Making self review work for you Carol Mutch Education Review Office June 2010

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teaching and Learning Coaches and School Accountability and School Improvement Jenny Flint 29 February 2008.
Advertisements

Leading Learning in the Social Sciences MARGARET LEAMY National Coordinator Social Sciences Te Tapuae o Rehua Consortium
5 th June 2008 Peer review and development Penny Silvester Divisional Manager Learning and skills.
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Creating the Map To Set the Direction. Educational Positioning System (EPS – a play on GPS)
Risk The chance of something happening that will have an impact on objectives. A risk is often specified in terms of an event or circumstance and the consequences.
Head of Learning: Job description
David Taylor Formerly Director of Inspection, Ofsted
Inclusion Quality Mark for Wales
Nau mai, haere mai Introductory Webinar Please dial into the audio conference a few minutes before the session is due to begin. On your phone dial: At.
The Index for Inclusion. Why have an Index Forum? Purpose To offer regular opportunities to discuss school improvement with other neighbouring schools,
What is moderation and why should we moderate?
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
Managing Change Principal Leadership Academy November 2012.
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools” Self-Evaluation of Learning and Teaching Self-Evaluation of Learning and.
Raising standards, improving lives The new school inspection framework – ‘out of hours’ learning John Kennedy Her Majesty’s Inspector The national Children’s.
SMSC and Inspection Spiritual Moral Social & Cultural.
The Ofsted ITE Inspection Framework 2014 A summary.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Overall Teacher Judgements
Ofsted lessons Clerks’ Update Jan Ofsted Sept 2012 The key judgements: Inspectors must judge the quality of education provided in the school – its.
‘What works’ and making it work for you Dr Graham Stoop Dr Carol Mutch Education Review Office 1 First-Time Principals’ Residential Course.
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 Updates continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director & Caroline Lansdown.
Sina Keshavaarz M.D Public Health &Preventive Medicine Measuring level of performance & sustaining improvement.
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
Reading and Writing National Standards workshop phase 2 Term
October ISIS – Cluster Moderation Assessment and moderation in CfE is a process, not an event! Aims of the morning: To further inform participants in the.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Gifted and Talented: Self review Presented 28 Sept 4.15 – Webinar 3 of a series of 4 Carolyn English LEARNING MEDIA.
STRATEGIC DIRECTION UPDATE JANUARY THE VISION AND MISSION THE VISION: ENRICHING LIVES AND CREATING SUCCESSFUL FUTURES. THE MISSION: EDUCATION EXCELLENCE.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Nursery Teachers Day 1 Every school A Good School Implications for Nursery Practice October 2009.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Important Information Have you got a username and password for the school SRF account? If your school has not registered before then you can do this if.
Evaluation. HPS is a “change” process that takes place within a school community A key consideration is that the change needs to be sustainable.
CPD Network meeting 1 February 2008 Annette Bruton Chief Inspector, HMIE.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Leading improvement using the Primary Framework. Keys to further improvement A growing body of research identifies important and interrelated keys to.
Active Learning Curriculum for Excellence Moira Lawson.
Self- Evaluation/GB Reviews leading to Continuous Improvement Workshop Option – 45 minutes.
The Quality Standards for resource provisions For deaf children and young people in mainstream school.
Making self review work for you Julie Foley & Dave Shepherd Education Review Office October 2010
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
ROSSHALL ACADEMY “Our School Our Future” Our Future”
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Inspired Planning 0 SDPI Summer School 23 rd August 2006 Inspired Planning Workshop.
AES Sydney Education Review Office Retention or Education? Ko te Tamaiti te Pūtake o te Kaupapa The Child the Heart of the Matter Elizabeth Welch.
KEEPING THE FOCUS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning.
How good is our school? (4 th edition) Professional learning events November 2015.
Comenius: Future School Leaders Action Research Carol Taylor.
Self Evaluation Therese Laing QIO Primary. Key Features This indicator relates to the school’s arrangements for improvement through self- evaluation and.
Principals’ Meeting September Agenda CASS model of support including: –Induction/EPD –Boards of Governors ESAGS Count, Read, Succeed Target-setting.
Promoting the Vision & Mission of the School Governing Board Online Training Module.
R EVISING ERO’ S E ARLY C HILDHOOD E DUCATION R EVIEW M ETHODOLOGY Early Childhood Council Annual Conference May 2012.
April 2016 Marie Keen Quality Improvement Officer – Early Years
Middle Managers Workshop 2: Measuring Progress. An opportunity for middle managers… Two linked workshops exploring what it means to implement the Act.
Clerks’ Annual Conference 2010 Clerking towards an “Outstanding” Governing Body Steve Telfer Leadership & Governance.
Self Review Made Easy – The purpose, process and benefits Facilitated by Bridgit Williams.
Looking at Our School 2016 A Quality Framework for Post-Primary Schools A tool to support reflection, self-review and evaluation ETBI PRINCIPALS AND DEPUTY.
Self-Evaluation Cycle for Governing Bodies
Presentation to SICI General Assembly Malta 3 October 2017
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
School Self-Evaluation 
Leading Teaching and Learning through School Self-Evaluation
“Effective professional development for teachers is a core
Professional development
Learning that deepens knowledge and understanding
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
Leadership of and for learning
Presentation transcript:

Making self review work for you Carol Mutch Education Review Office June 2010

ERO self review presentation2 Talk outline What is self review? What are the elements of self review? What might effective self review look like? What does this mean for you?

Question 1 What is self review?

ERO self review presentation4 Self review is… Self review involves investigating evidence about student outcomes and current ways of doing things to find out where improvement is needed. Planning for school improvement requires schools to set goals and targets for better student outcomes and make changes that are necessary to bring about those improvements. (MoE Planning and Reporting, 2003)

ERO self review presentation5 Or… …the deliberate and on-going process of finding out how well our practice enhances children’s learning and development. Review allows us to see which aspects of our practice are working well and what we could do better. As a result we can make decisions about what to do to improve. Through review our practice is transformed, and ultimately, our children’s learning benefits. (MoE, ECE, 2006)

ERO self review presentation6 Or… Kura are most successful when there is an robust process of on-going internal review that leads to further improvement. Effective internal review focuses on the key goals for students and the evidence of the extent to which they are actually being achieved…[It is] rigorous, informed by excellence in evaluation practice, with findings based on evidence… (ERO, Te Aho Matua, 2008)

ERO self review presentation7 Or… Self evaluation will collect and analyse a combination of qualitative and quantitative data that helps leaders and teachers develop themselves, their practices, promote high performance, help support student progress and develop intervention programmes from a proactive perspective. (Paphitis, n.d.) Self evaluation is a dialogic process, a meeting of hearts and minds, a forging of new ways of doing, vital and continuing because it is the core of a school’s educational life. It is the essence of the learning community, the intelligent school, schools that learn. (MacBeath, 1994)

ERO self review presentation8 Summary. Self review is: Centred around giving all students the most successful educational experiences possible Set in a collaborative culture of continuous self reflection and constructive critique Self initiated by a desire to seek constant improvement – mostly planned but sometimes spontaneous Celebrating and sustaining what is working well while striving to improve what is not A willingness to embrace challenge and change Setting long term goals and mid-term targets and gathering rigorous and wide-ranging evidence to examine the extent to which these have been achieved

Question 2 What are the elements of self review?

ERO self review presentation10 There are three types of self review: Strategic self review is long term and focused on key goals related to the school’s vision Regular self reviews are about “business-as- usual”. They are smaller, focused and on-going, feeding regular data into the strategic self review Emergent self reviews are in response to unplanned events or issues that have arisen. They are one-off spontaneous reviews but should fit with overall goals and link to other reviews

ERO self review presentation11 Which link to each other

ERO self review presentation12 Turning data into evidence… Schools gather lots of data – ‘hard’ (quantitative/ numerical) and ‘soft’; (qualitative/narrative). The raw or aggregated data is only the first level of analysis. It describes ‘what is’ or ‘what is happening’. The second level of analysis takes data and turns it into information. It explains ‘what this means’. It allows schools to make key statements or comparisons. The third level uses this information as evidence to support judgments (how well/to what extent), to make decisions (if this so then we need to…) and to prioritise (the most compelling need is…).

ERO self review presentation13 Within a process… Select an area to investigate or to focus on Gather wide ranging data Make a diagnosis Make a judgment Determine an area for action Design an action plan Allocate resources and responsibilities Implement the action plan Provide progress reports Determine the success of the action plan Decide what to do next

ERO self review presentation14 Of on-going review cycles… Considering Informing Monitoring Implementing Organising

ERO self review presentation15 Balancing accountability and improvement Complementary evaluation Eg Assurance statements Eg External audit Eg Self review Eg ERO education review INTERNAL EXTERNAL ACOUNTABILITYIMPROVEMENT

Question 3 What does effective self review look like?

ERO self review presentation17 What do we know about effective schools? National and international research, eg, BES ERO’s Evaluation at a Glance: Effective Schools: –A focus on the learner –Strong leadership within an inclusive culture –Effective teaching –Quality engagement with parents, whānau and communities –Coherent and consistent policies and practices within a cycle of continuous self review

ERO self review presentation18 What have we learned from ECE? The ERO national evaluation of ECE self review tells us that common features of services with effective self review are: –Strong leadership to promote self review –Professional learning and development to support self review –Stable, supportive and collaborative staff –Sound sustainable systems –Relevant resources and support systems

ERO self review presentation19 What are we learning from ERO’s good practice in self review case studies? Importance of leadership to drive the vision Importance of ‘buy-in” from all involved Belief that students can achieve Belief that teachers can make a difference Importance of the big picture Commitment to the long term Importance of prioritising Remembering to celebrate and build on successes Importance of gathering useful data and analysing it effectively Using strengths from in and outside the school There is no one way- each school and community is unique but we can learn from each other

ERO self review presentation20 What are we learning from our workshops? Schools do it differently:

Question 4 What does this mean for you?

ERO self review presentation22 ERO’s differentiated review cycle Rather than being based on a “one-size-fits-all” three yearly- cycle, the differentiated review cycle is based on ERO’s confidence that the school is providing a quality education for all students and maintaining an on-going process of continuous self improvement Not confident/not yet confident (12-24 month return) Confident (three year return) Highly confident (4-5 year return) Self review is the tool through which schools monitor and sustain this continuous improvement and provide evidence of what they are doing and what is working for their students

ERO self review presentation23 ERO’s updated evaluation indicators Whakataukī Ko te Tamaiti the Pūtake o te Kaupapa Six dimensions: –Student learning: engagement, progress and achievement –Governing the school –Leading and managing the school –Inclusive school culture –Engaging families and communities

ERO self review presentation24 Support available From ERO Framework for reviews Evaluation Indicators Good practice case studies (not yet available) Evaluation at a Glance: Effective Schools (not yet available) Board/Whānau Assurance Statement Checklist National Evaluations Getting the most out of your ERO review booklets Workshops and cluster meetings From other sources: MoE self review tools for National Standards MoE Kiwi Leadership material MoE governance resource Commercial tools Local advisors/consultants Each other!

ERO self review presentation25 To conclude Be assured that self review is not new and much of what you already do fits under that umbrella Make on-going self review, reflection and action a “state of mind” in your school Ensure smaller review cycles feed data into strategic self review in a coherent way ERO are not looking for particular ways of doing things but at the quality of the evidence and the robustness of the processes that you use for your decision making Ask yourself : “How do you know that you make a difference for every student in your school?”