~ WELCOME ~ 2017 October Convening Hosted by California State University East Bay & San Jose State University Play Video https://vimeo.com/234691424 WiFi Marriot_Conference AVMS456 Tweet #CPED2017 www.facebook.com/cpedinitiative/

State of CPED Welcome Address Jill A. Perry, Executive Director October 2017 Convening – Oakland, CA

Creating New Futures: Thinking Differently to Build a Better World Relate to each other as practitioners Emphasize our collective work to improve the EdD Collaborate in meaningful and intentional ways to improve educational practice Celebrate our creative differences across members Serve as role models to our students Creating New Futures: Thinking Differently to Build a Better World  

Messages from June 2017 Is what GOT you here today enough to GET you where we want to go tomorrow? How can CPED Members: Keep our research practice innovative? Ensure & improve the centrality of addressing pressing problems of practice? Community of Innovators Investigate our “active site” Make our evidence of change public Invite others to critique our learning Pass it on for continuous improvement

SOEs Graduates Shared IMPACT Programs Faculty SOEs Problems of Practice Graduates Shared IMPACT We are Practitioners w/ shared Commitment for EdD Redesign We are Networked Improvement Community.

HARVARD ED PUBLICATION GROUP (HEPG) BOOK PROPOSAL RESPONSE Whether this book makes a significant contribution to the “field” depends heavily on whether schools of education are interested in its emphasis upon doctoral education in improving educational practice. So far that is very weak subject. While many graduate schools of education profess to prepare practitioners at the doctoral level in ways that will improve educational practice, so far few are able to do so effectively, regularly and widely. Most are still caught in explaining the problem, not in fixing it. Hence, programs that claim to make doctoral graduates able to remedy the educational flaws found in the US and thus improve educational practice lack broad public support for their enterprise. If such programs were ever able to provide compelling evidence for their claims, undoubtedly they would be in great demand since without question such skills would be extremely valuable. If the authors had evidence that doctoral preparation in education was truly changing as a result of their efforts, then this book would be very useful.

Spencer 2009: Graduate Outcome FIPSE 2010-2014: SOE change WT Grant Study 2017-2020: Graduate Research Evidence Use CPED Report 2017: History, demographics, Framework

Norms of Engagement   1) CPED members engage with each other to make decisions about the EdD. 2) CPED members are active, respectful, and courteous listeners. 3) To ensure the highest quality education doctorate programs, CPED members serve each other as critical friends. 4) CPED members respect and value the time they have together and apart. 5) CPED members share ideas and resources. 6) When information is shared or data are gathered within an institution, or across the consortium, it is credited and kept confidential. 7) CPED members collaborate with various organizations. 8) CPED members promote CPED. 9) CPED members strive for excellence through high impact practices and continuous improvement. 10) CPED members promote accessibility and inclusion.

for your commitment, hard work, willingness. THANK YOU for your commitment, hard work, willingness.

CPED Board of Directors David Imig, University of Maryland, Chair David Rock, Dean, University of Mississippi Virginia Roach, Dean, Fordham University Jay Fiene, Dean, CSU San Bernardino Jon Pedersen, Dean, University of South Carolina Gaetane Jean-Marie, Northern Iowa University Valerie Kinloch, Dean, University of Pittsburgh, ex officio Jennifer K. Rice, Dean, University of Maryland, ex officio Jill Perry, Executive Director, ex officio Retiring Member: Lucindia Chance, Georgia Southern University CPED Board of Directors 2017-2018

iLead AIM STRATEGY To prepare school and teacher leaders capable of engaging in continuous improvement toward dual goals of equity and excellence In their locality Create Exemplary Instructional Programs Local Workforce Development Build Repositories for Instructional Resources in Improvement Science Deepen Higher Education Institutions in Local Service by enhancing the demand side Create a Scholarship Production Infrastructure for Improvement Science

iLEAD’s Nested Communities Interest Engagement Practice Collaborate in creating design, research, and strategy Access to iLEAD products Attend iLEAD meeting at the Carnegie Summit Participate in Higher Education Network Contribute to the knowledge repository iLead pilot program in place by June 2019 Pilot iLEAD program in place by June 2018. iLEAD cohort in place by Augu2018 Consensus 3-year development plan for connecting continuous improvement to degree programs 2019 Participate in iLEAD design convenings Participate in documenting progress of iLEAD teams