A Summative Evaluation is Not an Event Dynamic Formative Observations = Increased Educator Effectiveness and Informed Summative Evaluations Dr. Ellen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Advertisements

Simpson County Schools: New Teacher Support Program A Proposal.
ESD 112 Professional Growth Cycle
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
ADEPT Framework
Slide 1 TPEP Implementation: Structures, roles and policy implications ESD 112 March 12, 2015.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Consider this… “Effective leaders see what is essential and ignore the rest…focus on what is vital and eliminate all of the extraneous distractions…stop.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
GEA TOOL KIT PRESENTATION STAR ORULLIAN – EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR GRANITE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.
Angela M. Rios EDU 660 September 12,  Shared decision making leads to better decisions  Shared instructional leadership includes ◦ the supervisor.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
Support for (rather than Evaluation of) Administrators Delaware Academy for School Leadership.
Colorado Department of Education Katy Anthes March 2014 Educator Effectiveness & Teacher Librarians.
Formative & Summative Measurement
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Greenbush Teacher/ School Specialist Mentoring Model
School Board Presentation September 24, 2012
Thinking about assessment…
Benchmark Lesson #2: Types and Purposes of Assessments
Professional Learning Communities
Organization Development and Change
Lynne Griffith-Jones Superintendent of Human Resources
Professional Learning Communities
Ann M. Renker, PhD Assistant Superintendent of Teaching and Learning
So, What is Teacher Leadership?
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
I love portfolio! Nelly Zafeiriadou MA, EdD ELT School Advisor
Chapter 18: Professional Development
Principal Selection Process
The Year of Core Instruction
Organization Development and Change
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Change Leadership Group of Harvard and Instructional Rounds
Russ Bennett Superintendent Aurora City Schools
Educator Evaluations DARTEP 2017
Education Professional Standards Board
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
On the Road to Marzano A TCAPS K-12 Music Perspective
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Personal Growth and Professional Development
Scale Up, Scale Back, or Maintain A Data-Driven Approach to Sustainability Planning April 25, 2018.
Exploring The Power of C!
Start with the Science & Technology Standards (2002, 2008?)
State Board of Education Progress Update
Discussion and Vote to Amend the Regulations
Joann Hooper Patty Rooks Paulette Richmond Gary Wenzel
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
The Coaching Evaluator: Can it Work?
Clinical Educator and Teacher Candidate Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
Exploring The Power of C!
OTL:NGP:EA:1217.
PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE RENEWAL PROCESS
Outcomes Based Reporting
Welcome and Introductions
Unfilled Positions FWEA Meeting March 18, 2019.
Value-added Teacher Evaluation
Conscious Competence Ladder: Debrief
Baldwin High School Wednesday, August 21, 2013
END-OF-YEAR EVALUATIONS
Conscious Competence Ladder: Debrief
Assessing Understanding
State Examples and Follow-up Data Requests for SOQ Proposals
Cooperating Teacher and Student Teacher Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
Presentation transcript:

A Summative Evaluation is Not an Event Dynamic Formative Observations = Increased Educator Effectiveness and Informed Summative Evaluations Dr. Ellen Williams, Director ObserverTab Retired Professor EDLF Brigham Young University Provo, UT Annette Brinkman, Director Teacher & Administrator, Induction and Intervention Granite School District, SLC, UT

Formative vs Summative Evaluation: A Clarification Two Minute Reflection What are the difference and similarities between formative and summative evaluations? In what ways does formative evaluation interact with and come to bear on summative evaluation? Share your thinking with a partner.

Formative Evaluation: improves the instructional performance of teachers and the leadership performance of administrators though a data-driven developmental process. The purpose of formative evaluation is to improve professional practice. It allows educators to set personal improvement goals and collect lines of evidence to determine if those goals have been met. The formative evaluation process includes: (1) self-reflecting to complete the self-assessment form, (2) determining goals related to standards, and (3) deciding lines of evidence that will best measure progress goals, (4) supervisor observations. There will be two meetings between the educator and the supervisor. One will be at the first of the year to jointly establish goals. In that first meeting, activities are listed, resources are identified, lines of evidence are selected, a time line is proposed, and a Professional Growth Plan created. The Professional Growth Plan identifies the goals and activities, resources needed, and lines of evidence. The educator and supervisor collaborate and agree on these. At least one line of evidence must be something other than participation in professional learning activities. A mid-year check up is accomplished through electronic communication. The second meeting occurs near the end of the year when progress towards those goals is reviewed.

Summative Evaluation is: using data to judge the effectiveness and quality of performance, to determine the future employment status of the educator. The purpose of summative evaluation is to determine whether standards are being met. It assembles the goals and lines of evidence developed during the formative evaluation years. Summative evaluation occurs at least every fifth year for career educators (or seventh year for educators with a level 3 license) or twice annually for provisional educators. It is designed to coincide with the educator’s licensure cycle.

The purpose of formative data is teacher growth.

A Summative Evaluation is is not an event. It is not an average A Summative Evaluation is is not an event. It is not an average. It is based on your judgment and experience with the teacher over time.

Summative Decisions A summative decision is not an average of formative observations – it is the final ending place after formative work. Good summative judgments come from multiple sources: Observational Data Conversations Student Interactions Collaboration with other teachers Etc

Don’t “judge” too soon…

Supporting Teacher Growth As a principal, To what degree do you: evaluate (effectiveness or ineffectiveness)? diagnose (determine the problem)? prescribe (assist with the problem)?

Roles of Leadership Summative Formative

Your World? SUMMATIVE formative

Or Perhaps… Summative Formative Diagnose Prescribe

Formative Evaluation Process Collect Data Assistance Data Tools Expectations Transitions Time Management Cueing Attention Prompts Proximity Signals Voice Tasking Diagnostic Data Tools Drop-In Tool Explicit Instruction Time-On-Task Diagnose Prescribe Growth Opportunities Polishers Consulting Coaching Professional Learning Book Study Identify Patterns

summative evaluation What about YOU? the boxes you are checking on a Do you have data to support the boxes you are checking on a summative evaluation form?

Summative Evaluation…

Formative Data…

Everyone else needs data!

Diagnose… Growth Promoting Time-on-Task Explicit Instruction Drop-Ins Common Core

Growth – Over Time

Determine a growth point to focus on One Teacher’s Growth Over Time Formative Determine a growth point to focus on

Determine a school’s growth point to focus on One School All Teachers Formative Determine a school’s growth point to focus on

Facts tell the story- Letting the facts tell the story takes the confrontation out of the conversation. NSDC, Summer 2008

Big Eight

Time On Task Tool

Diagnosis: Cueing Provide Assistance With Cueing

Data does not replace the need for face-to-face dialogue. A Word of Caution Data does not replace the need for face-to-face dialogue.

Complete the Summative Formative Data: Effective Instruction Time on Task Explicit Instruction Drop-Ins

over-diagnosing and under-prescribing? Ponder… Are you over-diagnosing and under-prescribing?

So… how should I spend my time? 25 drop-ins – leave keepers and polishers 4 drop-ins – conversation regarding patterns 3 observations – email them the data 1 observation - conversation

Formative Evaluation Process: Professional Growth If you want to feel safe and secure, continue to do what you have always done. If you want to grow, go to the cutting edge of our profession. Just know that when you do, there will be a temporary loss of sanity. So know when you don’t quite know what you are doing, you are probably growing! Madeline Hunter

“Quality educators are essential for the success of all students”

Brinkman-Forlini-Williams www.student-engagement.net annettebrinkma@gmail.com ellenjwilliams44@gmail.com