Infrared Detectors Grown on Silicon Substrates

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A photon-counting detector for exoplanet missions Don Figer 1, Joong Lee 1, Brandon Hanold 1, Brian Aull 2, Jim Gregory 2, Dan Schuette 2 1 Center for.
Advertisements

HgCdTe Avalanche Photodiode Arrays for Wavefront Sensing and Interferometry Applications Ian Baker* and Gert Finger** *SELEX Sensors and Airborne Systems.
Development of Sensitive Long-wave Infrared Detector Arrays for Passively Cooled Space Missions Craig McMurtry, Donald Lee, James Beletic, Chi-Yi A. Chen,
The Second Generation of IR detectors for WFC3 Massimo Robberto European Space Agency and Space Telescope Science Institute.
Parameters to choose the CCD The CCD test bench *Temperature range : -55 to +40°C. *Stabilization : < 0.05°C/hour. *5 temperature probes : CCD and electronics.
Near-Infrared Detector Arrays - The State of the Art -
Development of an Active Pixel Sensor Vertex Detector H. Matis, F. Bieser, G. Rai, F. Retiere, S. Wurzel, H. Wieman, E. Yamamato, LBNL S. Kleinfelder,
Astronomical Detectors
Tin Based Absorbers for Infrared Detection, Part 2 Presented By: Justin Markunas Direct energy gap group IV semiconductor alloys and quantum dot arrays.
Solar Cell Operation Key aim is to generate power by:
Silicon PIN Diodes: A Promising Technology for UV-Optical Space Astronomy 11 April 2003 Presentation at NHST Workshop Bernard J. Rauscher, Donald F. Figer,
Metal Semiconductor Field Effect Transistors
Chris Maloney May 10, 2011 Characterization of a Geiger-mode Avalanche Photodiode.
Earth Systems Science Jeff Puschell Jan van Aardt Craig McMurtry John Border Stephanie Sublett.
Mid-IR photon counting array using HgCdTe APDs and the Medipix2 ROIC
Photon Counting Sensors for Future Missions
Breakout Template Don Figer RIT, RIDL 3 IT Collaboratory 2009 Research Symposium Charge to Breakout Sessions Breakout groups will determine: – the most.
Photo courtesy NOAO, taken with LBNL fully depleted CCD Optical Characterization of 1.7  m NIR Detectors for SNAP M. Brown (Michigan), J. Balleza (IDTL),
Zero Read Noise Detectors for the TMT Don Figer, Brian Ashe , John Frye, Brandon Hanold, Tom Montagliano, Don Stauffer (RIDL), Brian Aull, Bob Reich, Dan.
Kansas State University III-Nitride Deep Ultraviolet Photonic Materials and Structures Jingyu Lin & Hongxing Jiang DMR Growth of III-nitride Photonic.
Photo-induced conductance fluctuations in mesoscopic Ge/Si systems with quantum dots N.P. Stepina, A.V. Dvurechenskii, A.I. Nikiforov {1} J. Moers, D.
3/26/2003BAE of 10 Application of photodiodes A brief overview.
H.-G. Moser Max-Planck-Institut for Physics, Munich CALOR 06 Chicago June 5-9, 2006 Silicon Photomultiplier, a new device for low light level photon detection.
Quantum Efficiency Measurements of a NIRSpec infrared sensor in the ODL* Peter McCullough, Project P. I. Mike Regan, ODL Lead Kevin Lindsay Eddie Bergeron.
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
CCDs in space: the effects of radiation on Hubble’s Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) Max Mutchler, David Golimowski (Space Telescope Science Institute),
How to achieve a homogeneous sensitivity in THz detector arrays
CCD Detectors CCD=“charge coupled device” Readout method:
Telescope Guiding with a HyViSI H2RG Used in Guide Mode Lance Simms Detectors for Astronomy /2/09.
Characterization of a Large Format HgCdTe on Silicon Focal Plane Array
AlGaN/InGaN Photocathodes D.J. Leopold and J.H. Buckley Washington University St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A. Large Area Picosecond Photodetector Development.
Performances of the COROT CCDs for high accuracy photometry Pernelle Bernardi and the CCD team From Meudon : Tristan Buey, Vincent Lapeyrere, Régis Schmidt,
10/26/20151 Observational Astrophysics I Astronomical detectors Kitchin pp
SNAP CCD Development Progress Hakeem Oluseyi January 9, 2003.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK)
Fine Pixel CCD for ILC Vertex Detector ‘08 7/31 Y. Takubo (Tohoku U.) for ILC-FPCCD vertex group ILC vertex detector Fine Pixel CCD (FPCCD) Test-sample.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory NU Status-1 JAB 11/20/2015 Advanced Photodiode Development 7 April, 2000 James A. Burns ll.mit.edu.
1 Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (1) S.Gomi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, M.Taguchi, (Kyoto University) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura, (KEK) Oct
Development of CCDs for the SXI We have developed 2 different types of CCDs for the SXI in parallel.. *Advantage =>They are successfully employed for current.
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR CLICPIX2 AND STATUS REPORT ON THE TSV PROJECT Pierpaolo Valerio 1.
Materials Integration of III-V Compounds for Electronic Device Applications The funding for this project has provided us with the means to understand the.
Charge Collection and Trapping in Epitaxial Silicon Detectors after Neutron-Irradiation Thomas Pöhlsen, Julian Becker, Eckhart Fretwurst, Robert Klanner,
TIPS - Oct 13, 2005 M. Sirianni Temperature change for ACS CCDs: initial study on scientific performance M. Sirianni, T. Wheeler, C.Cox, M. Mutchler, A.
Meeting 2014-October WP1 INL : Simulation for Laser Interference Lithography sample (PI32) -2. Possible alternative: patterning of the front electrode.
The Second Generation of IR detectors for WFC3 Massimo Robberto European Space Agency and Space Telescope Science Institute.
The development of the readout ASIC for the pair-monitor with SOI technology ~irradiation test~ Yutaro Sato Tohoku Univ. 29 th Mar  Introduction.
9 th “Trento” Workshop on Advanced Silicon Radiation Detectors Genova, February 26-28, 2014 Centro Nacional de MicroelectrónicaInstituto de Microelectrónica.
Prospects to Use Silicon Photomultipliers for the Astroparticle Physics Experiments EUSO and MAGIC A. Nepomuk Otte Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München.
-1-CERN (11/24/2010)P. Valerio Noise performances of MAPS and Hybrid Detector technology Pierpaolo Valerio.
F Don Lincoln, Fermilab f Fermilab/Boeing Test Results for HiSTE-VI Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
M.Taguchi and T.Nobuhara(Kyoto) HPK MPPC(Multi Pixel Photon Counter) status T2K280m meeting.
25 um pitch 100 um pitch 50 um pitch 25 um pitch Individual SPADs 1 mm APD Nominal “standard” Devices: 25 um pitch ~50% fill factor AR coated > 20% DE?
MOHAMAD KHALIL APC LABORATORY PARIS 17/06/2013 DSSD and SSD Simulation with Silvaco.
Date of download: 9/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Characterization and modelling of signal dynamics in 3D-DDTC detectors
NUV-SiPM short technology description
I. Rashevskaya on behalf of the Slim5 Collaboration, Trieste Group
4x8 Mosaic Camera Development
FINAL YEAR PROJECT 4SSCZ
Detectors of JWST Near IR Instruments
Bernard J. Rauscher Space Telescope Science Institute
SDW, Baltimore Adrien Lamoure
Detector Basics The purpose of any detector is to record the light collected by the telescope. All detectors transform the incident radiation into a some.
Spectral Imager Product
LSST Camera Detector Status
Performance of Science Grade HgCdTe H4RG-15 Image Sensors
Detective Quantum Efficiency Preliminary Design Review
L. Mears, J. Bangs, L. Corrales, J. Getty, C. Keasler, M
Kimberly Kolb, Brandon Hanold, Joong Lee, Don Figer
Computed Tomography (C.T)
Presentation transcript:

Infrared Detectors Grown on Silicon Substrates September 27, 2017 Joong Lee, Don Figer, Liz Corrales, Jonathan Getty, Lynn Mears, Erik Stassinos

Outline Project overview Device design Characterization results Summary Future work

Project Overview Format 2K×2K 8K×8K Pixel Size 20 mm 15 mm Center for Detectors (CfD) and Raytheon Vision Systems (RVS) are developing HgCdTe detectors grown on silicon substrates on a project called SWIR Advanced Technology Instruments for NSF and NASA (SATIN) funded by NSF and NASA. develop cost effective HgCdTe detectors for astronomy by growing them on silicon wafers Significant cost savings are gained through the use of silicon wafers, instead of CdZnTe (CZT) wafers. Si wafers are less expensive than CZT wafers Silicon wafers being available in large sizes, more die per wafer can be printed, reducing cost per die Silicon wafers are available in large sizes, providing for scalability to very large formats. Project goal is to fabricate 1K1K & 2K2K MBE HgCdTe/Si detectors with competitive performance. Parameter Project Goal Long-term Goal Format 2K×2K 8K×8K Pixel Size 20 mm 15 mm Read Noise (Fowler-16) 5 e- 2 e- Wavelength Range 0.4 – 2.5 mm 0.4 – (2.5-5.5) mm Dark Current (e-/s/pixel) <0.05 @80 K (95% Operability) <0.05 @80 K (95% Operability) Substrate Si DQE (w/AR coating) >70% Persistence (after 100% saturation) <0.1%  

Detector Design Over the last few years, we have been studying effects of design changes Current Progress Last fabrication lot produced detectors with high persistence and large tails in per pixel dark current distribution RVS addressed these issues in latest fabrication round by increasing the buffer thickness alternative annealing and substrate removal processes yielded good results on other projects. Three thinned 1K1K devices (F10, F12 & F13) were characterized F13 characterized before and after having the substrate removed allowing for the change in the detector characteristics after thinning to be studied

Conversion Gain/Linearity/Well Depth Conversion gain is measured through photon transfer using flat field illumination Conversion gain of F13 decreased from 3.1 e/ADU before thinning to 2.5 e/ADU after thinning, corresponding to a decrease in pixel capacitance from 47 fF to 38 fF Well Depth ~400,000 e After thinning Linearity = 1+aDN+bDN2 DN – Cumulative Signal a = -1.93  10-6 b = -6.22  10-11 Linearity is ~80% by the time the well is saturated.

Read Noise The read noise is 6 e- (Fowler-16) in both the science pixels (left) and the reference row (right). The read noise is higher in the science pixels of some devices, depending on the growth recipe and the processing steps.

Crosstalk Crosstalk is obtained by identifying cosmic ray hits and the induced signals in the neighboring pixels. Crosstalk is around 0.5% in the nearest neighbors prior to thinning (left). After being thinned, crosstalk increases two- to three-fold (right). Crosstalk nearly identical on F10, F12, and F13 The detectors are back filled with epoxy for mechanical integrity after being thinned. RVS is exploring the option to use softer epoxy which performs better in crosstalk. Softer epoxy added bonus of putting less stress on the lattices which should help with dark current.

Quantum Efficiency Use diode replacement method Cutoff wavelength is 2.7 µm QE ~ 90% at highest point The short wavelength QE extends below 1.1 µm Substrate has been removed QE nearly identical on F10, F12, and F13

Dark Current Dark current of VIRGO-14 increases slowly over increasing temperature, doubling every ~30 K. Very close to meeting project goals at 80 K In comparison with VIRGO-14, F3 and F13 (after being thinned) perform on par or better at 40 K and 60 K but start to diverge at 80 K F10 and F12 are nearly identical to F13

Dark Current VIRGO-14 VIRGO-F3 VIRGO-F13 The mode of the distributions on all three parts nearly identical at 40 K. Virgo-14 has symmetrical dark current distribution Compared to VIRGO-14, the dark current distribution of F3 has a large tail. Compared to F3, F13 has a more symmetrical distribution with a smaller tail. Increasing the buffer thickness reduced the tail in dark current distribution in this fabrication run. F10, F12, and F13 all have smaller tails compared to F3. VIRGO-14 symmetrical.

Persistence Persistence is the increase in dark current after a detector is illuminated. Persistence is quantified in terms of the percentage of the fluence. In this example, the cumulative persistence collected over an hour is 0.4% after being illuminated to a fluence equivalent to 150% of the well depth. Most of persistence is released within the first 1000 seconds. Nearly all persistence is released within one hour.

Persistence Cumulative persistence collected over one hour wavelength = 1.75 µm Persistence low for all fluences for F13 before thinning 0.2% at the highest point After thinning, persistence of F13 is high It can be as high as 1.5% for low fluences Persistence of F3 is just as high as, if not higher than, persistence of F13 after thinning Persistence of F13 before being thinned is an order of magnitude lower than persistence of thinned F13 and F3 Almost meets the project goals F3 is an unthinned device

Persistence Measured wavelength dependence of persistence of thinned F13 The longer the wavelength, the larger the persistence for <100% fluence Correlated with absorption depth Persistence for different wavelengths converge and meet at the same point past 100% fluence The wavelength dependence is also present on F10, F12, and F3 F13, before being thinned, did not have appreciable wavelength dependence

Summary Parameter Project Goal Delivered/Achieved Format 1K1K & 2K2K 1K1K and 2K2K Pixel Size 20 µm 20 um Read Noise (Fowler-16) 5 e- 6 e- Wavelength Range 0.8 – 2.5 um 0.5 – 2.5 um Dark Current (e-/s/pixel)* <0.05 @ 80 K (95% Operability) <0.05 @ 80 K (70% Operability) Substrate Si Minimum readout time (s) 1 0.3 Number of readouts 4,16 4, 16 Reference pixels Yes Reference outputs No Window mode Well size (e-) 300,000 400,000 Gain at unit cell (µV/e-) >8 DQE (w/AR coating) >70% >75% Pixel readout rate (kHz) 100 Readout system SFD Buttability 3-side, <2 mm gap Package not design for large gaps Persistence (after 100% saturation) <0.1% > 0.1% Read noise (Fowler-16) is 6 e- for both science pixels and reference row. Best Dark current achieved at 80 K is 0.05 e/sec (70% operability). F13, before substrate removal, almost meets the project goals for persistence. 0.2% at the highest point On the previous fabrication run, unthinned devices had persistence that is an order of magnitude higher.

Future Work RVS has determined that in order to meet the project goals, the etch pit density (EPD) has to be reduced at least four-fold. RVS has successfully produced experimental wafers that have EPDs that meet the constraints. RVS will only process wafers with EPDs that satisfy the specifications in the next fabrication run.

Acknowledgments Funding: NSF ATI Program, Grant No. AST-1509716 P.I. Don Figer Joong Lee Engineer Brandon Hanold Engineer Engineer Iain Marcuson Engineer Dan Grant PhD, IS Kim Kolb Matt Davis MS, EE Neil Guertin BS, CS MS, EE Jon Zimmermann BS, Physics Mike Every John Hatakeyama BS, EE Tre DiPassio MS, EE BS, ME Kenny Bean I would like to acknowledge all of the students and staff that have contributed to this work at the Center for Detectors. Funding: NSF ATI Program, Grant No. AST-1509716 NASA APRA Program, Grant No. NNX13AH70G 16