E. Barbuto, C. Bozza, A. Cioffi, M. Giorgini

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
0 - Electron Discrimination in Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
NEURAL NETWORKS Backpropagation Algorithm
1 Machine Learning: Lecture 4 Artificial Neural Networks (Based on Chapter 4 of Mitchell T.., Machine Learning, 1997)
Oscillation Project with Emulsion tRacking Apparatus F. Juget Institut de Physique Université de Neuchâtel Neutrino-CH meeting, Neuchâtel June
Muon Identification Antoine Cazes Laboratoire de l’ Accelerateur Lineaire OPERA Collaboration Meeting in Frascatti Physics coordination meeting. October.
Search for spontaneous muon emission from lead nuclei with OPERA bricks M. Giorgini, V. Popa Bologna Group OPERA Collaboration Meeting, LNGS, 19-22/05/2003.
Summary of downstream PID MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
Reconstruction of neutrino interactions in PEANUT G.D.L., Andrea Russo, Luca Scotto Lavina Naples University.
Application of Neural Networks for Energy Reconstruction J. Damgov and L. Litov University of Sofia.
Status of the OPERA experiment Yoshiaki Nonoyama Nagoya Univ.
EM shower reconstruction and located neutrino event analysis Ciro Pistillo (Bern LHEP) on behalf of the Swiss OPERA groups.
Neural Network Tools. Neural Net Concepts The package provides a “standard” multi-layer perceptron –Composed of layers of neurons –All neurons in a layer.
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
The LiC Detector Toy M. Valentan, M. Regler, R. Frühwirth Austrian Academy of Sciences Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna InputSimulation ReconstructionOutput.
PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.
1 A ROOT Tool for 3D Event Visualization in ATLAS Calorimeters Luciano Andrade José de Seixas Federal University of Rio de Janeiro/COPPE.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
Back-Propagation Algorithm AN INTRODUCTION TO LEARNING INTERNAL REPRESENTATIONS BY ERROR PROPAGATION Presented by: Kunal Parmar UHID:
An Artificial Neural Network Approach to Surface Waviness Prediction in Surface Finishing Process by Chi Ngo ECE/ME 539 Class Project.
A Clustering Algorithm for LumiCal Halina Abramowicz, Ronen Ingbir, Sergey Kananov, Aharon Levy, Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University DESY Collaboration High.
Particle Identification at BESIII Kanglin He April 23, 2007, Amsterdam.
Some remarks on (mis)identification: separation of pions from electrons Answer the question of the feasibility of p_bar p  e + e - Answer the question.
Study of hadron interactions in OPERA-like bricks Aim: background study of   h, hhh decays 4 th September 2012 H. Shibuya, H. Ishida, T. Matsuo, T. Fukuda,
Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1.
3D Event reconstruction in ArgoNeuT Maddalena Antonello and Ornella Palamara 11 gennaio 20161M.Antonello - INFN, LNGS.
1 D.Chakraborty – VLCW'06 – 2006/07/21 PFA reconstruction with directed tree clustering Dhiman Chakraborty for the NICADD/NIU software group Vancouver.
Inclusive Measurements of inelastic electron/positron scattering on unpolarized H and D targets at Lara De Nardo for the HERMES COLLABORATION.
Emulsion Simulation Y. Caffari (IPN Lyon) F. Juget (IPH Neuchatel) A. Marotta (CNRS-IN2P3 Lyon) CERN 3-5/05/2006.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
N. Saoulidou & G. Tzanakos1 Analysis for new Period 3 Events N. Saoulidou and G. Tzanakos University of Athens, Department of Physics’ Div. Of Nuclear.
1 Limitations in the use of RICH counters to detect tau-neutrino appearance Tord Ekelöf /Uppsala University Roger Forty /CERN Christian Hansen This talk.
Electron Reconstruction through OpEmuRec Collaboration meeting 22/09/10 Florian Brunet.
LAV efficiency studies with photons T. Spadaro* *Frascati National Laboratory of INFN.
Localization of a Neutrino Interaction Vertex in the OPERA Experiment S.Dmitrievsky, Yu.Gornushkin, G.Ososkov (JINR, Dubna) Gran Sasso, Italy, November.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
2008 European School of High-Energy Physics - Trest, Czech Republic - 19 August - 1st September Target Tracker Data Analysis In OPERA Experiment S. Dmitrievsky,
Emulsion Test Beam first results Annarita Buonaura, Valeri Tioukov On behalf of Napoli emulsion group This activity was supported by AIDA2020.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Characterization of muon beam in T2K with emulsion detectors A. Ariga, T. Ariga, C. Pistillo AEC-LHEP University of Bern 1.
Exploring Artificial Neural Networks to Discover Higgs at LHC Using Neural Networks for B-tagging By Rohan Adur
by students Rozhkov G.V. Khalikov E.V. scientific adviser Iyudin A.F.
Machine Learning Supervised Learning Classification and Regression
Nuclear emulsions One of the eldest particle detectors, still used in particle physics experiment (CHORUS, DONUT, OPERA) for its unique peculiarities:
Parameterization of EMC response for
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
Artificial Neural Networks
Identification of isolated photons
EvtGen Miniworkshop, Patrick Robbe LAL Orsay, 21 Jan 2005
Cross section of the process
Localization of a Neutrino Interaction Vertex in the OPERA Experiment
Status of the OPERA experiment
Results from OPERA Pablo del Amo Sánchez for the OPERA collaboration
Pure  exposure for e/ separation
Training a Neural Network
Artificial Neural Networks
Argonne National Laboratory
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Summary of dE/dx studies in silicon and MS in muon system
Search for coincidences and study of cosmic rays spectrum
p0 detection and reconstruction with the
G. Battistoni, R. Brunetti, K. Cieślik, A. Dąbrowska, R. Dolfini,
Search for Lepton Flavour Violation in the decay  → BaBar
ZHH Analysis preliminary results on different detector models
Practical session on neural network modelling
Problems in π0 Reconstruction
Presentation transcript:

E. Barbuto, C. Bozza, A. Cioffi, M. Giorgini OPERA Collaboration Meeting Nagoya, Japan, 30 Jan – 4 Feb 2004 Updated results from a new Neural Network tool: e-/p- separation energy measurement from e.m. showers E. Barbuto, C. Bozza, A. Cioffi, M. Giorgini

Outline Features of the Neural Network (NN) Software MC simulation used for the training Results on : Particle (e-/p-) separation Energy reconstruction in e.m. showers Conclusions

Neural Network library structure (see C. Bozza, Gran Sasso Coll. Meeting, May `03) Full generality/modularity Platform and language independence (the library has been tested and debugged both under Windows and Linux) It can be used by any user program, even in server mode Users can extend the library even without recompiling GUI and console interface allowing an interactive monitoring of the training and testing phases Network Type Output layer Multilayer Perceptron : several layers of “neurons”, each one with its transfer function Hidden layer Input layer

MC simulation for training and test lead (1mm) p ,e x y z ..... 56 GEANT simulation of a complete OPERA brick (56 lead targets and 56 emulsion-base-emulsion sheets) First step : e/p discrimination only through their multiple Coulomb scattering before interacting/showering (see E. Barbuto, Phys. Coord. July `03) New step : algorithm taking into account the showers Full analysis : MCS of primary particle + shower analysis

Shower analysis (MC data) 1 GeV e- 1 GeV p- 5 GeV e- 5 GeV p- 10 GeV p- 10 GeV e-

Description of the shower analysis Goals : electron/pion separation electron energy reconstruction Requests for a good shower description : Consider as much as possible tracks belonging to the shower Do not integrate over background tracks In order to achieve these requirements : we opened a 50 mrad cone around the primary for each track, we required a maximum relative angle of 400 mrad with respect to the primary direction the tracking thresholds was set at ~10 MeV (due to the tracking efficiency)

NN structure Input variables Training NN NN Output INPUT LAYER : 672 NEURONS Emulsion films crossed by primary particle before showering (1 var.) Number of film where the cone starts (1 var.) Number of charged particle detected per film inside the cone (112 var.) x-coordinates sigma for charged particles in the cone (112 var.) y-coordinates sigma for charged particles in the cone (112 var.) x-angular sigma for charged particles in the cone (112 var.) y-angular sigma for charged particles in the cone (112 var.) Dqx by Multiple Coulomb Scattering of the primary (55 var.) Dqy by Multiple Coulomb Scattering of the primary (55 var.) Input variables NN Output NN Training HIDDEN LAYER : 100 sigmoid neurons OUTPUT LAYER : 1 logistic neuron giving a number between 0 and 1 67300 (672x100+100x1) weights

A special feature : missing data Real emulsion data come with inefficiencies (missing tracks in one or more sheets) Each missing track corresponds to some missing network inputs In order to have a tool able to analyze real data, the situation of missing data must be correctly handled The decreasing of the primary particle energy leads to a higher number of missing input data Example: percentage of events with a minimum number of films crossed by particles of the shower E (GeV) nfilm28 nfilm72 nfilm108 1 67% 2% 0% 3 90% 88% 3% 5 95% 94% 18% 7 96% 29% 9 97% 35%

Electron ID: training the network Training events: 2000 e- + 2000 - with a continuous energy spectrum [0-10] GeV Weight updating every 10 events 90 epochs

Electron ID: test with variable energies First test : MC data having a continuous spectrum [0-10] GeV Electrons (5000 ev.) Pions (2500 ev.) Testing events: 5000 e- + 2500 - Separation value x]0;1[: if network output < x  electron if network output > x  pion x = 0.9 A suitable value could be x = 0.9

Electron ID: test on fixed energies We tested the NN also with e-/- particles with fixed energies 3 GeV e- 3 GeV - NN output NN output 5 GeV e- 5 GeV - NN output NN output

e-/p- separation efficiency ID(e-): fractions of electrons correctly identified ID(-): fractions of pions correctly identified f = ID(e-)ID(-) E (GeV) f ID(e-) ID(-) 1 77.9% 81.3% 95.8% 3 98.3% 99.9% 5 99.3% 100% 7 99% 99.2% 99.8% 9 98% 99.7% 0-10 82% 83.3% 98.5%

Energy reconstruction: variable e- energies 0 - 10 GeV electrons Total entries : 5000 Mean Value : -0.012 RMS : 1.667 Fit Mean: -0.006 Sigma : 0.885 Ereal-Erec (GeV) 0-2 GeV electrons Total entries : 1000 Mean Value : -0.787 RMS : 2.084 Fit Mean: -0.113 Sigma : 0.625 Ereal-Erec (GeV) 8 - 10 GeV electrons Total entries : 1000 Mean Value: 0.635 RMS: 1.366 Fit Mean : 0.322 Sigma: 0.664 Ereal-Erec (GeV)

Energy reconstruction: fixed e- energies 1 GeV electrons Total entries : 5000 Mean Value : 1.773 RMS : 1.957 Mean Fit : 1.241 Sigma : 0.795 5 GeV electrons Total entries : 5000 Mean Value : 4.990 RMS : 1.502 Mean Fit : 5.178 Sigma : 1.164 Erec(GeV) Erec(GeV) 7 GeV electrons Total entries : 5000 Mean Value : 6.953 RMS : 1.562 Mean Fit : 7.352 Sigma : 0.980 9 GeV electrons Total entries : 5000 Mean Value : 8.347 RMS : 1.523 Mean Fit : 8.832 Sigma : 0.512 Erec(GeV) Erec(GeV)

Energy reconstruction resolution As already said, this NN can work with missing input data, so it was trained and tested with ALL THE EVENTS, independently from the number of crossed layers or particle produced. The reconstruction precision could be improved selecting data with a minimum number of emulsion films crossed by charged particles in the selected cone (this is the usual procedure used in standard NN) 3 GeV electrons (all events) Total entries : 5000 Mean Value : 2.978 RMS : 1.444 Mean Fit : 2.938 Sigma : 0.914 DE/E ≈ 31% 3 GeV electrons, ≥ 28 films Total entries : 4532 Mean Value : 2.707 RMS : 0.699 Mean Fit: 2.720 Sigma : 0.631 Erec(GeV) DE/E ≈ 23% Erec(GeV)

Conclusions A general neural network software has been developed Special feature: deals with missing input data It can be used in various modes and environments (Windows/Linux, Interactive/Server) Results: (1) e-/p- separation with f > 98% for 3<E<10 GeV (2) Electron momentum reconstruction can be done without selecting the data (like in the real case!)

Electron ID : 7,9 GeV 7GeV p- 7GeV e- 9GeV e- 9GeV -

Energy reconstruction: 3 GeV, 72films 3 GeV electrons, ≥ 72 films Total entries: 4386 Mean Value: 2.733 RMS: 0.652 Mean Fit : 2.729 Sigma : 0.620 DE/E ≈ 22% Erec(GeV)

Class hierarchy NeuronDescriptor Constructor TransferFunction DerivativeOfTransferFunction BiasNeuronDescriptor ExpNeuronDescriptor GaussianNeuronDescriptor HardLimNeuronDescriptor LinearNeuronDescriptor LogisticNeuronDescriptor SigmoidNeuronDescriptor TrainingHistoryEntry TrainingSet MLPerceptron Constructor Evaluate Train Weights MLPerceptronWithBackPropagation MLPerceptronWithLangevinTraining MLPerceptronWithManhattanTraining MLPerceptronWithStabilizedBPTraining

Standard back propagation learning parameter teaching value neuron output  is a global parameter: if is small the training can be too slow in flat regions and it can be trapped il local minimum if is too big the training could never converge because it always exceed a minimum