TOTEM early measurements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

LHC/HERA workshop, WG 4 (17. Jan. 2005)
K.Eggert/CERN TOTEM Physics  tot elastic scattering diffraction (together with CMS) Karsten Eggert CERN, PH Department on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration.
V.Avati Physics at LHC TOTEM and Diffractive Physics at the LHC INFN Sezione di Bari and Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy Case Western Reserve University,
P. 1Mario Deile – DIS 2004 Mario Deile CERN on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration TOTEM: Forward Physics at the LHC.
April 22, 2006 DIS2006 XIV International Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering Tsukuba, Japan, 20-24/April/ TOTEM: Early Diffractive Physics at the.
The CMS and TOTEM diffractive and forward physics program
The TOTEM Experiment at the LHC  Physics program  Detector overview Giuseppe Latino (University of Siena & Pisa INFN) (on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration)
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
Total Cross Section, Elastic Scattering and Diffraction Dissociation at the LHC K. Österberg High Energy Physics Division, Department of Physical Sciences,
Elastic Scattering at s=1.96 TeV Using the DØ Forward Proton Detector
M. Gallinaro - "Physics with the CT-PPS project" - LHC Forward - Sep. 23, Michele Gallinaro LIP Lisbon (on behalf of the CMS and TOTEM collaborations)
V. Kundrát1 Bari-KFKI Budapest-Case Western Reserve Univ.-CERN-Genoa-Helsinki- Pisa/Siena-Prague-Tallinn (~ 80 physicists) Elastic pp scattering at energy.
G. Ruggiero/TOTEM 1 The TOTEM Experiment T1 Telescope (CSC) T1 Telescope (CSC) T2 Telescope (GEM) T2 Telescope (GEM) Roman Pots (Si Edgeless detect.) Roman.
Gueorgui ANTCHEVNEC’2013 – Varna, Bulgaria 1 The TOTEM Experiment Consolidation and Upgrade G. Antchev * On behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration * INRNE-BAS,
Predictions of Diffractive, Elastic, Total, and Total-Inelastic pp Cross Sections vs LHC Measurements Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University DIS-2013,
Stefano Lami INFN Pisa on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration.
News on ZEUS Leading Baryon analyses Roberto Sacchi Università di Torino and INFN DIS2004 Workshop Slovakia, April 14-18, 2004 Introduction Study of the.
New measurements of forward physics in the TOTEM experiment at the LHC Hubert Niewiadomski on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration ICHEP 2012, 4-11 July 2012,
Lishep06 Gilvan Alves1 Overview of Diffraction from DØ Gilvan Alves Lafex/Brazil  Introduction  DØ RunI x RunII  Special Runs  Outlook.
AFP Introduction September 10th 2014 M. Bruschi, INFN Bologna (Italy) 1.
1 Triggering on Diffraction with the CMS Level-1 Trigger Monika Grothe, U Wisconsin HERA-LHC workshop March 2004 Need highest achievable LHC Lumi, L LHC.
CMS results on soft diffraction Konstantin Goulianos (on behalf of the CMS collaboration ) The Rockefeller University EDS BLOIS 2013, 15 th Conference.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
P. 1K. Eggert – Early TOTEM Running with the  * =90m Optics Karsten Eggert on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration Politecnico di Bari and Sezione INFN Bari,
Karsten Eggert / PENN State - p. 1 Karsten Eggert CERN / PH Proton Detection at IP3 Enlarge the acceptance for diffractive protons to lower  p/p ~ 10.
Status of the TOTEM Experiment and Latest Results
Convergence in Proton Reconstruction Algorithm and final reference tests of Roman pots before installation in LHC Ayah Massoud Penn State University Supervisor:
Mayda M. Velasco MBUEWO Sept. 6-7, 2010 Latest CMS Minimum Bias Results.
Backgrounds at FP420 Henri Kowalski DESY 18 th of May 2006.
E.C. AschenauerEIC INT Program, Seattle Week 81.
Total Cross Section, Elastic Scattering and Diffraction Dissociation at the LHC V. Avati University of Helsinki on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration
Quarkonia production with the HERA-B experiment J. Spengler, MPI Heidelberg.
Mirko Berretti - Giuseppe Latino (University of Siena & INFN-Pisa) Track and Jet reconstruction in T2 “Forward Physics at LHC with TOTEM” Penn State University.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
Improving ATLAS hard diffraction measurements with the STEP award Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 18/10/2013.
An FPD quadrupole castle Elastic Scattering and High Mass Exclusive Dijets at DØ (  s=1.96 TeV) Andrew Brandt University of Texas, Arlington on behalf.
Kreuth, 2015/10/5-9 Csörgő, T. Evidence for non-exponential pp d/dt at low t and √s = 8 TeV by TOTEM T. Csörgő for the TOTEM Collaboration.
Status of the Experiment RRB - TOTEM 16 April 2013 S.Giani - CERN on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration CERN-RRB
y x Vincenzo Monaco, University of Torino HERA-LHC workshop 18/1/2005
The timing upgrade project of the TOTEM Roman Pot detectors
Xth Blois Workshop on Elastic and Diffractive Scattering
Central Detector Pseudo-Rapidity or Rapidity Gaps -- DY = ln (W2/M2X)
M. Kuhn, P. Hopchev, M. Ferro-Luzzi
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
Diffraction and Forward Physics in ATLAS: results and perspectives
Charged-particle multiplicity with ALICE at LHC
Emmanuel Tsesmelis TS/LEA 26 January 2007
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Recent Results from TOTEM
Measurements of Proton-Proton Elastic Scattering and Total Cross-Section at the LHC by TOTEM Diffraction 2012 Lanzarote, 15 September Mario Deile on.
Results of dN/dt Elastic
TOTEM Results and Perspectives
(with R. Arcidiacono, A. Solano)
Other experiments at LHC: LHCf, MoEDAL, Totem
Planar Edgeless Silicon Detectors for the TOTEM Experiment
The LHC collider in Geneva
QCD at LHC with ATLAS Arthur M. Moraes University of Sheffield, UK
Can micro channeling improve the TOTEM experiment
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Open heavy flavor analysis with the ALICE experiment at LHC
TOTEM experiment at the LHC
Physics with TOTEM TOTEM Collaboration on behalf of the
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
On behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration:
Quarkonium production in p-p and A-A collisions: ALICE status report
The D0 Forward Proton Detector (FPD) Status
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
Double Pomeron Exchange (DPE)
Results, Status and Perspectives for 2011
Presentation transcript:

TOTEM early measurements Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova On behalf of TOTEM Collaboration INFN Sezione di Bari & Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy MTA KFKI RMKI, Budapest, Hungary Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Università di Genova & Sezione INFN, Genova, Italy University of Helsinki & HIP, Helsinki, Finland Penn State University, University Park, USA Academy of Sciences, Praha, Czech Republic Università di Siena & Sezione INFN-Pisa, Italy Estonian Academy of Sciences, Tallinn, Estonia MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova Experimental area Leading protons detected at -220m & -147m from IP LHC - IP5 CMS TOTEM Leading protons detected at 147m and 220m from IP. CMS coverage extended by TOTEM T1 and T2 telescopes Leading protons detected at +220m & +147m from IP MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova Physics program Total pp cross section Elastic pp scattering in a wide t range 103 < -t < 10 GeV2 (-t~p2q2) Soft diffraction Charged multiplicity measurement in a wide  range Study of low-xBj dynamics Hard diffraction (single, central and with jet, W and heavy flavour production) Exclusive particle production in central diffraction (DPE: Double Pomeron Exchange)  and p physics Charged particle flow TOTEM CMS TOTEM Energy flow  with CMS MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova Total pp cross section Possible TOTEM measurement Final goal: ~1 % accuracy Early goal: ~5 % accuracy Luminosity independent method: measurement of elastic and inelastic rate - Fundamental ingredient in any cross section measurement COMPETE collaboration Fit from available data: COMPETE Collaboration, PRL 89 (2002) 201801. MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova Experimental setup Inelastic telescopes: Tracking of charged particles & vertex reconstruction in inelastic events (main goal: measurement of Ninel) T1: 3.1 <  < 4.7 T2: 5.3 <  < 6.5 T1: 18 – 90 mrad T2: 3 – 10 mrad IP5 ~ 10 m T1 HF (CMS) T2 CASTOR (CMS) ~ 14 m Roman Pots: measurement of elastic and diffractive protons near the outgoing beam Scattering angles: 5 – 500 rad (depending on beam optics) IP5 RP147 RP220 MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova T1 telescope Cathode Strip Chambers(CSC) 3.1 < |h| < 4.7 5 planes: measurement of 3 coordinates per plane Primary vertex reconstruction to discriminate background (not beam-beam events) for the measurement of Ninel Vertex resolution:  ~ 2 cm, z ~ 20 cm Trigger with anodic wires () ~ 0.02  0.2 (depending on particle momentum) Multiplicity measurement CSC 3m Spatial resolution ~1mm MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova T1: preparing for installation Support rails Storage and cosmic tests Status: preparing to install in 2009 ¼ ofT1 MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova T2 telescope 3-GEM (Gas Electron Multiplier) 5.3 < |h| < 6.5 10 semi-planes which provide 2 coordinates on both beampipe sides Primary vertex reconstruction Trigger with pads () ~ 0.04 – 0.1 Multiplicity measurement 65(j) x 24(h) = 1560 pads Pads: Dh x Dj = 0.06 x 0.015p 2x2 mm2 __ 7x7 mm2 Strips: 256 (width/pitch: 80/400 mm) Radial resolution: ~ 100 m Azimuthal resolution: ~ 1° MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova T2 installation Test Beam T2 and the beampipe CMS T2 Status: ¼ of T2 installed. Complete installation in 2009 MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova Roman Pots BPM fixed to RP structure  beam position Horizontal Pot Vertical Pots BPM RP station: 2 units, 4 m distance 1 unit: 2 vertical pots / 1 horizontal and 1 BPM MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova RP installed at 147 m and 220 m on both sides of IP5 MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova Roman Pot and Proton Detectors 10 planes of Si detectors 512 strips at  45° Pitch: 66 m Resolution: ~ 20 m Detector overlap Ferrite Status: detectors installed in horizontal RPs at 220m. Complete 220m in 2009 and 147m just after. RP vertical RP horizontal RP vertical MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Planar technology + CTS (Current Terminating Structure) Si CTS edgeless detectors Proton detection down to 10beam, + d (beam, = 80  600 m) To minimize d : detectors with highly reduced inactive edge (”edgeless”) Planar technology + CTS (Current Terminating Structure) I2 I1 + - biasing ring Al p+ n+ cut edge current terminating ring SiO2 n-type bulk 50µm Micro-strip Si detectors designed to reduce the inefficiency at the edge. Inefficient edge ~ 50 m 50 µm MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Optics and Beam Parameters (standard step in LHC start-up) = 90 m (early TOTEM optics) = 1540 m (final TOTEM optics) Crossing angle 0.0 N of bunches 156 43 N of part./bunch (4 – 9) x 1010 3 x 1010 Emittance n [m ∙ rad] 3.75 1 10 y beam width at RP220 [mm] ~ 3 6.25 0.8 Luminosity [cm-2 s-1] (2 – 11) x 1031 (5 – 25) x 1029 1.6 x 1028 * = 90 m ideal for early running: fits well into the LHC start-up running scenario; uses standard injection (b* = 11m)  easier to commission than 1540 m optics wide beam  ideal for training the RP operation (less sensitive to alignment) * = 90 m optics optimized both for stot and diffraction. MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova TOTEM physics and LHC optics Feasible physics depends on running scenarios: luminosity beam optics (β*) acceptance of proton detectors precision in the measurement of scattering angle (beam divergency ) stot(~1%), low t elastic, stot(~5%), low t elastic, high t elastic, soft diffraction (semi)-hard diffraction hard diffraction cross section luminosity EARLY  mb b nb * (m) 1540 90 2 0.5 L (cm2 s1) 1028 1030 1031 1033 TOTEM runs Standard runs MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Proton detected using: Proton detection strategy Hit distribution in the RP at 220m (diffractive scattering) low *: 0.5  2 m high *: 90 y(mm) y(mm) y ~ yscatt ~ | ty | x ~   p/p 10 10 x(mm) x(mm) Proton detected using: momentum loss (low *) or transverse momentum (high *) MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova Proton Acceptance > 10 % acceptance for RP 220 m DPE Measurement of cross sections for different processes (Elastic, SD, DPE, …) Study of corresponding rapidity gaps and their suppression MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova Elastic scattering b*=90m L=3x1030 b*=2m L=1032 2x109 - 2.3x107 - 4000 1.2x105 500 4x104 b* = 90 m 30 3000 b* = 11 m 1 160 b* = 2 m 0.3 50 N events/day MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Elastic scattering at low |t| Exponential slope B(t) b* = 1540 m b* = 90 m fit interval b* = 1540 m: |t|min = 0.002 GeV2 b* = 90 m: |t|min = 0.04 GeV2 best parameterization: B(t) = B0 + B1 t + B2 t2 MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Extrapolation to the Optical Point (t = 0) at b* = 90 m (extrapol. - model) / model in d/dt |t=0 Statistical extrapolation uncertainty ∫ L dt = 2 nb-1 (5 hours @ 1029 cm-2 s-1) Common bias due to beam divergence : – 2 % (angular spread flattens dN/dt distribution) Spread between most of the models: ±1% Systematic error due to uncertainty of optical functions: ± 3% Different parameterizations for extrapolation tested (e.g. const. B, linear continuation of B(t)): negligible impact MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova Trigger schemes p T1/T2 RP CMS Elastic Trigger Single Diffractive Trigger Double Diffractive Trigger Central Diffractive Trigger (Double Pomeron Exchange DPE) Non-diffractive Inelastic Trigger p Big uncertainties on expected individual cross sections p p MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Measurement of the inelastic rate Inelastic double arm trigger: robust against background, inefficient at small M Inelastic single arm trigger: suffers from beam-gas + halo background, best efficiency Inelastic triggers and proton (SD, DPE): cleanest trigger, proton inefficiency to be extrapolated Trigger on non-colliding bunches to determine beam-gas + halo rates. Vertex reconstruction with T1, T2 to suppress background Extrapolation of diffractive cross-section to large 1/M2 assuming ds/dM2 ~ 1/M2 : - dsSD/dM can be measured with high b optics, not with low b (only for very high M) Acceptance single diffraction simulated extrapolated detected Loss at low diffractive masses M s [mb] trigger loss [mb] systematic error after extrapolations [mb] Non-diffractive inelastic 58 0.06 Single diffractive 14 3 0.6 Double diffractive 7 0.3 0.1 Double Pomeron 1 0.2 0.02 Total 80 3.6 0.8 MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova tot measurement * = 90 m / * = 1540 m Early Later (asap) Extrapolation of the elatic cross section to t = 0: ± 4 % /  0.2 % Total elastic rate: ± 2 % /  0.1 % Total inelastic rate: ± 1 % /  0.8 % (error dominated by the loss of single and double diffractive events) Contribution from (1+2) using the systematic error from COMPETE d/ = 33% ± 1.2 % => Total error on tot (taking into account correlations): ± 5 % /  (12) % Error on luminosity (~ squared total rate) : ± 7 % /  2 % A precise measurement with * = 1540 m needs: Better knowledge of the optical functions RP alignment precision < 50 m MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Very first measurements with low b* optics Using horizontal RPs dSD/dM (SD events with high mass) 0.02 <  < 0.18  2 < M < 6 TeV (M)/M = 24 % dDPE/dM 250 < M < 2500 GeV (M)/M = 2.13.5 % Using vertical RPs: high t elastic scattering dElastic/dt 2 < |t| < 10 GeV2 (t)  0.25|t|  p p SD MX2 =  s Rapidity Gap -ln    p X 2 p p2 1 p p1 DPE  Rapidity Gap -ln 1 Rapidity Gap -ln 2 p1 X p2 MX2 = 1 2s  MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Soft diffraction with high b* optics = 90 m: 65 % = 1540 m: 95 % of all diffractive protons are detected, independently on their  Reconstruction of x via protons or rapidity gap (Dh= –ln x): = 90 m: sp(x) = 6 x 10-3 (without CMS vertex knowledge) = 1540 m: sp(x)  9 x 10-3 s(Dh) = 0.8 – 1  sDh(x) = (0.8 – 1) x proton 2 proton 1 Dh1 Dh2 M DPE Mass Distribution (acceptance corrected) via rapidity gap (T1, T2) s(x)/x = 100% via proton (b*=90m) via rapidity gap (CMS) via rapidity gap (T1, T2) proton resolution limited by LHC energy spread various diffractive studies (Single Diffraction and Double Pomeron Exchange) to be extended later together with CMS. MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

T1/T2: charged multiplicity Measurement of charged multiplicity for different processes Important also for cosmic ray physics (e.g. for MC generator validation) Identification and measurement of rapidity gaps minimum bias Acceptance: 3.1 <  < 4.7 (T1) & 5.3 <  < 6.5 (T2) () = 0.04  0.2, no mom. & limited  info dNch/dh [1/unit] Charged multiplicity single diffractive MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova Multiplicity in single diffraction T1/T2 coverage Multiplicity for different x ranges: high cross sections, but partial rapidity coverage MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova Conclusions Setup and optics TOTEM has partially installed its detectors and will finish the installation in the first months of 2009 ready for the new LHC start-up TOTEM measurements strongly depend on beam optics. Requested short runs at b* = 90m optics to maximize physics sensitivity. Early measurements With 90m optics: 5% measurement of stot inclusive studies of the main diffractive processes study of the elastic scattering already in a wide range of t measurement of forward charged multiplicity With low b* optics: study of SD and DPE at high masses elastic scattering at high t (t > 2 GeV2) Later A more precise measurement (1-2%) of stot will need the b*=1540m optics already foreseen for dedicated short TOTEM runs An extensive program of physics together with CMS is foreseen MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova Back up MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova

Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova The b* = 90 m optics Concept: Optics optimised for both elastic and diffractive scattering. Proton coordinates w.r.t. beam in the RP at 220 m: (x*, y*): vertex position (x*, y*): emission angle x = Dp/p Ly = 265m (large) vy = 0 Lx = 0 vx = – 2 D = 23mm vertical parallel-to-point focussing  optimum sensitivity to y* and hence to t (azimuth. symmetry) elimination of x* dependence enhanced sensitivity to x in diffractive events, horizontal vertex measurement in elastic events. RP (220m) hit distribution (elastic) x-projection horiz. vertex distribution (shape, width)  assuming round beams: luminosity from beam parameters  directly: beam position measurement to ~ 1mm every minute t ~ 10 s MPI@LHC 2008 Fabrizio Ferro – INFN Genova