Standard IV Students.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment: A Mirror with 2 Faces Accountability Reflective Practice.
Advertisements

Meeting MSCHE Assessment Expectations
Commission for Academic Accreditation 1 Accreditation and Academic Quality King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals Faculty Workshop Accreditation,
UNIT TECHNOLOGY A NARRATED PRESENTATION (TURN ON YOUR SOUND) College of Education.
Program Review: The Foundation for Institutional Planning and Improvement.
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
First Choice Graduate Programs Initiating a First Choice Program Consultation and Review.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
1 Southern Connecticut State University Graduate Council Academic Standards Committee Procedures for Southern Connecticut State University.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching operations with mission: Student Learning Standard 5.1:Universal Required Competencies.
Mission: Medical School Faculty Senate  Represent and serve as a voice for the faculty.  Provides a forum for discussion and communication on matters.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Student Services Program Review Plan. Overview Develop/Review Mission, Purpose, Vision and Values Create Strategic Academic Development Plan (5 year plan)
Middle States Summary. Middle States Timeline September 2 nd - Report is available to the entire college community for feedback September 14 th – Report.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Globe University Minnesota School of Business Collaborating with Workforce Centers.
Developed by Yolanda S. George, AAAS Education & Human Resources Programs and Patricia Campbell, Campbell-Kibler Associates, Inc. With input from the AGEP.
Primary Functions of Program Directors Leadership Curriculum Management and Coordination Coordinate Program Assessment Marketing, Recruitment and Admissions.
SHORTER COLLEGE Assessment Week Sponsored by the Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment & the Division of Academic Affairs.
April 8, Agenda Charge of the Group SACS/QEP Update/Overview 5 th Year Interim Report Assigned Areas Next Steps.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Establishing an Assessment Process for a Computing Program Cheryl Aasheim, Georgia Southern University Art Gowan, Georgia Southern University Han Reichgelt,
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
ABET ACCRIDITATION STATUS AND TASKS AHEAD By Dr. Abdul Azeem.
Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
CMSP: Finding our Mathematical Roots Lee Ann Pruske Beth Schefelker MTL Meeting October 18, 2011.
Assessment and Evaluation of CAREER Educational Components Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment Research.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, & Students 1. Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students (#82) INTENT STATEMENTS 4.1.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Academic Program Viability Report February 2010 Florida Association of Institutional Research 2010 Annual Conference.
Administration, Finances, and Resources
Student Learning Outcomes Documentation
Övergripande org. illustration
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN AND SOCIAL CIENCES APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH CAREER    “THE INFLUENCE OF TEACHER’S ATTITUDES AND BELIEFS INTO TECHNOLOGY-RELATED.
Standard I Systematic Planning.
Utilizing an Admission’s CRM for the Life Cycle of a Transfer Student
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Quality Assurance of Higher Education Programs:
Accreditation at the Masters Level
Standard III Faculty.
Standard II Curriculum.
New Program Director Workshop
New Program Director Workshop:
Communication Coordination Consolidation Collaboration
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Rebecca Jackson Iowa State University June 17, 2005
Charter School Application
Assessment Presentation
Program Assessment Processes for Developing and Strengthening
Accreditation Summary
WHO WE ARE AND WHY WHAT WE DO MATTERS
Standard Four Program Impact
PORTERVILLE COLLEGE ACCREDITATION OVERVIEW Fall 2017
Middle States Commission on Higher Education
Career Services and Retention Strategies for Success
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Understanding and Preparing for Accreditation
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
State of College Admission
TESTING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION GA 3113 lecture 1
NEASC Self –Study Appraisal.
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
Program Modification “Academic Year 2019” Assumption University
Learning Strategies WHO BELIEVES: ACADEMIC ADVISING IS TEACHING
Presentation transcript:

Standard IV Students

Not only this… But also this, for example… Description of recruitment activities List of criteria for admission Description of placement activities Table showing number of applications, acceptances, conditional acceptances with justifications IV.1 Recruitment, admission, financial aid, career services, and other policies match program mission.

IV.2 Program information available to public and students Not only this… But also this, for example… Description of what and where information is communicated to constituents Links to online resources available to students and to the public. Copies of printed material about the program, its status, new developments, and changes. Copies of texts or videos of public presentations about the program. IV.2 Program information available to public and students

IV.3 Admission standards applied consistently Not only this… But also this, for example… Published admissions standards. Policies for waiving published requirements. Number of admitted students for whom requirements were waived. Statistics for retention and time to degree for students admitted under various waivers and for regular admits. IV.3 Admission standards applied consistently

Not only this… But also this , for example… Advising policies and published course recommendations for various tracks. Examples of programs of study for a sample of students. Data from surveys of alumni on this topic. Student assessment of advising. Progress and retention data over several years. IV.4 Students construct coherent plans of study and receive systematic multi-faceted evaluation of achievements.

IV.5 Student participation in total learning experience Not only this… But also this, for example… Lists of student organizations and activities. Descriptions of student organizations. Programs from student organization activities. Results of surveys on student attitudes on the total experience in program. IV.5 Student participation in total learning experience

Not only this… But also this, for example… List of student learning outcomes. List of ways individual learning is assessed. Examples of the use of these evaluations to enhance or improve the program. IV.6 Results of evaluation of student achievement inform program development

Not only this… But also this, for example… “The program uses direct and indirect measures…” Tables of direct and indirect measures used in evaluation of program and individual student learning outcomes. IV.7 Data substantiates evaluation of student learning outcomes with direct and indirect measures

Not only this… But also this, for example… “The program incorporates student learning evaluations in making curriculum decisions…” Minutes of meetings where evaluations informed curriculum or other committees toward improvement of the program. Descriptions of decisions made with evaluation data. IV.8 Results of student learning evaluation used to improve program and plan

Suggestions for Standard IV documentation Use graphics to represent process Give concrete examples Use tables to organize information Use timelines to illustrate process Suggestions for Standard IV documentation