Intel Validation of TGn Simulation Scenarios

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1404r0 Submission November 2014 Eisuke Sakai, Sony CorporationSlide 1 11aa GCR-BA Performance in OBSS Date: 2014/11/2 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0046r0 Submission January 2015 Eisuke Sakai, Sony CorporationSlide 1 11aa GCR-BA Performance in OBSS Date: 2015/01/12 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /702r0 Submission September 2003 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Report of High Throughput Usage Model Special Committee.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1161r0 September 2014 Eric Wong et al (Apple)Slide 1 Parameters for Power Save Mechanisms Date: Authors:
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
IEEE e Performance Evaluation
MU MIMO beamforming protocol proposal
Delayed Acknowledgement v.s. Normal Acknowledgement
Performance Evaluation for 11ac
PHY Abstraction for MU-MIMO in TGac
MAC Simulator Calibration Results
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
Parameters for Power Save Mechanisms
Proposal for Fast Inter-BBS Transitions
TDMA for Eliminating Hidden Station Effect in Dense Networks
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
Simulation results for
Closed versus Open Loop
High Throughput Coexistence issues – a personal comment
MU-MIMO STA scheduling strategy and Related PHY signaling
SLS Box5 Calibration Results and Discussions
Outputs of the Usage Model Special Committee
Proposed PAR and 5 Criteria for High Throughput Task Group
Qualcomm MAC Supplementary Presentation
TGn FRCC Jan 2004 Report Adrian P Stephens
Simulation for EDCF Enhancement Comparison
MAC Calibration Results
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
A Comment on Black-Box adaptation for simulation methodology
MAC Simulation Results and Methodology (60GHz)
MAC Simulation Results and Methodology (60GHz)
Application parameters definition for usage models
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Simulation Results for Box5
Comparison of Draft Spec Framework Documents
MU-MIMO STA scheduling strategy and Related PHY signaling
EDCF / EPCF Comparisons
TGn FRCC Jan 2004 Report Adrian P Stephens
TGn FRCC Jan 2004 Report Adrian P Stephens
MAC Considerations for Mesh
Class-based Contention Periods (CCP) for the n MAC
Proposed PAR and 5 Criteria for High Throughput Task Group
Joint submission for Box 5 calibration
Mesh Media Access Coordination Ad Hoc Group Report Out
DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results
TDMA for Eliminating Hidden Station Effect in Dense Networks
WME+ / Fasttrack Differences
Qualcomm MAC Supplementary Presentation
Delayed Acknowledgement v.s. Normal Acknowledgement
Box5 Calibration Results
Box5 Results of 11ac SS6 Date: Authors: Jan 2015 Sept 2014
Enhanced-DCF Wireless MAC Protocol: Some Simulation Results
System Performance Results for Scenario 1
Box 5 Calibration Result
November 2007 doc.: IEEE /2752r1 July 2008
Evaluation of RR over EDCF
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
Outdoor Mesh MAC Protocol Issues & Considerations
40 MHz Vs 20 MHz for video Date: Authors: July 2009
Performance Comparison of Dynamic OFDM with n
Intel Validation of TGn Simulation Scenarios
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
Month 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 November 2003
DSC Calibration Result
MAC Considerations for Mesh
TGn FRCC Jan 2004 Report Adrian P Stephens
Use Auto Repetition in low latency queue
Presentation transcript:

Intel Validation of TGn Simulation Scenarios January 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 November 2003 Intel Validation of TGn Simulation Scenarios Adrian P Stephens Dmitry Akhmetov Sergey Shtin (adrian.p.stephens@intel.com) (dmitry.akhmetov@intel.com) (sergey.shtin@intel.com) Intel Corporation Adrian Stephens, Intel John Doe, His Company

January 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 November 2003 Purpose of the work To show that the simulation scenarios defined in 11-03-802 can be implemented in a realistic protocol To encourage a “yes” vote to the following: Move to adopt the simulation scenarios in 11-03-802r<xx> Adrian Stephens, Intel John Doe, His Company

Simulation Methodology November 2003 Simulation Methodology Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 Model & Features Framework: Opnet V9 with substantially modified 802.11 components PHY Model: TGn channel models (with shadowing) Collect SNIR per sub-carrier per interference region Adaptive Bit Loading MAC Model: DCF channel access RTS/CTS training exchange Aggregate transmission using ABL-trained packets Adrian Stephens, Intel

Implementation of scenarios November 2003 Implementation of scenarios Only interested in the QoS (UDP) flows Don’t have EDCA or HCCA yet Assume HCCA good enough to isolate UDP based on polled TXOPs from loss of service by applied TCP/IP flows Measure throughput, delay, number of packets lost and delayed “too long” Adrian Stephens, Intel

PHY Mode 1x1 Antenna configuration Channel width 80MHz November 2003 PHY Mode 1x1 Antenna configuration Channel width 80MHz to give 4x raw speed Because we haven’t completed our MIMO model yet Expect to be similar to 2x2 40MHz results ABL operation during data transmissions Adrian Stephens, Intel

MAC Parameters RTS/CTS/Burst/Block Ack protocol November 2003 MAC Parameters RTS/CTS/Burst/Block Ack protocol MIN Burst Size = 3 MPDU MAX Burst Size = 31 MPDU TXOP limit = 2 microseconds Full TXOP usage (Always try and fill TXOP) Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 Status of results Initial simulation results show that all the simulated scenarios meet the application QoS requirements except #2, 6, 9, 11. Have not implemented 9 & 11 Don’t expect any problems with 9 & 11 Simulations #2 & 6 Need EDCA (which we don’t have yet) to give priority to VoIP over video. Using DCF means high Video Rate traffic causes UDP voice to exceed its delay limits Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 Conclusion All scenarios except 2,6, 9 and 11 have been simulated as specified including only UDP traffic It is reasonable to expect that all scenarios will meet the QoS limits within our model when EDCA is implemented Recommend we recommend acceptance of these scenarios to TGn in Albuquerque Any changed models/scenarios will need re-validation Adrian Stephens, Intel

QoS Performance for SS #1 November 2003 QoS Performance for SS #1 Scenario #1 RX TX Maximum delay ms Peak ETE delay Total received PLR (too late)   STA0 STA7 30 0.041654 1900 0.63% STA8 0.046585 1901 0.47% STA9 0.057728 1902 STA10 STA11 16 0.018546 12455 0.16% PLR of the rest STAs is 0 (zero) Adrian Stephens, Intel

QoS Performance for SS # 4 November 2003 QoS Performance for SS # 4 Scenario #4 RX TX Maximum delay ms Peak ETE delay Total received % of “too late”   STA0 STA28 30 0.035515 1876 0.23% PLR of the rest STAs is 0 (zero) Adrian Stephens, Intel

QoS Performance for SS # 4 November 2003 QoS Performance for SS # 4 Scenario #4 RX TX Lost Packets Total Rx % PLR   STA0 STA1 13 4981 0.26 STA2 3 4960 0.06 STA3 2 4958 0.04 STA6 1884 0.15 STA7 7 2421 0.28 STA8 5 2410 0.21 STA25 1895 0.36 STA26 11 1875 0.58 STA27 1896 0.11 STA28 20 1876 1.06 Adrian Stephens, Intel

Detailed Results for SS # 1 November 2003 Detailed Results for SS # 1 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 Aggregate Throughput Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA0 Rx Rate Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA0 Tx Burst Size Adrian Stephens, Intel

STA0 Medium Access Delay November 2003 STA0 Medium Access Delay Adrian Stephens, Intel

STA0 Number of Tx sequences per TXOP November 2003 STA0 Number of Tx sequences per TXOP Adrian Stephens, Intel

STA0 Number of retransmission attempts November 2003 STA0 Number of retransmission attempts Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA1 Rx Rate Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA1 Tx Burst Size Adrian Stephens, Intel

STA1 Medium Access Delay November 2003 STA1 Medium Access Delay Adrian Stephens, Intel

STA1 Number of retransmission attempts November 2003 STA1 Number of retransmission attempts Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA10 Rx Rate Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA10 End to End Delay Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA11 Tx Burst Size Adrian Stephens, Intel

STA11 Tx Media Access Delay November 2003 STA11 Tx Media Access Delay Adrian Stephens, Intel

STA11 Tx Undelivered MPDUs per Burst November 2003 STA11 Tx Undelivered MPDUs per Burst Adrian Stephens, Intel

STA11 Tx sequences per TXOP November 2003 STA11 Tx sequences per TXOP Adrian Stephens, Intel

STA11 Tx Retransmission Attempts November 2003 STA11 Tx Retransmission Attempts Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA3 Rx Rate Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA3 Tx Burst Size Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA3 Media Access Delay Adrian Stephens, Intel

STA3 Retransmission Attempts November 2003 STA3 Retransmission Attempts Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA4 Rx Rate Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA5 Rx rate Adrian Stephens, Intel

STA5 Medium Access Delay November 2003 STA5 Medium Access Delay Adrian Stephens, Intel

STA5 Retransmission Attempts November 2003 STA5 Retransmission Attempts Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA6 Rx Rate Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA6 Media Access Delay Adrian Stephens, Intel

STA6 Retransmission Attempts November 2003 STA6 Retransmission Attempts Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA7 Rx Rate Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA7 Burst Size Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA7 Media Access Delay Adrian Stephens, Intel

STA7 Retransmission Attempts November 2003 STA7 Retransmission Attempts Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA8 Rx Rate Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA8 Burst Size Adrian Stephens, Intel

STA8 Medium Access Delay November 2003 STA8 Medium Access Delay Adrian Stephens, Intel

STA8 Retransmission Attempts November 2003 STA8 Retransmission Attempts Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA9 Rx Rate Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA9 Burst Size Adrian Stephens, Intel

STA9 Medium Access Delay November 2003 STA9 Medium Access Delay Adrian Stephens, Intel

STA9 Retransmission Attempts November 2003 STA9 Retransmission Attempts Adrian Stephens, Intel

Detailed results for SS # 4 November 2003 Detailed results for SS # 4 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 Aggregate throughput Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA0 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA0 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA0 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA0 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA0 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA1 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA1 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA1 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA1 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA10 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA2 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA2 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA2 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA2 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA25 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA25 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA25 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA25 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA26 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA26 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA26 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA26 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA27 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA27 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA27 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA28 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA28 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA28 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA28 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA29 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA29 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA29 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA3 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA3 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA3 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA3 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA30 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA30 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA30 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA30 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA4 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA4 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA4 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA4 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA5 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA5 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA5 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA5 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA6 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA6 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA6 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA6 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA7 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA7 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA7 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA7 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA8 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA8 Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2003 STA9 Adrian Stephens, Intel