Instructional Leadership Team: Implementation Woodland Middle School

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Advertisements

A Guide to Implementation
The Classroom-Focused Improvement Process
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Unwrapping the Standards to Develop Learning Targets
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Debbie C. Hester Austin ISD July 9 & 11, 2012 Texas Turnaround Center.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
SAM for “Really Smart Dummies” Peggy Goodman, Principal Christine Douthart, Assistant Principal Cindy Bloodworth, Administrative Assistant Five Forks.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Leadership Through An Instructional Lens Dr. Krista D. Parent Oregon Leadership Network Institute April 22, 2009.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
AGENDA  A teacher’s perspective  Barb Schmidt Stevens High School  Acacia Trevillyan South Park Elementary  Review steps to create a quality CFA 
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
Rationale for the Evaluation Frameworks Project Previous Paradigm in Our State A Compliance Exercise, Often Based Solely on Positional Authority.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Together, we can make a difference.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
WCPSS Coaching Framework Strengthening Consistency, Cohesion, and Clarity for Coaches in WCPSS.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
CAPS: COACHING TEACHERS Facilitator: Dr. Lynne Paradis BELIZE LITERACY PROGRAM June 2011.
Gradual Release of Responsibility PD: Focus Lesson: Instructional Model By: Tracey Klell.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
You ARE the Leader of Learning Frederick Brown Learning Principal Supervisor Summit Ft. Lauderdale, FL May 12-13,
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building the Capacity of Principals to Lead the Improvement of Instruction A Presentation by the Charlotte.
Continuous School Improvement & ASSIST ACIP Dr. Melissa Shields, NBCT
Summer Leadership August 7-9, 2017
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
By: Alice Tackett and Jill Maynard
Huntsville City Schools
A. Tracie Brown & Dr. Christi Buell Area Superintendents Arlington ISD
Jeff McCoy, Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology
Comprehensive Planning
PLC Team Meetings September 13, 2016 Nimitz Middle School
School Self-Evaluation 
Cesar Chavez Academy Lower Elementary
Collaborative Inquiry and Professional Learning Communities
PLCs and the high performing, High Poverty school
Quality Comprehensive Improvement System
School Redesign and SRCL Implementation
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting November, 2013
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting September, 2013
School Improvement Plans and School Data Teams
Jean Scott & Logan Searcy July 22, MEGA
Implementing Effective Professional Learning Communities
Exploring The Power of C!
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012
Chicago Public Schools
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores!
Building Coherence: P. S
Implementing Race to the Top
Goal Progress Measure 1.1 Update September 26, 2017 Academics Division
GROWING ALL STUDENTS THROUGH HIGH-QUALITY ASSIGNMENTS
Mileposts Demo Sandbox
©Joan Sedita, Kinds of PD Follow Up ©Joan Sedita,
Do Now Think about a time when someone gave you feedback that actually led to a change in practice. What was it about that feedback that led to positive.
Exploring The Power of C!
Using data for instructional decision-making
Building impactful instructional leadership teams
New Prospect Elementary School
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Our Leadership Journey
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
Presentation transcript:

Instructional Leadership Team: Implementation Woodland Middle School Presenters: Doretha Melton, Assistant Principal Riki Gilliam, Administrative Assistant Monique Johnson, Model Teacher Leader-Math Dr. Jason Stamper, Principal

PLCs in August

PLCs in March

Purpose and Outcomes: We will collaborate to support instructional practices and professional growth in all Woodland Middle School staff members to positively impact student growth and achievement.

Instruction Standard #3 Focus Area: Instruction Standard #3 Establishes and communicates clear learning targets and success criteria aligned to curriculum standards Georgia School Performance Standards

IMPLEMENTATION: Phase I: Leading The Change Process Phase II: Develop Structures, Systems, and Processes Phase III: “The Work”

Leading The Change: Assistant Principals Leverage Leadership: Paul Bambrick-Santoyo Create a collaborative and cohesive environment focused on student achievement Establish Clear Expectations and Roles for all ILT members Lead the PLC Observe and give feedback (without evaluation) Model Lesson Co-teach Side-by-side coaching Coach 4. OneNote and Yammer

Develop Structures, Systems, and Processes: * Meeting Dates * Topics * Presenters (Building Capacity) * Agendas WMS ILT Agenda Dec 8.docx * Instructional Expectations (lesson plans, collaborative content meeting and notes, Academic Content Collaboration Meeting(1).doc co-teaching collaboration, etc) * Model, Practice, Monitor, Feedback, Reflection

Tight Versus Loose Tight: “The What” Loose: “The How” All PLC’s will have established norms Each PLC may establish their own norms All PLCs will meet a minimum of twice a week on Tuesday and Wednesday Location of the meeting   Each staff member must have a PLC binder with standards, “I can” statements (Learning Targets), AZ curriculum guides, most recent assessment data, and previous week’s lesson plans at every meeting. Binder can be electronic or a hard copy Purpose and intended outcome of each meeting must be established using some form of data (Team based, surveys, test results, observations, etc.) Completed collaboration and data dig documentation uploaded in Edmodo after PLC weekly Who is responsible for completing the documentation (it can change weekly) Each ILT content leader will establish a weekly meeting with like content leaders to calibrate content progress and needs (i.e. 6th, 7th and 8th grade ELA ILT leaders will meet weekly) Meeting day and time will be flexible

Common Expectations “The Work”: Instructional Leadership Team Standard-Based Instructional Boards Instructional Framework Observation, Feedback and Monitoring Coaching Cycle and Co-Teaching

Standard Based Instructional Boards

Standard-Based Instructional Boards

Standard-Based Instructional Boards Common Expectations: *Standard *Essential Question *Learning Target

Instructional Framework: Gradual Release

Common Expectations “The Work”: Instructional Leadership Team Standard-Based Instructional Boards Instructional Framework Observation, Feedback and Monitoring Coaching Cycle and Co-Teaching

Observation and Feedback The primary purpose of observation should not be to judge the quality of teachers, but to find the most effective ways to coach them to improve student learning.

Activity View the short video clip At your table identify examples of the six steps of effective feedback. How would this feedback lead to effective coaching? https://www.yammer.com/fultonschools.org/#/files/76071158

Observation and feedback are only fully effective when leaders systematically track which teachers have been observed, what feedback they have received, and whether that feedback has improved their practice.

Common Expectations “The Work”: Instructional Leadership Team Standard-Based Instructional Boards Instructional Framework Observation, Feedback and Monitoring Coaching Cycle and Co-Teaching

“When Providing Feedback is not Enough: Using Co-teaching strategies to grow your teachers.”

Has this ever happened to you? Providing Feedback

What’s Next? Now that you’ve done observations and given feedback and the behavior has not changed…

How would you go about supporting that teacher to change the behavior? Think—Pair—Share

Collaborative Teaching using Co-teaching strategies There are several co-teaching models that are quite useful for instructional coaching. They are used to help give specific, direct, effective feedback for mentoring and guidance to bring about positive instructional change.

Co-teaching Strategies One Teach, One Observe One Teach, One Assist Station Teaching Team Teaching Alternative/Differentiated Teaching

Chalk Talk Now lets revisit our struggling teachers and use one of the co-teaching strategies to support.

Graffiti Wall Create a #hashtag describing your plans for a successful ILT. Ex: #planningwithapurpose