College Students’ Attitudes About Who Should Adopt Timothy Dugas and Sara Sohr-Preston Southeastern Louisiana University Abstract To examine factors possibly.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Adolescent Social Expectations. Emily L. Loeb, Elenda T. Hessel, Megan M. Schad, & Joseph P. Allen University of Virginia.
Advertisements

Correlates of Passion, Intimacy, and Commitment in Couples’ Daily Experiences STUDY 1 Goal: To develop an adjective-rating measure of the components of.
Kelsey Grossman Laura Jimenez
Designing the Questionnaire
Home-schooling as an extreme form of parental involvement Christa L. Green.
ILLNESSES, INJURIES, AND HOSPITALIZATIONS AMONG INNER-CITY MINORITY INFANTS IN CHICAGO.
Implication of Gender and Perception of Self- Competence on Educational Aspiration among Graduates in Taiwan Wan-Chen Hsu and Chia- Hsun Chiang Presenter.
Origins of Attraction MATTHEW CORRINET. Biological: Fischer et al. (2003)  “... used an fMRI... to investigate blood flow in the brains of 20 men and.
1 Summarize from: “Examining Trust in Information Technology Artifacts: The Effects of System Quality and Culture”, Journal of Management Information Systems,
Evaluation of After School Programs Denise Huang CRESST Conference September 8th, 2005.
Marriage and Changing Family Arrangements Chapter 12
HAOMING LIU JINLI ZENG KENAN ERTUNC GENETIC ABILITY AND INTERGENERATIONAL EARNINGS MOBILITY 1.
Expecting the worst often leads to poor outcomes. This process is particularly true in close relationships, as those who are most sensitive to rejection.
Sex differences in romantic kissing among college students: An evolutionary perspective Summary by Amber Kika, Nina Dangourian, and Esmeralda Huerta For.
Edward F. Garrido, Ph.D. and Heather N. Taussig, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine Kempe Center for the Prevention and Treatment of.
Husbands' Traditionality and Wives' Marital and Personal Well-being in Mexican American Families Yuliana Rodriguez, Jill K. Walls, Heather M. Helms, &
Examining Subjective Understanding of Participants and Outside Observers’ in Adolescent Romantic Couples’ Interactions Joseph W. Dickson 1 Melinda S. Harper.
The Role of Physical Attractiveness in Adolescent Romantic Relationships. Rebecca Furr, M.A. & Deborah Welsh, Ph.D. University of Tennessee.
RESULTS In both studies, greater anticipated mobility significantly predicted reduced relationship prioritization, even after controlling for demographics.
We thank the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs for supporting this research, and Learning & Technology Services for printing this poster. Introduction.
Can Pretty People Have Their Cake and Eat it Too? Positive and Negative Effects of Physical Attractiveness. Megan M. Schad, David E. Szwedo, Joanna M.
Condom Use as it Relates to Partner Perception and Self-Efficacy Taryn D. Larribas, University of San Francisco Hypotheses It was hypothesized that condom.
T Relationships do matter: Understanding how nurse-physician relationships can impact patient care outcomes Sandra L. Siedlecki PhD RN CNS.
Change in undergraduate developmental psychology students' knowledge of and attitudes about parenting Sara L. Sohr-Preston, Priscilla Taggart, and Valerie.
The Relationship between Nature Relatedness, Trait Emotional Intelligence and Well-Being Priscilla R. Gerofsky Supervisors: Philip A. Vernon, Ph.D. &
Loneliness in Marriage Scale
Implementing Color Me Healthy in Jackson County Mississippi Head Start Centers: Successes, Struggles, and Future Implications (Year Two Results) Danielle.
Discussion & Conclusion
The Relationship Between Instagram Photo Editing and Undergraduate College Women’s Body Dissatisfaction Madeline Wick, Cindy Miller-Perrin, & Jennifer.
Optimism is Weakly and Not Significantly Related to Decision Making
Journey Into Self-Awareness
 “Textisms”: The Comfort of the Recipient
SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY
Parental Alcoholism and Adolescent Depression?
Emerging Adults’ Feelings of Loneliness in College
Content Analysis of Family Building Blogs: Preliminary Findings
Predictors of Parenting Self-Efficacy in Parents Attending College
Predictors of Attitudes Towards Gay and Lesbian Couples
What is parenting?.
The Disclosure of Virginity Status and Sexual Orientation
Political dissonance: The effect of political ideology on premarital sex Destini A. Smith, Lakin N. Douglas, Damien R. Jones, Alison J. Patev, & Kristina.
Mothers' Vocabulary and Autonomy-Granting Behaviors as Predictors of Gains in Children's Vocabulary Competence from Age 3 to Age 4 Sara L. Sohr-Preston.
Introduction Hypotheses Results Discussion Method
SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY
CHAPTER 2 Research Methods in Industrial/Organizational Psychology
DESCRIPTIVES AND CORRELATIONS
Evidence for gender bias in interpreting online professor ratings
My, But We are Impressive
Self-discrepancies in the Social Role of Mother: Associations between Self-discrepancies and Negative Affect Nicole J. Holmberg, Laura D. Pittman, Emily.
Kayla McCaleb, Sara Sohr-Preston, and Karen Phung
Implications and Future Research Research Subjects/Questions
Section 20.3 Adulthood and Marriage Objectives
Determining Parental Readiness
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Bell Ringer #4 Textbook page 232
Assignment 3 for EPM Research Practices and Applications
Sexual Consent: Changing the Gender Stereotype
Social Practical Charlie.
CHAPTER 28: READINESS FOR MARRIAGE
Learning online: Motivated to Self-Regulate?
The Welcoming Walkthrough
Deciding About Children
Study Design/Methods Used
The Effects of Childhood Emotional Abuse on Later Romantic Relationship Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Self-Worth, Alcohol, and Jealousy Madeline M.
Introduction Results Discussion Hypotheses Method
A Social Learning Approach Martina Miller
Effects of Sexualization in Advertisements
Marriage and Changing Family Arrangements
Conclusions and Implications
Purpose and Hypothesis
Presentation transcript:

College Students’ Attitudes About Who Should Adopt Timothy Dugas and Sara Sohr-Preston Southeastern Louisiana University Abstract To examine factors possibly contributing to selection for adoption, this study investigated college student’s attitudes toward potential adoptive parents. A sample of college students were asked a series of questions about the perspective parent and the child potentially adopted. Married prospective parents were rated more favorably in a number of areas than single prospective parents. Method Participants A sample of undergraduate college students (N = 366) recruited from a Southeastern Louisiana campus were surveyed. Participants were predominately white (72.20%), female (78.50%), and averaged 19.75 years old. Vignettes Vignettes were created which described married couples and single individuals who were attempting to adopt. Married couples consisted of same-sex and opposite-sex partners. Participants were randomly assigned to read vignettes featuring single versus married potential parents. Measures Survey items were created for the current study. Item content and response patterns are listed in Table 1. Items 1-14 utilized a scale of 1 (not at all likely) to 9 (extremely likely). Items 15-19 were scaled from 1 (not at all) to 5 (completely). Item 20 was scaled from 1 (never) to 4 (probably). Future Research and Implications A more diverse sample would extend generalizability of these findings. Future researchers may construct different vignettes to observe if other factors change the attitudes towards couples and individuals, and their ability to adopt. Future researchers should also survey actual adoption agency staff. This research provides insight into biases possibly present in evaluating prospective adoptive parents and suggest areas to address in training adoption agency staff. Introduction Infant adoption is a pathway to parenthood for many adults, whether single, in same sex couples, or experiencing infertility or concerns about genetic inheritance. Selection involves some subjectivity (Shelley-Sireci & Ciano-Boyce, 2002), meaning not all prospective parents successfully adopt. Attitudes towards adopting and adoption vary depending on many factors. Western societies tend to view adoption subpar to having biological children (Bartholet, 1993). This attitude was also observed in Latino immigrants, but declined slightly when the were infertile (Nachtigall, 2010). Not only do attitudes about adopting vary, but so do opinions on whom should be able to adopt. Whatley and Jahangard (2003) reported college students being more accepting towards transracial adoption. This view was in opposition to Perry and Whitehead (2015) who observed that Christians were less accepting of transracial adoption. Crawford and Solliiday (1996) also reported a less favorable attitude towards same sex couples attempting to adopt and rated less likely to be awarded custody. With so many differences in recent findings, the current study examined college students’ attitudes towards potential adopting parents to assess who might be more likely to be granted adoption rights if participants were employed by an adoption agency. Hypothesis: Differences in attitudes would be observed towards married couples versus single individuals attempting to adopt Table 1 Summary of ANOVA results Single Mean (SD) Married Mean (SD) F 1. This person will become a parent within the next year. 4.63 (2.11) 5.49 (2.15) 14.56 ** 2. This person will become a parent within the next 5 years. 6.64 (2.03) 7.20 (1.81) 7.79 ** 3. This person will be excited about being a parent. 8.24 (1.27) 8.35 (1.21) .71 4. This person will be financially equipped for a new baby. 6.34 (1.78) 6.90 (1.66) 9.49 ** 5. This person will be emotionally equipped for a new baby. 6.47 (1.59) 6.79 (1.70) 3.41 6. If selected to be an adoptive parent, this person’s baby will be healthy. 6.45 (1.64) 6.80 (1.70) 2.56 7. This person will resent the baby if selected to be an adoptive parent. 2.77 (2.08) 2.62 (2.08) .44 8. This person will exhibit warmth and sensitivity with a baby. 7.34 (1.57) 7.64 (1.48) 3.28 9. This person will be a good role model for a child. 6.76 (1.69) 6.68 (1.99) .16 10. A child adopted by this person will exhibit behavior problems. 4.27 (1.78) 4.52 (1.80) 1.82 11. A child adopted by this person will have a happy life. 6.56 (1.58) 6.70 (1.66) .66 12. A child adopted by this person will receive needed attention. 6.73 (1.85) 7.29 (1.74) 8.86 ** 13. A child adopted by this person will receive needed guidance and life lessons. 6.76 (1.83) 7.01 (1.79) 1.70 14. A child adopted by this person will develop healthy perceptions of romantic relationships. 5.58 (1.83) 6.35 (2.10) 13.17 ** 15. Overall, to what degree do you support or approve of this person’s attempt to adopt? 3.99 (.98) 4.20 (1.01) 4.04 * 16. Overall, how likable do you think this person is? 3.86 (.80) 3.97 (.81) 17. Overall, how responsible do you think this person is? 4.06 (.75) 4.30 (.81) 7.72 ** 18. Overall, how selfish do you think this person is? 2.05 (.87) 2.09 (.90) .18 19. Overall, how immoral do you think this person is? 2.10 (.92) 2.30 (1.14) 3.10 20. Finally, do you picture yourself (or a partner) ever trying to become an adoptive parent? 2.62 (.74) 2.70 (.75) 1.06 Results A series of one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) were conducted to compare responses to survey items based on whether the potential parent in the vignette was single or married. Results of these ANOVA are summarized in Table 1. Discussion College students reported prospective adoptees who were married would be more likely to be granted adoption rights than single individuals. Students also were more likely to rate married couples to be responsible and provide a financially stable home for their child. Participants anticipated an adopted child would receive more attention if adopted by a married couple. Finally, participants approved of the adoption significantly less when the potential adoptive parent was single. Note. * p < .05; ** p < .01