1 June 2013 Federal Aviation Administration 1 October 2013 WET Update to NBAA and FPAW Federal Aviation Administration.
ATFM – Smarter Decision Making
Ames Research Center 1October 2006 Aviation Software Systems Workshop FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Aviation Software Systems.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Evans benefits ARAM1 jee 6/4/2015 Assessment of Aviation Delay Reduction Benefits for Nowcasts and Short Term Forecasts James Evans.
Sabre Airline Solutions
Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen): Wx Integration Ray Moy New Weather Concept Development Branch FAA, Aviation Weather Division, ANG-C62.
Gate-to-Gate Project: Implementing Sequencing, Merging, and Spacing Captain Bob Hilb September 11, 2006.
Date: 18 February 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Collaborative Decision Making at the FAA/ATO A look at how CDM is applied in the U.S.
FAA Stated Requirements “ The goal is to substantially improve the capabilities for delivery of aviation weather information and to transform the current.
Weather Satellite Data in FAA Operations Randy Bass Aviation Weather Research Program Aviation Weather Division NextGen Organization Federal Aviation Administration.
. Center TRACON Automation System (CTAS) Traffic Management Advisor (TMA) Transportation authorities around the globe are working to keep air traffic moving.
. Traffic Flow Management System Benefits Flexibility for Future Growth: TFMS provides a modern software architecture to meet future growth and support.
Presented to: NWS Aviation Weather Users By: Danny Sims, Manager of Traffic Flow Management Weather Programs, FAA Date: 18 November 2008 Federal Aviation.
Distributed Multi-Nodal ATFM Operational Trial
ICAO-IATA Cross-Border ATFM Workshop
Analysis-Oriented View for Cross-Border ATFM. CONTENTS PAGE Chapter1 Issues Chapter 2 Response Chapter 3 Summary.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 6 “Collaborative Tools and Technology”
Federal Aviation Administration 1 June 2013 Federal Aviation Administration 1 October 2013 WET Update to NBAA and FPAW Federal Aviation Administration.
CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (CDM) Testimony before the National Civil Aviation Review Commission Testimony.
Collaborative Convective Forecast Product (CCFP).
The Evolution of NWS Aviation Weather Services in Chicago Mike Bardou National Weather Service Chicago.
1 REAL-TIME INTER-MODAL SUBSTITUTION (RTIMS) AS AN AIRPORT CONGESTION MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Mark Hansen Yu Zhang University of California Berkeley.
Flexible Use of Airspace and Collaborative Decision Making The aim of this presentation is to provide the aviation industry with the understanding of the.
Benefits of CDM Within AFI Region Presented by: Mikateko Chabani.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 7 “Formulating CDM Strategies”
© 2015, Fiatech Collaborative Decision making -- How IT can help.
COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING
How do we mitigate weather impacts to the NAS?
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Improving Air Traffic Management Together…
1 NWS IMPACT-BASED WEATHER SUPPORT TO ATCSCC AND THE NAS Frank Brody Meteorologist in Charge National Weather Service National Aviation Meteorologists.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
1 CWSU Near-term Improvement Program. 2 Objective Low-cost improvements at CWSUs which will noticeably improve quality of support provided to FAA ARTCCs.
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Capacity Tradeoff Optimization: a Case Study at the St. Louis Lambert International Airport (STL) Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo.
Digital In The Skies Simon Daykin NATS Chief Architect.
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
Collaborative Decision Making Module 8 “Collaborative Leadership”
FF-ICE A CONCEPT TO SUPPORT THE ATM SYSTEM OF THE FUTURE
The Role of Air Traffic Control in A CDM ENVIRONMENT
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING CONFERENCE
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Collaborative Decision Making “Formulating CDM Strategies”
ENHANCING MANAGEMENT DECISION MAKING
Ensuring a 'Flexible Use of Airspace'….
ATFM IMPLEMENATION IN INDIA – FUTURE PLANS
ATFM IMPLEMENTATION IN INDIA – PROGRESS THROUGH COLLABORATION
TDWR Measurement Capabilities
Bringing Large Commercial Airport Capabilities to Your Local Community
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Cockpit participation in
Traffic Management and FUA integration
Collaborative Decision Making Improving Air Traffic Management
Collaborative Decision Making “Developing A Collaborative Framework”
Long term vision for Air Traffic Systems CARATS
A Concept for Launch and Reentry Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)
Presentation transcript:

Collaborative Decision Making “Collaborative Tools and Technology” Module 6 “Collaborative Tools and Technology”

Data sharing leads to reductions in controller and support staff workload and improves cost efficiency by working smarter not harder.

CDM Collaborative Tools Common situational awareness between stakeholders and ATC allows for integration of data from all sources to make a “Better” decision Integration of ATC and airline data to provide the “Big Picture” Customers participate in the daily management of the NAS through: - Participating in daily weather assessment - Common Constraint Situation Display (CCSD) - Planning Telcons – conducted every two hours - Representatives located at the ATCSCC - Direct access to the Tactical Customer Advocate - FAA management access through daily customer telcons - Participating in regular system improvement meetings

Mexico CCFMEX: PROSAT

Brazil: SYNCROMAX  SYNCROMAX DEMAND AND CAPACITY ANALYSE  

South Africa CAMU

South Africa CAMU

South Africa CAMU

Flight Schedule Monitor (FSM) EWR Pre-Demand Levels Flight Schedule Monitor (FSM) EWR Pre-Demand Levels Flight Schedule Monitor - A major component that works with the TFMS technology. The FSM is the main tool for traffic management specialists at the Air Traffic Control System Command Center to monitor, model and implement Ground Delay Program (GDP) operations. From both a technological and operational aspect, FSM represents the results of efforts realized by Collaborative Decision Making. These tools allow for the monitoring of traffic flows and evaluation of capacity and demand. FSM provides common situational awareness to FSM users by presenting airport demand and capacity information both graphically and through text. Collaborative Convective Forecast Product (CCFP) Cornerstone weather forecast for strategic planning -- On TSD -- Also on Aviation Weather Center Internet site at aviationweather.gov -- Provides common situational awareness and improves coordination and communication -- Collaborative process involving AWC, CWSUs, airline meteorologists, and Canadian meteorological services The TSD and CCFP allow traffic managers to evaluate the current and predicted convective weather scenario.

EWR after GDP issued:

Flight Schedule Monitor (FSM) Since system-wide usage began in 2000 FSM has… Reduced delays by 36 million minutes Saved 400 million liters of fuel Cut CO2 emissions by over a million tones Produced cost savings of over $4 billion Thus the initial business case was made for developing CDM-based ATFM. The FAA’s real-time collaborative traffic flow management system called Flight Schedule Monitor (FSM) was developed by Metron Aviation and successfully tested in San Francisco and Newark. FSM enabled a CDM community with a new level of common situational awareness and advanced ATFM decision support. Thus began the CDM paradigm. The door was opened; only a crack, but it surely portended great things into the future. Since system-wide usage began in 2000, FSM has reduced delays by 36 million minutes, saved 400 million liters of fuel, cut CO2 emissions by over a million tones and produced cost savings of over $4 billion. The deployment of the FSM platform was strategically important because it created a shared platform for numerous future collaborative functions. One such early innovation was the so-called ‘enhanced substitution module’ which allows airlines to make slot substitutions to optimize their operations. The primary benefits to airlines are a reduction in ATC delay and the ability to prioritize flights based on the airline’s business goals. This translates directly into cost savings for the carrier. Daily savings for a hub carrier at a single regulated airport can easily reach dozens of hours and hundreds of thousands of dollars. FSM also began to show even a skeptical workforce that open cooperation could benefit every stakeholder and overcome organizational barriers to success. For example, there were cultural challenges including a historical bias where some carriers would try to game the system, thus undermining traffic flow programs and resulting in less favorable system performance. So the FAA gave the entire CDM community a web-based FSM reporting tool that highlighted anyone who cheated by leaving early or late or even flying a cancelled flight. With this shared transparency, the traffic management team, controllers and airlines were able to maintain operational compliance and this type of gaming misbehavior quickly ceased, resulting in a dramatically more accurate and predictable flow.

Operational Information System: OIS

Traffic Situation Display: TSD Traffic Situational Display - Updated every minute, this program converts data from radar and other sources into a customizable screen capable of showing every aircraft in the sky at any given minute. TSD’s computer system receives radar track data from Air Route Traffic Control Centers, organizes this data into a display and presents it on a computer screen to monitor any number of traffic situations or system-wide traffic flows. The user has the option of superimposing these aircraft positions over any number of background displays. These background options include ARTCC boundaries, any stratum of en route sector boundaries, fixes, airways, military and other special use airspace, airports and geopolitical boundaries.

Results quickly confirmed the anticipated benefits of sharing real-time data among users. Tests have been conducted by gathering airline dispatch personnel, controllers and traffic management coordinators in a real-time simulation environment. The cross-functional teams would run through “what-if” scenarios and use statistical models to evaluate total system optimization. The results quickly confirmed the anticipated benefits of sharing realtime data among previously disparate systems and users. Importantly, the team demonstrated the need for far fewer ground delay programs, and when they were necessary, the time parameters could be greatly reduced.