Intel Corporation, Apple

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1196r1 Submission Data Rate and Spectrum Requirements for IEEE aj (45 GHz) Date: Authors: Haiming Wang (SEU)Slide.
Advertisements

Way forward for LTE DL 4Rx AP SI on RF
Way Forward Proposals for Inter-band CA Consisting of B41
WF on PBCH Coverage Enhancement
Submission doc.: /1320r00 Bo, Sun (ZTE Corp), et al Slide 1 11aj 45GHz Link Budget for use cases discussion Date: Authors: Nov 2012.
[Qualcomm, Ericsson, Nokia Networks, Huawei,…]
[Qualcomm, Ericsson, Nokia Networks, Huawei,…]
Doc.: IEEE /1062r0 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR September 2010 RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China Date: Authors: Slide.
WF on CQI Table for eMTC ZTE, Sony, Nokia, Ericsson, Samsung… R GPP TSG RAN WG1 #83 Anaheim, USA, 15th – 22nd November, 2015 Agenda item
WF on MCOT and CWS for LBT priority classes
Way forward to NB-IoT 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #83 R1-157xxx
WF on SIB1bis Transmission
Proposal for NB-IoT single-tone only UE
WF on UE capability signaling for FD-MIMO Class B LG Electronics, Intel Coorporation, NTT DOCOMO, Qualcomm 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #84 R St Julian’s,
WF on Channel Modeling Requirements Huawei, HiSilicon, Ericsson, Keysight, CMCC, […] R GPP TSG RAN1#84 St Julian’s, Malta, Feb , 2016.
WF on Supporting different Numerologies in a NR carrier LG Electronics, [Huawei, HiSilicon, Panasonic], 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #85R Nanjing,
WF on UE Beam forming Qualcomm, [] R4-16XXXX. General Antenna Model Antenna consists of Mg x Ng panels, each of them composed of M x N antenna elemnts.
Way Forward on NR UE Testability Intel Corporation, CATR 3GPP TSG-RAN WG4 Meeting #80bis R Ljubljana, Slovenia, August, 2016.
WF on Bandwidth Part for DL common channel
WF on RA-RNTI design 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting NR#3 R1-171xxxx
3GPP TSG-RAN WG4 Meeting NR#3 Nagoya, Japan, 18 – 21 Sep, 2017
Way Forward on UE measurement definition and capability
Summary of SLS for RRM NTT DOCOMO
Offline Discussion on remaining details about RACH Procedure
Draft WF on single Tx switched UL
3GPP TSG-RAN WG4 Meeting #84bis
WF on new NR CG sequences for PUCCH
WF on pre-DFT PT-RS pattern for DFTsOFDM
Summary of offline discussion for PDCCH structure
Way forward on emissions scaling
Way forward on UE EIS Spherical Coverage and Beam Correspondence
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #90bis
R : SRS Enhancements for LTE-A
WF on spherical coverage in FR2
R WF on channel raster Nokia,.
R WF on channel raster Nokia,.
WF on remaining open items for allowing 1Tx transmission in LTE-NR DC
WF on Beam failure recovery
Qualcomm Incorporated
Way forward on cell identification in NR
Proposal for defining requirement of LTE BHH TRP/TRS
Way forward on DL ACLR&ACS for WP5D LS
WF on beam reporting CATT, Intel R1-17xxxxx
WF on CSI timing offset for PUSCH
R WF on channel raster Nokia,.
WF on Radio Link Monitoring in NR
Motorola Mobility, Lenovo, …
WF on UE mandatory channel bandwidth for NR bands
WF on scenarios and evaluation assumptions for flexible duplex
Evaluation Model for LTE-Advanced
WF for 4Rx CA 256QAM(1/2 layer) and 3/4 layers tests in Rel-14
Motivation for WI on "LTE-based V2X Services"
Way Forward on Coexistence Evaluation Methodologies for LAA
WF on LTE-NR DC with UL coexistence
WF on 4Tx UL Codebook For CP-OFDM
Summary of Offline Discussion on RMSI CORESET Configuration (Part 2)
WF on UL Beam Management
WF on UL Beam Management
WF on Phase discontinuity issue in intra-band EN-DC with 1-PA
2-Channel Option for 11g (proposal)
Month Year November 2018 November 2018
WF on LTE-NR Coexistence
Updates on the 60GHz bands
Per-User Data Rate, Band and Bandwidth Options for VHT
Spectral Control Issues for TGg
Prof. Kiran Kuchi IIT HyderAbad
Current Status of submission about EUHT
on the overall 5G-NR eMBB workplan
RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China
Presentation transcript:

Intel Corporation, Apple 3GPP TSG-RAN WG4 Meeting #85 Reno, Nevada, USA, November 27 – December 1, 2017 Agenda: 9.4.3.1.2 R4-17xxxxx WF on FR2 power class Intel Corporation, Apple

Background RAN4 has discussed the power class requirement definition for FR2 Views on the challenges associated with UE design were exchanged Views on the impact on network design were exchanged Views on the selection of a reference waveform for peak EIRP definition were exchanged

Agreements (1) The maximum EIRP value for the UE power class is defined for the DFT-s-OFDM full allocation waveform with the QPSK modulation and MPR=0, measured over 1 ms It is understood that MPR = 0 for the DFT-s-OFDM full allocation waveform with the QPSK modulation for the PA output power provided by companies in the UE power class derivation (slide #4) Handling of pi/2 BPSK with spectral shaping modulation UE support for pi/2 BPSK with spectral shaping is mandatory in Rel-15 The DFT-s-OFDM full allocation waveform with QPSK is the reference waveform with MPR=0 MPR requirements for waveforms that operate at higher output power can be defined with a negative value The UE Tx EVM requirement for pi/2 BPSK with spectral shaping can be reused from pi/2 BPSK The Pcmax requirement includes an additional term to account for pi/2 BPSK with spectral shaping MPR, if it is a negative value, in both the Pcmax_L and Pcmax_H terms

Summary of proposed peak EIRP values Parameter Unit Intel LGE MediaTek Huawei Samsung Motorola Qualcomm Frequency range GHz 24.2-29.5 37-40 # ant elements   4  4 4  Avg. element gain (per polarization) dBi 4.00  5.00  4.0 4.50 4.0 2.50 1.50 Antenna roll-off loss vs frequency dB -2.00 -2.50  -1.00  -1.50 -3.00 -1.50 -1.00 -0.50 Realized ant. array gain 8.00 7.50  10.00 8.5 0 9.00 9.50 7.00 Polarization gain 2.80  2.50 2.00 Total implementation loss (nominal) -6.75 -7.95  -7.25  -8.50 -5.10 -6.10 -4.85 -5.85 -7.75 -4.25 Total implementation loss (worst-case) -9.60 -10.90  -10.00 -11.45 -7.45 -8.55 -8.70 -8.80 -10.20 -6.70 P1d per PA (nominal) dBm 14.00  14.00 14.00  12.50 12.00 P1d per PA (minimum) Peak EIRP (nominal) 24.05 22.35  25.25  22.5 24.90 23.90 26.15 23.65 25.25 26.55 25.55 Tolerance 3.85 3.95  3.75  3.95 3.45 2.85 Peak EIRP (minimum) 20.20 18.40  21.50  18.55 21.05 20.45 22.30 19.70 22.40 20.60 23.70 22.10

Agreements (2) To reduce the risk of adopting a peak EIRP core requirement which may result in high conformance failure rates of NR FR2 UEs undergoing certification, a proposal for the peak EIRP based on the nth percentile of all minimum peak EIRP proposed values among the companies in slide 4 is preferred The handheld UE peak EIRP requirement is defined according to Option 1: Minimum across all companies For 28 GHz min value = 20 dBm, for 39 GHz min value = 18.2 dBm Option 2: 10th percentile of CDF of proposals For 28 GHz min value = 20. 6 dBm, for 39 GHz min value = 18.5 dBm It is agreed to adopt Option 2

References TDoc Title Source R4-1712931 TP for UE RF TR 38.817-01: mmWave power class Sumitomo Elec. Industries, Ltd R4-1712934 TP for UE RF TR 38.817-01: mmWave EIRP spherical coverage requirement R4-1712319 UE power class for FR2 Intel Corporation, Apple, OPPO, Samsung, LGE, Xiaomi, MediaTek, Motorola, Huawei R4-1712320 TP on UE power class for FR2 Intel Corporation R4-1712386 mmW Power class Qualcomm Incorporated R4-1712525 TP to 38.101-2: Maximum output power Ericsson R4-1712923 mmWave peak EIRP evaluation result update Huawei, HiSilicon R4-1713193 Further evaluation on NR UE power class at mmWave LG Electronics France R4-1713849 Network performance impact of practical peak EIRP Apple (UK) Limited, Intel Corporation