Comparison of Bare-Metal Stents and Drug-Eluting Stents in Coronary Ostial Lesions (from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry) Samip Vasaiwala, MD, MSc, Helen Vlachos, MSc, Faith Selzer, PhD, Oscar Marroquin, MD, Suresh Mulukutla, MD, J. Dawn Abbott, MD, David O. Williams, MD American Journal of Cardiology Volume 110, Issue 8, Pages 1113-1118 (October 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.05.051 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Kaplan–Meier plots of 3-year cumulative incidence of (A) death, (B) myocardial infarction, and (C) coronary artery bypass grafting/repeat percutaneous coronary intervention in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial lesions using bare-metal versus drug-eluting stents. American Journal of Cardiology 2012 110, 1113-1118DOI: (10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.05.051) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Adjusted hazard rates/relative risk of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial lesions. AHR = adjusted hazard ratio; CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting. American Journal of Cardiology 2012 110, 1113-1118DOI: (10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.05.051) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions