CESAER Task Force Benchmarking: SHARING / MONITORING / INFLUENCING

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U-MULTIRANK Approach to m ultidimensional evaluation of HEI performance Getalo Elena lead expert, Development Programs Office, Tomsk Polytechnic University.
Advertisements

Workshop Mapping Estonian Universities Frans Kaiser & Marike Faber, Tartu (Estonia) 21 March 2011.
U-Multirank – The implementation of a multidimensional international ranking IREG Forum on University Rankings – Methodologies under scrutiny Warsaw,
Understanding College Rankings Amy VanSurksum, International Officer (USA Midwest & Northeast) University of Glasgow.
Higher School of Economics
Rob Hartman Director ASML. PAGE 2 Education and research in engineering and sciences Architecture, Building and Planning Chemical Engineering & Chemistry.
The world’s first global, multi-dimensional, user-driven university* ranking (* includes all higher education institutions) Jordi Curell Director Higher.
UNLV T IER 1 I NITIATIVE Enhancing Southern Nevada’s Innovation Capacity and Advancing Regional Economic Development for the Long Term.
Edouard Mathieu Head of the Benchmarking Center Invest in France Agency * ARWU: Academic Ranking of World Universities 2005 A few remarks on ARWU*
Embedding Mobility into Institutional Partnerships: Joint Degrees Arab-Euro Conference on Higher Education, Amman, Jordan (10-12 June, 2014) Professor.
BOLOGNA PROCESS - A Challenging Process for Albanian Universities Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lindita MILO (LATI), Vice-Rector of University of Tirana, ALBANIA.
1 24 th Conference of Rectors & Presidents of European Universities of Technology Date proposed : 22nd & 23rd September 2005, in Paris Topic suggested.
Danube Rectors’ Conference. University of Excelence. Teaching, Learning, Research and Community Services 4 th - 7 th November, 2010, Cluj-Napoca Peer evaluation.
An Agenda for Reforming European Universities André Sapir Senior Fellow, Bruegel Professor of Economics, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Expanding Europe Rectors Conference New Cultural Environment in the European Higher Education Area: Degree equivalence as a driving force for the international.
Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.
RANKINGS WORKSHOP STRATEGIES FOR MARKETING, BRANDING, AND IMPROVING INTERNATIONAL RANKINGS MICHAEL FUNG DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH THE.
Maastricht University Prof. dr. M. Paul, President.
IT Education in Serbia Prof. Dr. Ivan Milentiejvic Computer Science Department Faculty of Electronic Engineering University of Nis University of NisSerbia.
Quality Assurance & University Rankings. Shanghai Ranking (Shanghai Jiao Tong University) THES (Times Higher Education Supplement) CHE Ranking »Centrum.
IT Education in Serbia Prof. Dr. Ivan Milentiejvic
International Activities Committee – June 12, 2014 University Rankings: An overview of research indicators used in rankings instruments.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
1 Making a Grope for an Understanding of Taiwan’s Scientific Performance through the Use of Quantified Indicators Prof. Dr. Hsien-Chun Meng Science and.
Biology - 3 Biotechnology – DNK Marine Sciences - 16 Physics - 3 Geology - 5 Mathematics - 1 Chemistry - DNK Dean Office - DNK Civil Eng. - DNK Chemical.
Sciences Dean: Prof. J.-M. Triscone. Sciences Teaching and Research: Astronomy  Astronomy  Biology  Chemistry, Biochemistry  Information technology.
Lauritz B. Holm-Nielsen, Rector Benchmarking cooperation Feb THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS The University of Aarhus  Classical research based.
Welcome to Grenoble Institute of Technology. Who are we ? -5,440 students -1,200 Master’s graduates -200 Ph.D graduates -450 faculty members -€ 146 million.
RWTH Aachen University 2015 The Big Picture in Figures.
Rosie Drinkwater & Professor Lawrence Young Group Finance Director, Pro Vice-Chancellor (Academic Planning & Resources) League Tables Where are we, why.
Communication Challenges for Nordic Universities NUAS Conference August, 2012 Prof. Andrejs Rauhvargers, EUA Senior Adviser Session A2b: Rankings.
7-11 September 2015 International Staff Training W eek in Tartu 2015.
KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. Sweden's oldest and largest university of technology More than 12,000 full-time students More than 1,900 PhD Students.
Classification & Ranking in Higher Arts Education New EU developments and the role of ELIA.
Academic Ranking of World Universities
Teachers’ evaluation by the Petroleum – Gas University of Ploiești
UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE 09/12/2017.
RWTH Aachen University
Which University Ranking is best for you?
AAU Membership Metrics
MUIC Development Direction via Gap Analysis of OP
Alliance 4 Universities
NTUST International Student Orientation
UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA
Financial autonomy and accountability of the Public Higher Education Institutions: Lessons learned from the FAITH project Prof. Ass. Dr. But Dedaj Dean.
Prof.Dr. Melih Bulu, Istinye University March 23
Benchmarking Pilot Results and Next Steps
On the feasibility of a new approach
Action 1 - Erasmus Mundus Masters Courses
Prof. Yrjö Neuvo Chairman of the Aalto DigimPlatform
Education, research and innovation
U-Multirank – The first Multidimensional Global University Ranking
Slide Set 2012 Department 6.0 – Planning, Development and Controlling Office, Division 6.4, RWTH Aachen University May 2012.
Action IC0603 Antenna Systems & Sensors for Information Society Technologies (ASSIST) Participating countries: BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI,
WELCOME MEETING FOR INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE STUDENTS
Maritime Engineering Education (at DTU)
Second headline (your name)
Leading Technology at the south of Europe
International survey of educational developers, 2014
Dr. Edriss Ali, AGU - Dubai
Motion to award Degrees
SciVal to support building a research strategy
TEEP II – A Pilot Evaluation of Joint Degrees
NordSecMob Master’s Programme in Security and Mobile Computing
School of Science Science for tomorrow’s technology, innovations, and businesses.
East Linden.
Rankings from the perspective of European universities
South Asia Challenges and benefits of research collaboration in a diverse region March 2019 Maria de Kleijn-Lloyd.
2019 Academic Administrator Workshop
South Asia Challenges and benefits of research collaboration in a diverse region March 2019 Maria de Kleijn-Lloyd.
Presentation transcript:

CESAER Task Force Benchmarking: SHARING / MONITORING / INFLUENCING 1 CESAER Task Force Benchmarking: SHARING / MONITORING / INFLUENCING Work, Results & Looking Ahead Special Focus: NTNU Prof. Dr.Techn. Mads Nygård Dean of Eng. Education, NTNU Chair, CESAER TF BENCH

The Happy Family – First Meeting in Copenhagen

CESAER TF Benchmarking: Background 3 Mandate: 2016-2018 (UMR => + THE, QS, ARWU & LEIDEN) Follow-up CESAER TF UMR Work on UMR New RMR Share Experiences and Learn from Each Other Monitor Tech Universities’ Ranking Performance Influence Rankers’ Measuring Methodologies Improve CESAER Members’ Strategies & Work 18 countries, 20 institutions, 28 members

CESAER TF Benchmarking: Activities 4

University Ranking Systems as Information Brokers

@UMultirank

U-Multirank: Several Dimensions + Ready Made Rankings U-Multirank: Several Dimensions + Ready Made Rankings ! Leiden: Several Variants - Select the Appropriate Ones ! THE Eng.: Slightly Adjusted Percentages U-Multirank Science & Tech.: Carefully Selected Indicators

The General Rankings: Not Adapted to Eng. / Science & Tech. (24.) (CES: 44) (CES: 30) (CES: 44)

THE Eng.: CESAER Performance 75% of CESAER members feature in the top 500 (41 vs. 44 / 51) 9

THE Eng.: 13 metrics – ALL Institutions vs. CESAER Institutions Left: ALL Right: CESAER 10

Strongest performing CESAER member in each country (top 10) Top 10 countries.

SWOT ANALYSIS: Top ranked CESAER Member in Each country Research Citation Score vs. Research Reputation Score 12

UMR READY MADE RANKING Science & Tech.: Indicators & Fields 13 Indicator   Level Institutional rankings Subject rankings TEACHING & LEARNING (4 / 9) Bachelor graduation rate X Master graduation rate Academic staff with doctorates Student-staff ratio RESEARCH (5 / 11) Art related output Citation rate Top cited publications Doctorate productivity Research publications (size normalized) KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER (4 / 9) Co-publications with industrial partners Publications cited in patents Spin-offs Patents awarded (size-normalized) INTERNATIONAL ORIENTATION (4 / 7) International academic staff International doctorate degrees International joint publications Student mobility REGIONAL ENGAGEMENT (0 / 6) No of Indicators 14 9 The Institutions & The 9 Subject Fields No of Entries All 231 Mathematics (NTNU: No 5) 67 Chemistry 91 Biology 48 Computer Science 104 Mechanical Engineering 102 Electrical Engineering 113 Chemical Engineering 77 Industrial Engineering 16 Civil Engineering 80 Which: CESAER Member / Tech NAME + > 40% PERC. Grad. & > 50% Valid INDIC.

(1.) 1. (2.) 2. (7.) 3. (12.) 4. (14.) 5. (15.) 6. (16.) 7. (17.) (20.)

UMR READY MADE RANKING Sci. & Tech. – 231 Institutions - 2017 15 CESAER Top 20 (among 231) DTU, DK (All: 2) Louvain, BE (All: 7) KTH, SE (All: 12) Delft, NL (All: 14) ETHZ, CH (All: 15) EPFL, CH (All: 16) Grenoble, FR (All: 17) Chalmers, SE (All: 21) Dublin, IE (All: 22) Eindhoven, NL (All: 25) Lund, SE (All: 26) München, DE (All: 32) Twente, NL (All: 33) Karlsruhe, DE (All: 35) Ghent, BE (All: 41) Aalborg, DK (All: 45) Technion, IL (All: 48) Aalto, FI (All: 56) Aachen, DE (All: 57) NTNU, NO (All: 66) CESAER Grouping (of 46/51) All 1-10: 2 (+2) All 1-20: 7 (+5) All 1-30: 11 (+4) All 1-40: 14 (+3) All 1-50: 17 (+3) All 1-60: 19 (+2) All 1-70: 20 (+1) All 1-80: 20 (+0) All 1-90: 23 (+3) All 1-100: 24 (+1) All 1-120: 28 (+4) All 1-140: 33 (+5) All 1-160: 36 (+3) All 1-180: 39 (+3) All 1-200: 42 (+3) All 1-220: 45 (+3) All 1-231: 46 (+1)

Averaging Own Indicators Only

Averaging Own Indicators Only - Readable (23.)

Averaging All 14 Indicators “Included”

Averaging All 14 Indicators “Included”- Readable (14.)

UMR READY MADE RANKING Science & Tech.: Different Sorting Crit. 20 With Relative No Method: DTU, DK (All: 2) Louvain, BE (All: 7) KTH, SE (All: 12) Delft, NL (All: 14) ETHZ, CH (All: 15) EPFL, CH (All: 16) Grenoble, FR (All: 17) Chalmers, SE (All: 21) Dublin, IE (All: 22) Eindhoven, NL (All: 25) With Absolute No Method: DTU, DK (Res: 11+2+0+0+0 = 13) Delft, NL (Res: 9+4+0+0+0 = 13) ETHZ, CH (Res: 9+3+1+0+0 = 13) EPFL, CH (Res: 9+3+0+1+0 = 13) Grenoble, FR (Res: 9+3+0+1+0 = 13) Eindhoven, NL (Res: 8+4+1+1+0 = 14) Chalmers, SE (Res: 8+1+1+2+0 = 12) Louvain, BE (Res: 5+2+0+0+0 = 7) KTH, SE (Res: 5+1+0+0+1 = 7) Dublin, IE (Res: 4+3+0+0+0 = 7) Averaging Own Indicators Only: DTU, DK (#: 13) Louvain, BE (#: 7) Delft, NL (#: : 13) ETHZ, CH (#: 13) Dublin, IE (#: 7) Grenoble, FR (#: 13) EPFL, CH (#: 13) München, DE (#: 13) Twente, NL (#: 13) Technion, IL (#: 7) Averaging All 14 Indicators “Included”: DTU, DK (#: 13 => 14) Delft, NL (#: 13 => 14) ETHZ, CH (#: 13 => 14) Grenoble, FR (#: 13 => 14) EPFL, CH (#: 13 => 14) München, DE (#: 13 => 14) Twente, NL (#: 13 => 14) Eindhoven, NL (#: 14 => 14) Ghent, IE (#: 13 => 14) Aalto, FI (#: 13 => 14)

UMR RMR – CESAER Performance Example: Research – Top 10 21

EU H2020 – CESAER Performance Example: ERC Grants – Top 15 22

CESAER External Profiling CESAER Internal Activity 23 Collective Size: Total No of Students: 1.036.806 Total No of International Students: 157.195 Total No of Academic Faculty Staff: 80.465 Individual Embedding: (By General Secretariat)

CESAER TF Benchmarking Past, Present & Future 24 Lessons Learned: Sharing & Learning Work Well – Also Here ! CESAER Members Perform Better – Especially on Eng. / Sci. & Tech. ! The Rankers may be Influenced – In Win-Win Situations ! Results Contain Structural Effects – As Well as Quality Effects ! Work Ahead: Continuous Cooperation – With Several Ranking Providers ! Increased Cooperation – With Other CESAER Task Forces ! From Ranking to Benchmarking – Data Analysis & Time Series ! Both External and Internal – Looking Better & Doing Better ! Inherent Challenges: Evolving & Expanding Landscape – Keeping Up-to-date ! What may be Measured – Vs. What should be Measured ! Subject & Data Definitions – Interpretation & Consistency Issues ! Subject & Data Results – Transparency & Accessibility !

University Mission Development: Current / Future Representat University Mission Development: Current / Future Representat. In Rankings

Questions? Comments / Reflections … 26 Questions? Comments / Reflections …