Reporting Approaches and Best Practices Jennifer Benjamin NCQA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Developing Innovative Payment Approaches: Finding the Path to High Performance Stuart Guterman Vice President, Payment and System.
Advertisements

Nina Muscillo and Andrew Hargreaves November 2014 Supporting Medication Reconciliation.
From Evidence to EMS Practice: Building the National Model Eddy Lang, MD, CFPC (EM), CSPQ SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University Montreal, Canada.
Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.
California Pay for Performance: Understanding the Impact of Provider Incentives for Quality Tom Williams Executive Director Integrated Healthcare Association.
MaineHealth ACO in Context W 5 Who? What? Why? When? HoW? 1.
DELAWARE HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES Division of Public Health Public Health and PCMH Karyl Rattay, MD, MS Director Delaware Division of Public Health.
Performance Measurement and Analysis for Health Organizations
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Developing Innovative Payment Approaches: Finding the Path to High Performance Stuart Guterman Assistant Vice President and Director,
Where Results Begin. “We don’t have a health care delivery system in this country. We have an expensive plethora of uncoordinated, unlinked, economically.
Pay for Performance – a critical assessment (using recent Estonian experience) “Improving primary care in Europe and the US: Towards patient- centered,
MN Community Measurement Jim Chase Executive Director February 14, 2007
September 2008 NH Multi-Stakeholder Medical Home Overview.
Better, Smarter, Healthier: Delivery System Reform U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 1.
The California Pay for Performance Program Stephen Shortell, Ph.D., MPH Dean, School of Public Health University of California at Berkeley National Pay.
1 Evaluation of Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Initiatives Meredith B. Rosenthal, PhD February 24, 2009.
SE MINNESOTA BEACON PROGRAM: Building Technology Capacity to Improve Health.
Health Information Technology Summit John Tooker, MD, MBA, FACP Executive Vice President/CEO American College of Physicians Washington, DC October 21,
Thomas B. Valuck, MD, JD Medical Officer & Senior Adviser Center for Medicare Management Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services CMS’ Progress Toward.
Slide 1 Achieving National Quality Reporting Progress? Elliott S. Fisher, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences Dartmouth.
Health Management Information Systems Clinical Decision Support Systems Lecture b This material Comp6_Unit5b was developed by Duke University, funded by.
Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and Patient- Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.
PRAGMATIC Study Designs: Elderly Cancer Trials
Department of Legal Medicine Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
Projects, Events and Training
Clinical Learning Environment Review GMEC January 8, 2013
A new tool for measuring client experience
Incentive Payments and Public Reporting
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Lou Diamond, MB, ChB, FACP Moderator
Minnesota Pay for Performance:
Development of National Strategies for Implementing and Evaluating Evidence-Based Indicators for Benchmarking and Monitoring Asthma Care in Canada Teresa.
NYHQ DSRIP Primary Care & Behavioral Health Committee Kick-Off Meeting
Critical Care Services Pharmacist Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital
From the Dry Run and National Implementation of the
CRISP Update January 2017.
Thomas B. Valuck, MD, JD Medical Officer & Senior Adviser
Prospects for New Delivery Systems and Reimbursement Models
Minnesota Direct Clinical Data Collection Methods and Results
MUHC Innovation Model.
Rural Health Summit June 11, 2010.
MHQP Executive Director Pay for Performance Summit
The Elements of Health Care Quality and Current Improvement Efforts
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Moving Beyond Survival to the Patient’s Perspective Linda J Burns, MD Medical Director, NMDP/Be The Match Health.
Minnesota Measurement and Pay for Performance
Pacific Business Group on Health (PBGH) System Transformation
Implementation of Quality Measures : Meaningful Measures
Public Reporting of Cardiovascular Data
High Performance Accountable Care: What Do We Need to Do?
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Improved Analytics for P4P
Critical Care I hope to continue my career as a nurse in the critical care setting. The Quality and Safety Education in Nursing (QSEN) practice standards.
Provider and Member Education in Managed Care Pharmacy
Johns Hopkins Medicine Innovation 2023 Strategic Plan
Medicare and Hospitals
Accountable care organizations
Sarah Burstein, MPH Operations Leader
Using Measurement in Community Health Improvement Processes to Identify Priorities and Drive Change Michael A. Stoto, PhD Collaborative Working Group on.
Implementing the IOM’s Rewarding Provider Performance Report
Provider Peer Grouping: Project Overview
Integrating Evidence into RT Practice: An Important Focus for the Profession Chapter 15 HPR 453.
Mission, Vision & Values
Worcestershire Joint Services Review
Healthcare Regional Cost Measurement & Transparency
Healthcare Regional Cost Measurement & Transparency
Karen Ignagni President & CEO America’s Health Insurance Plans
Market Mover? The Emerging Role of CMS in P4P
Value-Based Healthcare: The Evolving Model
Improving the Quality of Healthcare through Health Information Exchange Results from eHI’s Third Annual Survey of State, Regional and Community-Based.
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Presentation transcript:

Reporting Approaches and Best Practices Jennifer Benjamin NCQA February 2008

This Presentation Reporting Performance Data Lessons Learned Reporting Strategy Methodology Reporting in a P4P Environment Lessons Learned

IOM Report: Rewarding Provider Performance Recommendations IOM. Rewarding Provider Performance. September. 2006/p6/c1/lines 1-4; p7/c1/lines 32-34; p8/c1/lines 23-27; p9/c1/lines 23-24 Implement pay for performance in Medicare (w/recommendations on funding) Reward high clinical quality, patient-centered, and efficient care: coordination of care, chronic conditions Providers should publicly report and participate as soon as possible (reporting, then improvement and excellence) Assist providers w/electronic data collection and implement a monitoring and evaluation system IOM. Rewarding Provider Performance. September. 2006/p9/c1/lines 32-35; /p10/c1/lines 31-35; p11/c1/lines 1-2; p12/c1/lines 24-41 IOM. Rewarding Provider Performance. September. 2006/p13/c1/lines 9-17; p14/c1/lines 1-6 and 15-24 Some of these recommendations have already been incorporated into demonstration and pilot projects. Others are a preview for what the Medicare program will incorporate over the coming years Review summary of the IOM’s 10 recommendations Institute of Medicine. Rewarding Provider Performance: Aligning Incentives in Medicare. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.

Public Reporting = Improved Performance IOM. Rewarding Provider Performance. September. 2006/p6/c1/lines 1-4; p7/c1/lines 32-34; p8/c1/lines 23-27; p9/c1/lines 23-24 “ Hospitals engaged in both public reporting and pay for performance achieved modestly greater improvements in quality than did hospitals engaged only in public reporting.” NEJM, “Public Reporting and Pay for Performance in Hospital Quality Improvement”, Feb 2007 IOM. Rewarding Provider Performance. September. 2006/p9/c1/lines 32-35; /p10/c1/lines 31-35; p11/c1/lines 1-2; p12/c1/lines 24-41 IOM. Rewarding Provider Performance. September. 2006/p13/c1/lines 9-17; p14/c1/lines 1-6 and 15-24 Some of these recommendations have already been incorporated into demonstration and pilot projects. Others are a preview for what the Medicare program will incorporate over the coming years Review summary of the IOM’s 10 recommendations Institute of Medicine. Rewarding Provider Performance: Aligning Incentives in Medicare. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.

Reporting Strategy AQA. Data Sharing and Aggregation Principles for Performance Measurement and Reporting. 2006 p1/lines 10-25 Is the information meaningful for the target audience? Will the target audience understand what to do with the information? Are the words or concepts presented at a level that the target audience is likely to understand? Does the information contain an appropriate level of detail? These principles were published by AQA in April 2006. To support performance measurement and reporting, an effective data sharing and aggregation model requires the following: Transparency Standardized metrics and data collection protocols that can be compared with national, regional, or other suitable benchmarks Useful data for physicians to improve the quality and cost of care they provide to their patients Public reporting to consumers of user-friendly, meaningful, and actionable information The collection of both public and private data Association for Quality Assurance. Data Sharing and Aggregation Principles for Performance Measurement and Reporting. January 2006;v1:1.

Reporting Strategy – General Principles AQA. Data Sharing and Aggregation Principles for Performance Measurement and Reporting. 2006 p1/lines 10-25 Group measures into reporting categories that are meaningful to consumers. Display comparative information in a format that is easy to read and understand. Use a rating scale that incorporates measures that are salient to the target audience. Focus Groups, Sample Report Cards These principles were published by AQA in April 2006. To support performance measurement and reporting, an effective data sharing and aggregation model requires the following: Transparency Standardized metrics and data collection protocols that can be compared with national, regional, or other suitable benchmarks Useful data for physicians to improve the quality and cost of care they provide to their patients Public reporting to consumers of user-friendly, meaningful, and actionable information The collection of both public and private data Association for Quality Assurance. Data Sharing and Aggregation Principles for Performance Measurement and Reporting. January 2006;v1:1.

Adapting Reporting Principles to P4P Collaberation: Involve key stakeholders in the overall process Transparent methods: Data specifications; results shared with physicians/physician organizations first Portrayal of performance differences: Results should be displayed relative to peers AQA. Principles for Reporting to Clinicians and Hospitals. 2006. p1/lines 20 – 40; p2/lines 1-43 Content of reports Reports should focus on areas that have the greatest opportunities to improve quality by making care safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable, and patient centered Reports should rely on standard-performance and patient-experience measures that meet the AQA Principles for Performance Measurement (eg, measures should be evidence based, relevant to patient outcomes, and statistically valid and reliable) Transparent methods Data specifications for reported performance data, such as sample size and methods of data collection and analysis, should be explicit and disclosed to physicians and hospitals Clinicians whose performance is reported should be able to review and comment on the methodology for data collection and analysis (including risk adjustment). Clinicians and hospitals should be notified in writing in a timely manner of any changes in program requirements and evaluation methods Portrayal of performance differences Results of individual clinician or group performance should be displayed relative to peers. Any reported differences between individual providers or groups should include the clinical relevancy of the findings Report design and testing for usability Practicing physicians should be actively involved in the design of performance reports. Report formats should be designed to be user-friendly and easily understood, and should be pilot-tested before implementation. Collaboration Clinicians and hospitals should collaborate to share pertinent information in a timely manner that promotes patient safety and quality improvement. Association for Quality Assurance. Principles for Reporting to Clinicians and Hospitals. April 2006;v1:1-2. Source: AQA.

IHA P4P Public Reporting: 2006 Data Reported in 2007 IHA. Online Report Card. [website] 2006 This is an example of how results from the IHA program are publicly reported to consumers and policy makers Consumers can go to www.iha.ncqa.org and search by county to find specific group information on quality Integrated Healthcare Association. Online report card, Alameda County. 2006. Available at: http://iha.ncqa.org/reportcard/Frames.aspx?cid=1. Accessed February 16, 2007.

IHA P4P Public Reporting: 2006 Data Reported in 2007 IHA. Online Report Card. [website] 2006 This is an example of how results from the IHA program are publicly reported to consumers and policy makers Consumers can go to www.iha.ncqa.org and search by county to find specific group information on quality Integrated Healthcare Association. Online report card, Alameda County. 2006. Available at: http://iha.ncqa.org/reportcard/Frames.aspx?cid=1. Accessed February 16, 2007.

IHA P4P Public Reporting: 2006 Data Reported in 2007 IHA. Online Report Card. [website] 2006 This is an example of how results from the IHA program are publicly reported to consumers and policy makers Consumers can go to www.iha.ncqa.org and search by county to find specific group information on quality Integrated Healthcare Association. Online report card, Alameda County. 2006. Available at: http://iha.ncqa.org/reportcard/Frames.aspx?cid=1. Accessed February 16, 2007.

MN Community Measurement Public Reporting Medical groups receive an advance copy of the Health Care Quality Report Report includes results of aggregate data by measure for each group and measure statistics Numerators, denominators, and patient lists by measure available on request Report also available on public Web site Also conduct provider Web cast and medical group meetings Keeping physicians engaged and feeling as though they are contributing to the process is important, especially when sharing initial results (prior to public reporting) According to a slide from Greg Pawlson, MD, Executive Vice President, NCQA, in association with Jim Chase, Executive Director, Minnesota Community Measurement Program, March 2007.

MN Community Measurement Provider Group Profile Chase,Jim. MN Community Measurement 2006 State of Health Care Quality Report Presentation. [Website] slide 38 This is an example of how Minnesota Community Measurement results are reported to the public This report card is at www.mnhealthcare.org Chase J, Magnan S. Minnesota Community Measurement 2006. Available at: http://www.mnhealthcare.org. Accessed March 12, 2007. Reprinted with permission from MNCM.

Important Considerations Lessons learned from two state report cards efforts: Content of report cards should be driven by the needs of the target audience. Report cards should use consumer-friendly reporting categories and measure descriptions. Consumers are more familiar with survey than clinical quality information Report cards should have clear and easy to understand tables/charts.

Conclusions Reporting data in a clear, concise manner that is meaningful to consumers is important Agree on methodology that makes sense to the target audience Stakeholder participation in the review process is key