Michele Pioppi* on behalf of PRIN _005 group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
B Tagging with CMS Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa B  Workshop Helsinki 29 May – 1 June 2002.
Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.
0 25. Sept 2006 M.Smizanska, Lancaster University, UK LHC preparations for precise measurements of muonic very rare B-decays 25. Sept 2006 M.Smizanska,
RAL Summer School September, 2004 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis High Level Trigger Studies for the.
A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.
On the Trail of the Higgs Boson Meenakshi Narain.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
Progress on B-tagging Efficiency Monica Dunford May 22 nd, 2007.
Study of a Compensating Calorimeter for a e + e - Linear Collider at Very High Energy 30 Aprile 2007 Vito Di Benedetto.
Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.
The CMS Level-1 Trigger System Dave Newbold, University of Bristol On behalf of the CMS collaboration.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
Faster tracking in hadron collider experiments  The problem  The solution  Conclusions Hans Drevermann (CERN) Nikos Konstantinidis ( Santa Cruz)
G. Eigen, LISHEP2011, Rio de Janeiro, July 5 th, Outline Introduction Introduction ATLAS detector and performance Vertex and impact parameter resolution.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High.
The CDF Online Silicon Vertex Tracker I. Fiori INFN & University of Padova 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies and Particle Physics Villa.
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Tracking at Level 2 for the ATLAS High Level Trigger Mark Sutton University College London 26 th September 2006.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln.
Commissioning and Performance of the CMS High Level Trigger Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago for the CMS collaboration.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS Helsinki b/tau workshop Lauri A. Wendland / HIP.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
Abstract Several models of elementary particle physics beyond the Standard Model, predict the existence of neutral particles that can decay in jets of.
Vertex and Track Reconstruction in CMS W. Adam Institute of High Energy Physics, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna CMS Collaboration Perugia, Italy.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
Tommaso Boccali SNS and INFN Pisa Vertex 2002 Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 3-8 November 2002 High Level Triggers at CMS with the Tracker.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System Mark Neubauer 1, Laura Sartori 2 1 University.
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
( ATLAS was designed for LHC: L=10 34 cm -2 s -1 ) [ Now we expect 7.5 x instantaneous and 10 x integrated luminosity ] PILEUP: from ~30  >200 proton.
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
BEACH 04J. Piedra1 SiSA Tracking Silicon stand alone (SiSA) tracking optimization SiSA validation Matthew Herndon University of Wisconsin Joint Physics.
The BTeV Pixel Detector and Trigger System Simon Kwan Fermilab P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA BEACH2002, June 29, 2002 Vancouver, Canada.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
Using IP Chi-Square Probability
More technical description:
Performance of jets algorithms in ATLAS
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Studies for Phase-II Muon Detector (|η| = ) – Plans
Jet reconstruction in ALICE using the EMCal
Central Exclusive Production of BSM Higgs bosons decaying to jets
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS
Trigger  Detectors at 420m can be included in the HLT
SM-like Higgs searches
Performance of ATLAS & CMS Silicon Tracker
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
LHCb Trigger LHCb Trigger Outlook:
Semileptonic ttH(Hbb) studies at UCL
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Presentation transcript:

First Performance studies of jet rejection using a pixel based detector Michele Pioppi* on behalf of PRIN 2003024739_005 group *Università degli studi di Perugia & INFN Perugia 7th International Conference on Large Scale Applications and Radiation Hardness of Semiconductor Detectors Firenze, 05 October 2005 RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia Outline Motivations Pixel detector overview Pixel performances Trigger strategies Results Plans & Conclusions RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia Motivations I LHC p-p collider Low luminosity L = 2x1033 cm-2s-1 -> ~108 events/s High Luminosity L = 1034 cm-2s-1 Mostly due to QCD background processes RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia Motivations II Main goal of LHC and CMS: Discovery of Higgs boson DAQ rate ~ 100 Hz 4*105 rejection power 2 trigger levels: L1 (40 MHz  100 kHz) HW Use of fast subdetectors HLT (100 kHz  100 Hz) SW Calorimetry Hgg CMS Muon chambers H4 m No L1trigger for multi hadronic jets final states ttH8 jets PIXEL COULD HELP!!! RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia Pixel Overview 3 barrel layers : r ~ 4.4cm r ~ 7.3 cm r ~ 10.2 cm |h|<1.6 endcap barrel 53cm ROC 8x8 mm2 Each ROC is a matrix of 52x80 pixel units(150x100 mm2) arranged in 26 doublecolumns. ROC has a fast output that provides: ROC address # hit doublecolumns # clusters of doublecolumns 16 x RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Pixel performanceses at full granularity How to build Pixel Jets : Pt measurement from pixel tracks 1)Pixel tracks from fit to triplets of pixel hits Good Pt meas. for Pt<10GeV 2) Vertex reconstruction 3) Pixel jets with at least 5 tracks Leading track (seed for jet) r Pixel tracks Rejected track ()jet=  Σi i·Pti Σi Pti z ()jet=  Σi ηi·Pti Σi Pti ZV (Pt)jet = Σi Pti RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Full granularity L1 calo/pixel jets comparison Studies performed on bb 100 GeV sample Test sample used to exploit algorithm performances pt f <Njet>=2,2 h Pixel Jet   PixelJet L1 calo jet <Njet>=1,7 Et f h L1 reconstruction: + cone algorithm 0.5 + Et>10 GeV + eta, phi bin = 0.087 RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Full granularity resolutions Geometrical associations between b partons and pixeljets Dz vtxrec-vtxsim Dh pixeljet-parton Df pixeljet-parton sh ~ 50 mrad sf ~ 50 mrad sz ~ 47 mm To be compared to 120 mrad spatial resolution of L1calo jet Improvement of jet finding & fake jet rejection RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Full granularity selection performances + Try to combine calorimetric and pixel information + Evaluate selection power on the ttH VS direct QCD production Fully hadronic final state (t->b, W->qq’ H->bb) 8 jets in the final state Soft jet (20-30 GeV) The pixel jet could help All events that can be considered not-signal from pp interaction We expect best performance on 3 and 4 jet-stream L1 selection RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Full granularity combining calo and pixel trigger L1 QCD rate (Low luminosity) 3 jets stream Ncaljet(E>Etr) >1,2,3,4 (Ncaljet(E>Etr) >1,2,3,4) && (Npixjet(E>Etr) >1,2,3,4) Considering the same QCD rate, the ttH efficiency gain is 20-40% Each pixel jet with at least 5 tracks RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Full granularity Pileup rejection Primary vertex finding is an essential tool to reduce secondary p-p interaction Approach: L1 calo/ pixel jet association Consider for L1 calo trigger, only jets that can be associated to a PV built with pixel RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Full granularity pixel vertex Jets vtx in 22mm PV window Jets vtx out of 22mm PV window Vertex width~22 mm 10*ptqual (PVpixel-PVtracker) before cuts (PVpixel-PVtracker) after cuts Selection: Ptqual>0.9 Dr(cal,pix)<0.5 RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Reduced granularity Idea: Use fast output of PixelROC to determine a L1 decision Worst scenario: At L1 only 52x80 pixel(8x8 mm2) geometry is available . RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Reduced granularity hit selection and track reconstruction ROCi= ROC of ith layer ROCHit selection #DoubleColumnROC1>1 #DoubleColumnROC2-3>0 ROCTrack preselection |fROC1 –fROC2 | <0.3 |Z0| from ZROC1 and ZROC2<15 cm |Z0| from ZROC1 and ZROC3<15 cm ROCTrack construction Linear and circular fit (Pt,h,f,Zv,) Tracks c2-ordered Only ROC1 could belong to more than 1 track <ROCHit>qcd80120 ~ 800 <ROCTracks>qcd80120 ~ 120 RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Reduced granularity Validation and angular resolution Study performed with a tighter preselection x-y plane Pixel jets ROC Hits ROC Tracks L1 Calo Jet sf =142 mrad bb jet 100 Gev events RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Reduced granularity Vertex reconstruction Algorithm: Histogram of Zv of all ROCtracks (Width of the bin = 1cm) Ntr(Pt>0.3GeV)>4 PVz =<Zroctk> of the most populated bin # vertices Primary Vertex resolution tth qcd5080 qcd80120 sz ~ 1.6 cm cm RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Reduced granularity ROCtracks in L1 trigger L1 trigger efficiency @ Etresh ~ 70 GeV Effqcd <0.1% Tth qcd5080 qcd80120 New L1 request: Ncalo (Et>Etresh) > 3 && Npixtr>90 Next step: Build ROCjets pointing at PV and use them at L1 RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Reduced granularity what is needed? Module trigger chip to combine fast output from all the ROC HW to build ROC tracks Pattern recognition (Associative memory) Histogramming vertex finder RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Reduced granularity alternative approach - strategy From ROC -> seed in f -> region finder Regional full granularity (DR=0.2) reconstruction Tracks are used for direction, PVz and IPz sf ~ 100 mrad qcd80-120 75% of events: 2 seeds found in DR<0.5 wrt MC RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Reduced granularity alternative approach - resolution s ~ 140 mm 80% Pv finding efficiency Good resolution on IPz For b-trigger application RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia

Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia Plans and conclusions Plans: Timing evaluation HW feasibility Conclusions: Pixel could contribute to L1 trigger especially for multihadronic jets final states At full granularity pixel can increase significantly ttH8jets efficiency maintaining the same QCD rate Reduced granularity: In the worst scenario (8x8 mm2) <ROChits>qcd80-120 ~800 Each ROChit is characterized by position(layer,phi,z), #doublecolumns and #clusters Tracks ~120 and vertices can be reconstructed at L1 L1 trigger efficiency for QCD reduced ROC could provide a seed in f for a regional full reconstruction RD05-Firenze, 5 Oct 2005 Michele Pioppi-Univ.&INFN Perugia