Depths of Knowledge and Reading

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Revised CSOs Denise White, WVDE. 21 st Century Learning Mission To grow the seeds of greatness in every child, teaching them to achieve to their fullest.
Advertisements

2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12)
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Division of Youth Services Oct 26, 2012 Common Core & the Content Areas.
Aligning Depth of Knowledge with the TEKS and the STAAR
Understanding Depth 0f knowledge
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Please print the three Cognitive Rigor Matrices full page. Thanks!
Science Break Out Session New Math and Science Teacher Dec 2008 Becky Smith.
Standards Scaling– Teacher Leaders LMS Team
An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D.
An Overview of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge USD 457. Objectives CO – Analyze and apply the four levels of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. LO – Read for the purpose of understanding.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Differentiating the Curriculum Bloom’s Taxonomy of the Cognitive Domain (Benjamin Bloom) Elements of Depth and Complexity (Sandra Hall Kaplan)
Make Connections while they read
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Building Effective Assessments. Agenda  Brief overview of Assess2Know content development  Assessment building pre-planning  Cognitive factors  Building.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
Modified from Depth of Knowledge presentation by Dr. Robin Smith at 2009 PRESA Leadership Conference… Adapted from Kentucky Department of Education, Mississippi.
A scale of cognitive demand.  Code with a ? to indicate that you have never heard of this,  Code with a + to indicate that you know something about.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Depth of Knowledge and Cognitive Demand QualityCore Professional Development Day 1, 2–1.
Teachers Helping Teachers with Rigor/Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Presented by NHCS Gifted Education Specialists.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Setting The Stage: Placemat Activity At your tables, get in groups of four and assign one box per person Take a moment and independently brainstorm important.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Learning Targets January 21, 2008 Londa Richter & Jo Hartmann TIE.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Depth of Knowledge and the Cognitive Rigor Matrix 1.
PLANTING THE SEEDS OF RIGOR Region I Principals’ Meeting November 5, 2010.
Selected Responses How deep does the question dig?????
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
Depth Level of Complexity Adapted from ILT to ILD, Moving Texas Forward 2002 FactsTopicsConceptsGeneralization Principle Synthesis Evaluation Analysis.
Today’s Learning Target I can explain how Webb’s Depth of Knowledge compliments Bloom’s Taxonomy to build rigor in the classroom.
How to design better questions!
From Infusing Rigor & Research into Instruction and Assessment presentation USOE, Salt Lake City, UT February 25-26, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D. Center for.
With great power comes great responsibility.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,
What is RIGOR in the Math Classroom?. Presenter Introduction: Stephanie Darley East Valley RttT Math Coach Curriculum Coach at DHHS Been with TLG for.
Write your personal definition of “cognitive rigor” What do rigorous academic environments look and sound like?
Depth of Knowledge Civic Literacy Teacher Network Social Studies.
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
Goals and Objectives  Why Use Questioning Strategies?  Effective Questioning Techniques  Levels of Questioning…Increasing Understanding, Models for.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
1 Cognitive Demand in Problems  Cognitive demand is a measure of what the instructional question (a question posed during class) or test item requires.
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
The Role of the School Librarian & Media Specialist In the Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Process South Carolina Department of Education Steve Driscoll,
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Bridging Assessment and Instruction
Depth of knowledge (dok)
About This Document The Cognitive Rigor (CR) Matrix (created by Karin Hess by combining Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge) is the primary.
Preparation for the American Literature Eoc
Preplanning Presentation
Norman L Webb.
Arroyo Valley High School August 19, 2013
Assessment and Higher-Order Thinking
Hess Cognitive Rigor Matrix
Presentation transcript:

Depths of Knowledge and Reading Questions to ask to promote deeper thinking about reading Curriculum Connection January 25, 2012

Norman Webb, a Wisconsin research scientist and mathematics educator (1997) There are four DOK levels, level 1 (recall), level 2 (skill/concept), level 3 (strategic thinking), and level 4 (extended thinking), and they are applicable to all subject areas and at all grade levels, including college.

Complex thinking vs hard questions DOK is about complexity, not difficulty. Hard: Name all the presidents of the United States beginning with George Washington. DOK 1 Complex: After a study on the American Revolution, research & explain reasons why George Washington did not want to be “king” of the United States. DOK 4

Academic Rigor in a Thinking Curriculum The DOK level describes the kind of thinking involved in the task, not whether it will be completed correctly. A greater DOK level requires greater conceptual understanding and cognitive processing by the students. Therefore, on average, students who reach greater DOK levels more regularly will have increased student achievement.

Recall and Reproduction Level 1 Descriptors: Recall and Reproduction Recall or recognition of a fact and/or information, (definitions, terms, dates, etc.) required to complete a problem or task.

DOK 1 Question Stems Who is the main character? What is the setting? Where does the story take place? What happens first?... Then… Next?

Level 1 From Charlotte’s Web #1. Who is in the story? What has happened so far? DOK Level 1- Recall and Reproduction – recall basic facts or identify key events in context- Knowledge

Level 2 Descriptors: Skills and Concepts Using information, using conceptual knowledge, selecting and/or applying appropriate procedure(s); includes the engagement of some mental processing beyond recalling or reproducing a response; requires a decision as to how to approach a problem or task.

DOK 2 Question Stems What can you say about the characters so far? Or…. What are you learning about the characters? How would you compare what happens to the main character to your life? Contrast_____? How is the main character like you? Different?

Level 2 From Charlotte’s Web #3.What theories are we developing about the characters? DOK Level 2 Skills & Concepts- make basic inferences or logical predictions from text- Comprehension

Level 3 Descriptors: Strategic Thinking Requires reasoning, developing a plan for approaching a problem or task, decision making, justification, and complex thinking.

Level 3 From Charlotte’s Web #2. What could this story be about? “This could be a story about…” DOK 3 Strategic Thinking/Reasoning Make inferences about theme or author’s purpose. Comprehension

Level 3 From Charlotte’s Web #4. The story started with…Now let’s add some details we learned from further on in the text. Let’s look at the way the characters interact, what they say to each other and what that means about their relationships with each other. Look at how Fern and her dad talk to each other. Look at what Mother says. What about Avery. DOK 3- Explain, generalize, or connect ideas using supporting text. Comprehension

Level 3 Charlotte’s Web #5. Reread and notice any words that may be a symbol or a hint at something in the story or may have a deeper meaning. What are the specific word choices that help shape meaning in the text? DOK 3- Analyze interrelationships among text elements, situations, events, or ideas. Analysis

Level 3 Charlotte’s Web #6. Think about the structure of this chapter. What will be the structure of this text based on this chapter? (Where are we in time and how does that move?) DOK Level 3 – Analyze an essay Analysis

Level 3 Charlotte’s Web #7. Whose point of view is represented in this chapter? How does the author show it? DOK Level 3- Synthesize information within one source or text. Synthesis

DOK 3 Question Stems What conclusions can you draw from the way the characters interact, what they say to each other and what that means about their relationships with each other? Why did the author……? Choose this setting, put this character in the story? What do you think about this story? Support your rationale. What facts would you select to support____? (logical argument) How will this story go based on what you know about stories like this one?

When they say, “I don’t know.” You say, “SUPPOSE YOU DID KNOW?”

Level 4 Descriptors: Extended Thinking An investigation or application that requires time to research, think, and process multiple conditions of the problem or task; includes non-routine manipulations or connections across disciplines/content areas/multiple sources.

Level 4 Extensions Reader’s notebooks Reading and writing connection Making connections across text (i.e. author study, series) Read non fiction text to gain more information that relates to the book or series you are currently reading (farm life, spiders) Research about the author Compare the movie and the book (discussion or writing) Read different versions of a fairy tale and tell about how they are the same or different

DOK 4 Question Stems Write a thesis, drawing conclusions from multiple sources. Apply information from one text to another text to develop a persuasive argument. What information can you gather to support your idea about___? DOK 4 would most likely be the writing about reading or applying information from one text to another text to develop a persuasive argument. DOK 4 requires time for extended thinking.

sources Nevada Department of Education www.doe.nv.gov Depth of Knowledge – Descriptors, Examples and Question Stems for Increasing Depth of Knowledge in the Classroom Developed by Dr. Norman Webb and Flip Chart developed by Myra Collins Charlotte’s Web by E.B. White (adapted from presentation at Teacher’s College-Mary Ehrenworth, Sept. 2011 Applying DOK Levels to Bloom’s Taxonomy Karin K. Hess, National Center for Assessment, 2006.