Medical Device Regulatory Essentials: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Use of Data Monitoring Committees (DMC) in Device Trials: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices (DCD) Perspective Bram Zuckerman MD, FACC
Advertisements

BME-IDEA Workshop, September 28, 2005
Regulatory Pathway for Platform Technologies
"Determining the Regulatory Pathway to Market" Classification Heather S. Rosecrans Director, 510(k) Staff Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices.
Humanitarian Device Exemptions (HDE) 101 Elizabeth Hillebrenner, MSE Biomedical Engineer IDE and HDE Program Staff Center for Devices and Radiological.
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
1 FDA Update - CDRH Markham C. Luke, MD PhD Deputy Director for Clinical Office of Device Evaluation, CDRH, FDA May 15, 2012 NORD Corporate Council.
IRB PRESENTATION REGULATORY PATHWAYS HDE – PMA William Hellenbrand MD Director – Pediatric Cardiology Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons.
Special Topics in IND Regulation
1 Historical overview of FDA regulation of digital pathology imaging applications: the safety and effectiveness issues Tremel A. Faison, MS, RAC, SCT(ASCP)
+ Medical Devices Approval Process. + Objectives Define a medical device Be familiar with the classification system for medical devices Understand the.
1 THE UNIQUE ROLES OF IRB IN MEDICAL DEVICE CLINICALL TRIAL Chiu Lin, Ph.D. CITI, May, 2009 CITI, May, 2009.
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
Clinical Trials. What is a clinical trial? Clinical trials are research studies involving people Used to find better ways to prevent, detect, and treat.
The Medical Device Pathway as a Legal Onramp for Futuristic Persons THE FUTURE T HE M EDICAL D EVICE P ATHWAY AS A L EGAL.
Industry Perspective on Challenges for Product Developers - Drugs Christine Allison, M.S., RAC Associate Regulatory Consultant, Global Regulatory Affairs.
Drug Submissions: Review Process Agnes V. Klein, MD Biologics and Genetic Therapies Directorate February, 2003 www/hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut.
1 CONSENSUS STANDARDS OIVD WORKSHOP April 22-23, 2003 Rockville MD Ginette Y. Michaud, M.D. OIVD.
Humanitarian Use Devices September 23, 2011 Theodore Stevens, MS, RAC Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Center for Biologics Evaluation and.
DHHS / FDA / CDRH 1 FDA Summary CardioSEAL® STARFlex™ Septal Occlusion System with Qwik Load NMT Medical P000049/S3.
Trial Design Issues Associated with Evaluation of Distal Protection Devices in Diseased Saphenous Vein Grafts Bram D. Zuckerman, MD, FACC Medical Officer,
Regulatory Decision Making D. Kathleen Wright, Reviewer Division of Microbiology Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation & Safety ( OIVD ) Food.
October 28, F OOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION AMENDMENTS ACT OF 2007 (FDAAA) and Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) Presented to the Ninth.
Overview of Premarket Approval (PMA) Program
GU Advisory Panel Meeting Nocturnal Home Hemodialysis Draft Carolyn Y. Neuland, Ph.D. Chief, Gastroenterology and Renal Devices Branch Division of Reproductive,
DHHS / FDA / CDRH 1 FDA Summary CardioSEAL® Septal Occlusion System with Qwik Load NMT Medical P
Radiology Advisory Panel Meeting Radiology Advisory Panel Meeting Computer-Assisted Detection (CADe) Devices Joyce M. Whang Deputy Division Director Radiological.
The CDRH Software Message (October 19, 2002) John F Murray Jr.. Center for Devices & Radiological Health US Food and Drug Administration
November 9, 2015 February 20, 2017 Using real world evidence – industry perspective Pma indication expansion Melissa hasenbank, phd Sr. Clinical Research.
Cardiovascular Device Development in the United States: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division.
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
Clinical trials for medical devices: FDA and the IDE process
CLI and Device Intervention Across the Pacific – An FDA View
Rachel Neubrander, PhD Division of Cardiovascular Devices
The CRT of EFS Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going
GCP AND MEDICAL DEVICES
What Are the FDA Requirements for Submitting an IDE?
Research Compliance and Institutional Review Boards
Division of Cardiovascular Devices
U.S. FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health Update
OUS Data: What does the CE Mark Really Mean?
FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices
Collaborative Program: Is It Ready for Valve Studies?
Jeff Shuren, MD, JD Center for Devices and Radiological Health U. S
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
How to Put Together an IDE Application
FDA Perspective on Cardiovascular Device Development
Balancing Pre and Postmarket Requirements Different Scenarios
Balancing Regulation and Innovation: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Reasonable Assurance of Safety and Effectiveness: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division.
Statistical Approaches to Support Device Innovation- FDA View
The FDA Early Feasibility Study Pilot and the Innovation Pathway
The Current PMA Requirements
FDA Guidance on Early Feasibility Studies, Including First-in-Human
First-in-Man, First In The USA: What’s The Difference?
Deputy Director, Division of Biostatistics No Conflict of Interest
Regulatory Synergies in Device Innovation
Introduction of New Technology: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Benefits of US EFS: A Clinical Perspective
Structural Heart Disease and Devices in Japan and USA
Lessons Learned: Past Present and Future Japan-USA Regulatory Interactions Erica Takai, PhD US Food and Drug Administration
US Early Feasibility Studies (EFS)
Lessons Learned Through HBD: The Regulator’s View - US FDA
Regulatory Considerations for Coronary Drug Coated Balloons – FDA View
FDA-CDRH in the Next Decade A Vision for Change
Erica Takai, PhD for Andrew Farb, M.D.
Regulatory perspective
Clinical Trials.
Opening an IND: Investigator Perspective
Cardiovascular Device Development and Approval: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of.
Presentation transcript:

Medical Device Regulatory Essentials: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health 1 1

Disclosures I have nothing to disclose 2

FDA’s and CDRH’s Public Health Mission FDA’s role: To assure that drugs and devices are safe and effective for their intended uses and that labeling and packaging is truthful and informative FDA’s Center for Devices (CDRH) is responsible for establishing a reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of medical devices prior to marketing in the U.S. Regulation is a balancing act - Get safe and effective devices to market as quickly as possible while ensuring that devices currently on the market remain safe and effective

Risk-Based Paradigm Medical Device Classes: Additional Classification: General Controls Most exempt from premarket submission Class II Special Controls Premarket Notification [510(k)] Class III Premarket Approval Require Premarket Application [PMA] Additional Classification: De Novo Device "types" that have never been marketed in the U.S., but whose safety profile and technology are now reasonably well understood Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) Devices for orphan diseases intended to benefit patients in diagnosis and/or treatment of disease or condition affecting or manifested in fewer than 4,000 patients per year in the United States 4

Safety and Effectiveness Defined in CFR Safety - benefits outweigh risks “There is reasonable assurance that a device is safe when it can be determined based on valid scientific evidence that the probable benefits to health from use of the device for its intended uses and conditions of use, when accompanied by adequate directions and warnings against unsafe use, outweigh the probable risks.” Effectiveness - results are clinically significant “There is reasonable assurance that a device is effective when it can be determined, based upon valid scientific evidence, that in a significant portion of the target population, the use of the device for its intended uses and conditions of use, when accompanied by adequate directions for use and warnings against unsafe use, will provide clinically significant results.” 21 CFR 860.7 What is S? Here is the language in the regs, and I will be discussing some of the caveats, but essentially safety means that the Benefits outweigh risks

Device Performance vs. Device Effectiveness Focuses on device mechanism of action For example: Enlarges arterial lumen, occludes LAA orifice Effectiveness Focuses on clinical outcomes For example: Reduces repeat revascularization rates, prevents strokes Limited role for surrogate endpoints It is important to note the difference between device performance, a standard requirement in the EU, and effectiveness, a US requirement. Performance focuses on…

Pivotal Trial Essential Elements Objective, meaningful study endpoints Appropriate inclusion/exclusion criteria Appropriate control group (standard of care) Minimize bias (with blinding if possible) Minimize missing data Statistical analysis plan Prespecified study hypotheses Sample size justification based on best estimates of event rates Control of type I error (rule out chance) Study FDA and sponsor slides and panel transcripts

Research Conducted Outside the US (OUS) OUS clinical data can be used to support approval of devices in the US Generalizability of OUS study results to the patient population in the US is a key issue. Sponsor must address factors such as demographics, standard of care, protocol employed Clinical studies should be conducted in compliance with applicable standards and with adequate human subject protection to ensure data quality Good Clinical Practices (GCPs) – see International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E6 guideline A global clinical trial may be a useful alternative to consider 8

The Total Product Life Cycle Regulation of device technologies requires a total product life cycle approach. 9 HHS/FDA/CDRH

Striking the Right Balance Between Pre- and Postmarket Evaluation Use appropriate amount of pre-market data to make primary decisions about approvability of new devices (safety, effectiveness) Use postmarket data to supplement our understanding about device and operator performance identify device malfunctions and take corrective action as necessary modify pre-market expectations for next generation devices. 10 10

Conclusion Complex and challenging technology No shortcuts Start working with the FDA early in the process Innovation not at the expense of safety and effectiveness 11 11