Simulations of Lateral Transport and Dropout Structure of Energetic Particles from Impulsive Solar Flares Paisan Tooprakai1, Achara Seripienlert2, David.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory SHINE 2005, July 11-15, 2005 Transient Shocks and Associated Energetic Particle Events Observed.
Advertisements

THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC TRANSPORT OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLES IN THE INNER HELIOSPHERE CRISM- 2011, Montpellier, 27 June – 1 July, Collaborators:
Energy Release and Particle Acceleration in Flares Siming Liu University of Glasgow 9 th RHESSI Workshop, Genova, Italy, Sep
Explaining the Acceleration and Transport of Solar Energetic Particles C.M.S. Cohen Caltech And still trying....
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
Anti-parallel versus Component Reconnection at the Magnetopause K.J. Trattner Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center Palo Alto, CA, USA and the Polar/TIMAS,
Solar Energetic Particles and Shocks. What are Solar Energetic Particles? Electrons, protons, and heavier ions Energies – Generally KeV – MeV – Much less.
“Physics at the End of the Galactic Cosmic-Ray Spectrum” Aspen, CO 4/28/05 Diffusive Shock Acceleration of High-Energy Cosmic Rays The origin of the very-highest-energy.
Nanoflares and MHD turbulence in Coronal Loop: a Hybrid Shell Model Giuseppina Nigro, F.Malara, V.Carbone, P.Veltri Dipartimento di Fisica Università della.
CME Workshop Elmau, Feb , WORKING GROUP C: ENERGETIC PARTICLE OBSERVATIONS Co-Chairs: Klecker, Kunow SUMMARY FROM WORKSHOP 1 Observations Questions.
Working Group 2 - Ion acceleration and interactions.
More phenomena difficult to observe A MacKinnon. More phenomena difficult to observe synchrotron radiation of positrons: sub-mm observations? inner bremsstrahlung.
Theory of Shock Acceleration of Hot Ion Populations Marty Lee Durham, New Hampshire USA.
CISM SEP Modeling Background The major SEP events come from the CME-generated coronal and interplanetary shock(s) These “gradual”events can have a “prompt”
Practical Models of Solar Energetic Particle Transport Leon Kocharov Space Research Laboratory University of Turku, Finland Requirements.
Constraints on Particle Acceleration from Interplanetary Observations R. P. Lin together with L. Wang, S. Krucker at UC Berkeley, G Mason at U. Maryland,
Identifying Interplanetary Shock Parameters in Heliospheric MHD Simulation Results S. A. Ledvina 1, D. Odstrcil 2 and J. G. Luhmann 1 1.Space Sciences.
Mike Marsh; S. Dalla; T. Laitinen; M. Dierckxsens; N. B. Crosby Jeremiah Horrocks Institute, University of Central Lancashire, Preston,
SHINE 2008 June, 2008 Utah, USA Visit our Websites:
Modeling Coronal Acceleration of Solar Energetic Protons K. A. Kozarev, R. M. Evans, N. A. Schwadron, M. A. Dayeh, M. Opher, K. E. Korreck NESSC Meeting,
Observational Tests of Suprathermal Particle Acceleration (Dayeh/Hill  Hill/Desai) WORKING GROUP SUMMARY.
1 July 14, SHINE WorkshopKeauhou, Hawaii, USA Chanruangrith Channok, 1 David Ruffolo, 1 Mihir Desai, 2 and Glenn Mason 2 1 THAILAND 2 USA Finite-Time.
Solar Wind and Coronal Mass Ejections
TO THE POSSIBILITY OF STUDY OF THE EXTERNAL SOLAR WIND THIN STRUCTURE IN DECAMETER RADIO WAVES Marina Olyak Institute of Radio Astronomy, 4 Chervonopraporna,
1 20 January 2005: Session Summary SHINE 2006 Zermatt, Utah, 31 July - 4 August Invited Talks Riley: what was the Alfven speed in the corona at.
Project: Understanding propagation characteristics of heavy ions to assess the contribution of solar flares to large SEP events Principal Investigator:
Review of Observations of Particles From Solar Flares and Their Clues to the Structure of the IMF Joe Mazur The Aerospace Corporation Glenn Mason Johns.
Lessons for STEREO - learned from Helios Presented at the STEREO/Solar B Workshop, Rainer Schwenn, MPS Lindau The Helios.
Composition and spectral properties of the 1 AU quiet- time suprathermal ion population during solar cycle23 M Al-Dayeh, M I Desai, J R Dwyer, H K Rassoul,
SHINE 2006 Student Day Working Group III summary Zermatt, Utah, July 31 - August 4 Gang Li.
Cosmic Rays2 The Origin of Cosmic Rays and Geomagnetic Effects.
Particle Transport in the Heliosphere: Part 1 Gaetano Zimbardo Universita’ della Calabria, Cosenza, Italy with contributions from S. Perri, P. Pommois,
Intermittency Analysis and Spatial Dependence of Magnetic Field Disturbances in the Fast Solar Wind Sunny W. Y. Tam 1 and Ya-Hui Yang 2 1 Institute of.
Analysis of Suprathermal Events Observed by STEREO/PLASTIC with a Focus on Upstream Events STEREO SWG - 20 Meredith, NH October 27-29, 2009 Josh Barry,
MHD Turbulence: influences on transport and acceleration of energetic particles W H Matthaeus Bartol Research Institute, University of Delaware Pablo Dmitruk.
THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC TRANSPORT SIMULATIONS: A PARAMETER STUDY FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF MULTI-SPACECRAFT SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLE OBSERVATIONS.
Particle transport in the heliosphere – part 2 Gaetano Zimbardo With contributions by S. Perri, P. Pommois, P. Veltri University of Calabria, Rende, Italy.
Solar Energetic Particles (SEP’s) J. R. Jokipii LPL, University of Arizona Lecture 2.
Multi-spacecraft observations of solar energetic electron events during the rising phase of solar cycle 24 W. Droege 1, R. Gomez-Herrero 2, J. Kartavykh.
Space Science MO&DA Programs - July Page 1 SS Possible Connection Between Solar Supergranulation and Temporal Variations of Solar Energetic Particles.
1 SEP Timing Studies: An Excruciatingly Brief Review Allan J. Tylka US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC SHINE 2006 Where was the CME when the SEPs.
Advanced Composition Explorer Measuring the Solar Wind and Solar Flares Oscar Puente Mentor: Dr. Paul Marchese.
1 Test Particle Simulations of Solar Energetic Particle Propagation for Space Weather Mike Marsh, S. Dalla, J. Kelly & T. Laitinen University of Central.
Radial Dependence of Solar Energetic Particle Intensities
On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration
GROUND-LEVEL EVENT (GLE)
On the three-dimensional configuration of coronal mass ejections
Session: Connecting Slow Wind Theories to Current and Future Observations by Justin Edmondson, Ben Lynch, Aleida Higginson, Xudong Sun and Liang Zhao.
An overview of turbulent transport in tokamaks
35th International Cosmic Ray Conference
T. Laitinen, S. Dalla Jeremiah Horrocks Institute, UCLan, UK
George C. Ho1, David Lario1, Robert B. Decker1, Mihir I. Desai2,
Rick Leske, A. C. Cummings, C. M. S. Cohen, R. A. Mewaldt,
A Relation between Solar Flare Manifestations and the GLE Onset
Search for Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station G. LA VACCA University of Milano-Bicocca.
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
3D Modelling of Heavy Ion SEP Propagation
Particle Acceleration at Coronal Shocks: the Effect of Large-scale Streamer-like Magnetic Field Structures Fan Guo (Los Alamos National Lab), Xiangliang.
Modeling the SEP/ESP Event of December 13, 2006
Solar Flare Energy Partition into Energetic Particle Acceleration
Student Day Working Group III summary
ESS 261 Topics in magnetospheric physics Space weather forecast models ____ the prediction of solar wind speed April 23, 2008.
Ulysses COSPIN High Energy Telescope observations of cosmic ray and solar energetic particles intensities since its distant Jupiter flyby in 2004 R.B.
Heliospheric/ISTP Missions Science Highlights
Introduction to Space Weather
Conveners: M. A. Dayeh (SwRI), R. Bucik (MPS/UG), and C. Salem (UCB)
Jakobus le Roux (1,2) & Gary Webb (1)
Solar Energetic Particle Spectral Breaks
Richard B. Horne British Antarctic Survey Cambridge UK
Presentation transcript:

Simulations of Lateral Transport and Dropout Structure of Energetic Particles from Impulsive Solar Flares Paisan Tooprakai1, Achara Seripienlert2, David Ruffolo2, Piyanate Chuychai3, and William H. Matthaeus4 1Chulalongkorn U., Thailand 2Mahidol U., Thailand 3Burapha U., Thailand 4U. Delaware, USA ก่อนอื่น คงต้องขออนุญาตพูดในภาษาอังกฤษครับ เพราะมีผู้ฟังบางท่านที่ไม่ค่อยถนัดกับภาษาไทยครับ

Observations from Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) [Mazur et al Observations from Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) [Mazur et al. 2000, Gosling et al. 2004, Chollet & Giacalone 2008] a) Energy of H-Fe ions (in units of MeV nucleon-1) vs. arrival time at 1 AU for the impulsive flare event of 1999 January 9. b) H-Fe counts vs. time in smoothed, ~14 minute bins. Observations from ACE showed SEP flux near Earth repeatedly disappearing and reappearing non-dispersively: “DROPOUTS” Usually interpreted as indicating a filamentary distribution of SEPs and little diffusion across these boundaries … … due to filamentary magnetic connectivity to a narrow source region at/near Sun date 1/9/1999 1/10/1999 1/ 11/1999 [Mazur et al. 2000]

Not diffusive during initial transport. A new view of lateral transport of field lines and particles: Not diffusive during initial transport. Filamentary magnetic connectivity from a narrow source region naturally arises from turbulence model. “core” of SEP with dropouts “halo” of low SEP density over wide lateral region [Ruffolo, Matthaeus, & Chuychai 2003; details of the process have been worked out by Chuychai et al. (2005, 2007), Tooprakai et al. (2007), Seripienlert et al. (2010)] October 11, 2006 @ STT32 3

The Maltese cross (of space physics) [Matthaeus et al. 1990] Correlation function of solar wind turbulence parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic field. Consistent with theoretical expectation of Shebalin et al. (1983). [Not to be confused with anisotropy in B direction.]

The 2D+slab Model of Magnetic Turbulence This model provides a useful description of magnetic fluctuations in the solar wind (e.g., Bieber et al. 1994, 1996)

Two components of turbulence [Ph.D. thesis of Achara Seripienlert, based on drawings by W. Dröge]

Topology of 2D turbulence leads to dropouts Two component model: slab turbulence 2D turbulence [Bieber et al. 1994] For 2D component: O-point  local maxima or minima in a(x,y) X-point  saddle points of a(x,y) Contour plot of potential function a(x,y)

Topology of 2D turbulence leads to dropouts Two component model: slab turbulence 2D turbulence Dropouts can be explained by filamentary magnetic connection due to Temporary topological trapping near O-points [Ruffolo et al. 2003] Suppressed diffusive escape [Chuychai et al. 2005, 2007] Contour plot of potential function a(x,y)

2D fields along angular coordinates in spherical geometry [Tooprakai et al. 2016] Spherical harmonic expansion 2D Fast Fourier Transform 2D MHD: Develop coherent structures

Recent results in spherical geometry Spatial distribution of magnetic field lines from narrow solar injection (impulsive solar flare) Dropout pattern becomes more complex farther from Sun [see also Servidio et al. 2014] Total spread is ~25o at 1 AU [consistent with Reames 1990, ApJS] Recent results in spherical geometry

For 1 MeV and 1 GeV, the initial large-scale spatial pattern is similar. At 1 MeV, pattern persists for long s = vt. At 1 GeV, after s = 4 AU (i.e., about 35 min. after the first particle arrival) the spatial pattern is much smoother. Still not diffusive! Particles remain within outer trapping boundary. Recent results for full proton orbit calculation in spherical geometry (so focusing occurs) as a function of energy and distance traveled s=vt. 1 MeV 1 GeV

What should Solar Probe Plus and Solar Orbiter see? (0.25 AU from Sun) Expect pulse of SEPs according to injected time profile, then delay as wait for backscattered particles [Earl 1976]. Many locations miss the pulse due to dropout pattern, see backscatter. Backscattered particles at long s = vt are initially close to same field line pattern, later spread within outer envelope. Again, the lateral transport is never diffusive! Solar Orbiter may corotate with Sun at perihelion: No dropouts Solar Probe Plus could observe non-dispersive dropout features X and γ imaging: Valuable data on magnetic connectivity. s=0.25-0.29 AU s=1.2-2.4 AU s=2.4-6 AU s=6-9 AU s=9-12 AU For details, see Tooprakai et al. (2016)

ขอขอบคุณที่ฟังด้วยครับ THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION! ขอขอบคุณที่ฟังด้วยครับ