Recommended Appendix B Redirect Standards Examples

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
W. WeathersModeled after Redirect Examples Examples: Reservations that are dotted show Capacity Available to Resell or Transfer. MWs in Gray are.
Advertisements

11 OASIS Subcommittee - Notification Task Force UPDATE May
DRAFT Recommendation Preemption & Competition CHALLENGER COUNTEROFFER June 25, 2013 NAESB OS.
Lottery Method in BPA’s Simultaneous Submission Windows and Potential Application to the Simultaneous Defender Matching Process NAESB Meeting 05/01/13.
Preemption and Competition Redirect Issues NAESB OS Meeting June 6, 2012 BPA Presenting.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange Version 1 Standard Revision 1, Draft 5 August, 2005.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange
Timing and Flowchart Assignment
W. Weathers1A Conference Call 8/18/05 Examples: In all cases a Parent Reservation to be Redirected must be Firm Point-to-Point. Unless noted otherwise,
NAESB OASIS 1A Subcommittee Wendy Weathers, Chair ESS Meeting May 2005 Resale Recommendation.
FERC Order minute Scheduling.
NAESB OASIS Subcommittee Long Term Competition Mike Norris, Rebecca Berdahl May 13, /13/141.
Standards Development Improvement Opportunities February 18, 2014.
DRAFT E-Tag Notification Presentation NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013 Seattle, WA.
OASIS Subcommittee Status EC Meeting 2/18/14. Preemption and Competition Annual Plan Items Affected 2013 AP Item 2(a) Develop version 2 business practice.
EC Meeting 2/24/ AP Item 7(b) Modify NAESB standards WEQ , WEQ , and related standards to be consistent with the Commission’s policy.
Treatment of Firm Redirects Recent FERC Order. Entergy Order Docket Nos. ER OA ER Issued May 16, 2013
Pseudo-Tie Reservations
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Thursday, January 19, :00 to 4:00 p.m. EST 4 th Quarter
DRAFT Request for Initiation of a NAESB Standard NAESB OS Oct 23-24, 2013 Richmond, VA.
NAESB WEQ UPDATE Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Meeting Salt Lake, UT August 26, 2015 Bob Harshbarger Puget Sound Energy.
1 Free Template from  NAESB  Coordinate Interchange Scheduling Subcommittee  OASIS Subcommittee  Business Practice Subcommittee.
Resale Business Practice Standards 3 Options remain.
Short-term Competition and Preemption (STCP) May 2015 Presenter: Marie Pompel Bonneville Power Administration.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Tuesday, April 21, :00 to 3:00 p.m. EDT.
Electronic Scheduling /Information Technology Subcommittees (ESS/ITS) Update 2008 Review November 4, 2008.
AFC METHODOLOGY EMS USER GROUP SEP 12, 2004 AFC – New Developments EMS USER GROUP Sep
E-Tag Notification Assignment NAESB OS Sep 17-19, 2013 Seattle, WA Assignee – Robin Cross Seattle City Light Interested Resources: Marie Pompel - BPA Power.
Resale Business Practice Standards 3 Options remain.
NITS Concepts  Contract Data Model: NITS Agreement represented as a Contract Contract has one or more Facilities Facility may be one or more Resources.
OASIS SUBCOMMITTEE STATUS EC Meeting 4/29/14. Preemption and Competition Annual Plan Items Affected  2013 AP Item 2(a) Develop version 2 business practice.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Resales, Aggregations & Redirects of Resales NAESB OS Presentation August 20, 2014 BPA Presenting.
Network Transmission and Rollover Rights July 22, 2015 BPA.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Wednesday, January 28, :00 to 3:00 p.m. ET.
Consolidation (API 5.d R09015) Business Practice Standards Draft WEQ OS Marie Pompel – July 2015.
NAESB WEQ EC Meeting 10/20/2015.   Workload  Long-Term Competition for Rollover Rights OASIS Subcommittee.
WEQ Executive Committee Contract Path Task Force Additional Issues Related To Contract Path Management ( WEQ and WEQ )
1 System for Administration, Training, and Educational Resources for NASA External Training Requests.
NAESB Update Kathy Anderson October 2015 MIC Meeting.
WEQ Executive Committee Contract Path Task Force Additional Issues Related To Contract Path Management ( WEQ and WEQ )
Standards Review Subcommittee Update August 19, 2014 Co-Chairs Rebecca Berdahl, BPA Marie Knox, MISO.
NITS on webSmart OASIS. NITS on webSmart OASIS Agenda  Company and User Permissions  Electronic Industry Registry requirement  WebSmart OASIS NITS.
NAESB NITS, and Long-term Competition
Preemption-ROFR Notification
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
WEQ OASIS Subcommittee
WEQ OASIS Subcommittee Development Update to the
BPA Formal Comments Overview to NAESB OS
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
Service Across Multiple Transmission Systems
Redispatch Cost Posting
Preemption & Competition Standards BPA – Southern Compromise Proposal October 24, 2017 PURPOSE: Review and discuss the inequity with the Short-Term Firm.
Add/Terminate NITS DNR
Assigned to the WEQ OASIS and BPS Subcommittees
Use of the term “Confirm” and derivatives in NAESB Business Standards
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
Short-term Competition and Preemption (STCP)
Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Meeting
R18011 discussion This document prepared for informational purposes only, and does not endorse a specific resolution to the request R18011.
2019 Annual Plan Items 3b and 3f (formerly 2018 API 3c and 3h)
NITS on webSmart OASIS.
Kathy Anderson October 2015 MIC Meeting
OASIS Subcommittee Status Preemption and Competition
Transportation Professionals Advisory Committee (TPAC)
OASIS Notification Recommendation.
Standards Review Subcommittee Update
OASIS Subcommittee Report to the NAESB Executive Committee October 2019 – Richmond, VA 2019 Annual Plan Item 3a Requirements for OASIS to obtain and use.
Standards Review Subcommittee Update
Presentation transcript:

Recommended Appendix B Redirect Standards Examples (to replace existing Appendix B) Notes for Examples: In all cases a Parent Reservation to be Redirected must be Firm Point-to-Point. Unless noted otherwise, example Redirect requests may be on either a firm or non-firm basis. Capacity that is shaded (dotted) shows Parent Capacity Available to Redirect. Capacity in Gray is not available to Redirect. Requests that are cross-hatched are outside the bounds of the Parent Reservation. Parent Capacity Available to Redirect Parent Capacity Unavailable to Redirect Requested Capacity outside the bounds of the Parent Reservation R04035 and R05002 Page 1

Example 1: Parent Reservation RECOMMENDATION TO NAESB WEQ EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Requesters: Electronic Scheduling Subcommittee and Information Technology Subcommittee Request No.: R05002 Request Title: Revision of Redirect Standards 9 and 10 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 60 MW - 20 MW - 100 MW - Confirmed Firm Parent ARef# 1000 Example 1: Parent Reservation 100 MW - Implemented Tag ID# 100 Confirmed Redirect ARef# 1002 Confirmed Resale ARef# 1001 60 MW - Pending Tag ID# 101 30 MW - Pending Redirect ARef# 1004 Confirmed Redirect ARef#1003 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Example 1: Parent Capacity Available to Redirect after various Events Example 1 – Capacity Available to Redirect against Parent ARef# 1000 would be 60 MW for day one, 30 MW for day two and zero MW for days 3 and 4. See Standards 9.4, 9.5, 10.4 and 10.5 and definition of Capacity Available to Redirect. R04035 and R05002 Page 2

Confirmed Firm Parent ARef# 2000 RECOMMENDATION TO NAESB WEQ EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Requesters: Electronic Scheduling Subcommittee and Information Technology Subcommittee Request No.: R05002 Request Title: Revision of Redirect Standards 9 and 10 100 MW - Outage 60 MW - Confirmed Firm Parent ARef# 2000 20 MW - Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Example 2: Parent Capacity Available to Redirect Not Affected by Outage Example 2 – The Capacity Available to Redirect is unaffected by the outage. The Capacity Available to Redirect against Parent ARef# 2000 would be 100 MW’s for all four days. See Standards 9.2 and 10.2. R04035 and R05002 Page 3

RECOMMENDATION TO NAESB WEQ EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Requesters: Electronic Scheduling Subcommittee and Information Technology Subcommittee Request No.: R05002 Request Title: Revision of Redirect Standards 9 and 10 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 60 MW - 20 MW - 100 MW - Confirmed Firm Parent ARef# 3000 Invalid Redirect ARef# 3001 Example 3: Redirect Request with Invalid Time Period Example 3 – The TP must deny Request 3001 because the time period is invalid (i.e. extends past the time period of the Parent Reservation). The Capacity Available to Redirect on the Parent Reservation remains at 100 MW for the duration of the reservation. See Standards 9.3, 9.4.1, 10.3 and 10.4.1 R04035 and R05002 Page 4

RECOMMENDATION TO NAESB WEQ EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Requesters: Electronic Scheduling Subcommittee and Information Technology Subcommittee Request No.: R05002 Request Title: Revision of Redirect Standards 9 and 10 Non-Firm Redirect Request ARef# 4001 100 MW - 60 MW - Confirmed Firm Parent ARef# 4000 20 MW - Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Example 4: Non-Firm Redirect with Capacity Requested exceeding Capacity Available to Redirect on Parent Reservation. Example 4 – With a Non-Firm Redirect Request where the capacity requested exceeds the Capacity Available to Redirect of the Parent, if ATC is available, the TP may Counteroffer ARef# 4001 at 100 MW (See Example 4a) or deny ARef# 4001 (See Example 4b). In 4a, assuming the customer confirmed the Counteroffer, the Capacity Available to Redirect on Parent Reservation ARef# 4000 would be 100 MW for the first two days and zero for days 3 and 4. See Standards 10.4 and 10.5. 100 MW - Non-Firm Redirect ARef# 4001 Counteroffered and Confirmed at 100 MW Confirmed Firm Parent ARef# 4000 60 MW - 20 MW - Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Example 4a: Non-Firm Redirect with Optional Counteroffer. R04035 and R05002 Page 5

RECOMMENDATION TO NAESB WEQ EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Requesters: Electronic Scheduling Subcommittee and Information Technology Subcommittee Request No.: R05002 Request Title: Revision of Redirect Standards 9 and 10 100 MW - Denied Non-Firm Redirect ARef# 4001 60 MW - Confirmed Firm Parent ARef# 4000 20 MW - Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Example 4b: Non-Firm Redirect with Optional Deny. Example 4b – In this scenario, the TP denied the Non-Firm Redirect ARef# 4001. The Capacity Available to Redirect on Parent Reservation ARef# 4000 remains 100 MW for all four days. The TP could also Counteroffer Request 4001 at 100 MW (See Example 4a). See Standard 10.4.3. R04035 and R05002 Page 6

RECOMMENDATION TO NAESB WEQ EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Requesters: Electronic Scheduling Subcommittee and Information Technology Subcommittee Request No.: R05002 Request Title: Revision of Redirect Standards 9 and 10 100 MW - Firm Redirect Request ARef# 5001 60 MW - Confirmed Firm Parent ARef# 5000 20 MW - Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Example 5: Firm Redirect with Capacity Requested exceeding Capacity Available to Redirect on Parent Reservation. Example 5 - With a Firm Redirect Request where the capacity requested exceeds the Capacity Available to Redirect of the Parent, assuming ATC is available, the TP must Counteroffer ARef# 5001 at 100 MW. Assuming also that the customer confirmed the Counteroffer, the Capacity Available to Redirect on Parent Reservation ARef# 5000 would be 100 MW for the first two days and zero for days 3 and 4. See Standard 9.4.3. 100 MW - Firm Redirect ARef# 5001 Counteroffered and Confirmed at 100 MW 60 MW - Confirmed Firm Parent ARef# 5000 20 MW - Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Example 5: Firm Redirect with Counteroffer R04035 and R05002 Page 7

RECOMMENDATION TO NAESB WEQ EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Requesters: Electronic Scheduling Subcommittee and Information Technology Subcommittee Request No.: R05002 Request Title: Revision of Redirect Standards 9 and 10 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 60 MW - 20 MW - 100 MW - Confirmed Firm Parent Reservation ARef# 6000 Accepted Non-Firm Redirect ARef# 6002 Accepted Non-Firm Redirect ARef# 6001 Example 6 – Multiple requests for Firm or Non-Firm Redirects may be pending against the same Capacity Available to Redirect. Once Request 6001 is Confirmed, Non-Firm ARef#6002 may be Refused by the TP or Withdrawn by the Customer. The Capacity Available to Redirect on ARef# 6000 is 40 MW for days 1 and 2. (The TP could also Counteroffer non-firm ARef# 6002. This scenario is not shown). See Standards 10.4.2, 10.5 and 10.5.2. 100 MW - Withdrawn Non-Firm Redirect ARef# 6002 Confirmed Firm Parent Reservation 5000 60 MW - Confirmed Firm Parent Reservation ARef# 6000 Confirmed Non-Firm Redirect ARef# 6001 20 MW - Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Example 6: Multiple Requests against same Capacity R04035 and R05002 Page 8

RECOMMENDATION TO NAESB WEQ EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Requesters: Electronic Scheduling Subcommittee and Information Technology Subcommittee Request No.: R05002 Request Title: Revision of Redirect Standards 9 and 10 100 MW - Accepted Firm Parent ARef# 7000 60 MW - Refused Redirect ARef# 7001 20 MW - Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Example 7: Redirect Parent Reservation must be Confirmed Example 7 – The Customer may only Redirect against capacity of a reservation that is in a Confirmed State. ARef# 7001 would be Refused and the Capacity Available to Redirect against Parent ARef# 7000 would be zero MW’s for all four days because the reservation is not Confirmed. See Standards 9.1.1 and 10.1.1. R04035 and R05002 Page 9