Adding an evidence-based family strengthening program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPLEMENTING THE ACA: HOW MUCH WILL IT HELP VULNERABLE ADOLESCENTS AND YOUNG ADULTS? Abigail English, JD Center for Adolescent Health & the Law
Advertisements

What Midwest Study Data Tell Us About Youth as Young Adults April 7, 2010 Mark E. Courtney Ballmer Chair for Child Wellbeing School of Social Work University.
From Harm to Home | Rescue.org Advancing Research and Learning on Parenting Interventions in Low-Resource or Humanitarian Settings Dr. Jeannie Annan Director,
NOW is the time for Transformation of our Criminal Justice System NOW is the time for 11X15 “The time is always right to do what is right” - MLK.
Analysis of Prison Nursery Benefits and Program Strategies: Alaska Department of Corrections Opportunity for Reduction in Recidivism and Improved Bonding.
DRAFT PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS Mark Rubin – Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Exploring the Factors Influencing Family Members’ Connections to Incarcerated Individuals Johnna Christian, Ph.D. Rutgers School of Criminal Justice.
Pre- and Post- Placement Intervention Approach with Kinship Families: Role for Child Protection Workers Priscilla Gibson, Ph.D., Katie Haas Shweta Singh.
A Case Study of the Intersection Between the Child Welfare and Criminal Justice Systems Charlene Wear Simmons, Ph.D. Parental Incarceration, Termination.
Claire Brindis, Dr. P.H. University of California, San Francisco American Public Health Association- Annual Meeting November 10, 2004 Adolescent Health:
WRAPAROUND MILWAUKEE “Never doubt that a small group of committed citizens can change the world: indeed, it’s the only thing that ever does.” Margaret.
1 OPHS FOUNDATIONAL STANDARD BOH Section Meeting February 11, 2011.
1 Joyce James, LMSW-AP Associate Deputy Executive Commissioner Overview of the Texas Model for Eliminating Disproportionality and Disparities Center for.
Participants Adoption Study 109 (83%) of 133 WSU Cooperative Extension county chairs, faculty, and program staff responded to survey Dissemination & Implementation.
Criminal Justice Reform in California Challenges and Opportunities Mia Bird Northern California Grantmakers Annual Conference – From Ideas to Action May.
Evaluation Basics Processes of Evaluation The process of evaluating “So what?” (outcomes) and “how was that?” (processes) can serve many purposes for leaders,
The NIDCR funded Collaborating Research Centers to Reduce Oral Health Disparities (CRCROHD) represent an innovative approach to understanding determinants.
Creating Lasting Family Connections. Program Funding The Creating Lasting Family Connections program is funded by Title V and the Indiana Criminal Justice.
Incarcerated Fathers Skype with Their Children from Prison: Outcome Indicators of Children’s Well-Being Kerry Kazura, Ph.D. Human Development and Family.
A Community Member’s Perspective On CHAMP Angela Paulino, B.S. Mount Sinai School of Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicineand The Bronx Community Collaborative.
April Anderson-Vizcaya California State University Long Beach May 2012.
CHAPTER 14 COUNSELING AFRICAN AMERICANS
Evaluation Highlights from Pilot Phase July 2005 – June 2007 Prepared for Leadership Team Meeting January 11, 2008.
Collaborative Practices: Transition Toolkit 2.0 – Meeting the Educational Needs of Youth Exposed to the Juvenile Justice System Simon Gonsoulin.
AB 12: California Fostering Connections to Success Act Policy Overview and Implications for THP-Plus Presentation to THP-Plus Institute July 28, 2009.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Learning to Reduce Recidivism: A 50-state analysis of postsecondary education policy Wendy Erisman Institute for Higher Education Policy Washington, DC.
Research on Permanent Supportive Housing for Families NAEH National Conference on Ending Family Homelessness Jacquelyn Anderson Senior Program Manager,
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
March 12,  May 2010 Governor Bob McDonnell signed Executive Order 10 calling for a Housing Policy Framework  The Homeless Outcomes Policy Report.
Enhanced Services for the Hard-to-Employ Project Transitional Jobs for Ex-Prisoners: Early Impacts from a Random Assignment Evaluation of the Center for.
Kathy Hebbeler SRI International February 17, 2010 Characteristics of Children Served in Part C.
Program Evaluation - Reunification of Foster Children with their Families: NYS Office of Children and Family Services, Division of Child Care Evelyn Jones,
Program Evaluation Principles and Applications PAS 2010.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Investigating mentorship influence on youth resilience A Research Proposal By: Sara Carter Clemson University April 18, 2012.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
Alberta Centre for Child, Family and Community Research Child and Youth Data Laboratory CYDL Project One Symposium Child Intervention Family Support for.
Change Fund Specialist LAAC Health Visitors. Context  A proposal was submitted from health, social work and education to the Early Years Change fund.
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
Medication Adherence and Substance Abuse Predict 18-Month Recidivism among Mental Health Jail Diversion Program Clients Elizabeth N. Burris 1, Evan M.
Alberta Centre for Child, Family and Community Research Child and Youth Data Laboratory CYDL Project One Symposium K-12 and Post-Secondary Educational.
Approaches to Linking Process and Outcome Data in a Cross-Site Evaluation Laura Elwyn, Ph.D. Kristin Stainbrook, Ph.D. American Evaluation Association.
Top 10,000 Clients - Social Sector Costs Presentation by the Social Development Minister 1.
Mark E. Courtney Professor School of Social Service Administration
Session Outcomes Overview of Project STAY OUT
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Juvenile Justice Policy and Oversight Committee
Faith, Reentry, Chaplains & the ACA
Emergency department pediatric psychiatric services
About Sandy Magaña Dr. Magaña is a Professor of Disability and Human Development at the University of Illinois at Chicago, and the Director of the Family.
Broward County Sheriff’s Office Civil Citation Program Evaluation
Participatory Action Research (PAR)
Ken Larimore, Ph.D., LISW-S
The association between a biological parent spending time in jail/prison and the child ending up in jail/prison later in life. Kathleen Johnson *Department.
Lisa Schelbe College of Social Work
Juvenile Justice Policy and Oversight Committee
RecycleForce: Transitional Jobs for Formerly Incarcerated
Comprehensive Youth Services
Senate Health and Human Services Committee
Inequality Starts Before Kindergarten
handling juvenile records
Presented by: Robin Koralek, Abt Associates
Linda Mayo Willis and Carolyn Pope Edwards
Community Engagement and Participation
Arely M. Hurtado1,2, Phillip D. Akutsu2, & Deanna L. Stammer1
Presentation transcript:

Adding an evidence-based family strengthening program to reentry services for fathers Background Mindy E. Scott, Lacey Morris, Heather Fish Next Steps Characteristics of Reentering Fathers and their Families* Child Trends is conducting an experimental evaluation to examine the impact of adding an evidence-based parenting program, the Strengthening Family Program (SFP), to reentry services for parents leaving prison in Chicago, IL. Working with the Safer Foundation, which provides a range of services for people with criminal records, the study will test whether this intervention reduces recidivism, improves family functioning, and improves child well-being among a vulnerable population of reentering fathers with children ages 10-14. More than half of the 1.5 million incarcerated adults are parents of minor children, meaning that hundreds of thousands of parents are released from incarceration facilities each year. The vast majority of incarcerated parents are male (93%). Father imprisonment disrupts father-child relationships; alters the network of familial support; and increases the likelihood that children of incarcerated individuals will also wind up involved in the criminal justice system. Test for program impacts by comparing outcomes for treatment and control families Father outcomes: Recidivism, engagement, employment, mental health Caregiver outcomes: Co-parenting, engagement Child outcomes: Delinquency, academic engagement, relationships with parents   Analyze qualitative data from the implementation study to: identify strengths and challenges of the SFP intervention; inform program adaptations for reentry population; provide context to impact analyses Implementation data collection: focus groups with fathers and caregivers; staff interviews; program observations 80 fathers, 55 caregivers, and 80 children enrolled in the SFP evaluation between November 2013 and December 2015. On average, fathers were 41 years old and children were 12 years old. The race and ethnicity of fathers served was predominately African American (84%) and Hispanic/Latino (10%). Only one-quarter of fathers were employed at enrollment. 58% of participating children were daughters. Implications Knowledge gained will help the criminal justice system, social service agencies, health care providers and communities work collaboratively to better meet the needs of reentering fathers and their families. Findings will also guide children and youth services policymakers, as more than five million U.S. children have had at least one parent in prison at one time or another. By determining the strengths and weaknesses of a proven program adapted to the reentry context, the research has the potential to identify a program model and best practices that could be adapted by correction and family service program operators across the nation. SFP Evaluation Objectives Objective 1: To conduct an outcomes evaluation to determine the short- and long-term impact of a parenting intervention designed for reentering fathers to rebuild relationships with their children on father well-being and child well-being . Objective 2: To conduct a process evaluation that will provide context, clarification and understanding of the outcome evaluation results in the context of reentry, and an opportunity to replicate and extend practices that work best with reentering fathers. *Characteristics were captured at baseline.