Implicit Sounding for HE WLAN

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Advertisements

DL OFDMA Performance and ACK Multiplexing
Submission doc.: IEEE /1452r0 November 2014 Leif Wilhelmsson, EricssonSlide 1 Frequency selective scheduling in OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0845r0 July 2015 Daewon Lee, NewracomSlide 1 LTF Design for Uplink MU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2015
Submission doc.: IEEE /0868r0 July 2015 Hakan Persson, Ericsson ABSlide 1 Impact of Frequency Selective Scheduling Feedback for OFDMA Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1088r0 September 2015 Daewon Lee, NewracomSlide 1 LTF Design for Uplink MU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1349r0 November 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Sounding for Uplink Transmission Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1314r2 November 2015 Interdigital CommunicationsSlide 1 I/Q Imbalance Impact to TGax OFDMA Uplink Reception Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0103r0 January 2016 Assaf KasherSlide 1 Beamforming Training proposals Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /1105r0 Submission Sept 14, 2010 Hongyuan Zhang, et al Slide 1 11ac Explicit Sounding and Feedback Authors: Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r2 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0935r1 Submission July 2011 Fei Tong, CSRSlide 1 An improved non-compressed beamforming feedback format for 11ac Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1329r2 November 2015 Yujin Noh, NewracomSlide 1 Link Adaptation for HE WLAN Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r0 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
InterDigital, Inc. Submission doc.: IEEE /0911r1 July 2016 Link Level Performance Comparisons of Open Loop, Closed Loop and Antenna Selection.
Beam Tracking for ay Date: Authors: January 2017
Closed Loop SU-MIMO Performance with Quantized Feedback
Open Loop vs Closed Loop SU-MIMO for 11ay
GI Overhead/Performance Impact on Open-Loop SU-MIMO
Locationing Protocol for 11az
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
Feedback Element Compression for ax
Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for ay
VHT Link Adaptations Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Hybrid Beamforming Protocol Design Details
Protocols for Hybrid Beamforming in ay
Analog and Baseband Beam Tracking in ay
Analog and Baseband Beam Tracking in ay
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
Preamble design aspects for MU-MIMO support
AP Coordinated Beamforming for EHT
Feedback Element Compression for ax
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 September 2010
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
11ax Beamformee Capabilities
Regarding HE NDPA frame for DL Sounding Sequence
Constrained Distributed MU-MIMO
Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for ay
Channel Dimension Reduction in MU Operation
Hybrid Beamforming Protocol Design Details
Time Domain CSI report for explicit feedback
Joint Processing MU-MIMO
Initial Distributed MU-MIMO Simulations
Protocols for Hybrid Beamforming in ay
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
11ac Explicit Sounding and Feedback
Time Domain CSI report for explicit feedback
DL MU-MIMO MAC efficiency issue
Explanations for CR on NDP feedback report
CSI Feedback Scheme using DCT for Explicit Beamforming
Link Adaptation for HE WLAN
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
Reducing Channel Dimension in MU-MIMO Explicit Feedback Operation
MIMO phase in MU-MIMO Beamforming
NDP Short Feedback Design
Sounding-only Support During Ranging
Comparison of Coordinated BF and Nulling with JT
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
Considerations on feedback overhead
Implicit Channel Sounding in IEEE (Feasibility Study)
Multi-AP backhaul analysis
Presentation transcript:

Implicit Sounding for HE WLAN Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 November 2015 Implicit Sounding for HE WLAN Date: 2015-11-09 Authors: Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom John Doe, Some Company

November 2015 Abstract We will discuss on support of implicit sounding for APs with self antenna calibration capability. Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Explicit vs. Implicit Sounding November 2015 Explicit vs. Implicit Sounding Explicit Sounding NDPA NDP Beamformer (TX) CSI Feedback Beamformee (RX) Size of feedback may vary between 104 Bytes ~ 450 KBytes Implicit Sounding (assume antennas are calibrated) Beamformer (TX) HE-LTF must be full dimension (i.e. full rank) PPDU Beamformee (RX) Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Uncalibrated Antenna Chains November 2015 Uncalibrated Antenna Chains ATX ARX BTX BRX KA KB HAB Calibration Matrix If not calibrated ATX and ARX do not match Beamformer Beamformee TX RX If uncalibrated ATX ≠ ARX, BTX ≠ BRX BRX HAB ATX ≠ (ARX HABT BTX )T Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Implicit Sounding without Antenna Calibration November 2015 Implicit Sounding without Antenna Calibration Antenna calibration procedure is the main reason implicit sounding becomes an unattractive solution. Calibration procedure between each AP and STA requires several exchanges of information. Resulting in large overhead. Is spec-supported antenna calibration procedure absolutely necessary for implicit sounding? Quick answer: No Simulation results show antenna calibration at the AP side is sufficient for SU/MU beamforming. STA side antenna calibration is not necessary. APs with self-antenna calibration do not require any additional procedure support from 802.11 specification. Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Few Antenna Self-Calibration Methods November 2015 Few Antenna Self-Calibration Methods Method 1) chip manufactoring level calibration Method 3) Using external calibration device (possible in enterprise deployments) Note: One time adjustment DUT in out Test Module Feedback loop (adjusts firmware) AP External Calibration Device connected either wired or wireless Feedback Loop Method 2) On-chip calibration loop Note: Typically very complex and difficult to implement Baseband Tx RF Rx RF Feedback loop All of these methods are available now and some vendors may have already implemented them at the AP Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Beamforming Simulation Results November 2015 Beamforming Simulation Results Simulation Parameters Antenna Setup: Tx-Rx: 4x2 and 8x2 Channel Model: TGac BW: 20MHz (assumed 64 FFT) STA positions: Equal distance without shadowing (i.e. equal average SNR) Performance metric: Average sum rate computed using capacity formula, log2(1+SINR) Feedback Latency: zero latency assumed Channel estimation (CE): CE error modeled both for implicit and explicit FB, CE gain assumption: 6 dB Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Simulated Algorithms & Plot Legends November 2015 Simulated Algorithms & Plot Legends Simulated Algorithms DPC bound with perfect channel knowledge assumed equal power loading between users SU-MIMO based on right singular vector/matrix precoding Implicit FB Explicit FB with Low fidelity SU, 2 bit PSI, 4 bit PHI Explicit FB with High fidelity SU, 4 bit PSI, 6 bit PHI (used as reference in MU-MIMO plots) MU-MIMO based on modification of MSE minimization precoding Explicit FB with Low fidelity MU, 5 bit PSI, 7 bit PHI Explicit FB with High fidelity MU, 7 bit PSI, 9 bit PHI Plot Legend MU BFer [±X dB, ±Y°] Bfee [±X dB, ±Y°] Beamformer side (i.e. AP) or each Beamformee (i.e. STA) has mis-calibrated Tx and Rx antennas. Each RF chain may have up to ±X dB difference in amplitude and ±Y° difference in phase. Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Simulation Results (1/2) November 2015 Simulation Results (1/2) It is less sensitive to mis-calibration as the receiver has enough degree of freedom to reject interference (Ntotal,SS = NRX) Effect of Tx/Rx Antenna calibration of Beamformer (i.e. AP) With perfectly calibrated Beamformee (i.e. STA) Effect of Tx/Rx Antenna calibration of Beamformer (i.e. AP) with completely un-calibrated Beamformee (i.e. STA) Conclusion: Tx/Rx antenna calibration at the STA side is NOT essential for obtaining MU-MIMO performance Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Simulation Results (2/2) November 2015 Simulation Results (2/2) It is more sensitive to mis-calibration as the receiver has enough degree of freedom to reject interference (Ntotal,SS > NRX) Effect of Tx/Rx Antenna calibration of Beamformer (i.e. AP) With perfectly calibrated Beamformee (i.e. STA) Effect of Tx/Rx Antenna calibration of Beamformer (i.e. AP) with completely un-calibrated Beamformee (i.e. STA) Loss from un-calibrated Beamformer side is higher when Tx antenna dimension is larger (e.g. 8 Tx antenna) Still with acceptable performance when AP antenna can be self-calibrated to within ±0.5 dB amplitude and ±5°phase. Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Support for Implicit Sounding in 802.11 November 2015 Support for Implicit Sounding in 802.11 In 802.11n, implicit sounding is supported by a procedure that is based of message exchanges for antenna calibration However, with the efficient calibration methods used in industry, above 11n antenna calibration procedure did not become a necessity in practice In 802.11ac, the legacy implicit sounding mechanism was not updated and as a result implicit sounding is limited to implementation-specific solutions and for one transmit/receive antenna cases Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Implicit Sounding in 11ax November 2015 Implicit Sounding in 11ax Given an AP with calibrated antenna chains, with either of the methods mentioned earlier, it takes the following to harvest the efficiency of implicit sounding: A STA sends a frame with full-dimension HE-LTF to a calibrated AP, assuming the AP is ready to process it accordingly for subsequent SU/MU BF, or A STA, instead of CSI report, sends NDP with full-dimension HE- LTF to a calibrated AP during a sounding period. It would more desirable if the possibility of a response frame with full-dimension HE-LTF is part of the HE sounding procedure Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

November 2015 Conclusion In case AP has self-antenna calibration capability (or at least has antennas that are calibrated within certain accuracy), implicit sounding is a very practical and efficient method of obtaining channel state information. Performance Almost no loss is observed for SU-MIMO case with implicit sounding for APs with self-antenna calibration. Comparable MU-MIMO performance between explicit and implicit sounding with APs with self-antenna calibration. Minimal specification support is needed for implicit sounding for APs with self-antenna calibration. Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Straw Poll #1 Do you agree that: November 2015 Straw Poll #1 Do you agree that: Implicit sounding is supported for APs with self- antenna calibration capability. Note: no explicit procedure to enable antenna calibration for AP or STA is supported in 11ax. Y/N/A Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Straw Poll #2 Do you agree to include into 11ax SFD that: November 2015 Straw Poll #2 Do you agree to include into 11ax SFD that: Beamforming sounding procedure shall provide a mechanism to solicit a full dimensioned (i.e. full rank) NDP response from beamformee. Y/N/A Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

APPENDIX: Additional Simulation Results November 2015 APPENDIX: Additional Simulation Results Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

4x2 - 1SS - SU-MIMO November 2015 Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

4x2 - 1SS - MU-MIMO (2 STAs) November 2015 Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

8x2 - 1SS - SU-MIMO November 2015 Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

4x2 - 1SS - MU-MIMO (4 STAs) November 2015 Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

4x2 - 2SS - SU-MIMO November 2015 Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

4x2 - 2SS - MU-MIMO (2 STAs) November 2015 Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

8x2 - 2SS - SU-MIMO November 2015 Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom

8x2 - 2SS - MU-MIMO (4 STAs) November 2015 Daewon Lee and Reza Hedayat, Newracom