The cosmic spin of SMBHs from radio observations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Grand unification of AGN activity across the universe Nikos Fanidakis and C.M. Baugh, R.G. Bower, S. Cole, C. Done, C. S. Frenk 9 th Hellenic Astronomical.
Advertisements

Formation and cosmic evolution of massive black holes
18 July Monte Carlo Markov Chain Parameter Estimation in Semi-Analytic Models Bruno Henriques Peter Thomas Sussex Survey Science Centre.
Federico Marulli, Dipartimento di Astronomia, Università di Bologna Modeling AGN properties in the local Universe Federico Marulli Dipartimento di Astronomia.
AGN Eddington Ratio Distributions
On the nature of AGN in hierarchical galaxy formation models Nikos Fanidakis and C.M. Baugh, R.G. Bower, S. Cole, C. Done, C. S. Frenk Leicester, March.
Felipe Garrido and Jorge Cuadra PUC, Chile XI SOCHIAS Annual Meeting January 2014.
The Radio-Loud/Radio-Quiet Dichotomy of AGN Brandon Kelly Astro 596.
AGN in hierarchical galaxy formation models Nikos Fanidakis and C.M. Baugh, R.G. Bower, S. Cole, C. Done, C. S. Frenk Accretion and ejection in AGN, Como,
Quasar Luminosity Functions at High Redshifts Gordon Richards Drexel University With thanks to Michael Strauss, Xiaohui Fan, Don Schneider, and Linhua.
Felipe Garrido (PUC), Jorge Cuadra (PUC), Alberto Sesana (AEI) and Takamitsu Tanaka (MPA) IAU Symposium 312: “Black Holes and Clusters across cosmic time”
Towards the Grand Unification of AGNs in Hierarchical Cosmologies Nikos Fanidakis and C.M. Baugh, R.G. Bower, S. Cole, C. Done, C.S. Frenk January 30,
A Unified, Merger-Driven Model of the Origin of Starbursts, Quasars, the Cosmic X-Ray Background, Supermassive Black Holes, and Galaxy Spheroids Hopkins,
AGN in hierarchical galaxy formation models Nikos Fanidakis and C.M. Baugh, R.G. Bower, S. Cole, C. Done, C. S. Frenk Physics of Galactic Nuclei, Ringberg.
Cosmological evolution of Black Hole Spins Nikos Fanidakis and C. Baugh, S. Cole, C. Frenk NEB-XIII, Thessaloniki, June 4-6, 2008.
Advanced Methods for Studying Astronomical Populations: Inferring Distributions and Evolution of Derived (not Measured!) Quantities Brandon C. Kelly (CfA,
Felipe Garrido Goicovic Supervisor: Jorge Cuadra PhD thesis project January 2014.
Transitional Millisecond pulsars as accretion probes
I N T R O D U C T I O N The mechanism of galaxy formation involves the cooling and condensation of baryons inside the gravitational potential well provided.
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.
Gravitational Waves from Massive Black-Hole Binaries Stuart Wyithe (U. Melb) NGC 6420.
The Black-Hole – Halo Mass Relation and High Redshift Quasars Stuart Wyithe Avi Loeb (The University of Melbourne) (Harvard University) Fan et al. (2001)
Obscured AGN and XRB models Andrea Comastri (INAF-OABologna-Italy) Roberto Gilli (INAF-OABologna-Italy) F. Fiore (INAF-OARoma-Italy) G. Hasinger (MPE-Garching-
Cosmological Galaxy Formation
THE HST VIEW OF LINERS AND OTHER LOCAL AGN MARCO CHIABERGE CNR - Istituto di Radioastronomia - Bologna Alessandro Capetti (INAF-OATo) Duccio Macchetto.
Black Hole Spin Properties of 130 AGN Ruth A. Daly Penn State University
The Accretion History of SMBHs in Massive Galaxies Kate Brand STScI Collaborators: M. Brown, A. Dey, B. Jannuzi, and the XBootes and Bootes MIPS teams.
Spins of supermassive black holes in quasars and galaxies Jian-Min Wang ( 王建民 ) Institute of High Energy Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing Dec.
Black hole accretion history of active galactic nuclei 曹新伍 中国科学院上海天文台.
Super Massive Black Holes The Unknown Astrophysics of their initial formation.
The dependence on redshift of quasar black hole masses from the SLOAN survey R. Decarli Università dell’Insubria, Como, Italy A. Treves Università dell’Insubria,
Evolution of Accretion Disks around Massive Black Holes: Constraints from the Demography of Active Galactic Nuclei Qingjuan Yu UC Berkeley April 21, 2006.
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club A Massive Protocluster of Galaxies at a Redshift of z ~ P. L. Capak et al. 2011, Nature, in press (arXive: )
The luminosity-dependent evolution of the radio luminosity function Emma Rigby University of Nottingham Collaborators: P. Best, M. Brookes, J. Dunlop,
A synthesis model for AGN evolution: unveiling SMBH growth with (past and future) X- ray surveys Ringberg Meeting, 2/2008 Andrea Merloni Max-Planck Institut.
“Black hole spin and radioloudness in a ΛCDM universe” Claudia Lagos (PUC, Chile) Nelson Padilla (PUC, Chile) Sofía Cora (UNLP, Argentina) SOCHIAS 2008.
Tools for computing the AGN feedback: radio-loudness and the kinetic luminosity function Gabriele Melini Fabio La Franca Fabrizio Fiore Active Galactic.
AGN in the VVDS (Bongiorno, Gavignaud, Zamorani et al.) 1.What has been done: main results on Type 1 AGN evolution and accretion properties of faint AGN.
Maracalagonis, 24/05/ Semi-Analytic Modeling of Galaxy Formation PhD student: Elena Ricciardelli Supervisor: prof. Alberto Franceschini.
Models of Black Holes and Black Box Models
The Origin and Structure of Elliptical Galaxies
The role of galaxy mergers in triggering AGN Sara Ellison (University of Victoria) Shobita Satyapal (GMU), Ryan Hickox (Dartmouth), Dave Patton (Trent),
Growth of SMBH studied through X-ray surveys
The formation and dynamical state of the brightest cluster galaxies
Long GRB rate in the binary merger model
Cosmological evolution of supermassive black holes and AGN: a synthesis model for accretion and feedback Andrea Merloni Excellence Cluster Universe &
The black hole fundamental plane: revisit with a larger sample of radio and X-ray emitting broad line AGNs Zhao-Yu Li Astronomy Department, Peking University.
LoCuSS: An XMM survey of X-ray groups being accreted by massive clusters Chris Haines (INAF - OA Brera, Milano) Alexis Finoguenov (Helsinki,
Clustering of galaxies around AGN in the HSC Wide survey
Biases in Virial Black Hole Masses: an SDSS Perspective
AY202a Galaxies & Dynamics Lecture 14: AGN: The Unified Model
HERSCHEL and Galaxies/AGN “dust and gas”
Supernova in images of Greg Thorne and Nick McCaw
Why only a small fraction of quasars are radio loud?
Announcements Observing Monday-Thursday of this week counts on the third exam. Fourth exam is Wednesday, November 17 Review will be Monday, November 15.
The origin nuclear X-ray emission in the nuclei of radio galaxy-FR Is
- = + = Quasars, Mergers, and the Formation of Elliptical Galaxies
Shuang-Nan Zhang, Yuan Liu, Jin Zhang Institute of High Energy Physics
(Taken from Beeston et al., 2018)
Li Shuang-Liang Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, China
Center for Gravitational Wave Physics Penn State University
Black Holes and Accretion: Observational Frontiers
Super Massive Black Holes
Demographics of SDSS Quasars in Two-Dimension
The merger-AGN connection since z~1: causal or circumstantial?
Radio-loud quasars in SDSS DR3
Galactic Astronomy 銀河物理学特論 I Lecture 3-3: Stellar mass function of galaxies Seminar: Perez-Gonzalez et al. 2008, ApJ, 675, 234 Lecture: 2012/01/16.
Cosmological Evolution of the Duty Cycle of Quasars
The 1/Vmax SMF for the high-redshift samples.
Borislav Nedelchev et al. 2019
Presentation transcript:

The cosmic spin of SMBHs from radio observations Alejo Martínez Sansigre (ICG-Portsmouth) & Steve Rawlings (Oxford)

Bolometric Luminosity Assumptions: Bolometric Luminosity Jet power e.g. Mckinney (2005), Hawley & Krolik (2006), Nemmen et al. (2007), Benson & Babul (2009), Tchekhovskoy et al. (2010). Leiden, Feb 2011

Bolometric Luminosity Assumptions: Bolometric Luminosity Accretion rate Jet power e.g. Mckinney (2005), Hawley & Krolik (2006), Nemmen et al. (2007), Benson & Babul (2009), Tchekhovskoy et al. (2010). Leiden, Feb 2011

Bolometric Luminosity Assumptions: Radiative efficiency Bolometric Luminosity Accretion rate Jet power Jet efficiency e.g. Mckinney (2005), Hawley & Krolik (2006), Nemmen et al. (2007), Benson & Babul (2009), Tchekhovskoy et al. (2010). Leiden, Feb 2011

Radio loudness of quasars?

Radio-loudness of quasars Spin Accretion Data from Cirasuolo et al. (2003) Martinez-Sansigre & Rawlings (2011) Leiden, Feb 2011

Can we explain the radio luminosity function?

The radio LF P. Best private communication Leiden, Feb 2011

Modelling the HEGs with QSOs Can convert Lx to accretion rate Silverman et al. (2008) Leiden, Feb 2011

Modelling the LEGs with ADAFs BH mass function Graham et al. (2007) Leiden, Feb 2011

Modelling the LEGs with ADAFs Distribution of Eddington ratios (flat prior due to ignorance) BH mass function Graham et al. (2007) Leiden, Feb 2011

Fit to the RLF Leiden, Feb 2011

Best-fitting distributions Leiden, Feb 2011

Prediction z=1 RLF Radio LFs from Willott et al. (2001) and Smolcic et al. (2009) Martinez-Sansigre & Rawlings (2011) Leiden, Feb 2011

Compare to cosmological simulations Fanidakis et al. (2010) Martinez-Sansigre & Rawlings (2011) Leiden, Feb 2011

Spin history Low-z Low accn rate High-z High spin peak High accn rate All spin low Leiden, Feb 2011

Chaotic accretion + mergers Chaotic accretion leads to low spins Martinez-Sansigre & Rawlings (2011) Leiden, Feb 2011

Chaotic accretion + mergers Chaotic accretion leads to low spins Recent major mergers lead to high spins Martinez-Sansigre & Rawlings (2011) Leiden, Feb 2011

Interpretation Physically, at z=0 the radio LF is dominated by low-accretion rate objects with high spins A small fraction, however, originates in high-accretion rate objects with low spin At higher redshifts, the density of high-accretion low-spin objects increases, an they eventually dominate the radio LF. This means that the mean spin is higher at low redshift, and lower at high redshift. This is consistent with the picture of chaotic accretion spinning SMBHs down, and major mergers spinning them up. Leiden, Feb 2011

Thank you! For more info: Martínez-Sansigre & Rawlings, MNRAS (2011), ArXiv: 1102.2228 Leiden, Feb 2011

Parametric forms for spin distribution Power-law distribution Leiden, Feb 2011

Parametric forms for spin distribution Single-gaussian distribution Leiden, Feb 2011

Parametric forms for spin distribution Double gaussian distribution Leiden, Feb 2011

Parametric forms for spin distribution Bayesian evidence chooses the double gaussian Leiden, Feb 2011

Jet efficiency e.g. Mckinney (2005), Hawley & Krolik (2006), Nemmen et al. (2007), Benson & Babul (2009), Tchekhovskoy et al. (2010). Leiden, Feb 2011

Comparison to entire RLF Leiden, Feb 2011 Martinez-Sansigre & Rawlings (2011)

Spin-down: chaotic accretion Infalling gas from the galaxy is NOT expected to all be in the same angular momentum plane Co- or counter-alignment will occur depending on relative J and orientation Overall effect is for chaotic accretion to spin down a rapidly rotating SMBH, typically to a~0.1 King et al. (2006,2008) Leiden, Feb 2011

Spin history Martinez-Sansigre & Rawlings (2011) Leiden, Feb 2011

Spin-up mechanism: BH mergers Major mergers of low spin BHs leads to high spin coalesced BHs. BH merger formula from Rezzolla et al. (2008) Leiden, Feb 2011

Spin-up mechanism: BH mergers Assume a Poisson distribution with a mean of 0.7 major mergers (following Robaina et al. 2010) BH merger formula from Rezzolla et al. (2008) Leiden, Feb 2011

ADAF component Leiden, Feb 2011

QSO component Leiden, Feb 2011

Radiative efficiency Novikov & Thorne (1973), Mckinney & Gammie (2004), Beckwith et al. (2008,) Noble et al. (2009), Penna et al. (2010) Leiden, Feb 2011

Producing jets Figure from: J. Krolik’s webpage Leiden, Feb 2011