Jesse Taylor: Remington Technologies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
American Water Raw Water Quality Not Textbook? Just Pilot! Iron Removal with High pH Raw Water March 27, 2008 Sandy Kutzing, P.E., CDM Eric Hahn, P.E.,
Advertisements

© 2011 COLUMBIA Technologies. Use of MiHpt Systems to Improve Project Outcomes Rapid, Real-Time High Resolution Site Characterization © 2013 COLUMBIA Technologies.
SWMU 48, 62 and AOC G/SWMU 49 Update Joint Base Charleston Weapons Partnering Meeting December 4, 2013.
Air Sparging at Fort Greely, Alaska Presented by Aung Syn & James Powell.
1 In Situ Oxidation of PAH Contaminants Associated With Former Manufactured Gas Plants Ron Jensen Southern California Edison 1.
Dale T Littlejohn Senior Geologist. What is fate and transport in the vadose zone? Vadose Zone Hydrocarbon release from buried pipeline Aquifer Surface.
Air Force Plant 4 Superfund Site Evaluation of SVE Combined with ERH for the Remediation of TCE Source Material Jeffrey Ragucci SWS 6262 – Soil Contamination.
Federal Mogul Department for Environmental Protection Kentucky Division of Waste Management February 10, 2015 Presented by Chris Jung To Protect and Enhance.
1 Thermal Remediation Services, Inc. Electrical Resistance Heating for In-Situ Remediation of Soil & Groundwater December 10, 2002 Greg Beyke (770)
Environmental Geotechnology Presentation Naval Air Station, Pensacola, Florida.
Biodegradation of btex
Background Site of a former Industrial Waste Treatment Plant Contaminants accumulated in sludge drying beds and surge pond, they subsequently leaked into.
“GAS MART” petroleum facility in Florida By: Ernest Twum-Barimah Zhengzhong Fang (John) Zhengzhong Fang (John)
Environmental Investigation by Con Edison Former E115th Street Gas Works November 13, 2007.
Dr. Mohammed M. Amro Petroleum Engineering Dept. King Saud University Effect of Scale and Corrosion Inhibitors on Well Productivity in Reservoirs Containing.
Unconventional Gas: Shale Gas Shale Gas  Unconventional gas (hydrocarbons) found in subsurface shale formations  Replacement to coal, oil, and natural.
Retrospective Study of Closed Leaking Underground Storage Tank (UST) Sites in Wisconsin A.M. Pelayo*, T.A. Evanson, J.M. Bahr and M.E. Gordon *Wisconsin.
Solution Provider bij bodemsanering Leading in soil and groundwater remediation Solution Provider for soil & groundwater remediation Leading in soil and.
Groundwater Pollution GW 12 Chemical Oxidation and Reduction 1.
LOGO Feasibility Test of Applying Complex Remediation Technology for Diesel Contamination in Soil and Groundwater 2012 International Conference on Environmental.
1 GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION OF A HIGHLY CONTAMINATED BEDROCK SITE - The Oxygen Infusion Phase - J. Morrow D. Side By :
1 Section 5: Limitations. 2 ISCO Limitations  Saturated Zone vs Unsaturated Zone  Chemistry  CoSolvents  Geology /Geochemistry/Hydrogeology  NAPL.
1 Section II: ISCO Technology  Importance of ISCO chemistry  Terminology  Reaction sequences/products/byproducts  Oxidant selection/contaminants 
7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund Site August 20, 2013.
The world’s leading sustainability consultancy In Situ Chemical Oxidation of Pesticides Using Shallow Soil Mixing The world’s leading sustainability consultancy.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
SITE STATUS UPDATE TOP STOP PETROLEUM RELEASE SITE GUNNISION, UTAH Morgan Atkinson – Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, Project Manager.
1 Section 6- ISCO DESIGN  Initial Site Evaluation  ISCO Compatibility  ISCO Modeling and Dosage Considerations  Bench Testing  Pilot Testing/Delivery.
Waste Management Strategy Outline - Geography - Future Needs – 5 and 25-Year Time Frames - Capacity - Near-Term Needs - Long Term Needs.
DNAPL Recovery System July 2010 Progress Meeting McCormick & Baxter Superfund Site Portland, Oregon.
Two Union Square Union Street, Suite 601 Seattle, WA (206) Field testing and modeling of in situ groundwater.
Snorre in-depth water diversion using silicate Arne Stavland, Hilde Jonsbråten, Olav Vikane, IRIS Kjetil Skrettingland and Herbert Fischer, Statoil FORCE.
1, 12/2/ Key factors for a successful ISCO application with Permanganate Prepared by: Richard W Lewis CPG Program Manager ERM.
DeNovo Constructors, Inc.
“ Safer, More Effective ISCO Remedial Actions Using Non-Extreme Persulfate Activation to Yield Sustained Secondary Treatment ” Michael Scalzi, President.
7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund Site February 19, 2013.
1 Section 4- Characterization  Characterization is 95% of the Success of ISCO  Develop a complete and comprehensive Conceptual Site Model  ISCO is a.
FULL - SCALE IMPLEMENTATION OF A PULSED AIR SPARGE AND SVE SYSTEM FOR TREATMENT OF VOCS, SVOCS, AND ARSENIC Authors: Kale Novalis, Nadira Najib, Omer Uppal,
“ Safer, More Effective ISCO Remedial Actions Using Non-Extreme Persulfate Activation to Yield Sustained Secondary Treatment ” Michael Scalzi, President.
Our Case Study. Rationale for study The TMDL model assumes that there is no decrease in seepage during low flow conditions, basing its calculations on.
Feb. 2006IHA/pm1 Site remediation 1 Planning site remediation Excavation: Pros/cons & How.
Can a Pilot Demonstration be too Small? William Lundy, Sr. Sr. Vice President DeepEarth Technologies, Inc IPEC 2015 Denver, CO.
In Situ Sediment Treatment: State of the Practice
MIC 303 INDUSTRIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Total Chemical Management for Remediation Safety and Risk Management System Engineering Installation and Commissioning Multi-Chemical Supply Project and.
“ Safer, More Effective ISCO Remedial Actions Using Non-Extreme Persulfate Activation to Yield Sustained Secondary Treatment ” Wade Meese, Vice President.
Using 3-D Image to Develop A Remediation Engineering Design A 3D Image of an Area Of Petroleum Impacted Soil Was Used to Design.
1 Groundwater Pollution GW 10 Monitored Natural Attenuation.
Melissa Boggs California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Office of Spill Prevention and Response.
Expediting Site Remediation By Integrating The Membrane Interface Probe With In-Situ Remediation Injection Design Eliot Cooper,
Remediating Contaminated Groundwater with Slow-Release Oxidants Remediating Contaminated Groundwater with Slow-Release Oxidants Steve Comfort – University.
Integration of Accelerated Precipitation Softening - Microfiltration (APS-MF) Assembly to Maximize Water Recovery from the Treatment of Brackish Water.
BUILDING STRONG ® TNT Source Area Ground Water Remediation Former Nansemond Ordnance Depot Formerly Used Defense Site June 2, 2016.
Use of a Vadose Zone Biobarrier for Removal of Nitrate from Percolating Groundwater Jim Hunter, USDA-ARS, Fort Collins, Colorado
Groundwater Pilot Treatment System Update May 2017
Bridge Pile Foundation Evaluation for a Soil Remediation Project
Cover Slide TCEQ logo.
FIELD INVESTIGATION OF IN SITU LIME NEUTRALIZATION OF ACIDIC SEDIMENT
Lead and Copper Rule (LCR)
Background Professional Geologist - 36 years
Determining Reaction Rate
Rapid Closure of Lingering Off-Site Plume Remediation Program in Residential Neighborhood using Horizontal Air Sparge and Soil Vapor Extraction Wells Narayanan.
ENHANCED BIOREMEDIATION PILOT USING iSOC® TECHNOLOGY AT A FORMER MANUFACTURED GAS PLANT CASE STUDY PREPARED BY: MR. DAVID WORK, PE RETEC GROUP.
RINGWOOD MINES/LANDFILL SITE PUBLIC MEETING December 6, 2016
Hydrogeologic Investigations of the Silver Lake Wetland
Update on Water Quality
System Monitoring/Regulatory Evaluation
From Tanker Roll-Over to NFA
Olusola Ayilara, P.E., P.G. PST-DCRP Section, Remediation Division
Presentation transcript:

Jesse Taylor: Remington Technologies Site Specific Evaluation of Various Oxidizing Compounds for Destruction of BTEX and TPH-G Jesse Taylor: Remington Technologies John Gould: Division of Oil & Public Safety, Colorado Department of Labor and Employment

Division of Oil and Public Safety (OPS) Study of In-Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) - 2007 Includes evaluation of ISCO application and its effectiveness at 20 petroleum-contaminated sites. Identified site specific factors and ISCO practices that can affect or contribute to successful remediation. Factors important to remedial success include adequate site characterization and bench and field-scale pilot testing. Characterization: Extent and levels of contamination – locations of sources and smear zone, GW concentrations and parameters (ORP, alkalinity, ferrous iron, TDS, and major cations and anions, in addition to DO, pH, temp, and SC). Bench: determine most effective oxidant and TOD. Field: determine injection rates, volume, oxidant concentration, and ROI (injection point spacing). Completion of these activities required prior to CAP approval.

Silty Sand

Plastic Clay

Remediation Strategies High © Copyright Regenesis 2008 Biological Physical Chemical Efficiency High Concentration

Bench Scale Test Controlled Environment Pre and Post Sample Control Observable Reaction Rate and Type Contaminant Mass/ Oxidant Mass Ratio Control

Test Amendments

Benzene Results

Benzene Cost Analysis

Test Amendments 1 – Sodium Persulfate/Fe-EDTA (80:20) 2 – Sodium Persulfate/H2O2 (80:20) 3 – Sodium Persulfate/Calcium Peroxide (80:20) 4 – RegenOx (Part A:B 80:20) 5 – Calcium Peroxide/Sodium Persulfate (50:50) 6 – Calcium Peroxide/Sodium Persulfate (80:20) 7 – Calcium Peroxide/ Fe-EDTA

Benzene Concentration Before Test

Benzene Concentration Before Test

Benzene Concentration Before Test

Benzene Concentration Before Test

Benzene Concentration Before Test

Pilot Test Determine if Injection Method Compatible with Subsurface Materials Determine Radius of Influence Determine Flow Rate and Down-Hole Pressure

Injection Truck

Drilling/Geoprobe Rig

Injection Tips

Former Service Station - Golden

History prior to ISCO Application UST system removed in 1994 along with 1,000 yards of contaminated soil. Additional excavation of 2,100 yards of contaminated soil performed in 2006. ORC spread over base of excavated areas. Subsequent groundwater monitoring indicated persistent high benzene concentrations in wells downgradient of excavated areas (as high as 11.0 ppm at MW-L). Proposal for four ISCO injection events submitted. OPS requested bench-scale and on-site pilot testing.

Bench-Scale Testing In addition to GW samples from well with highest benzene concentration (MW-L), soil samples collected from sandy backfill of former UST basin and native clay-rich material outside of excavated areas. Two sets of nine batches prepared with sandy or clay-rich soils mixed with GW and four drops of gasoline. After 48 hours, samples collected from each batch were submitted for lab analysis (benzene and TPH-G). 1% solutions of various oxidants prepared. For eight of the clay or sand test vessels, 50 ml of one solution or a combination of two was added. One vessel in each set served as a standard (no oxidant added). Oxidants included sodium persulfate (Klozur), calcium peroxide (PermeOx), hydrogen peroxide, and Fe-EDTA

Bench-Scale Testing (continued) Seven days later, samples collected from all 18 test vessels and sent for lab analysis. Final choice of oxidant or oxidant mixture for treating sandy or clay–rich material dependant upon percent reduction in contaminant concentrations as well as relative costs of each oxidant or mixture. Results suggested most cost-effective approach was to use calcium peroxide in the sandy zones and a 50/50 mixture of calcium peroxide and sodium persulfate in the clay-rich areas.

On-Site Pilot Test Injections To determine allowable flow rates, injection pressures, and injection intervals that would limit surface seepage of solutions. Conducted May 1, 2009. Eight points used to inject solution (5% sodium persulfate/5% calcium peroxide). Was found best to limit injection volumes to 50 gallons per point, down-hole pressure to 5 psi, and the injection intervals to zone below the water table.

ISCO Implementation Approval granted for 12 monthly injection events. Injection events completed on 2/11/10, 3/23/10, 4/27/10, 5/25/10, and 6/25/10. Benzene at well MW-L dropped from 8.0 ppm prior to injections to 3.1 ppm on 3/17/10 and to 2.5 ppm on 6/14/10. Benzene at well MW-A dropped from 2.0 ppm prior to injections to 1.7 ppm on 3/17/10 and 0.0044 ppm on 6/14/10. Stay tuned. Seven more monthly injections planned.

Benzene Concentrations at Well MW-L

Former Service Station - Denver

History prior to ISCO application Free product detected at service station in 1989. Dissolve phase benzene concentrations initially as high as 6,400 ppb. GW pump and treat system operated between 1991 and 1995. System shutdown in 1996 after free product was no longer detected. All USTs removed in 1999. Several mobile DPE events performed in 2003-2005.

Pilot Testing In July 2005, bench scale testing performed. ISCO pilot test injections performed 11/21/05, 1/27/06, and 3/3/ 06. Sodium persulfate injected, along with chelated iron and hydrogen peroxide. Due to positive results, approval granted for five full-scale ISCO events. Same testing as mentioned in 2nd slide?

ISCO Implementation Four three-day ISCO injection events completed on 5/1/08, 6/27/08, 8/7/08, and 6/12/09. Sodium persulfate used as the primary oxidant. Chelated iron used as activator/catalyst during first three events, and hydrogen peroxide included during fourth persulfate injection event. Significant decreases in benzene noted, but BTEX concentrations still exceeded regulatory limits. Between 2,880 and 5,370 gallons of solution injected (8% persulfate and 12% chelated iron during first three events, and 6% persulfate and 1% hydrogen peroxide during 4th event) into 22 to 24 borings around MW-18, MW-21, and MW-24

ISCO Implementation A fifth ISCO injection event completed on 1/19/10 using calcium peroxide with chelated iron catalyst, focusing on area near three remaining contaminated wells (MW-18, MW-21, and MW-24). Following this injection event, benzene concentrations dropped by roughly one order of magnitude at these three wells (based on March and June 2010 sampling). 1,500 gallons of solution in 14 borings in vicinity of same three monitoring wells

Benzene Concentrations at Source Area Well

Additional Source Area Well (maybe include only one of these graphs?)

Current status Benzene concentrations before and after five ISCO treatments: MW-18 went from 1,400 to 36 ppb; MW-21 went from 540 to 79 ppb; and MW-24 went from 170 to 7 ppb. One additional calcium peroxide injection event has been recommended and this proposal is currently under review.

Conclusions Bench-scale testing important for choosing most effective oxidants and solution concentrations. Field pilot testing important for determining proper spacing of injection points and ability of subsurface to accept injectate. Important to note that an oxidant effective at high concentrations may not be as effective as a different oxidant once concentrations have been significantly reduced.

Thank You! Contact us for more information John Gould: john.gould@state.co.us Telephone: 303-318-8542 Jesse Taylor: jtaylor@remingtontech.net Telephone: 970-278-1646