Future Video Coding Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jörn Ostermann.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to H.264 / AVC Video Coding Standard Multimedia Systems Sharif University of Technology November 2008.
Advertisements

Standards, process, requirements 4K PLAYBACK EXPLAINED.
Basics of MPEG Picture sizes: up to 4095 x 4095 Most algorithms are for the CCIR 601 format for video frames Y-Cb-Cr color space NTSC: 525 lines per frame.
-1/20- MPEG 4, H.264 Compression Standards Presented by Dukhyun Chang
Technion - IIT Dept. of Electrical Engineering Signal and Image Processing lab Transrating and Transcoding of Coded Video Signals David Malah Ran Bar-Sella.
1 Video Coding Concept Kai-Chao Yang. 2 Video Sequence and Picture Video sequence Large amount of temporal redundancy Intra Picture/VOP/Slice (I-Picture)
JVT Wednesday Report Bangkok JVTJVT JVT Report Wednesday Plenary 75 th MPEG Meeting, Bangkok Co-Chairs: Gary Sullivan, Jens-Rainer Ohm Vice Chairs: Ajay.
Overview of the H.264/AVC Video Coding Standard
H.264/Advanced Video Coding – A New Standard Song Jiqiang Oct 21, 2003.
H.264 / MPEG-4 Part 10 Nimrod Peleg March 2003.
Final Report – Spring 2014 Course: EE5359 – Multimedia Processing
An Introduction to H.264/AVC and 3D Video Coding.
Delivering More Video Content at Half the Cost Using MPEG-4 AVC Bob Wilson Chairman & CEO
Topic: Advanced Video Coding Standard (Comparison of HEVC with H.264 and H.264 with MPEG-2) A PROJECT UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF DR. K. R. RAO COURSE: EE5359.
EE 5359 H.264 to VC 1 Transcoding Vidhya Vijayakumar Multimedia Processing Lab MSEE, University of Arlington Guided.
3D EXTENSION of HEVC: Multi-View plus Depth Parashar Nayana Karunakar Student Id: Department of Electrical Engineering.
3D EXTENSION of HEVC: Multi-View plus Depth Parashar Nayana Karunakar Student Id: Department of Electrical Engineering.
PROJECT PROPOSAL HEVC DEBLOCKING FILTER AND ITS IMPLIMENTATION RAKESH SAI SRIRAMBHATLA UTA ID: EE 5359 Under the guidance of DR. K. R. RAO.
PROJECT INTERIM REPORT HEVC DEBLOCKING FILTER AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION RAKESH SAI SRIRAMBHATLA UTA ID:
CS 414 – Multimedia Systems Design Lecture 14 – H.264, H.265
MPEG Motion Picture Expert Group Moving Picture Encoded Group Prateek raj gautam(725/09)
Video Coding --- State of the Art and Beyond
Data Compression and Network Video by Mark Pelley Navin Dodanwela.
Profiles and levelstMyn1 Profiles and levels MPEG-2 is intended to be generic, supporting a diverse range of applications Different algorithmic elements.
CMPT365 Multimedia Systems 1 Media Compression - Video Coding Standards Spring 2015 CMPT 365 Multimedia Systems.
By Abhishek Hassan Thungaraj Supervisor- Dr. K. R. Rao.
Outline JVT/H.26L: History, Goals, Applications, Structure
- By Naveen Siddaraju - Under the guidance of Dr K R Rao Study and comparison of H.264/MPEG4.
MPEG MPEG : Motion Pictures Experts Group MPEG : ISO Committee Widely Used Video Compression Standard.
8. 1 MPEG MPEG is Moving Picture Experts Group On 1992 MPEG-1 was the standard, but was replaced only a year after by MPEG-2. Nowadays, MPEG-2 is gradually.
Compression video overview 演講者:林崇元. Outline Introduction Fundamentals of video compression Picture type Signal quality measure Video encoder and decoder.
Implementation and comparison study of H.264 and AVS China EE 5359 Multimedia Processing Spring 2012 Guidance : Prof K R Rao Pavan Kumar Reddy Gajjala.
- By Naveen Siddaraju - Under the guidance of Dr K R Rao Study and comparison between H.264.
Fundamentals of Multimedia Chapter 12 MPEG Video Coding II MPEG-4, 7 Ze-Nian Li & Mark S. Drew.
Figure 1.a AVS China encoder [3] Video Bit stream.
INTERIM Presentation on Topic: Advanced Video Coding (Comparison of HEVC with H.264 and H.264 with MPEG-2) A PROJECT UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF DR. K. R. RAO.
ELIS – Multimedia Lab MPEG activities. ELIS – Multimedia Lab MPEG activities HEVC: High Efficiency Video Coding MFC: MPEG Frame Compatible 3DTV.
High-efficiency video coding: tools and complexity Oct
AIMS’99 Workshop Heidelberg, May 1999 Assessing Audio Visual Quality P905 - AQUAVIT Assessment of Quality for audio-visual signals over Internet.
Video Compression and Standards
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HEVC and H.264 INTRA FRAME CODING AND JPEG2000 BY Under the Guidance of Harshdeep Brahmasury Jain Dr. K. R. RAO ID MS Electrical.
V ENUS INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY Guided by : Rinkal mam.
Interim Report – Spring 2014 Course: EE5359 – Multimedia Processing Performance Comparison of HEVC & H.264 using various test sequences Under the guidance.
Implementation and comparison study of H.264 and AVS china EE 5359 Multimedia Processing Spring 2012 Guidance : Prof K R Rao Pavan Kumar Reddy Gajjala.
EE 5359 MULTIMEDIA PROCESSING PROJECT PROPOSAL SPRING 2016 STUDY AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF HEVC, H.264/AVC AND DIRAC By ASHRITA MANDALAPU
MPEG Video Coding I: MPEG-1 1. Overview  MPEG: Moving Pictures Experts Group, established in 1988 for the development of digital video.  It is appropriately.
H. 261 Video Compression Techniques 1. H.261  H.261: An earlier digital video compression standard, its principle of MC-based compression is retained.
© 2014 Networking for Information Communications and Energy Lab. Q17: IPTV and Netflix: How can the Internet Support Video? Prof. Hongseok Kim Networked.
Introduction to H.264 / AVC Video Coding Standard Multimedia Systems Sharif University of Technology November 2008.
ITU-T STUDY GROUP 16 Multimedia Yushi Naito Chairman ITU-T SG16
Consultation with CE manufacturers re new DTV technologies
Quality Evaluation and Comparison of SVC Encoders
CS644 Advanced Topics in Networking
Thomas Daede October 5, 2017 AV1 Update Thomas Daede October 5, 2017.
Will Law, Chief Architect, Media Division, Akamai
Overview of the Scalable Video Coding
Video Compression - MPEG
Sony Pictures Technologies
Study and Optimization of the Deblocking Filter in H
PROJECT PROPOSAL HEVC DEBLOCKING FILTER AND ITS IMPLIMENTATION RAKESH SAI SRIRAMBHATLA UTA ID: EE 5359 Under the guidance of DR. K. R. RAO.
ENEE 631 Project Video Codec and Shot Segmentation
/ Fast block partitioning method in HEVC Intra coding for UHD video /
Viewport-based 360 Video Streaming:
Standards Presentation ECE 8873 – Data Compression and Modeling
Viewport-based 360 Video Streaming:
Chap 3: Encoding Video Content
Presentation of MPEG Standardisation Roadmap Status: Approved, Public
What Choices Make A Killer Video Processor Architecture?
Person New In Header Large Enterprise Use Case
Presentation of MPEG Standardisation Roadmap Status: Approved, Public
Presentation transcript:

Future Video Coding Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jörn Ostermann

Technology Improvements Video Coding Technology Improvements Infrastructure Device Constant need for improved compression More devices, more pixels, more frames, more user-generated content 50% rate reduction in 10 years Constant need for additional functionality High dynamic range, wide color gamut, head mounted displays, augmented reality, virtual reality Prof. Dr-Ing- Jörn Ostermann ostermann@tnt.uni-hannover.de

New usages: Panorama mono Video Coding New usages: Panorama mono Prof. Dr-Ing- Jörn Ostermann ostermann@tnt.uni-hannover.de

New usages: Panorama stereo Video Coding New usages: Panorama stereo Prof. Dr-Ing- Jörn Ostermann ostermann@tnt.uni-hannover.de

Use Cases for Future Video Codec Existing Markets Terrestrial, and Satellite broadcasting, cable services, managed IPTV services, surveillance New Markets Over-the-top (OTT) services, User generated content, video conferencing, gaming Emerging Markets Augmented and Virtual reality, multicast streaming/broadcast; media centric internet of things Prof. Dr-Ing- Jörn Ostermann ostermann@tnt.uni-hannover.de

Requirements on Future Video Codec Source material 8k, 0Hz, 120 Hz, WCG, HDR, 10bit Rectangular, panorama, projected / viewports Natural, synthetic Monoscopic, multiview Network interface Streaming, error resilience, scalability, low delay Emerging Markets Augmented and Virtual reality, multicast streaming/broadcast; media centric internet of things Prof. Dr-Ing- Jörn Ostermann ostermann@tnt.uni-hannover.de

Relevant Bodies ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 Motion Picture Experts Group (MPEG) ITU-T Study Group 16 with Q6/16 (VCEG) Common work between MPEG and VCEG MPEG-4 AVC (ITU-T H.264, ISO/IEC 14496-10) HEVC (ITU-T H.265, ISO/IEC 23008-2) MV-HEVC, 3D-HEVC as extensions of HEVC Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) Future Video Coding Prof. Dr-Ing- Jörn Ostermann ostermann@tnt.uni-hannover.de

Experimental open source software “Joint Exploration Model“ (JEM) JEM – where we are Experimental open source software “Joint Exploration Model“ (JEM) Intended to investigate potential for better compression beyond HEVC Open source code available for download https://jvet.hhi.fraunhofer.de/ Documentation openly and freely available for download: http://phenix.it-sudparis.eu/jvet/ HEVC software plus additional or improved compression tools General architecture similar to HEVC Hybrid closed-loop, high level syntax, reference picture management, etc. Improved/new compression tools Prof. Dr-Ing- Jörn Ostermann ostermann@tnt.uni-hannover.de

Overall: Hybrid Coding / Closed Loop Decoded Picture Buffer Filter Control Data Header Formatting & CABAC Scaling & Inverse Transform Motion Compensation General Control Quantized Transform Coefficients Intra Prediction Intra/Inter Selection Estimation Transform, Scaling & Quantization - Input Video Signal Split into CTUs Intra-Picture Prediction Deblocking & SAO Filters Output Coded Bitstream Prof. Dr-Ing- Jörn Ostermann ostermann@tnt.uni-hannover.de Source: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jens Ohm

JEM Results compared to HEVC (HM) Measured average rate reduction for same PSNR (Bjontegaard delta method) Average encoder and decoder run time Random Access Over HM-16.16 (sequential, gcc6.2) Y U V EncT DecT Class A1 -27.2% -33.1% -35.2% 10.7x 5.6x Class A2 -36.3% -45.2% -38.2% 7.8x 6x Class B -27.0% -36.9% -31.7% 8.8x 6.3x Class C -26.3% -31.2% -33.6% 11.3x Class D -26.0% -30.0% -31.5% 11.5x 11.7x Overall -28.5% -35.4% -33.9% 9.9x 7.2x Prof. Dr-Ing- Jörn Ostermann ostermann@tnt.uni-hannover.de Source: Prof. Dr-Ing. Jens Ohm

JEM – HEVC – AV1 Prof. Dr-Ing- Jörn Ostermann ostermann@tnt.uni-hannover.de

Call for Evidence results Joint Call for Evidence on Video Compression with Capability beyond HEVC (April 2017) Test cases with eight 4K/SDR, five HD/SDR, five HD/HDR, and five 360-degree video sequences 4 rate points each Results of Joint Call for Evidence on Video Compression with Capability beyond HEVC (July 2017) Evaluates JEM anchors and other proposals against HEVC Main 10 Expert viewing tests with double-stimulus approach, allows grading on an MOS (mean opinion score) scale Prof. Dr-Ing- Jörn Ostermann ostermann@tnt.uni-hannover.de Source: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jens Ohm

Call for Evidence results Test cases SDR / UHD 4K, MOS over rate [kbps "Daylight Road" "Campfire Party" Source: JVET-G1004 Prof. Dr-Ing- Jörn Ostermann ostermann@tnt.uni-hannover.de Source: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jens Ohm

Call for Evidence results Test cases HDR / HD, MOS over rate [kbps] "Hurdles" "Cosmos" Source: JVET-G1004 Prof. Dr-Ing- Jörn Ostermann ostermann@tnt.uni-hannover.de Source: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jens Ohm

Call for Evidence results Test cases 360° Video, dynamic viewports, MOS over rate [kbps] Source: JVET-G1004 "Kite Flite" "Harbour" Prof. Dr-Ing- Jörn Ostermann ostermann@tnt.uni-hannover.de Source: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jens Ohm

Next Steps Joint Call for Proposals on Video Compression with Capability beyond HEVC Test cases with 4K/SDR, HD/SDR, HD/HDR, 360-degree video 4 rate points each HM anchors and JEM anchors Formal subjective assessment in labs Timeline: CfP October 2017 Submissions by February 2018, subjective testing March/April Evaluation of proposals: April 2018 Next generation standard by end of 2020 Prof. Dr-Ing- Jörn Ostermann ostermann@tnt.uni-hannover.de Source: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jens Ohm

Future Video Coding will focus on: Conclusions Future Video Coding will focus on: Rectangular 10 bit WCG HDR UHD video Future Video Coding will enable: Support for panoramic video Edge-based rendering for interactivity, games Future Video coding will deliver in 2020: Coding efficiency for UHD at 50% of the rate of HEVC for the same quality UHD at typically less than 4MBit/s MPEG continues to deliver compression technology beyond the state of the art Prof. Dr-Ing- Jörn Ostermann ostermann@tnt.uni-hannover.de