Planning Commission Hearing March 16, 2017 City of Woodland General Plan Team Update

Next Steps Two public hearings before the Planning Commission March 2 #1 Staff presentation, questions, public comments March 16 #2 Clarifications, discussion and recommendation to the City Council Two public hearings before the City Council April 4 #1 Staff presentation, questions, public comments April 18 #2 Clarifications, discussion and intent motions

Woodland Planning Area (Urban Limit Line – Voter approved 2006) Yolo County Yolo County

Woodland’s General Plan History 1958 City’s First General Plan Preserve residential character and develop amore complete central business district. Anticipated rapid growth to the south and west of CRs 25 and 98 1979 Full General Plan Update Five year study process. City established an urban limit line and phasing plan accompanied by an urban development policy with the County 1988 Revised General Plan Allowed new development East of CR 101 and South of I-5 as the next phase (Southeast Area) City adopted the Southeast Area Specific Plan in 1990 1996 General Plan approved by vote on November 5, 1996 Provided for growth to the South and West of CR 102, created Urban Reserve for lands east of CR 102 except for the Gateway I center location.

Woodland’s General Plan History 1958 City’s First General Plan Preserve residential character and develop amore complete central business district. Anticipated rapid growth to the south and west of CRs 25 and 98 1979 Full General Plan Update Five year study process. City established an urban limit line and phasing plan accompanied by an urban development policy with the County 1988 Revised General Plan Allowed new development East of CR 101 and South of I-5 as the next phase (Southeast Area) City adopted the Southeast Area Specific Plan in 1990 1996 General Plan approved by vote on November 5, 1996 Provided for growth to the South and West of CR 102, created Urban Reserve for lands east of CR 102 except for the Gateway I center location.

Woodland’s General Plan History 1958 City’s First General Plan Preserve residential character and develop amore complete central business district. Anticipated rapid growth to the south and west of CRs 25 and 98 1979 Full General Plan Update Five year study process. City established an urban limit line and phasing plan accompanied by an urban development policy with the County 1988 Revised General Plan Allowed new development East of CR 101 and South of I-5 as the next phase (Southeast Area) City adopted the Southeast Area Specific Plan in 1990 1996 General Plan approved by vote on November 5, 1996 Provided for growth to the South and West of CR 102, created Urban Reserve for lands east of CR 102 except for the Gateway I center location.

Woodland’s General Plan History 1958 City’s First General Plan Preserve residential character and develop more complete central business district. Anticipated rapid growth to the south and west of CRs 25 and 98 1979 Full General Plan Update Five year study process. City established an urban limit line and phasing plan accompanied by an urban development policy with the County 1988 Revised General Plan Allowed new development East of CR 101 and South of I-5 as the next phase (Southeast Area) City adopted the Southeast Area Specific Plan in 1990 1996 General Plan approved by vote on November 5, 1996 Provided for growth to the South and West of CR 102, created Urban Reserve for lands east of CR 102 except for the Gateway I center location.

Voter approved General Plan Voter approved Urban Limit Line Key Development Decisions Southeast Area Specific Plan Downtown Specific Plan Voter approved General Plan Spring Lake Specific Plan and EIR Community Facilities and Infrastructure Voter approved Urban Limit Line Infrastructure Investment – WPCF and WDCWA 1990 1993 1996 2001 2004 2006 2010

Voter approved General Plan Voter approved Urban Limit Line Key Development Decisions Southeast Area Specific Plan Downtown Specific Plan Voter approved General Plan Spring Lake Specific Plan and EIR Community Facilities and Infrastructure Voter approved Urban Limit Line Infrastructure Investment – WPCF and WDCWA 1990 1993 1996 2001 2004 2006 2010

Voter approved General Plan Voter approved Urban Limit Line Key Development Decisions Southeast Area Specific Plan Downtown Specific Plan Voter approved General Plan Spring Lake Specific Plan and EIR Community Facilities and Infrastructure Voter approved Urban Limit Line Infrastructure Investment – WPCF and WDCWA 1990 1993 1996 2001 2004 2006 2010

Voter approved General Plan Voter approved Urban Limit Line Key Development Decisions Southeast Area Specific Plan Downtown Specific Plan Voter approved General Plan Spring Lake Specific Plan and EIR Community Facilities and Infrastructure Voter approved Urban Limit Line Infrastructure Investment – WPCF and WDCWA 1990 1993 1996 2001 2004 2006 2010

Voter approved General Plan Voter approved Urban Limit Line Key Development Decisions Southeast Area Specific Plan Downtown Specific Plan Voter approved General Plan Spring Lake Specific Plan and EIR Community Facilities and Infrastructure Voter approved Urban Limit Line Infrastructure Investment – WPCF and WDCWA 1990 1993 1996 2001 2004 2006 2010

Voter approved General Plan Voter approved Urban Limit Line Key Development Decisions Southeast Area Specific Plan Downtown Specific Plan Voter approved General Plan Spring Lake Specific Plan and EIR Community Facilities and Infrastructure Voter approved Urban Limit Line Infrastructure Investment – WPCF and WDCWA 1990 1993 1996 2001 2004 2006 2010

Voter approved General Plan Voter approved Urban Limit Line Key Development Decisions Southeast Area Specific Plan Downtown Specific Plan Voter approved General Plan Spring Lake Specific Plan and EIR Community Facilities and Infrastructure Voter approved Urban Limit Line Infrastructure Investment – WPCF and WDCWA 1990 1993 1996 2001 2004 2006 2010

Key Decisions continued – Approval of 1996 General Plan and Spring Lake Specific Plan and EIR in 2001

PCP Irrigation and Solids Application Area Footnote: A thorough soils analysis should be prepared as part of any future environmental review conducted as part of Specific Plan area proposal.

Community Vision and Guiding Principals Quality and Character Orderly Development Historic Downtown Economic Development Mobility Options Housing Choice Agricultural Heritage Safety Environmental Stewardship Public Services Health and Recreation Quality Education

General Plan Elements Land Use Circulation Economic Public Healthy Growth Alternative Considerations – all GP policies, one should not carry more weight over the others.

Community Assessment Key Considerations Build Compactly Connect to existing physical, social and economic networks Minimize community risk and maximize fiscal return in both near term and long term decisions Create the new homes and jobs for Woodland’s millennials and for future generations.

Existing & Possible Future Community Services PCP - 18 inch diameter pipe (private facility) D o w n t o w n New Fire Station and Police Beat Fire Station Community Sports Park

Existing & Possible Future Infrastructure Investment Cache Creek Flood Protection Required Surface Water Facility New CR-103 Interchange D o w n t o w n West Bypass Levee flood protection required WPCF Protection Relocate PCP Spray Field Spring Lake Infrastructure Investment

Recommendation Adopt Resolution No. PC 17-01 recommending to the City Council: Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH # 2013032015) for the 2035 General Plan and based on findings of fact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and Adoption of the final 2035 General Plan and final Climate Action Plan

March 2, 2017

July 8, 2016