Do you have any? Phobias What do you think caused them?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Little Albert J.B. Watson & Rosalie Rayner’s
Advertisements

C ONDITIONED EMOTIONAL REACTIONS Watson & Rayner, 1920.
Conditioned emotional reactions
Recapping the behaviourist principles.
Core Study: Watson and Rayner (1920) Little Albert BATs Outline and evaluate Watson and Rayner’s experiment to induce a phobia in a young child (C+) Hand.
Explanations of dysfunctional behaviour G543. Different approaches have different assumptions about db –Behavioural  Db is learnt by conditioning or.
Unit 2 The Learning approach Study in Detail Watson & Raynor (1920)
Behavioral Theorists: Skinner and Watson By: Francy Lopez & Alex Sparacino.
Classical Conditioning Pavlov’s Experiment. Neutral Stimulus Pavlov used a tuning fork Pavlov used a tuning fork A tuning fork has nothing to do with.
Classical Conditioning Chapter 6- Section 1 Learning is achieved through experience. If we are born knowing how to do it, it is not the result of learning.
Classical conditioning in real life
Little Emotional Albert Rachel Walterman, Jamie Clay, Jess Schweer, Candace Cornick.
Classical Conditioning Chapter 6 Psychology. Learning  Learning: some kind of change in behavior or knowledge that is long-lasting due to an increase.
Little Albert Experiment Jordan Krasienko / brian buffington.
Learning Learning = any relatively enduring change in behavior due to experience 1.Learning through signaling (= classical conditioning) 2.Learning through.
Principles of Learning Learning Introduction Learning –a relatively permanent change in an organism’s behavior due to experience. Several types of.
LITTLE EMOTIONAL ALBERT Amanda Wagner Alex Gabliani.
AP Psych DMA 1.In Pavlov’s experiments, the dog’s salivation triggered by the taste of food was an…. 2.An event that increases the frequency of the behavior.
Chapter 4: Classical Conditioning: Basic Phenomena and Various Complexities Basic Terms Two Extensions Three Limitations Additional Phenomena.
Explanations of dysfunctional behaviour G543. Types of Phobias Specific Phobias Fear of a specific object or situation such as: - –Arachnophobia – Fear.
Chapter 9 Section 2: Classical Conditioning in Real Life.
Classical Conditioning. Ivan Pavlov’s Experiment Originally interested in physiology – Studying effect saliva had on digestion Noticed dogs began to salivate.
Concepts of Classical Conditioning. Adaptive Value The usefulness of certain abilities or traits that have evolved in animals and humans that tend to.
English for Academic Purposes Practice Activities English for Academic Purposes Practice activities Reading more efficiently Lesson 6 Expressing stance.
Unit 2: Classical Conditioning.  Behaviour is acquired by learning experiences  Theorist examine how we acquire behaviour and study the mechanisms that.
Learning and Classical Conditioning. Agenda 1. Bell Ringer: Quick Questions (5) 2. Classical Conditioning and Pavlov (20) 3. Jim and Dwight… (5) 4. Little.
Classical Conditioning DAY 2 AP PSYCH. Review Time is important ▪ Usually must have repeated pairings of the UCS and NS to produce and CR. – If Pavlov.
Learning. What does Learning mean? Learning is any relatively permanent change in behavior brought about by experience or practice  ** Different from.
CLASSICAL CONDITIONING
Learning Chapter 5 Presentation:Fajr Harris Presenter:Daniel Rodriguez
Psychological approaches to psychopathology - Behavioural
Approaches to Learning
Learning and Conditioning
What is a Case Study? A case study can be defined as an in-depth investigation of human experience called ‘a case’. The aim of the case study is to describe,
Debate: Nature and Nurture
Classical Conditioning
Classical Conditioning
Classical Conditioning
Classic Study Watson and Rayner: Little Albert
Unit 6 Learning.
Classical Conditioning
Definition Learning is a relatively permanent change in an organism’s behavior due to experience.
Explaining abnormality
Learning.
Debate: Nature and Nurture
Classical Conditioning
HCC – WEST LOOP MR. ALAS, MS
Behaviorism Ms.Carmelitano.
Learning Chapter 6.
Behaviourism: Classical Conditioning
Principles of Learning
Objectives To be able to describe the Two process theory of Phobias.
Discovering Psychology Special Update For DSM-5
What is learning? A relatively permanent change in behavior that comes as a result of experience. Not automatic…based on EXPERIENCE Not due to maturation,
Aim: How does classical conditioning impact behavior?
Special Update For DSM-5
Definition Learning is a relatively permanent change in an organism’s behavior due to experience.
The N tional Dog Training Academy
Classical Conditioning
Bell Work Are there any foods that you avoid because they made you ill in the past? Is there anything that you associate with fear? Clowns? Darkness? Cats/Dogs?
Famous Psychology Experiments
Part 1- Behaviorist Learning Theory
UNIT 4 BRAIN, BEHAVIOUR & EXPERIENCE
Classical Conditioning
Learning Chapter 6.
AP Psych DMA Describe what a fixed-ratio schedule of reinforcement is.
Learning Learning is a relatively permanent change in behavior that occurs as a result of experience. Associative Learning- learning to associate 2 events,
Presentation transcript:

Do you have any? Phobias What do you think caused them?

Behavioural Explanations Study of classical conditioning Watson & Raynor (1920) Study of classical conditioning

Aim To see if a fear of a previously unfeared objects can be induced through classical conditioning To see if the fear will be transferred to other similar objects To see what effect time will have on the fear response To see how it is possible to remove the fear response in the laboratory

Methodology Case study – 1 child ‘little Albert’ Controlled lab conditions DV – Albert’s reactions to stimuli before & after conditioning

Participant Little Albert Lived in a hospital environment “Stolid (not overly sensitive/excitable) and unemotional” Showed no fear of a rat, rabbit, dog, monkey, mask with hair or cotton wool When Albert was 8 months old, researchers tested hitting a suspended steel bar with a hammer above Little Albert He was startled, held his breath and began to cry. As this was something he clearly did not like, the researchers decided to use it to condition Albert to fear certain objects

Procedure Tested at 8 months old for fear responses. Experiments began at 11 months SESSION 1 When they presented Albert with a rat, experimenters hit the steel bar with the hammer just as he reached for it. Albert jumped and fell forward. For a second time, they presented Albert with a rat and hit the steel bar with the hammer just as he reached for it. This time Albert began to whimper Albert was then given a week off.

1 week later… SESSION 2 First, the rat was presented with no noise Next, the rat was presented with the noise three more times Then, the rat was presented with no noise Next, the rat was presented with the noise twice more Finally, the rat was presented with no noise

SESSION 2 Albert’s reactions After Albert had experienced the rat and loud noise together 5 times… …he began immediately crying even when he saw the rat with no noise and crawled quickly away

5 days later… SESSION 3 To see if the fear was transferred/ generalised Neutral stimulus – Little Albert like playing with blocks so they were used to calm him down As he was playing with them he was presented with: A rabbit A dog A seal-fur coat Cotton wool Watson’s hair A Santa Claus mask Interspersed with being given the blocks to calm him down

SESSION 3 Albert’s reactions = Happy Albert = Crying, moving away from stimulus & crawling away = Less negativity

5 days later… SESSION 4 To see how time had affected the response 1. Albert was presented the rat with no noise. The response was present but weaker so they performed conditioning again 2. Also conditioned response to the dog and rabbit by making loud noise with their presentation 3. Albert was taken to well-lit lecture theatre to see if the response was same as in the small lab room

SESSION 4 Albert’s reactions = Fear response large, cried, crawled away = Fear reaction was slight = Still no fear response

1 month later… SESSION 5 Albert was tested again with various stimuli including the rat, rabbit, dog, fur coat and Santa Claus mask

SESSION 5 Albert’s reactions Albert still showed varying degrees of fear reactions to all of the stimuli, still crying and crawling away some of the time He did seem less frightened of the rabbit and wanted to play with it BUT when he touched it he usually showed the fear response

So what does it all mean? Session 2 Sessions 3 & 4 Session 5 After just 5 paired presentations a fear response had been conditioned so fear can be created through classical conditioning. Sessions 3 & 4 The fear could be transferred/ generalised to other similar objects Session 5 The fear response did not disappear over time

Aim 4: To see how it is possible to remove the fear response in the laboratory Little Albert was removed from the hospital after session 5. Watson and Raynor were never able to see if they could remove the fear response Little Albert may well have had a fear or furry animals for ever more. When we move onto the treatments section of this topic we can see how the fear could have been removed with de-sensitisation.

Let’s watch it in action http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FKZAYt77ZM