Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
Advertisements

Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 May 2015 Tomoko Adachi, ToshibaSlide 1 Regarding trigger frame in UL MU Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0550r0 May 2015 K. Yunoki and B. Zhao, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 L-Preamble Issues for UL-OFDMA Date: Authors:
Uplink Multi-User MIMO Protocol Design
Submission doc.: IEEE /0567r0 May 2015 Xiaofei Wang (InterDigital)Slide 1 Multi-STA BA for SU Transmissions Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission May 2015 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza.
Doc.: IEEE /0285r0 March 2013 Submission Resource Allocation Frame Format for RAW- based Medium Access Date: Authors: Chittabrata Ghosh,
Submission Vida Ferdowsi, NewracomSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /0856r0July 2015 Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1096r0 Sep 2015 John Son et al., WILUSSlide 1 Recovery Procedures in Cascading Sequences Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1328r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1097r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1349r0 November 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Sounding for Uplink Transmission Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1052r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Bandwidth for UL MU Transmission Date: Authors: September 2015.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1098r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 ACK/BA frame for UL MU under cascading structure Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0042r2 January 2016 Geonjung Ko, WILUSSlide 1 BSS Color Settings for a Multiple BSSID Set Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r2 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1116r1 September 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Trigger Frame Channel Access Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r0 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
HE Trigger Frame Format
Submission doc.: IEEE /0674r0 May 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 EIFS excess problem of Acknowledgement for UL MU procedure Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection using MU-RTS/CTS Date: Authors: January 2016.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0961r0 July 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Consideration on Multi-STA BlockAck Optimization Date:
DL-OFDMA Procedure in IEEE ax
Multi-STA BA Design Date: Authors: March 2016 Month Year
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
MU BAR Frame Format Date: Authors: November 2015 Month Year
Signalling Support for Full Bandwidth MU-MIMO Compressed SIG-B Mode
UL OFDMA Random Access Control
Trigger Frame Format for az
Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement
How to collect STAs’ Tx demands for UL MU
Feedback Element Compression for ax
Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission
RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
Efficient FDMA transmission for WUR
Resource Allocation for Unassociated STAs – Follow Up
Feedback Element Compression for ax
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
Regarding HE NDPA frame for DL Sounding Sequence
Further considerations on WUR frame format
Regarding UL MU protection
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Efficient FDMA transmission for WUR
MAC Clarifications Date: Authors: September 2016
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
Follow up on Issue related to unused UL OFDMA RUs
Duration/ID field in UL-MU
Further considerations on WUR frame format
DL MU-MIMO ack protocol
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
MU Synchronization Requirements for SFD
Explicit Block Ack Request in DL MU PPDU
UL MU Random Access Analysis
PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: Month Year
Random Access UL MU Resource Allocation and Indication
BSS Color Settings for a Multiple BSSID Set
Reception Status of Frames Transmitted in Random Access RUs
Regarding HE fragmentation
Multiplexing of Acknowledgements for Multicast Transmission
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
Location Measurement Protocol for 11ax
Regarding trigger frame in UL MU
A unified transmission procedure for multi-AP coordination
Presentation transcript:

Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame Date: 2015-07-12 Authors:

Abstract An UL MU transmission has been defined as a sequence of UL-TR frame, UL MU PPDU and ACK An UL MU PPDU (MU-MIMO or OFDMA) is sent as an immediate response (IFS TBD) to a Trigger frame (format TBD) sent by the AP. [1] The amendment shall define a mechanism for multiplexing DL acknowledgments sent in response to UL MU transmissions. [1] UL MU transmission extension in one TXOP

Option 1: A TR schedules all uplink transmissions AP time UL TR STA 1 STA 2 ACK/BA STA 3 STA 6 STA 5 STA 4 TXOP Padding Cons: Synchronization problem Padding overhead for aperiodic traffic (since AP should know about STAs queue status) Pros: Nodes can go to the sleep mode Less TR overhead Useful for periodic traffic

Option 2: More than one TR can be transmitted during UP link TXOP (1/2) AP time UL TR STA 1 STA 2 ACK/BA STA 3 STA 6 STA 5 STA 4 TXOP Padding Cons: Nodes cannot go to the sleep mode TR over head can be high Padding overhead for aperiodic traffic, since AP doesn't know the buffer status of STA Pros: No synchronization problem

Option 2: More than one TR can be transmitted during UP link TXOP (2/2) Padding overhead for aperiodic traffics can be solved with polling and with multiple transmission per group of users AP time UL TR STA 1 STA 2 ACK/BA STA 3 STA 6 STA 5 STA 4 TXOP Polling Pros: Scheduling is simpler for aperiodic traffics Synchronization is simpler Cons: TR Overhead is high

A simple comparison Case 1: Case 2: Assumptions Therefore if AP time UL TR STA 1 STA 2 BA STA 3 TXOP AP time UL TR STA 1 STA 2 BA STA 3 TXOP Assumptions Length of padding and UL data are the same for all STAs (for simplicity) n: number of STAs per group m: number of transmissions per group 𝑇𝑅 𝑓𝑖π‘₯𝑒𝑑 : Length of the fixed part of TR 𝑇𝑅 π‘’π‘™π‘’π‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ : Length of UP transmission info per STA π‘ˆπΏ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘Ž : Length of Uplink frames π‘ˆπΏ π‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘‘π‘–π‘›π‘” : Length of Padding π‘‡π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘›π‘ π‘šπ‘–π‘ π‘ π‘–π‘œπ‘›π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’ 1 = 𝑇𝑅 𝑓𝑖π‘₯𝑒𝑑 +𝑛 𝑇𝑅 π‘’π‘™π‘’π‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ + π‘ˆπΏ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘Ž + π‘ˆπΏ π‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘‘π‘–π‘›π‘” π‘‡π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘›π‘ π‘šπ‘–π‘ π‘ π‘–π‘œπ‘›π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’ 2 =mβˆ— 𝑇𝑅 𝑓𝑖π‘₯𝑒𝑑 +mβˆ—π‘› 𝑇𝑅 π‘’π‘™π‘’π‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ + π‘ˆπΏ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘Ž Therefore π‘‡π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘›π‘ π‘šπ‘–π‘ π‘ π‘–π‘œπ‘›π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’ 2 > π‘‡π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘›π‘ π‘šπ‘–π‘ π‘ π‘–π‘œπ‘›π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’ 1 π‘šβˆ— 𝑇𝑅 𝑓𝑖π‘₯𝑒𝑑 +π‘šβˆ—π‘› 𝑇𝑅 π‘’π‘™π‘’π‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ > π‘ˆπΏ π‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘‘π‘–π‘›π‘” if If the length of 𝑇𝑅 π‘’π‘™π‘’π‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ is large, the overhead of polling strategy will be high.

Solution: Avoiding retransmitting TRelements Compressed Trigger Frame AP time UL TR STA1 STA2 ACK/BA STA3 STA6 STA5 STA 4 STA 1 STA 2 STA 3 STA 5 STA 6 STAs can use information from previous TR to transmit its uplink frames.

Compressed Trigger Frame (option 1) Same resource allocation is repeated for the same group of STAs. If β€œMore elements” field has NOT been set, it means the trigger frame dose NOT contain resource allocation elements. STA shall save the information of TRs per TXOP. If the identifier of compressed TR is same as the identifier of the saved TR, then STA shall use the saved information for uplink transmission.

Compressed Trigger Frame (Option 2) A subset of assigned group transmits with the same uplink transmission information but on different sub-channels. AP by setting β€œprevious assignment” filed in BA per STA notifies that STA shall use the previous uplink transmission settings after receiving a compressed TR. AP may assign new sub-channel range in BA. STA shall use the saved information for transmitting an uplink frames, if the the identifier of the compressed TR is same as identifier of the regular TR.

Straw Poll Do you agree to add the following sentence SFD: Per-user information in the Trigger Frame may be omitted for scheduled STA(s).

Reference [1] IEEE 802.11-15/0132r5 Specification Framework for TGax